UNITED STATES

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

 

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

(RULE 14a-101)


INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT


SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION


Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

 

 Filed by the RegistrantFiled by a party other than the Registrant

 

Check the appropriate box:
 Preliminary Proxy Statement
 CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14a-6(e)(2))
 Definitive Proxy Statement
 Definitive Additional Materials
 Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
 No fee required.
 Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11
(set (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 (5) Total fee paid:
 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1) Amount Previously Paid:
 (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 (3) Filing Party:
 (4) Date Filed:
 

 

 

PG&E Corporation

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

 

Joint Notice of2019Annual Meetings
Joint Proxy Statement

 

Joint Notice of Friday, June 21, 20192021 Annual Meetings
Joint Proxy Statement

Thursday, May 20, 2021

10:00 a.m., Pacific Time

PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Headquarters
77 Beale Street, San Francisco, California

PG&E Corporation

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

May 17, 2019

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

For PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the past two years have been extraordinarily challenging, more so than any other time in our history. The devastating Northern California wildfires will stand as watershed moments for fire victims, our customers, our employees, our owners, and California.

California’s energy providers, including us, are contending with a host of environmental, demographic, regulatory, legal, and financial factors that are shaping our business. Against this backdrop, and faced with a complex legal and financial situation as a result of the 2018 Camp fire and 2017 Northern California wildfires, the companies earlier this year filed to reorganize under Chapter 11. The primary goal of this court-supervised process is to fairly address our liabilities so that we can continue to provide safe and reliable service to our customers, while improving our overall operations.

We believe that the reorganization process is in the best interests of all the stakeholders, including wildfire claimants. In addition to the expeditious resolution of wildfire liability claims, the Chapter 11 filings allow for:

fair treatment of fire victims and other claimholders;

access to capital necessary to support ongoing operations and enable the companies to continue investing in systems, infrastructure, and critical safety efforts;

a process to work with regulators and policymakers to determine the most effective way for customers to receive safe natural gas and electric service for the long-term in an operating environment that continues to be transformed by climate change; and

ultimately, a reorganized enterprise with refreshed management and Board members who are committed to safety and reliability in all aspects of our business.

The tragic events of the past few years have made clear that the energy system status quo is no longer working for California. We have heard the calls for change and are committed to answering them with strong actions that will help us re-earn the trust of all our stakeholders. This starts at the top. We replaced PG&E Corporation’s CEO and the vast majority of our Boards of Directors with experienced people with the commitment and expertise necessary to redirect our safety culture and navigate one of the most complex corporate reorganizations ever.

William “Bill” Johnson joined us as Chief Executive Officer and President of PG&E Corporation. Bill brings substantial safety and operational expertise from his extensive career in the energy industry. With decades of experience at two major utility companies, Mr. Johnson has a deep understanding of managing risk and the responsibility of keeping customers safe.

Most recently, as President and CEO of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), he was responsible for leading the nation’s largest publicly owned utility in its mission of providing energy, environmental stewardship, and economic development across a seven-state region. During his time at TVA, the organization achieved the best safety records in its 85-year history and has been a perennial top decile safety performer in the utility industry.

Bill also led the retirement of more than half of TVA’s coal generation, resulting in a reduction of TVA’s carbon emissions by 50 percent over the last decade. He also oversaw TVA’s expansion into utility scale solar in recent years, and pursued the modernization of its hydro assets to increase the amount of energy from that renewable resource.

We believe Mr. Johnson is the right leader at the right time for us. We also significantly revamped our Boards of Directors, as eight of ten incumbent independent directors resigned, and eleven new independent directors were appointed in their stead.

As detailed in the attached joint proxy statement, the new Boards include people who have expertise and experience in all areas necessary for us to navigate the complex challenges before us, and who come to the job committed to work tirelessly to help Pacific Gas and Electric Company be the safest, most reliable operator in the industry.

The management team and the Boards are also committed to working constructively with regulators, policymakers, and other stakeholders in an open and transparent fashion in support of California’s policy goals. We are determined to emerge from Chapter 11 as an enterprise that is positioned to deliver safe and reliable service for customers, create value for shareholders, and help meet the challenges of climate change for California.

As always, we value your input and welcome the opportunity to engage with you to listen to your views and address your concerns.

We cordially invite you to attend the companies’ 2019 annual meetings, which will be held concurrently on Friday, June 21, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time at the PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company headquarters, 77 Beale Street, San Francisco, California. Following this letter are a notice of the meetings and our 2019 Joint Proxy Statement containing information about the matters to be considered at the meetings.

Sincerely,

The Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company

 

Joint Notice of Annual Meetings of Shareholders of

PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company

 

Friday, June 21, 2019April 8, 2021

10:00 a.m., Pacific Time

Dear Shareholders,

After more than a century of service to Northern and Central California, the year 2020 brought PG&E(1) to a turning point unlike any other in our history.

Together, PG&E Corporation and its subsidiary, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, headquarters, 77 Beale Street
San Francisco, Californiatook responsibility for a series of devastating wildfires caused by our electric equipment, including the 2018 Camp fire. The Utility pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter in the deaths of the 84 people who lost their lives in that tragedy. We settled billions of dollars in damage claims by fire victims, as well as by cities, counties, and other public entities.

 

ToWe concluded an 18-month Chapter 11 proceeding while fending off hostile takeover attempts. And we emerged with a plan of reorganization that includes strong commitments regarding our corporate governance, operations, and financial structure — forged with guidance from both the ShareholdersCalifornia Governor’s Office and our state regulator — that are designed to further prioritize safety. Now, under the leadership of PG&E Corporation CEO Patricia K. Poppe and Pacific Gas and Electric Company:

The annual meetings of shareholders of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company will be held concurrently on Friday, June 21, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, at the PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company headquarters, 77 Beale Street, San Francisco, California, for the purpose of considering the following matters:

For PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company shareholders:

To elect the following 14 individuals nominated by the applicable Board of Directors to each serve as director on each Board for the ensuing year:

Richard R. BarreraCheryl F. CampbellKenneth LiangKristine M. Schmidt
Jeffrey L. BleichFred J. FowlerDominique MielleAlejandro D. Wolff
Nora Mead BrownellWilliam D. Johnson*Meridee A. Moore
Frederick W. BuckmanMichael J. LeffellEric D. Mullins

*In the event the PG&E Corporation shareholders vote against approving the Charter Amendment Proposal (as described below), any votes to elect Mr. Johnson to the PG&E Corporation Board will be disregarded.

To ratify each Audit Committee’s appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2019 for the respective company,

To provide an advisory vote on each company’s executive compensation, and

To transact any other business that may properly come before the meetings and any adjournments or postponements of the meetings. Any matters raised before the meetings by shareholders must be properly submitted consistent with the respective company’s Bylaw requirements and other applicable requirements.

For PG&E Corporation shareholders:

To approve an amendment to the Restated Articles of Incorporation of PG&E Corporation to increase the maximum number of directors on the PG&E Corporation Board to 15 directors and to increase the minimum number of directors on the PG&E Corporation Board to 8 directors (the “Charter Amendment Proposal”), and

To act upon proposals submitted by individual PG&E Corporation shareholders as described on pages 95-97.

Shareholders can go on-line at www.pgecorp.com/investors/financial_reports/ to access electronic copies of this 2019 Joint Proxy Statement and the 2018 Annual Report to Shareholders. Shareholders also may vote their proxies on-line as noted on page 11 of the Joint Proxy Statement. Specific Internet voting instructions also are included on the shareholder’s proxy card.

Thesubstantially new Boards of Directors, have set the close of businesswe are embarked on May 15, 2019a new era for PG&E, charting a new path toward a brighter future as the record datea different enterprise—one that we expect will provide better outcomes and more sustainable results for determining which shareholders are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the annual meetings.all those who depend on us.

 

YouYet we will not forget the hard lessons we have learned. Rather, we will use them as a driving force for continuous improvement, accountability, and sustained performance in the work we do every day. Earning back the trust we have lost will require us to meet each one of our obligations and deliver on our promises, without fail.

Overall, we believe that the course we have set will position PG&E as a sustainable, financially sound energy business with the appropriate governance and oversight to safely serve our customers for the long-term, while also making the investments required to help the State achieve its climate and clean energy goals.

Accordingly, we have recommitted our support for California’s climate leadership, including electrification of the energy grid, a charging network sufficient to power millions of electric vehicles, and a carbon-neutral economy by 2045. We are urgedadapting our systems to readclimate risks, particularly the Joint Proxy Statement carefullyrising threat of wildfires and whether or not you planextreme weather. And we are doing so with the recognition that both the costs and benefits of these innovations must be shared equitably across the economic spectrum.

Within our own organization, we are responding to attendcalls for racial equity by deepening PG&E’s long-standing dedication to diversity, inclusion, and equal opportunity in the meeting, to promptly submit a proxy: (a) by telephone or over the Internet following the easy instructionsworkplace, while intensifying our focus on the enclosed proxy cardhealth and safety of our customers, workforce, and communities.

As we pursue that vision, we understand that our success will be measured in tangible results, not intentions, pledges, or (b) by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy cardwords. We welcome your feedback on our progress in the postage-paid envelope provided.days ahead.

Sincerely,

 

Robert C. Flexon

Chair of the Board, PG&E Corporation

 

2019 Joint Proxy Statement(1)1“PG&E” or “companies” refer to both PG&E Corporation and its subsidiary, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, or the “Utility.”
 

PG&E Corporation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company

YOUR VOTE IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT.

April 8, 2021 Dear Shareholders,

 

Even if you planShortly after joining PG&E Corporation as the company’s new CEO, I shared a favorite song with my 23,000 coworkers. It’s one of those “oldie but goodie” classics — a single released in 1970 by the Five Stairsteps. Like so many popular tunes, the lyrics don’t scan on paper as well as they pair with music. But when times are tough, their upbeat message never fails to attendhelp me get through:

Oooh, …child

Things are gonna get easier

Oooh, …child

Things are gonna get brighter

We all know that PG&E has been through its own tough times over the annual meetings, please act promptlypast few years. Bankruptcy. Wildfires. Season after season of extreme weather events. And like everyone, the COVID-19 pandemic.

But things will get better. And we at PG&E are going to vote your sharesbe part of making the future brighter for everyone who relies on PG&E, as measured by completing, signingour “Triple Bottom Line” of people, planet, and datingprosperity.

People, because providing safe and affordable energy to those we are privileged to serve is the proxy cardreason we exist. Planet, because doing so in a way that does no harm to the environment that sustains us is our solemn responsibility. Prosperity, because the special business charter we enjoy comes with a social duty to help our economy grow and returning itthrive.

Already, we are delivering results across all three.

In the people category, we are assembling a diverse new team of senior leaders skilled in the postage-paid envelope provided. You may also vote your shares overkind of organizational design, standards, and processes that will enable us to deliver a “hometown service” experience for our customers and communities — one tailored to the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card.specific local needs within our distinctive geographic regions.

 

Please vote soon so that your shares can be represented. Your vote is extremely important no matter how many shares you own. If you have any questions or require any assistance with voting your shares, please contactFor the planet, we are meeting California’s clean energy and climate goals, while continuing to look aggressively for new ways to reduce our proxy solicitor:carbon footprint.

 

Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Stockholders may call toll-free: 1 (877) 750-0502
BanksAnd in support of prosperity, we successfully executed the sale of our transmission tower wireless licenses, yielding $973 million in initial proceeds —roughly half of which we intend to return to customers in the form of lower rates — and Brokers may call collect: 1 (212) 750-5833significantly reducing our 2021 equity needs.

 

Dated: May 17, 2019The Triple Bottom Line will continue to guide our decision-making in the months and years ahead, underpinned by a relentless focus on performance. Only by keeping our promises and doing what we say we will do can we earn back trust and become the enterprise that all of our stakeholders deserve.

 

By Order ofUnlike the Boards of Directors of
Five Stairsteps, I don’t know how to create an inspirational song. But I do have a passion for creating the playbook for a great energy business, and that’s what we’ll be writing here at PG&E — for our customers, our coworkers, and our investors.

Sincerely,

Patricia K. Poppe

CEO, PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company,

“OOH CHILD” lyrics by Stan Vincent.

Used by Permission of Sony Music Publishing (US) LLC. All rights reserved.

Linda Y.H. Cheng

Vice President, Corporate Governance and Corporate SecretarySenior Leadership Team of
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company

 

2019Patricia K. PoppeAdam L. Wright
Chief Executive Officer,
PG&E Corporation
Executive Vice President, Operations and
Chief Operating Officer
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Marlene SantosJulius Cox
Executive Vice President and
Chief Customer Officer
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Executive Vice President, People,
Shared Services, and Supply Chain
PG&E Corporation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Christopher A. FosterJohn R. Simon
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer1
PG&E Corporation
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer
PG&E Corporation
Francisco BenavidesSumeet Singh
Senior Vice President and
Chief Safety Officer
PG&E Corporation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Senior Vice President and
Chief Risk Officer
PG&E Corporation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Ajay WaghrayRobert S. Kenney
Senior Vice President and
Chief Information Officer
PG&E Corporation
Vice President, Regulatory and
External Affiars
Pacific Gas and Electric Company

(1)Appointed as the PG&E Corporation Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on March 21, 2021.

Joint Notice of 2021 Annual Meetings of Shareholders of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Items to be Voted OnCorporationUtilityRecommendation
1Election of Directors6 Nominees7 Nominees
Cheryl F. CampbellXXFOR
Kerry W. CooperXXFOR
Arno L. HarrisXXFOR
Michael R. NiggliXXFOR
Oluwadara J. TresederXXFOR
Benjamin F. WilsonXXFOR
Adam L. WrightXFOR
2Ratification of Deloitte andTouche, LLP as the IndependentPublic Accounting FirmXXFOR
3Advisory Vote on Executive CompensationXXFOR
4Management Proposal to Approvethe PG&E Corporation 2021Long-Term Incentive PlanXFOR

Your Vote is Extremely Important

April 8, 2021

Brian M. Wong
Corporate Secretary
PG&E Corporation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Meeting Information

Date: May 20, 2021

Time: 10:00 a.m. PDT

Location: Virtual Meeting(1)

Record Date

Shareholders as of March 22, 2021, are entitled to vote at the Joint Annual Meetings.

Voting Your Shares

You can vote over the Internet, by phone, by returning the proxy card by mail, or virtually at the 2021 Annual Meetings. The deadline to vote is 11:59p.m. Eastern Time on May 19, 2021, or 11:59p.m. Eastern Time on May 17, 2021, if you are a participant in PG&E’s 401k Plan.

Solicitation of Proxies

The Boards of Directors are soliciting proxies from you for use at the Annual Meetings or any adjournments or postponements. Proxies allow designated individuals to vote on your behalf.


IMPORTANT NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF 2021 PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE JOINT ANNUAL MEETINGS:

We are making the Joint Proxy Statement and form of proxy available to shareholders starting on or about April 8, 2021. The Joint Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at investor.pgecorp.com/financials/annual-reports-and-proxy-statements. Detailed information on how to vote your proxy is included in the User Guide at the end of this Joint Proxy Statement.

(1)2Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2021 Annual Meetings will be virtual to protect the health and safety of our shareholders, customers, and employees. Holders of PG&E Corporation shares can access the 2021 Annual Meetings, vote, and ask questions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PCG2021. Holders of Utility shares can access the 2021 Annual Meetings, vote, and ask questions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PCG-P2021.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   1
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

JOINT NOTICE OF 2021 ANNUAL MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS OF PG&E CORPORATION AND PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY1
  
JOINT PROXY STATEMENTOUR VALUES53
  
Defined Terms Used in this Proxy StatementOUR BOARD57
2019 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY6
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETINGS AND VOTING11
ITEM NO.Item No. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS OF PG&E CORPORATION AND PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY17
Certain Agreements with BlueMountain18
Nominees forElection of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company7
Director Biographies8
Director Nominee Selection16
Diversity16
Skills17
Independence19
Commitment to Our Board19
Service on Other Boards19
  
OUR GOVERNANCE PRACTICESCORPORATE GOVERNANCE20
Leadership Structure3020
Committees and Membership21
Oversight24
Management Succession26
Evaluations26
Orientation and Continuing Education27
Shareholder Engagement27
Correspondence28
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors28
  
Corporate Governance GuidelinesOUR AUDITORS3032
Board Leadership Structure30
BoardItem No. 2: Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for PG&E Corporation and Director General IndependencePacific Gas and QualificationsElectric Company32
Board Committee Duties33
Committee Membership, Independence, and Qualifications35
Director Service on Other Public Company Boards36
Director Meeting Attendance During 201836
Director Nomination Process36
Board and Committee Self-Evaluations38
Risk Management39
Board Oversight41
Director Orientation and Continuing Education44
Communicating With Directors and Officers45
COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS46
ITEM NO. 2: AMENDMENT TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM SIZE OF THE CORPORATION’S BOARD TO 15 DIRECTORS49
ITEM NO. 3: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR PG&E CORPORATION AND PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY50
Information Regarding the Independent Auditor for PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company5133
Report of the Audit Committees5436
OUR PAY37
Item No. 3: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation for PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company37
Compensation Committee Report38
Compensation Discussion and Analysis39
Executive Officer Compensation Information69
Item No. 4: PG&E Corporation Proposal to Approve the PG&E Corporation 2021 Long-term Incentive Plan88
OUR SHAREHOLDERS97
Share Ownership Information97
Related Party Transactions100
Related Person Transactions101
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS102
USER GUIDE104
Defined Terms104
Website Availability of Governance Documents106
General Information About the 2021 Annual Meetings and Voting107
2022 Annual Meetings113
APPENDIX A: PG&E CORPORATION 2021 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANA-1

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement32
 
Back to Contents

Our Values

PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company together provide 16 million Californians with combined natural gas and electric utility service. Our primary purpose is to provide safe, reliable, affordable, and clean energy to our customers. Our customers also look to us for grid innovation, clean energy technology, and support in achieving our state’s zero carbon goals. Our values, focused on safety, people, planet, and California’s prosperity, shape the way we approach our challenges and opportunities.

Safety

Protecting the safety of the public, our co-workers, and contractors must come before anything else, all the time, everywhere. Our goal is to continually reduce risk to keep our customers, the communities we serve, and our workforce (co-workers and contractors) safe. Our focus is on continuously building an organization where we have designed every work activity to facilitate safe performance, every member of our workforce knows and practices safe behaviors, and every individual is encouraged to speak up and stop work if they see unsafe or risky behavior, and has confidence that their concerns and ideas will be heard and pursued. Our performance during the past few years has fallen short of that aspiration. We are committed to significantly improving our safety performance by strengthening our risk-based focus so we understand our risks, prioritize our work, and use controls to reduce them, and continuously measure and improve risk reduction. We are creating a culture in which we hold each other accountable for safety, resolve issues promptly, and have engagement at all levels.

People

PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s human capital resource objectives are to build and retain an engaged, well-trained, diverse, and equitable workforce. 

We provide stable, benefits-paying jobs for our co-workers, and promote health, wellness, work-life balance, teamwork, and an ability to perform well for our customers. We offer:
ITEM NO. 4: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION FOR PG&E CORPORATION AND PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY55
Compensation Committee Report56
Compensation Discussion and Analysis57
Executive Officer Compensation Information77
ITEM NOS. 5 AND 6: PG&E CORPORATION SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS95
SHARE OWNERSHIP INFORMATION98
Principal Shareholders98
Security Ownership

OUR WORKFORCE IS STRONG

Approximately 15,000 employees of Management

99
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance100
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS101
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS103
WEBSITE AVAILABILITY OF GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS105
2020 ANNUAL MEETINGS10624,000 are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Forty-two percent of our employees have a tenure of more than 10 years.

 

•   Medical, health, and wellness plans, health screenings, and coaching.

•   Employee Assistance Programs that help support mental health and offer confidential counseling.

•   Peer volunteer programs that support co-workers who are in long-term recovery from substance use disorders.

•   401(k) retirement plans.

•   Life and accident insurance.

•   Free financial counseling.

•  We create careers for our co-workers:

•  PG&E Academy develops PG&E’s next leaders.

•   We fund major reskilling initiatives when our operations change, such as when we began to decommission our Diablo Canyon Power Plant.

•  We operate thirty-one apprenticeship programs to reduce barriers to entry for prospective employees.

•  We create opportunity with PowerPathway, an innovative program designed to enlarge the talent pool of local qualified diverse candidates for skilled craft and utility jobs. PowerPathway helps people, including women and military veterans, prepare for high demand jobs in the utility and energy industry by providing eight weeks of training necessary to compete for in-demand jobs. Ninety-three percent of our PowerPathway graduates (including women and veterans) find industry jobs.

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement43
 
Back to Contents
We maintain and are building on leading Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs:

 Forty-six percent of our co-workers are ethnic minorities, twenty-seven percent are women and seven percent are military veterans.
We disclose detailed race, ethnic, and gender workforce statistics on our website.
Sixty percent of our management is racially or gender diverse.
We support fourteen employee resource groups (ERGs) and have won multiple awards for diversity, equity, and inclusion leadership. Our ERGs hosted 80 programs in 2020 ranging from professional development series to intersectional presentations on identity and bias, including discussions featuring members of PG&E’s Boards of Directors.
The Diversity Council is chaired by PG&E Corporation’s CEO and includes representatives from our ERGs and Engineering Network Groups as well as our Diversity Champions.
We consistently participate in external partnerships in support of building a diverse workforce with the National Society of Black Engineers, Society of Hispanic Engineers, and Society of Women Engineers.

We listen:

We conduct biennial employee engagement surveys, quarterly pulse surveys, and voluntary upward feedback surveys and maintain a Corrective Action Program to support continuous improvement based on this feedback.
Our “Here to Help” hotline and health and wellness hotline provide 24/7 access.
We conduct quarterly performance conversations with employees.

 

Joint Proxy StatementPlanet

 

The Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company are soliciting Proxies for useCalifornia has long been at the companies’ 2019 annual meetingsforefront of shareholders,protecting our planet, and PG&E continues to actively embrace our state’s bold climate and clean energy goals. There are many ways we can be a force for good, and our size and scale enable PG&E to meaningfully address the growing threat of climate change.

Our longstanding commitment includes aligning our resources and business strategy with California’s clean energy goals and advocating for policies and programs that enable safe, reliable, and affordable clean and resilient energy for our customers. At the same time, we are working to reduce the ever-growing risks posed by extreme weather and wildfires by incorporating forward-looking climate data into our asset management and decision-making today. These efforts are complementary and consistent — every action taken in climate mitigation also supports climate resilience.

California has set an ambitious goal to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045. We embrace our foundational role in achieving this goal and transitioning California to a decarbonized and more climate-resilient economy. We are proud of our track record with renewable energy, exceeding California’s renewable portfolio standards goal for each utility (including the Utility) to deliver 33 percent of renewable energy by the end of 2020, and delivering clean electricity to our customers last year that was more than 88 percent greenhouse gas free. More than 535,000 of PG&E’s customers have adopted private rooftop solar and one in five electric vehicles in the U.S. plugs into PG&E’s grid. We are excited about the growth opportunities that a cleaner future presents for PG&E and our customers, including any adjournments or postponements. The 2019 Annual Meetings are scheduled toa strong push for more electric vehicles. We also believe clean energy alternatives should be held concurrently on Friday, June 21, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, at the PG&E Corporationaffordable for and Pacific Gas and Electric Company headquarters, 77 Beale Street, San Francisco, California.inclusive of all economic backgrounds.

 

In connection with this Proxy solicitation, beginning on or about May 24, 2019, PG&E Corporation and the Utility each mailed or caused to be mailed to its respective shareholders a copy of the Joint Notice, this Proxy Statement, a Proxy Card or Voting Instruction Card, and the 2018 Annual Report. Certain shareholders who hold their shares of PG&E Corporation or Utility stock of record may have already received their copy of the 2018 Annual Report. The materials were sent to anyone who owned shares of common stock of PG&E Corporation and/or shares of preferred stock of the Utility at the close of business on May 15, 2019. This date is the record date set by the Boards to determine which shareholders may vote at and attend the 2019 Annual Meetings.

Your vote is extremely important. Even if you plan to attend the 2019 Annual Meetings, we request that you act promptly to vote your shares by completing, signing and dating the enclosed Proxy Card and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope, or by voting over the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions provided on the enclosed Proxy Card or Voting Instruction Card.

Please see pages 11-16 for additional information regarding admission to the meeting and how to vote your shares.

Defined Terms Used in this Proxy Statement

“2006 LTIP”refers to the PG&E Corporation 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

“2014 LTIP”refers to the PG&E Corporation 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

“2018 Annual Report”refers to the PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company 2018 Joint Annual Report to Shareholders.

“2019 Annual Meetings”refers to the 2019 annual meetings of shareholders of PG&E Corporation and the Utility, which will be held concurrently on June 21, 2019.

“2019 Proxy Materials” refers to the Joint Notice, this Proxy Statement, the Proxy Card or Voting Instruction Card, and the 2018 Annual Report.

“401(k) Plan”refers to the PG&E Corporation Retirement Savings Plan or the PG&E Corporation Retirement Savings Plan for Union-Represented Employees.

“Bankruptcy Code” refers to the United States Bankruptcy Code.

“Bankruptcy Court” refers to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California.

“BlueMountain”refers to Blue Mountain Credit Alternatives Master Fund L.P., together with certain of its affiliates.

“Board”refers to the Board of Directors of either PG&E Corporation or the Utility, as applicable.

“CD&A”refers to the section of the Proxy Statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

“CEO”refers to the position of Chief Executive Officer.

“Chapter 11”refers to chapter 11 of title 11 of the U.S. Code.

“Chapter 11 Cases”refers to voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11, which were filed by each of PG&E Corporation and the Utility on January 29, 2019, in the Bankruptcy Court.

“Charter Amendment Proposal”refers to the proposal for shareholders to approve an amendment to the Corporation Charter to increase the maximum number of directors on the Corporation Board to 15 directors and to increase the minimum number of directors on the Corporation Board to 8 directors (which the Corporation Board unanimously recommends the shareholders of PG&E Corporation vote FOR).

“COO”refers to the position of Chief Operating Officer.

“Corporation”refers to PG&E Corporation.

“Corporation Board”refers to the Board of Directors of PG&E Corporation.

“Corporation Charter”refers to the PG&E Corporation Restated Articles of Incorporation.

“CPUC”refers to the California Public Utilities Commission.

“Guidelines”refers to the Corporate Governance Guidelines adopted by the Boards of PG&E Corporation and the Utility.

“Independent Auditor”refers to the independent registered public accounting firm.

“Joint Notice”refers to the Joint Notice of Annual Meetings of Shareholders of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company.

“LTIP”refers to the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan and/or the 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

“NEO”or“Named Executive Officer”refers to an officer who is listed in the Summary Compensation Table of this Proxy Statement.

“NYSE”refers to the New York Stock Exchange.

“NYSE American”refers to the NYSE American stock exchange (formerly known as NYSE MKT, LLC and as the American Stock Exchange).2020, we:

 

2019Delivered some of the nation’s cleanest electricity to customers, with more than 35 percent from renewable sources — and we remain on track to meet the state’s goal of 60 percent by 2030.
Remained on track to meet the Million Ton Challenge, a voluntary goal to avoid one million tons of greenhouse gas emissions from our operations over five years.
Helped customers avoid the emission of more than 534,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide through our energy efficiency programs – moving towards the state’s goal to double energy efficiency in existing buildings by 2030. This number is roughly equal to $308 million in energy bill savings.
Awarded contracts for more than 1 gigawatt of battery energy storage, strengthening the state’s grid efficiency and reliability and reducing the need for additional fossil fuel generation plants.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement54
 
Back to Contents
Installed 4,180 Level 2 fast-charging ports for electric vehicles at workplaces and multi-family dwellings — with more than one-third in disadvantaged communities — and also offered programs to support medium- and heavy-duty fleets and public fast charging in support of the state’s goal of 100 percent sales of light duty zero emission vehicles by 2035.
Brought the total number of interconnected private solar customers to more than 500,000.
Supported more than 18,600 customers who have installed battery storage at their homes or businesses, often paired with a solar power system.
Further integrated climate change adaptation planning into our risk management processes.

“PEO”refers to an officer or officers who serve as “principal executive officer” of PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company, as appropriate.

We are focused on protecting and preserving California’s natural beauty

As one of California’s largest private landowners, we are committed to protecting threatened and endangered species and their habitats and safeguarding watershed lands. We continue to make significant progress in securing Habitat Conservation Plans, which enable PG&E to efficiently conduct operations and maintenance activities while protecting listed endangered species. We also permanently protected 13,250 acres of land last year as part of our Land Conservation Commitment, which ultimately will protect approximately 140,000 acres of PG&E-owned watershed lands in perpetuity.

 

“Proxy”refers to your authorization for another person or persons to vote your shares atWe do this work transparently, reporting our progress in our annual Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Report (which starting in 2020 now incorporates reporting using the 2019 Annual Meetings,Sustainability Accounting Standards Board voluntary reporting framework), and in the manner indicated on the Proxy. Also may referour responses to the person or persons so authorized (also called proxy holders)CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project) and related organizations. We are conducting a multi-year, system-wide climate vulnerability assessment to better understand how climate-driven natural hazards will impact our assets, services, and operations. We also plan to issue a Climate Strategy Report, which will align with the guidance from the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).

 

“Proxy Card”refers to your proxy card, on which you may indicate how you would like the named proxy holders to vote your shares at the 2019 Annual Meetings.California’s Prosperity

 

“Proxy Statement”refersWe believe clean energy alternatives need to this 2019 Joint Proxy Statementbe affordable for PG&E Corporation and inclusive of all economic backgrounds.

We are supporting our customers and co-workers through the COVID-19 pandemic

We are helping our customers throughout this crisis by providing financial assistance programs, and tools and tips to save energy. To protect our co-workers’ health and safety, we are providing essential safety gear and continually updating guidance on how to perform critical work safely while keeping virus transmission at bay. We are working with our local communities to assist with vaccination efforts, and to vaccinate our employees.

We are addressing energy affordability and accessibility along with the Utility.California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).

In 2020, PG&E helped almost 200,000 customers enroll in the California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE) program, providing income-qualified customers with a monthly discount on their Utility bill. At the end of January 2021, more than 1.58 million PG&E customers were enrolled in CARE, compared to the 1.39 million enrolled at the end of February 2020 prior to the shelter-at-home mandates in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
PG&E’s Energy Savings Assistance program provides income-qualified households with no-cost improvements to make their homes more energy efficient, safe, and comfortable.
The federally funded Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program provides financial assistance to help offset eligible household energy costs, including heating, cooling, and home weatherization expenses.

WE SUPPORT COMMUNITY PROSPERITY

Over one-third (37.9 percent) of our 2020 spend went to businesses owned by women, minorities, service-disabled veterans, and LGBTQ individuals.

•   Convenient ways to better manage energy costs are available to all customers through online account tools that monitor energy use and check or compare rate plans, as well as help avoid or manage unanticipated high bills.

•   We help our communities prosper: For the first time in the 40-year history of PG&E’s supplier diversity program, our spending with diverse suppliers reached $4.1 billion, representing 37.9 percent of our total spend, and exceeding goals set by the CPUC.

•   We support the communities we serve through employee community volunteer and charitable giving programs as well as through our own donations and matching donations.

 

“RSU”refers to a restricted stock unit.

“SEC”refers•   In 2020, although we suspended company-wide volunteer activities due to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

“Sectionglobal pandemic, a quick shift to virtual volunteerism enabled 700 employees to volunteer in support of 16 Officer”referscommunity-based organizations throughout our service territory with home-based virtual volunteer events, sending nearly 3,500 care packages to any “officer” as definedcommunity members in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

“STIP”refers to the Short-Term Incentive Plan.

“TSR”refers to Total Shareholder Return, measured by stock price appreciation and dividends paid, relative to companies in the Performance Comparator Group.

“Utility”refers to Pacific Gas and Electric Company.

“Voting Instruction Card”refers to the form used by beneficial shareholders or participants in a 401(k) Plan to transmit instructions to the nominee or the plan trustee, respectively, on how to vote any shares for which that shareholder or plan participant has voting rights.

need.

 

 

2019 Proxy Statement Summary

This proxy statement summary highlights information to assist you in your review of this Proxy Statement. The summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and we encourage you to read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

Your vote is extremely important. Even if you plan to attend the 2019 Annual Meetings, we request that you act promptly to vote your shares by signing and dating the enclosed Proxy Card and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope, or by voting your shares over the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions provided on the enclosed Proxy Card or Voting Instruction Card.

2019 Annual Meetings of Shareholders

Time and Date10:00 a.m., Pacific Time on Friday, June 21, 2019
PlacePG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company headquarters, 77 Beale Street, San Francisco, California
Record DateMay 15, 2019
VotingShareholders as of the record date are entitled to vote.
Each share of PG&E Corporation common stock, Pacific Gas and Electric Company common stock, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company preferred stock is entitled to cast one vote on each of the respective company’s director nominees and one vote on each of that company’s other proposals.
AdmissionAll shareholders as of the record date are invited to attend the 2019 Annual Meetings. Shareholders must have acceptable proof of share ownership as of the record date and valid photo identification in order to enter the meeting. Please see the instructions on pages 15-16.

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement65
 
Back to Contents

Meeting Agenda and Voting Recommendations

Our Performance

 

The following items

We are expecteddecentralizing regionally to be voted on at the 2019 Annual Meetings.The Boards unanimously recommend that you vote as follows:

place more co-workers and operational leadership closer to our customers. We aim to:

 

PG&E Corporation

ItemBoard’s Voting
Recommendation
Voting
Standard
Page Reference
(for more detail)
Election of 14 directors*FOR all nomineesMajority of votes cast17
Charter Amendment ProposalFORMajority of outstanding common stock49
Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Auditor for 2019FORMajority of votes cast50
Advisory vote to approve executive compensationFORMajority of votes cast55
Shareholder proposal: Corporation structure reformAGAINSTMajority of votes cast95
Shareholder proposal: Improve shareholder proxy accessAGAINSTMajority of votes cast96Address local issues faster;
 Reduce outage response times;
 
*In the event that the PG&E Corporation shareholders vote against approving the Charter Amendment Proposal (Item No. 2), any votes to elect Mr. JohnsonCreate faster interconnections for our customers connecting solar or distributed energy to the Corporation Board will be disregarded.grid; and
Build stronger relationships and information flow between us and our customers.

We worked to make our Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) program more targeted and focused in 2020. We used technology to achieve:

More than twice as precise modelling capabilities for the 2020 season;
Fifty-five percent fewer average impacted customers, exceeding our 33 percent goal; and
Restoration of 96 percent of impacted customers within 12 daylight hours.

We intend even greater improvements in 2021:

Further utilization of PSPS mitigations including sectionalizing devices for both distribution and transmission, temporary generation applications, and implementation of pilot technologies.
Enhanced customer support for our most vulnerable and frequently impacted customers, including batteries to support medical devices, meal replacements, and improved in-event PSPS communications though our partnerships with community-based organizations.

The majority of our executives’ variable (non-salary) pay is tied directly to customer and safety metrics:

Seventy-five percent of annual variable incentive pay granted in 2020 was tied to public and employee safety performance.
Fifty percent of our long-term incentive executive pay granted in 2020 was tied to public safety and reliability performance, and the other 50 percent tied to customer experience (half tied to a customer satisfaction score and half to PSPS notification accuracy).

We continue to make progress on the core elements of our Wildfire Mitigation Plan, including:

System hardening;
Vegetation management;
Enhanced inspections;
Improved situation monitoring and modeling; and
Improved risk assessments in project planning and execution.

We have improved financial clarity due to progress in key regulatory cases.
We are projecting 10 percent non-GAAP core earnings per share1 compound average growth from 2021 through 2025.
We are projecting approximately 8.5 percent rate base growth, largely driven by wildfire mitigation capital investments.

 

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

ItemBoard’s Voting
Recommendation
Voting
Standard
Page Reference
(for more detail)
Election of 14 directorsFOR all nomineesMajority of votes cast17
Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Auditor for 2019FORMajority of votes cast50
Advisory vote to approve executive compensationFORMajority of votes cast55

Director NomineesCautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

 

WeThis Joint Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements that are asking shareholders of each company to vote “FOR” each ofnot historical facts, including statements about the director nominees listed below (it being understood that if the Charter Amendment Proposal is not approved, shareholders that vote on the Corporation’s Proxy Card will be deemed to vote for each of the director nominees to the Corporation Board other than Mr. Johnsonbeliefs, expectations, estimates, future plans and any votes to elect Mr. Johnson will be disregarded). As a result of the PG&E Corporation Board’s previously announced board refreshment process, in April 2019, eleven new directors (Richard R. Barrera, Jeffrey L. Bleich, Nora Mead Brownell, Frederick W. Buckman, Cheryl F. Campbell, Michael J. Leffell, Kenneth Liang, Dominique Mielle, Meridee A. Moore, Kristine M. Schmidt, and Alejandro D. Wolff) joined two continuing directors (Fred J. Fowler and Eric D. Mullins) on the Boardsstrategies of PG&E Corporation and the Utility, with eight of ten then-incumbent directors stepping down. The then-incumbent directors of each Board, including the continuing directors, approved the appointments of the new directors. Mr. Johnson joined the Board of Pacific Gasas well as forecasts and Electric Company on May 2, 2019 concurrently with stepping into his role as CEO and President ofestimates regarding PG&E Corporation.

Corporation’s non-GAAP core earnings per share, rate base growth, PSPS program, Wildfire Mitigation Plan and other financial and operating expectations, estimates, plans and strategies. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions, which management believes are reasonable, and on information currently available to management, but are necessarily subject to various risks and uncertainties. In addition to the Boards ofrisk that these assumptions prove to be inaccurate, factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements include factors disclosed in PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 and other reports filed with the SEC, which are available on PG&E Corporation’s website at www.pgecorp.com and on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company have nominated, and recommend that shareholders vote in favor of, the following candidates for electionUtility undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether due to new information, future events or otherwise, except to the Boards at the 2019 Annual Meetings:

Richard R. BarreraCheryl F. CampbellKenneth LiangKristine M. Schmidt
Jeffrey L. BleichFred J. FowlerDominique MielleAlejandro D. Wolff
Nora Mead BrownellWilliam D. JohnsonMeridee A. Moore
Frederick W. BuckmanMichael J. LeffellEric D. Mullins

As noted above, there are currently 13 directors on the Board of PG&E Corporation, which is the maximum number of directors currently permitted under the Corporation Charter. In order to allow for the addition of more diverse perspectives and to enhance the collective effectiveness of the PG&E Corporation Board, shareholders are being asked to vote on a proposal to amend the Corporation Charter to increase the maximum size of the PG&E Corporation Board to 15 members (and to concurrently increase the minimum size of the PG&E Corporation Board to 8 members, asextent required by state law).The Board of PG&E Corporation unanimously recommends that shareholders vote FOR each of PG&E Corporation’s director nominees and FOR the proposal to amend the Corporation Charter to increase the maximum size of the PG&E Corporation Board to 15 members.Under each company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, each member of each Board is elected annually and serves a one-year term.

We are confident these slates of nominees, including PG&E Corporation’s new CEO and President, Bill Johnson, will guide the companies through the Chapter 11 process while balancing the interests of all stakeholders.law.

 

20191“Non-GAAP core earnings” and “Non-GAAP core earnings per share” are non-GAAP financial measures. See Exhibit A at the end of the CD&A for a reconciliation of results based on non-GAAP core earnings to results based on income available for common shareholders in accordance with GAAP

2021 Joint Proxy Statement76
 
Back to Contents

In 2019, the elections of directors for the Corporation and for Pacific Gas and Electric Company are not contested, and therefore, directors of the Corporation and of Pacific Gas and Electric Company will be elected by a majority of the votes represented and voting at the 2019 Annual Meetings.Our Board

 

Below is summary information about each director nominee recommended by the Corporation and Utility Boards. See pages 21 to 29 for complete biographical information for each of the nominees. The Boards recommend that you vote FOR each of the nominees.

NomineeAgeDirector SincePrincipal OccupationCurrent CommitteeITEM NO. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS OF PG&E CORPORATION AND PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY 
Memberships
Other Current Public
Company Boards
Richard R. Barrera47April 2019Founder, CEO and Portfolio Manager, Roystone Capital Management LP

•   Audit

•   Executive

•   Finance (Chair)

Jeffrey L. Bleich58April 2019Attorney, former Special Counsel to the President, U.S. Ambassador, and California State Bar President

•   Compliance and Public Policy

•   Safety and Nuclear Oversight

Nora Mead Brownell71April 2019Founder, Espy Energy Solutions LLC•   Safety and Nuclear Oversight
Frederick W. Buckman73April 2019Retired President and CEO of Powerlink Transmission Company

•   Audit

•   Safety and Nuclear Oversight

Cheryl F. Campbell59April 2019Former Senior Vice President, Gas, Xcel Energy, Inc.

•   Compliance and Public Policy

•   Executive

•   Finance

•   Safety and Nuclear Oversight (Chair)

Fred J. Fowler73March 2012Retired Chairman of the Board, Spectra Energy Partners, LP

•   Finance

•   Safety and Nuclear Oversight

•   DCP Midstream Partners, LP

•   Encana Corporation

William D. Johnson65May 2019*CEO and President of PG&E Corporation

•   Executive

Michael J. Leffell60April 2019Founder, Portage Partners

•   Compliance and Public Policy

•   Executive

•   Nominating and Governance (Chair)

Kenneth Liang57April 2019Former senior Managing Director and Head of Restructurings, Oaktree Capital Management

•   Compensation

•   Finance

Dominique Mielle50April 2019Former Partner and Senior Portfolio Manager, Canyon Partners LLC

•   Audit (Chair)

•   Executive

•   Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation

•   Studio City International

Meridee A. Moore61April 2019Senior Managing Member, Watershed Asset Management LLC

•   Compensation (Chair)

•   Executive

•   Finance

•   Nominating and Governance

•   BlackRock Capital Investment Corporation
Eric D. Mullins56September 2016Managing Director and Co-CEO, Lime Rock Resources, L.P.

•   Audit

•   Safety and Nuclear Oversight

•   Anadarko Petroleum Company
Kristine M. Schmidt55April 2019Retired Owner and Consultant of Swan Consulting Services, LLC; former President of ITC Great Plains; former Chair of the Western Energy Imbalance Market Governing Body

•   Compliance and Public Policy (Chair)

•   Executive

•   Nominating and Governance

•   Safety and Nuclear Oversight

Alejandro D. Wolff62April 2019Former U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Chile; former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations

•   Compensation

•   Compliance and Public Policy

•   Albemarle Corporation

•   Versum Materials

*indicates that the applicable nominee is a member of the Board of the Utility only.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement8
Back to Contents

Corporate Governance Highlights

Significant board refreshment process to provide fresh perspectives and additional expertise to help address the changing nature of the companies’ business and the serious challenges they face now and in the futureDirector overboarding policy requiring Board approval for service on more than three other public company boards; directors who are principal executive officers of public companies must receive Board approval for service on more than two other public company boards
Board refreshment process resulted in new PG&E Corporation CEO and eleven new directors who were appointed to the Corporation and Utility Boards in April 2019 to join two continuing directors, with eight of ten incumbent directors resigningPolicy to consider diversity in the director nomination process
All non-executive directors are currently independentSuccession planning for the Boards of Directors, the CEO, and senior management
Independent key Board committees (excluding the Executive Committees)Executive and director stock ownership guidelines
Independent non-executive Chair at both companies since December 2017 (independent lead director if the Chair is not independent)Board oversight of risk management, and proxy statement disclosure on the Boards’ roles and responsibilities with respect to risk management
Executive sessions of independent directors at regular Board meetingsBoard oversight of corporate sustainability, and disclosure on sustainability programs and performance
Annual evaluation of CEO and President performance by independent directorsBoard oversight and transparent public disclosure of political activities
Annual Board and committee self-evaluationsBoard oversight of compliance and ethics; the Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer has direct access to the Chair of the Compliance and Public Policy Committee of the PG&E Corporation Board
Annual election of directorsBoard oversight of enterprise-wide safety matters; the Chief Safety Officer reports to the Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees of the Boards
Majority vote for directors, with mandatory resignation policy and plurality carve-out for contested electionsPolicy limiting obtaining certain types of services from the Independent Auditor
One share one voteNo poison pill; shareholder approval required for adoption
No supermajority vote requirementsProxy access bylaw provisions that are consistent with prevailing market standards
Confidential voting policy for uncontested electionsRegular investor outreach, including opportunities for dialogue with the Board’s independent leadership when applicable

Vote to Approve Charter Amendment Proposal

 

We are asking shareholders of the Corporation to approve a resolution to amend the Corporation Charter to increase the maximum size of the Corporation Board to 15 members (and to concurrently increase the minimum size of the Corporation Board to 8 members), effective at the 2019 annual meeting. The Corporation Board recommends a “FOR” vote because it believes that increasing the size of the Corporation Board is in the best interest of the Corporation and its shareholders, will allowask for more diverse perspectives on the Board, and will enhance the overall effectiveness of the Corporation Board. The increase of the size of the Corporation Board will allow all 14 individuals nominated by the Corporation Board to serve as directors on the Corporation Board following the 2019 annual meeting with one additional vacant seat to be filled in the future as appropriate. In the event that the PG&E Corporation shareholders do not approve the Charter Amendment Proposal (Item No. 2), any votesyour support to elect Mr. Johnson to the Corporation Board will be disregarded.

Auditors

As a matter of good corporate governance, we are asking shareholders of each company to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte & Touche”) as that company’s Independent Auditor for 2019. We provide information on fees paid to Deloitte & Touche beginning on page 51. Each Board recommends a vote “FOR” the proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement9
Back to Contents

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

We are asking shareholders of each company to approve on an advisory basis the compensation paid for 2018 to that company’s executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table of this Proxy Statement (“say-on-pay” vote). Each Board recommends a “FOR” vote because it believes that the applicable company’s compensation policies and practices were effective in achieving the companies’ goals of rewarding sustained financial and operating performance and excellence, aligning the executives’ long-term interests with those of our shareholders, and motivating executives to remain with the companies for long and productive careers.

Shareholder Proposals

The proxy materials contain two proposals submitted pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 by individual PG&E Corporation shareholders pertaining to (1) Corporation structure reform and (2) improvement of shareholder proxy access. These proposals are being submitted to PG&E Corporation shareholders only. The PG&E Corporation Board recommends that the Corporation’s shareholders vote “AGAINST” these proposals for the reasons indicated beginning on page 95.

General Information About the 2019 Annual Meetings and Voting

Answers to many frequently asked questions about the 2019 Annual Meetings and voting can be found in the Q&A section beginning on page 11.

2020 Annual Meetings

•  Deadline for submission of shareholder proposals for inclusion in the proxy statement:January 25, 2020
 •  Period for submission of proxy access director nominees for inclusion in the proxy statement (PG&E Corporation only):December 26, 2019 – January 25, 2020
 •  Period for submission of advance written notice of other business and nominations for director:February 22, 2020 – March 23, 2020

2019 Joint Proxy Statement10
Back to Contents

General Information About the 2019 Annual Meetings and Voting

How do I vote?

If your shares are registered to you directly, there are three ways to submit your Proxy:

Over the Internet. You may submit your Proxy and vote your shares over the Internet by following the instructions on the Proxy Card.
By telephone. You may submit your Proxy and vote your shares by calling the toll-free number on the Proxy Card.
By mail. You may submit your Proxy and vote your shares by completing, signing, and dating the Proxy Card and mailing it in the postage-paid envelope provided.

You can also attend and vote at the 2019 Annual Meetings, however we encourage you to vote your proxy over the Internet, telephone, or mail prior to the meeting, even if you plan to attend in person. (See meeting location information on the back cover of this Proxy Statement).

If your shares are not registered to you directly but are held indirectly through a broker, bank, trustee, nominee, or other third party (“broker”), follow the instructions provided by your broker to vote your shares.If you do not submit voting instructions to your broker, the broker will not be permitted to vote your shares on any proposal, unless it constitutes a “routine” item and your broker is a member of the NYSE and permitted by NYSE rules to vote on “routine” items. The election of directors, the say-on-pay vote, the Charter Amendment Proposal, and shareholder proposals, for example, are “non-routine” items.

If you are a 401(k) Plan participant, specific instructions for voting are noted on the Voting Instruction Card.

Can I change my vote?

If your shares are registered to you directly, you can change your vote or revoke your Proxy any time before it is exercised by doing one of the following before the applicable deadline: (1) returning a signed Proxy Card with a later date, (2) entering a new vote over the Internet or by telephone, (3) notifying the Corporate Secretary of PG&E Corporation or the Utility, as appropriate, in writing, at 77 Beale Street, P.O. Box 770000, San Francisco, California 94177 or (4) submitting a written ballot at the 2019 Annual Meetings. Your attendance at the 2019 Annual Meetings will not automatically revoke your Proxy unless you vote again at the 2019 Annual Meetings.

If you are a participant in a 401(k) Plan, you may change your vote at any time prior to 6:00 a.m., Eastern time, on Wednesday, June 19, 2019. The last vote that the 401(k) Plan trustee receives from you within this timeframe will be the vote that is counted. Participants in a 401(k) Plan are not eligible to vote in person at the 2019 Annual Meetings.

If your shares otherwise are not registered to you directly but are registered in the name of your nominee (such as a broker, bank, trustee, or other third party), follow the instructions provided by your nominee to change your vote or revoke your voting instructions.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement11
Back to Contents

What is the voting deadline?

If you hold your shares directly and submit your Proxy over the Internet or by telephone, your vote must be received by 6:00 a.m., Eastern time, on Friday, June 21, 2019. These Internet and telephone voting procedures comply with California law. If you submit your Proxy by mail, your vote must be received by 10:00 a.m., Pacific time, on Friday, June 21, 2019.

If you are a participant in a 401(k) Plan, your voting instructions must be received by 6:00 a.m., Eastern time, on Wednesday, June 19, 2019, for the 401(k) Plan trustee to vote your shares.

If your shares otherwise are not registered to you directly but are registered in the name of your nominee (such as a broker, bank, trustee, or other third party), please consult information provided by the nominee.

Have other candidates been nominated for election at the 2019 Annual Meetings in opposition to PG&E Corporation Board’s nominees?

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, no other candidates have been nominated for election at the 2019 Annual Meetings in opposition to the Corporation Board nominees. Previously, BlueMountain had provided notice of its intent to nominate a slate of 13 nominees for election to the Corporation Board at the 2019 annual meeting in opposition to the Corporation Board’s recommended nominees. In connection with a settlement agreement between the Corporation and BlueMountain, BlueMountain has withdrawn all of its nominees. For more information regarding the settlement agreement with BlueMountain please refer to page 18.

What am I voting on, and what are each Board’s voting recommendations?

PG&E Corporation shareholders will be voting on the following items andthe Board of the Corporation unanimously recommends that you vote as follows:

Item No.DescriptionBoard’s Voting
Recommendation
1Election of 14 directors*FOR all nominees
2Charter Amendment Proposal*FOR this proposal
3Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Auditor for 2019FOR this proposal
4Advisory vote to approve executive compensationFOR this proposal
5Shareholder proposal: Corporation Structure ReformAGAINST this proposal
6Shareholder proposal: Amendment of proxy access bylaw provisionsAGAINST this proposal

*In the event that the PG&E Corporation shareholders vote against approving Item No. 2 (Charter Amendment Proposal), any votes to elect Mr. Johnson to the Corporation Board will be disregarded.

The Utility’s shareholders will be voting on the following items andthe Board of the Utility unanimously recommends that you vote as follows:

Item No.*DescriptionBoard’s Voting
Recommendation
1Election of 14 directorsFOR all nominees
3Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Auditor for 2019FOR this proposal
4Advisory vote to approve executive compensationFOR this proposal

*There is no Item No. 2 proposal for the Utility.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement12
Back to Contents

What vote is required to approve each item?

A majority voting standard applies to the election of each director nominee and to the approval of Item Nos. 3, 4, 5, and 6. Under a majority voting standard, approval occurs if the shares voted “for” a director nominee or other item exceed the number of shares voted “against” that nominee or item. In addition, the shares voting affirmatively must equal at least a majority of the quorum that is required to conduct business at each meeting. This means that the shares voting affirmatively must be greater than 25 percent of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.

The approval of Item No. 2 (Charter Amendment Proposal) with respect to the Corporation requires the vote of a majority of the Corporation’s outstanding shares of common stock as of the record date. In the event that the shareholders of the Corporation do not approve the Charter Amendment Proposal, then any votes to elect Mr. Johnson will be disregarded.

In determining whether a majority of the shares represented and voting have elected a director nominee or approved a proposal, abstentions and any broker non-votes (see the definition below under “What is a broker non-vote?”) will not be considered.

For all matters subject to a majority voting standard (i.e., all matters other than the Charter Amendment Proposal), abstentions and broker non-votes that occur with respect to the election of a director nominee or a proposal could prevent the election of a nominee or the approval of a proposal if the number of shares voting affirmatively does not constitute a majority of the required quorum. For the Charter Amendment Proposal, abstentions and any broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal and could prevent the approval of this proposal if the number of shares voting affirmatively does not constitute a majority of the Corporation’s outstanding shares of common stock as of the record date.

Abstentions and broker non-votes will be treated as present for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present at each meeting.

Where shareholders are being asked for an advisory vote or for ratification (Item Nos. 3, 4, 5, and 6), any voting results with respect to these items will be non-binding on the affected company but will be considered by that company’s Board.

What is a broker non-vote?

If you hold your shares indirectly through your broker, then your broker is the registered holder of your shares and submits the Proxy to vote your shares. You are the beneficial owner of the shares, and typically you will be asked to provide your broker with instructions as to how you want your shares to be voted. Under the rules of the NYSE, if you fail to provide your broker with voting instructions, your broker can use its discretion to vote your shares on “routine” matters, like the ratification of the appointment of the Independent Auditor. However, your broker may not use its discretion to vote your shares on “non-routine” matters, like director elections, advisory votes on executive compensation, the Charter Amendment Proposal, and the shareholder proposals. When a broker votes your shares on routine matters but is unable to vote your shares on other non-routine matters because you have failed to provide instructions on how to vote any non-routine matters, a “broker non-vote” occurs with respect to these other non-routine matters.

What shares am I entitled to vote?

If you are a PG&E Corporation registered shareholder, you are entitled to vote all the shares of PG&E Corporation common stock that you own (or for which you have been given the right to provide instructions as to how such shares should be voted) as of the close of business on May 15, 2019 (the “record date”). If you are a Utility registered shareholder, you are entitled to vote all the shares of Utility preferred stock that you own (or for which you have been given the right to provide instructions as to how such shares should be voted) as of the record date.

If you are a registered holder of both PG&E Corporation common stock and Utility preferred stock, you are entitled to vote separately on each company’s proposals.

We encourage shareholders to submit proxies in advance of the 2019 Annual Meetings over the Internet, by telephone, or by mail. You can ensure that your shares are voted at the 2019 Annual Meetings by following the instructions on the enclosed Proxy Card and submitting your votes over the Internet or by telephone, or by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed Proxy Card.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement13
Back to Contents

How many copies of the 2019 Proxy Materials will I receive?

Registered Holders and 401(k) Plan Participants

You will receive one copy of the 2019 Proxy Materials for each account.

Beneficial Owners

If you receive your proxy materials through Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions (“Broadridge”), and there are multiple beneficial owners at the same address, you may receive fewer copies of the 2019 Proxy Materials than the number of beneficial owners at that address. SEC rules permit Broadridge to deliver only one copy of the 2019 Proxy Materials to multiple beneficial owners sharing an address, unless the applicable company receives contrary instructions from any beneficial owner at that address.

If you receive your proxy materials through Broadridge and (1) you currently receive only one copy of the 2019 Proxy Materials at a shared address but you wish to receive an additional copy of the 2019 Proxy Materials or of any future notices or proxy materials, or (2) you share an address with other beneficial owners who also receive their separate proxy materials through Broadridge and you wish to request delivery of a single copy of the proxy materials to the shared address in the future, please contact the office of the Corporate Secretary of PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company, as appropriate, at 77 Beale Street, P.O. Box 770000, San Francisco, California 94177, or call 1-415-973-8200. We will promptly honor your request.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Proxy Card on or about the same time?

It means that your PG&E Corporation common shares or Utility preferred shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. In order to vote all of your shares, please sign and return each Proxy Card or, if you vote over the Internet or by telephone, vote once for each Proxy Card you receive.

Are proxy materials for the 2019 Annual Meetings available online?

Yes. You can go online atinvestor.pgecorp.com/financials/annual-reports-and-proxy-statementsto access the 2019 Proxy Materials.

What if I submit my Proxy but I do not specify how I want my shares voted?

For PG&E Corporation’s registered shareholders, the Corporation’s proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with the Corporation Board’s recommendations, which are as follows: “For” each of the Corporation Board’s nominees for director, “For” Item Nos. 2, 3, and 4 and “Against” Item Nos. 5 and 6. If the Charter Amendment Proposal (Item No. 2) is not approved, shareholders that vote on the Corporation’s Proxy Card will be deemed to vote for each of the nominees other than Mr. Johnson and any votes to elect Mr. Johnson will be disregarded. For the Utility’s registered shareholders, the Utility’s proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with the Utility Board’s recommendations, which are as follows: “For” each of the nominees for director and “For” Item Nos. 3 and 4 (there is no Item No. 2 proposal for the Utility).

What if I do not submit my Proxy or Voting Instruction Card?

If you are a registered shareholder, your shares will not be voted if you do not submit your Proxy or vote in person at the 2019 Annual Meetings. If you are a participant in a 401(k) Plan, your shares will not be voted if you do not submit your Voting Instruction Card. If you hold your shares through a broker (or other intermediary), your broker may vote your shares in the broker’s discretion on “routine” matters, as discussed above under “What is a broker non-vote?”.

Your vote is extremely important. Even if you plan to attend the 2019 Annual Meetings, we request that you act promptly to vote your shares by completing, signing and dating the enclosed Proxy Card and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope, or by voting over the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions provided on the enclosed Proxy Card or Voting Instruction Card.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement14
Back to Contents

Is my vote confidential?

PG&E Corporation and the Utility each have adopted a confidential voting policy under which shareholder votes are revealed only to a non-employee proxy tabulator or an independent inspector of election, except (1) as necessary to meet legal requirements, (2) in a dispute regarding authenticity of proxies and ballots, (3) in the event of a proxy contest if the other party does not agree to comply with the confidential voting policy, and (4) where disclosure may be necessary for either company to assert or defend claims. The policy allows the companies to engage shareholders, and to directly or indirectly (1) accept voting information that is voluntarily provided by shareholders, or (2) request and obtain final shareholder voting information that is or will be publicly disclosed pursuant to law, regulation, or similar requirements.

Who will count the votes?

First Coast Results, Inc. will act as the proxy tabulators and the inspectors of election for the 2019 Annual Meetings. First Coast Results, Inc. is independent of PG&E Corporation and the Utility and their respective directors, officers, and employees. Corporate Election Services will be the voting instruction tabulator for the 401(k) Plan.

How many shares are entitled to vote at the 2019 Annual Meetings?

As of the record date, there were 529,212,562 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock, without par value, outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share is entitled to one vote.

As of the record date, there were 10,319,782 shares of Utility first preferred stock, $25 par value, and 264,374,809 shares of Utility common stock, $5 par value, outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share is entitled to one vote.

May I attend the 2019 Annual Meetings?

Only PG&E Corporation and Utility shareholders who held shares as of the record date (May 15, 2019), or their duly appointed legal proxies, may attend the 2019 Annual Meetings. If you plan to attend the meeting, you must:

Present a government-issued photo identification at the 2019 Annual Meetings, such as a driver’s license, state-issued ID card, or passport, and
Establish proof of ownership using one of the following permitted methods:

Registered Shareholders

Any oneof the following:

•   Registered Shareholder List: Your name will be verified against our list of registered shareholders as of the record date; or

•   Proxy Card: You may present the Proxy Card at Shareholder Registration that you received in the mail (in case you voted over the Internet or by telephone, or intend to vote your shares at the 2019 Annual Meetings)

BeneficialOwnersthrough a401(k) Plan

Any oneof the following:

•   Shareholder List: Your name will be verified against PG&E Corporation’s list of shareholders provided by the 401(k) Plan trustee (Fidelity) as of the record date; or

•   Voting Instruction Card: You may present the top portion of the Voting Instruction Card that you received in the mail showing your name, address, and valid control number at Shareholder Registration.

Other Beneficial Owners

Any oneof the following:

•   Account Statement: You may present a copy of your May 2019 brokerage or bank account statement showing that you owned PG&E Corporation or Utility stock as of the record date;

•   Voting Instruction Card: You may present the Voting Instruction Card that you received in the mail showing your name, address, and valid control number;

•   Legal Proxy: You may present a valid legal proxy from your broker, bank, trustee, or nominee holding your shares, containing your name, address, and valid control number; or

•   Letter from Intermediary: You may present a letter from the broker, bank, trustee, or nominee holding your shares, confirming that you owned PG&E Corporation or Utility stock as of the record date.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement15
Back to Contents

If you do not have a valid photo identification or proof of your stock ownership, you will not be admitted to the 2019 Annual Meetings. Please note that the following items will not be allowed in the meeting: cameras, video or tape recorders, and other electronic recording devices, or any other items that might be disruptive or pose a safety or security risk. For your protection, all purses, briefcases, backpacks, and packages will be subject to inspection, and you may be required to check these items. Photography and video/audio recording are not permitted at the 2019 Annual Meetings. Please arrive early enough to allow yourself adequate time to clear security.

Even if you plan to attend the 2019 Annual Meetings, we request that you act promptly to vote your shares by voting over the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions provided on the enclosed Proxy Card or Voting Instruction Card or by completing, signing and dating the enclosed Proxy Card and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

May I bring a guest to the 2019 Annual Meetings?

Each registered shareholder or beneficial owner may bring either a spouse or a domestic partner as his or her guest to the 2019 Annual Meetings.

Whom can I contact if I have questions or need assistance in voting my shares, or if I need additional copies of the 2019 Proxy Materials?

Please contact Innisfree, the firm assisting us in the solicitation of proxies, toll-free at 877-750-0502. Banks and brokers may call collect at 212-750-5833.

How will the 2019 Annual Meetings be conducted?

The independent non-executive Chair of the Board of PG&E Corporation, or her designee, will preside over the 2019 Annual Meetings and will make any and all determinations regarding the conduct of the meetings.

All items of business described in Item Nos. 1-6 in this Proxy Statement will be deemed presented at the 2019 Annual Meetings.

How much will this Proxy solicitation cost?

All costs of soliciting proxies on behalf of PG&E Corporation and the Utility will be borne by PG&E Corporation and the Utility.

PG&E Corporation and the Utility hired Innisfree M&A Incorporated (“Innisfree”) to assist in the distribution of proxy materials and solicitation of votes for a fee not to exceed $1,200,000 plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. PG&E Corporation and the Utility have agreed to indemnify Innisfree against certain liabilities relating to, or arising out of, its engagement. In addition, the Corporation and the Utility will reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to shareholders. The companies’ solicitation of Proxies also may be made in person, by telephone, or by electronic communications by the companies’ respective directors, officers, and employees, who will not receive additional compensation for those solicitation activities.

The total amount to be spent for the companies’ solicitation of Proxies from the companies’ respective shareholders for the 2019 Annual Meetings, including expenses for vote tabulation and inspection but excluding salaries and wages of regular employees and officers of the companies, is estimated to be approximately $1.73 million, approximately $280,000 of which has been accrued to date.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement16
Back to Contents

Item No. 1: Election of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Shareholders are being asked to elect 14 directors to serve on the Board of PG&E Corporation and 7 directors to serve on the Board of the Utility. All

To create stability as we emerged from Chapter 11 in 2020, as part of our Plan of Reorganization, we agreed with the CPUC that our Boards would be divided into two classes, with each class elected for two-year terms. These terms will be phased out over the next three years so that, in 2024, all directors will be elected for one-year terms and stand for election annually.

All nominees for director of the Corporation in 2021 also are nominees for director of the Utility. In addition, Adam L. Wright, the event that the Charter Amendment Proposal (Item No. 2) is not approved, shareholders that vote on the Corporation’s Proxy Card will be deemed to vote for eachExecutive Vice President, Operations and Chief Operating Officer of the nominees other than Mr. JohnsonUtility, is a nominee for the Board of the Utility. Each nominee is an incumbent director and the votes for Mr. Johnson will be disregarded, and only 13 directors will beeach was elected to the PG&E Corporation Board.Boards in July 2020 in connection with the companies’ emergence from Chapter 11, except for Mr. Wright, who joined the Utility Board in February 2021.

NameAgeIndependent
Cheryl F. Campbell61
Kerry W. Cooper49
Arno L. Harris51
Michael R. Niggli71
Oluwadara J. Treseder32
Benjamin F. Wilson62
UTILITY BOARD ONLY
Adam L. Wright43

 

If elected as director,directors, all of the 2021 nominees have agreed to serve and will hold office until the 20202023 annual meetings or until their successors shall beare elected and qualified, except in the case of death, resignation, or removal of a director. Each nominee has consented to being named in this Joint Proxy Statement and intends to serve if elected.

 

If any of the nominees become unavailableis unable at the time of the 20192021 Annual Meetings to accept nomination or electionserve as a director, the proxy holders named on the PG&E Corporation or Utility Proxy Card (as applicable) will vote for substitute nominees at their discretion.

 

As you will read in the biographical information that follows, the current Boards, including the incumbent nominees, bring significant experience in utility management, safety, technology, finance, emergency management, communications, remediation projects, and public policy, and familiarity with the needs of the state of California.

The Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Unanimously Recommend Using the Proxy Card to VoteVoting FOR Each of the Nominees for Director Presented in This Joint Proxy Statement.

 

If you have any questions, please contact Innisfree, our proxy solicitor assisting us in connection with the 2019 Annual Meetings, by calling toll free 877-750-0502.

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement177
 
Back to Contents

CERTAIN AGREEMENTS WITH BLUEMOUNTAINDirector Biographies

 

In connection with BlueMountain’s proposal to nominate director candidates that has since been withdrawn,Mr. Buckman entered into a nomination agreement (the “Nomination Agreement”) with BlueMountain, pursuant to which Mr. Buckman agreed, among other things, to be nominated by BlueMountainClass “A” Directors (Standing for election to the Corporation Board at the 2019 annual meeting, and, if elected, to serve as a director of the Corporation. Pursuant to the Nomination Agreement, BlueMountain agreed to pay to Mr. Buckman $100,000Election in connection with the nomination. The Nomination Agreement includes customary reimbursement and indemnification provisions in favor of Mr. Buckman.

On April 22, 2019, Richard C. Kelly resigned from the Boards of the Corporation and the Utility. Also, PG&E Corporation entered into a Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with BlueMountain. In connection with the execution and delivery of the Settlement Agreement, and effective upon Mr. Kelly’s resignation, Frederick W. Buckman was appointed to fill the resulting vacancies on the Boards.

Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement with BlueMountain, the Corporation has agreed to propose an amendment, and recommend that the Corporation’s shareholders vote in favor of such amendment at the 2019 annual meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation, to the Corporation’s Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the maximum size of the Board to fifteen members. Under the Settlement Agreement, subject to the approval of such amendment by the shareholders of the Corporation, the Boards will endeavor to select a person to be appointed to each of the Boards, taking into account such person’s clean energy / clean energy technology expertise, ties to the state of California, and expertise relating to the achievement of California’s clean energy goals. In addition, the Corporation has agreed to engage Christopher A. Hart to provide consulting services to the CEO of the Corporation regarding matters of safety.

The full text of the Settlement Agreement is attached as an exhibit to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 23, 2019.2021)

 

Cheryl F. Campbell

Age: 61

Director Since: April 2019

Current Board Committees: Compliance and Public Policy, Executive, Nominating and Governance, Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committee (Chair)

Current Position: Consultant, Former Senior Vice President, Xcel Energy, Inc.

Prior Positions:

Ms. Campbell served as the Senior Vice President, Gas at Xcel Energy, and President and CEO of West Gas Interstate, In. a FERC-regulated pipeline owned by Xcel Energy, from 2011 to 2018. Prior to Xcel Energy Inc., Ms. Campbell worked at Coastal Corporation (1984 to 2001) where she held various roles, including director.

Other Board Experience:

Ms. Campbell currently serves as a board member of Summit Utilities, Inc. (energy) (2020 to present), and National Underground Group (construction) (2018 to present). Advisory director for JANA Corporation (software development/IT) (2020 to present).

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Ms. Campbell has extensive experience in risk management, employee and public safety, and improving customer, regulatory, and financial outcomes. She has worked at the national level with the Department of Transportation on safety regulations, as well as with organizations involved in environmental sustainability. Ms. Campbell served as a member of the independent panel assessing the enterprise risk management and overall safety of the 11 gas utilities in Massachusetts in the aftermath of the September 2018 explosions and fires in Merrimack Valley. She is also committed to public service, with leadership roles in non-profit organizations, including Boardbound by Women’s Leadership Foundation, which focuses on educating and increasing the number of women on boards.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement188
 
Back to Contents

NOMINEES FOR DIRECTORS OF PG&E CORPORATION AND PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

As summarized in the below director biographies, the Boards were significantly changed in April 2019. The new Boards’ members’ skills and experiences cover areas we believe are most important to our sustainable success going forward. Mr. Johnson joined the Board of the Utility on May 2, 2019 and is nominated to both Boards at the 2019 Annual Meetings, subject to approval of the Charter Amendment Proposal. Mr. Johnson brings substantial safety and operational expertise from his extensive career in the energy industry. The two continuing directors provide diverse expertise, years of leadership and experience, and the institutional knowledge believed to be necessary to ensure stability and continuity on the Boards. The eleven new directors for the PG&E Corporation and Utility Boards provide fresh perspectives, leadership experience, and specific expertise to lead the companies through their current challenges and drive necessary cultural and operational changes. The new directors include:

Industry leaders who have dedicated their careers to delivering safe and reliable utility service to millions of customers;

Leaders with fresh perspectives on safety and risk management; and

Leaders with over 125 years of collective experience in financial and operational restructurings, which often involved making fundamental changes to corporate culture. This experience will not only help guide the Corporation and the Utility through Chapter 11, but will also enable cultural change at the Corporation and the Utility.

The Boards believe that each nominee for director is a qualified, dedicated, ethical, and highly regarded individual. The Corporation and the Utility also each believe that a diverse Board with a mix of operational, safety, risk management, governance, regulatory, compliance, legal, restructuring, strategic planning, financial, audit, and business experience will be critical to continue improvements to safety, drive operational excellence, and navigate the restructuring process. The refreshed Boards, as a whole, include individuals who are committed to further enhancing the safety culture, understanding and properly responding to customer concerns, and fairly treating wildfire victims, employees, retirees, and other stakeholders. There are no agreements, arrangements, or understandings between the eleven new directors and any third party relating to their respective nominations for election to the Boards at the 2019 Annual Meetings.

The information provided below includes a chart and a description of each nominee’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills that indicate why that person should serve as a director of the applicable company, in light of the Corporation’s and the Utility’s business and structure. The Boards do not believe that each nominee must possess all of the characteristics shown in the chart below in order for each Board, as a whole, to function effectively.

The Corporation and the Utility believe that, collectively, the distribution of the nominees’ experience, skills, and expertise, among other characteristics, reflects a balanced and multi-disciplinary Board at each company, and appropriately meets the needs of the companies.

Kerry W. Cooper

Age: 49

Director Since: July 2020

Current Board Committees: Finance, Audit, Compliance and Public Policy

Most Recent Position: President and Chief Operations Officer, Rothy's, Inc.

Prior Positions:

Ms. Cooper served as the President and Chief Operating Officer at Rothy's, a consumer goods company, from November 2017 to January 2020, where she built the brand and growth marketing teams as well as the operations, merchandising, and planning functions. Prior to that, she served as CEO of Choose Energy (national energy marketplace) (2013 to 2016), Chief Operating Officer and Chief Marketing Officer of Modcloth (consumer goods) (2010 to 2013), and held various leadership positions at Walmart (2008 to 2010).

Other Board Experience:

Ms. Cooper currently serves as a board member of Fernish (furniture rental) (2020 to present), Treau (HVAC start-up) (2020 to present), and The Production Board (capital holding company) (March 2020 to present). She formerly served on the boards of BevMo! (2017 to 2020), Weddington Way (2015 to 2017), and Choose Energy (2013 to 2016).

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Ms. Cooper brings extensive experience in implementing large-scale customer programs, as well as building businesses and teams, which are critical as the Boards oversee PG&E’s efforts to decentralize and bring operations closer to the customer. During her time at Choose Energy, she oversaw its expansion to operating in all deregulated states, and added natural gas and solar, and shifted the marketing mix from largely paid online acquisition to diverse channels. Ms. Cooper was responsible for owning and driving major technology projects at Walmart.com, driving omnichannel integration, building new products (e.g., marketplace), and building big data connections between store and online. Ms. Cooper also provides the perspective of a PG&E customer and California resident. Ms. Cooper has been responsible for building consumer brands, especially in the energy sector, and connecting to consumers’ needs.

Arno L. Harris

Age: 51

Director Since: July 2020

Current Board Committees: Compliance and Public Policy, Finance, Technology and Cybersecurity

Current Position: Managing Partner, AHC

Prior Positions:

Mr. Harris served as the CEO of Alta Motors, an electric motorcycle manufacturer, from October 2017 to October 2018. He previously founded and served as the CEO of Recurrent Energy (U.S. utility-scale solar and energy storage project developer) (2006 to 2015).

Other Public Company Board Experience:

Mr. Harris has served on the boards of Azure Power Global Limited (solar IPP and developer in India) since 2016, and ArcLight Clean Transition Corp. (SPAC / energy transition) since 2020.

Other Board Experience:

Mr. Harris has also served on the boards of Alta Motors (2017 to 2018) and Advanced Energy Economy (trade association) (2012 to 2015), and chaired the Solar Energy Industries Association board (trade association) (2014 to 2015) and the Recurrent Energy board (2006 to 2015).

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Mr. Harris brings 25 years of experience in clean technology and renewable energy, with deep experience working on climate change issues through the intersection of technology, business, and public policy. Mr. Harris' understanding of energy, sustainability, and commercial operations within California's regulatory environment contributes to the Boards' effective oversight of ESG and climate change issues. Mr. Harris is also a longtime California resident and PG&E customer, who has demonstrated a commitment to the community through his work supporting Tipping Point Community, a non-profit focused on alleviating poverty.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement199
 
Back to Contents

Michael R. Niggli

Age: 71

Director Since: July 2020

Current Board Committees: Finance, Safety and Nuclear Oversight, Technology and Cybersecurity

Most Recent Position: President and Chief Operations Officer, San Diego Gas & Electric Company

Prior Positions:

Mr. Niggli served as President and Chief Operating Officer of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), a regulated utility company owned by Sempra Energy, from 2010 through December 2013. He held other leadership positions at Sempra Energy, including as Chief Operating Officer of SDG&E (2008 to 2010), Chief Operating Officer of both SDG&E & Southern California Gas Company (2006 to 2007), and President of Sempra Generation (2000 to 2006). Prior to his time at Sempra Energy, he served as the Chairman of the Board, CEO, and President of Sierra Pacific Resources (1999 to 2000), and Chairman of the Board, CEO, and President of Nevada Power Company (1998 to 1999).

Other Board Experience:

Mr. Niggli currently serves on the boards of American Transmission Company (2015 to present), ESVAL (subsidiary of AndesCan SpA in Chile) (2015 to present), ESSBIO (subsidiary of AndesCan SpA in Chile) (2015 to present), and as Chairman of the Board of ESS, Inc. (energy storage) (Board member from 2015 to present).

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

With over four decades of experience in the utility and energy sector, Mr. Niggli brings significant operations, risk management and leadership experience, particularly in regulated utilities in California. Mr. Niggli provides in-depth knowledge of the California regulatory landscape, and while in his leadership role at SDG&E, established first-of-their-kind wildfire and public safety programs aimed at reducing risks associated with wildfire. Mr. Niggli has been a longtime supporter of and leader for the Great Basin National Park Foundation, working to preserve and make accessible the natural beauty of the park.

Oluwadara (Dara) J. Treseder

Age: 32

Director Since: July 2020

Current Board Committees: Compensation, Finance

Current Position: Senior Vice President, Head of Global Marketing & Communications, Peloton Interactive, Inc.

Prior Positions:

Ms. Treseder was the Chief Marketing and Communications Officer at Carbon Inc., a 3D printing technology company, from December 2018 to August 2020, where she led marketing, communications, and inside sales. Prior to that, she was the Chief Marketing Officer at GE Business Innovations and GE Ventures (2017 to 2018) and Marketing Manager and Global Head of Demand Generation, File Maker, at Apple, Inc. (2015 to 2017).

Other Board Experience:

Ms. Treseder currently serves on the board of the Public Health Institute (non-profit public health organization) (2017 to present).

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Ms. Treseder brings experience in large-scale customer operations, consumer insights, and communication to the PG&E Boards. Ms. Treseder has a background leading communications in highly regulated industries and driving customer engagement, a strong understanding of finance and, financial planning, and knowledge of management incentives and compensation. Ms. Treseder has been a champion for underserved and marginalized groups and remains committed to building strong communities that work for everyone.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   10
Back to Contents

Benjamin F. Wilson

Age: 62

Director Since: July 2020

Current Board Committees: Audit (Chair), Executive, Nominating and Governance

Current Position: Chairman, Beveridge & Diamond PC

Prior Positions:

Mr. Wilson has spent 35 years at Beveridge & Diamond PC, an environmental law practice group.

Other Board Experience:

Mr. Wilson currently serves as a board member of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company (2013 to present), Beveridge & Diamond, P.C. (2015 to present), and Environmental Law Institute (2011 to present). He has also served on the board of Dartmouth College (2012 to 2020).

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Mr. Wilson brings a depth of experience, having been lead counsel in numerous complex environmental and regulatory matters for major consumer product corporations, retailers, oil and gas companies, municipalities, and developers. His service as Monitor for the Duke Energy coal ash spill remediation project and as Deputy Monitor in the Volkswagen emissions proceedings provides an important perspective to the Board. Mr. Wilson also offers deep experience with environmental justice issues and is a recognized leader on diversity and inclusion issues in the legal profession. Mr. Wilson served on the Audit Committee of the board of directors of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company and chaired the Audit Committee for the Board of Trustees of Dartmouth College.

Adam L. Wright

Age: 43

Director Since: February 2021

Current Position: Executive Vice President, Operations and Chief Operating Officer, Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Prior Positions:

Mr. Wright served as President and CEO of MidAmerican Energy Company (MEC), a Berkshire Hathaway Energy company, from January 2018 to January 2021. In his 18-year tenure with the Berkshire Hathaway Energy family of businesses, he served in various leadership positions, including as MEC’s Vice President of Gas Delivery (2015 to 2017) and Vice President of Wind Generation and Development (2012 to 2015).

Other Board Experience:

Mr. Wright has served on the boards of MEC (2018 to 2021), the Iowa Business Council (2018 to 2021) and Iowa Utility Association (2018 to 2021). He was also an advisory director for the American Gas Association.

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Mr. Wright provides the Utility Board with knowledge of the Utility’s operations, experienced utility leadership, and engineering background. He also brings experience in safety, compliance, operations, customer service, natural gas, renewable generation, and transmission and distribution developed during his career with MEC and other Berkshire Hathaway Energy companies. As PG&E’s Executive Vice President of Operations and Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Wright focuses on safety, increasing connectivity among operational groups, and promoting excellence.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   11
Back to Contents

Class “B” Directors (Not Standing for Election in 2021)

Each director is elected

Rajat Bahri

Age: 57

Director Since: July 2020

Current Board Committees: Audit, Technology and Cybersecurity

Current Position: Chief Financial Officer, Wish, Inc.

Prior Positions:

Mr. Bahri served as Chief Financial Officer at Jasper Technologies, Inc., a leading Internet of Things service platform, from July 2013 until June 2016, where he scaled the company, prepared the company for an initial public offering, and successfully sold the company to Cisco Systems, Inc. He previously served as Chief Financial Officer for Trimble Navigation (2005 to 2013), Kraft Canada, Inc. (2001 to 2004), and Kraft Pizza Company (2000 to 2001).

Other Public Company Board Experience:

Mr. Bahri previously served on the board of Stec, Inc. (computer storage) (2008 to 2011), where he was Chair of the Audit Committee.

Other Board Experience: N/A Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Mr. Bahri is a seasoned CFO with public company and leadership experience and extensive knowledge of finance, financial performance, and planning and audit. At Wish, Mr. Bahri supported the company’s global expansion to over 80 countries and prepared its infrastructure and resources for the initial public offering in 2020. He is skilled at building enterprise-wide systems and teams and brings decades of experience in executive compensation, enterprise risk management, and corporate governance, as well as the operation of audit committees. As a California resident, Mr. Bahri also provides the perspective of a utility customer to the Boards.

Jessica L. Denecour

Age: 59

Director Since: July 2020

Current Board Committees: Compensation, Executive, Nominating and Governance, Technology and Cybersecurity (Chair)

Most Recent Position: Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Varian Medical Systems, Inc.

Prior Positions:

Ms. Denecour was the Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Varian Medical Systems, Inc., a leading manufacturer of medical devices and software for cancer treatments, from January 2006 to September 2017. Prior to that, she held numerous senior roles at Agilent Technologies, Inc. (chemical analysis, life sciences, and diagnostics) (1999 to 2005) and The Hewlett- Packard Company (information technology and services) (1983 to 1999). 

Other Public Company Board Experience:

Ms. Denecour served on the board of MobileIron, Inc. (software security) (2017 to 2020).

Other Board Experience: N/A Experience, Skills, and Expertise: 

Ms. Denecour has more than 30 years of experience as an information technology and cybersecurity executive, including overseeing investments in new and innovative technology. She has a deep understanding of threats and mitigations in cybersecurity risk management. During her career, she has led multiple IT transformations, built effective data privacy and security programs, and implemented state-of-the-art IT governance. A long-time California resident and utility customer, Ms. Denecour has also demonstrated a commitment to the community through her board work supporting non-profits aimed at achieving gender parity in the boardroom, as well as supporting creativity and lifelong learning in children.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   12
Back to Contents

Admiral Mark E. Ferguson III, USN (ret.)

Age: 64

Director Since: July 2020

Current Board Committees: Compensation (Chair), Executive, Safety and Nuclear Oversight, Technology and Cybersecurity

Current Position: Senior Advisor, Institute for Defense Analyses and NATO

Prior Positions:

Admiral Ferguson retired from the U.S. Navy in 2016 after 38 years of service, having most recently served as Commander of the U.S. Naval Forces in Europe and Africa and NATO Allied Joint Force Command, Naples, Italy (2014 to 2016). Prior to that, he served as Vice Chief of Naval Operations (2011 to 2014) and Chief of Naval Personnel (2008 to 2011). He served as a Senior Advisor with McKinsey & Company (2016 to 2020) and as an independent aerospace and defense consultant.

Public Company Board Experience:

Mr. Ferguson serves on the board of VSE Corporation (logistics and supply chain) (2017 to present).

Other Board Experience: 

Mr. Ferguson also serves on the board of trustees for the Center for Naval Analyses (federally-funded R&D center) (2017 to present).

Experience, Skills, and Expertise: 

Admiral Ferguson brings decades of experience in nuclear reactor operations, risk and change management, and cyber preparedness. During his tenure in the U.S. Navy, he directed the transformation of its personnel management system and education programs; his organization received the Workforce Magazine Optimas Award for innovative personnel policies supporting diversity and women in the workplace. He presently is a member of several veteran service organizations.

Robert C. Flexon

Age: 62

Director Since: July 2020, Independent non-executive Chair of the Corporation Board since July 2020.

Current Board Committees: Audit, Compensation, Executive (Chair, Corporation committee), Nominating and Governance (Chair)

Most Recent Position: Chief Executive Officer, Dynegy

Prior Positions:

Mr. Flexon served as President and CEO of Dynegy Inc., a power and energy supplier and marketer serving the Northeast, Midwest, Texas, and California from June 2011 to May 2018, where he was a key architect in creating the largest independent power producer in the U.S. through the strategic combination with Vistra Corp. Prior to his tenure at Dynegy, he was President and CEO of Foster Wheeler AG (Engineering and Construction) (2009 to 2010), and held a variety of leadership positions at NRG Energy, Inc. (integrated independent power generator and marketer (2004 to 2009).

Public Company Board Experience:

Mr. Flexon currently serves on the boards of Capstone Turbine Corporation (micro turbine manufacturer) (2017 to present) and Charah Solutions, Inc. (coal ash management, remediation and marketing) (2018 to present). Mr. Flexon previously served on the board of Dynegy (2011 to 2018), TransAlta Corporation (power generator and energy marketer) (2018 to 2020), and Westmoreland Coal Company (coal mining) (2016 to 2019).

Other Board Experience:

Mr. Flexon has served on the board of Genesys Works Houston since 2016, providing career education and professional experience to high school students in the underserved communities of Houston, Texas.

Experience, Skills, and Expertise: 

Mr. Flexon provides executive leadership experience in the competitive power and oil and gas sectors. During his time at Dynegy, he executed cultural, operational, and financial restructuring, and achieved top decile safety performance, and enhanced employee engagement. Mr. Flexon brings extensive safety, risk management and labor relations experience, as well as experience with turnarounds, having led both Dynegy’s 2011 bankruptcy and its culture transformation and growth post-emergence.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   13
Back to Contents

W. Craig Fugate

Age: 61

Director Since: July 2020

Current Board Committees: Compliance and Public Policy, Safety and Nuclear Oversight

Current Position: Chief Emergency Management Officer, One Concern (Emergency management technology)

Prior Positions:

Mr. Fugate was appointed by President Barack Obama to serve as the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) from May 2009 to January 2017. Prior to that, he served as Florida Governor Jeb Bush’s Emergency Management Director (2001 to 2009).

Other Board Experience:

Mr. Fugate currently serves on the board of America’s Public Television Stations (2018 to present).

Experience, Skills, and Expertise: 

Mr. Fugate has an unparalleled background in emergency management and crisis response at the county, state, and federal level. In addition to being the Chief Emergency Management Officer at One Concern, he is also a Senior Advisor at the Pew Trust for Flood Prepared Communities and a Consultant for Resilient Force, among other positions. During his time at FEMA, Mr. Fugate led the organization through multiple record-breaking disaster years and oversaw the Federal Government’s response to major events, such as the Joplin and Moore tornadoes, Hurricane Sandy, Hurricane Matthew, and the 2016 Louisiana flooding. Mr. Fugate also demonstrates leadership in establishing a strong safety culture and driving a community-oriented approach to emergency management.

Dean Seavers

Age: 60

Director Since: July 2020, Independent non-executive Chair of the Utility Board since July 2020.

Current Board Committees: Executive (Chair, Utility committee), Finance (Chair), Nominating and Governance, Safety and Nuclear Oversight

Most Recent Position: President and Executive Director, National Grid

Prior Positions:

Mr. Seavers served as the President of National Grid US and Executive Director of National Grid plc, a multinational electric and gas utility, from December 2014 to January 2020, where he led business transformation initiatives to improve financial performance, safety, and employee engagement. Prior to that, he was the founder and CEO of Red Hawk Fire & Security (facilities services) (2012 to 2018), President of Global Services at United Technologies Fire and Security (2010 to 2011), and President and CEO of GE Security (electronic security and fire systems) (2007 to 2010).

Other Public Company Board Experience:

Mr. Seavers has served on the boards of James Hardie Industries plc (building materials) since February 2021, and Albemarle Corporation (specialty chemicals) since 2018.

Experience, Skills, and Expertise: 

Mr. Seavers brings a broad utility and safety background to the Boards of the Corporation and the Utility, as well as utility leadership experience. He has a deep background in risk management and operational planning in large customer-oriented companies, and understands the needs of employees and workforce safety. During his tenure at National Grid, he led the implementation of National Grid’s jurisdictional model which placed operational control with jurisdictional presidents, which is particularly relevant as PG&E moves to decentralize operations in order to drive a customer focus.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   14
Back to Contents

Patricia K. Poppe

Age: 52

Director Since: January 2021

Current Board Committee: Executive

Current Position: Chief Executive Officer, PG&E Corporation

Prior Positions:

Ms. Poppe served as President and CEO of CMS Energy Corporation and its principal subsidiary, Consumers Energy Company, from July 2016 to December 2020, where she focused on connecting the utility more closely with its customers and adapting lean operating system principles throughout the business. In her decade-long career with CMS Energy, she held various leadership positions, including Senior Vice President of Distribution Operations, Engineering and Transmission; Vice President of Customer Experience, Rates and Regulation; and Vice President of Customer Operations. Prior to her tenure at CMS, she served as a Power Plant Director at DTE Energy Company (2005 to 2010).

Other Public Company Board Experience:

Ms. Poppe currently serves on the board of Whirlpool Corporation (2019 to present).

Other Company Board Experience:

Ms. Poppe also serves on the board of AEGIS Insurance Services, Inc. (2019 to present), and on the executive committees for the Edison Electric Institute and the American Gas Association.

Experience, Skills, and Expertise: 

Ms. Poppe brings over 15 years of experience, including as chief executive, in the highly regulated utility industry. Under her leadership, CMS Energy and Consumers Energy earned consistent industry recognition and maintained strong operational and financial performance. PG&E values Ms. Poppe’s extensive utility experience championing safety and workplace equity, developing strong working relationships with labor, and building broad support for clean energy.

William M. Smith

Age: 63

Director Since: October 2019

Current Board Committees: Executive, Finance, Technology and Cybersecurity

Most Recent Position: President of AT&T Technology Operations, AT&T Services, Inc.

Prior Positions:

Mr. Smith served as the interim CEO of PG&E Corporation from July 2020 to December 2020, following the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11, providing stability and leadership during a time of transition. Prior to that, he was the President of Technology Operations at AT&T Services, Inc. (telecommunications) where he spent 37 years (1979 to 2016). Mr. Smith previously served on the advisory boards of Blue Ridge Networks, Inc. (telecommunications) (2018 to 2020) and ASOCS Ltd., (telecommunications) (2018 to present).

Other Public Company Board Experience:

Mr. Smith previously served as a director of Oclaro, Inc. (telecommunications) (2009 to 2012, 2018).

Other Board Experience:

Mr. Smith currently serves on the board of Tillman Infrastructure, LLV. (infrastructure) (2017 to present).

Experience, Skills, and Expertise: 

Mr. Smith brings in-depth knowledge of PG&E’s operations to the Boards, along with a background in implementation of technology and innovation on large scale operations. Mr. Smith also brings an ability to identify and leverage new technologies to meet future business needs, experience in cybersecurity and risk management, knowledge of financial planning, and a track record of delivering on commitments to public and employee safety.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   15
Back to Contents

DIRECTOR NOMINEE SELECTION

In July 2020, each company seated 11 new Board members after a one-year term,comprehensive search conducted by two leading national independent search firms, with specific mandates to identify diverse candidates. Three existing Board members remained on each Board. All Board members were selected based on criteria approved by or agreed upon with our regulators and key stakeholders, including diversity, skills, experience, and their understanding of the needs of Californians. Their appointments were reviewed and supported broadly, including by the Governor of California. These Board members represent the companies’ commitment to stability as well as a vision of how the companies can best serve customers in general, the future.

Our ongoing process to select directors begins with the PG&E Corporation Nominating and Governance Committee, who selects the nominees who will recommend,be submitted for shareholder vote. The Nominating and each Board will re-nominate,Governance Committee recommends an existingeligible director for re-election if it believes the Committee and the Board each believe that the individualdirector would continue to be a productive and effective contributor to the Board, unless that individual no longer is eligible for re-nomination underBoards. The Nominating and Governance Committee makes these assessments together with the applicable company’s BoardBoards of Directors retirement policy or he or she declines to stand for re-election.each company.

 

With respectFor new Board nominees, the Committee works with independent search firms (retained by the Boards or the Committee) to diversity,identify candidates who are qualified to serve and who demonstrate one or more of the pre-determined skills that the Boards have approved as being desirable to meet the companies’ needs. The companies also accept recommendations for director nominees from a variety of sources, including shareholders, community-based organizations, management, and other directors. We use the same criteria, described below under “Skills,” to review all candidates recommended for nomination at the annual meetings - including candidates nominated by shareholders - and review all such candidates at the same time.

Shareholders may recommend a person for the Committee to consider as a nominee for director of PG&E Corporation or the Utility, by writing to that company’s Corporate Secretary. Recommendations must include (a) a description of the candidate (name, age, principal occupation, business address, and residence address), (b) the class and number of shares of the company’s stock owned by the shareholder and the candidate, (c) other information about the candidate that would be in a proxy statement listing the candidate as a director nominee, and (d) any interest of the shareholder in the candidate’s nomination. We may request additional information on the candidate or the shareholder if needed.

DIVERSITY

Diversity is a core value for us as demonstrated by our Boards, and one that we will continue to champion in the future.

The Nominating and Governance Committee’s policy, as reflected in the companies’ respective Corporate Governanceeach company’s Guidelines, is to seek nominees with a range of different backgrounds, perspectives, skills, and experiences. NineThe Guidelines further specify that candidates are evaluated based on a range of skills and attributes (see Skills section below), including consideration of important public policy objectives, such as diversity.

We asked the continuing directors to self-identify using the categories of underrepresented communities listed in California’s Assembly Bill 979 (AB 979) on board diversity: Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender. 9 of 14 directors of PG&E Corporation, and 10 of 15 directors of the 14 director nominees for eachUtility identify as either being members of an underrepresented community or identify as female. More specifically, 5 directors identify as female, 1 as Asian or Pacific Islander, and 4 as Black or African American (3 on the PG&E Corporation Board). Each company’s continuing Board are diverse with respectexceeds the requirements of AB 979.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   16
Back to Contents

Our commitment to gender or ethnicity.diversity extends beyond just seating members from under-represented communities on our Boards - it also includes representation on key leadership positions on the Boards:

Corporation ChiefExecutive OfficerUtility Chief Operating OfficerIndependent Chair of UtilityBoard of Directors/ Chairof Finance Committee
Chair of Audit CommitteeChair of Safety andNuclear Oversight CommitteeChair of Technology andCybersecurity Committee

 

The Nominating and Governance Committee and the Boards annually review whether the diversity represented by the members of the Boards serves the needs of the companies, given the current operating environment. If a diversity gap is identified, the Committee will consider and prioritize the need to close that gap, along with other factors, in its director recruitment process. The diversity represented by the director nominees is shown below.

 

SKILLS

Our Boards exhibit diversity of experience, skills, and attributes, and this allows them to effectively oversee the companies’ operations. As part of the establishment of the Boards in 2020, we agreed that directors should demonstrate one or more of a list of skills specific to our companies' needs (the skills matrix), and key Board leaders would have substantial expertise in areas such as wildfire mitigation, natural gas operations, risk management, and cybersecurity. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and the Boards approve the skills matrix annually, taking into account the current composition of the Boards and the criteria previously agreed upon with our key stakeholders and regulators.

Each director is nominated after consideration of his or her skills on this list, as well as diversity, character, and fit with Board culture, including characteristics like integrity, ethical standards, judgment, interpersonal skills and relations, communication skills, and the ability to work collaboratively with others. The Committee and Boards also consider important public policy objectives such as diversity, representation from regions PG&E serves, and commitment to California’s climate change goals, and also consider a candidate’s age (in light of each Board’s director retirement policy), applicable legal requirements, residency, and such other factors as it deems appropriate given the current needs of the Board and the Company.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement2017
 
Back to Contents

Skills Matrix

Richard R. Barrera

Age:47

Director Since:April 2019

Current Board Committees:Finance (Chair); Audit; Executive

Current Position:Founder, CEOWildfire safety, preparedness, prevention, mitigation,response and/or recovery

Workforce safety and Portfolio Manager, Roystone Capital public safety
Technology and cybersecurityNuclear generation safety
Natural gas transmission, distribution, operation, andsafetyPublic policy (legal, regulatory, or government)
Leadership in the energy or utility industryUtility operation or related engineering experience
Innovation and technology in the clean energy orutility industryRisk management (including enterprise risk management)
Climate change mitigation or climate resilienceRenewable energy and related engineering experience
Financial performance and planningFinancial literacy
AuditManagement LP (an asset management firm that invests across the capital structure in both debt and equity)

Prior Positions:

Mr. Barrera previously was a Partner and Co-Portfolio Manager at Redwood Capital Management and Glenview Capital Management (both private investment management firms).

Other Board Experience:

Mr. Barrera is a member of theincentives

Labor relationsLarge-scale customer experience
Public company board of Mount Sinai Children’s Center Foundation and a member of the board of Success Academy Charter Schools.

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Mr. Barrera has over 20 years of asset management and financial expertise investing in businesses undergoing transformations across a wide range of sectors. Throughout his career, Mr. Barrera has invested across the electric utility and independent power industries and has directly participated in numerous restructurings both in and out of Chapter 11. Mr. Barrera’s restructuring experience includes several bankruptcies involving complex litigation and a number of telecommunication restructurings in which he actively helped companies recapitalize balance sheets to enable successful operational turnarounds.

Community leadership

 

 

Jeffrey L. Bleich

Age:57

Director Since:April 2019; independent non-executive Chair of the Board of the Utility since April 2019

Current Board Committees:Compliance and Public Policy; Safety and Nuclear Oversight

Current Position:Attorney

Prior Positions:

Mr. Bleich was a partner in the San Francisco, CA office of Dentons US LLP (a multinational law firm) from 2016 to April 2019. Mr. Bleich served as a member of the Senior Advisory Group to the Director of National Intelligence from 2014 to 2016. Mr. Bleich served as U.S. Ambassador to Australia from 2009 to 2013 and also as Special Counsel to President Obama in the White House from 2008 to 2009. Mr. Bleich previously was a long-time partner at the California law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, where he was recognized as one of California’s leading litigators, litigated a variety of complex civil cases and handled landmark state and U.S. Supreme Court pro bono cases.

Other Board Experience:

Mr. Bleich is a member of the board of Nuix Pty. Ltd (from 2017 to present) and the advisory board of Amber Kinetics, Inc. (from 2017 to present). Mr. Bleich serves on several boards, including as Chair of the Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board (appointed by President Obama).

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Mr. Bleich has over three decades of experience resolving complex domestic and international disputes and specializing in cybersecurity. In addition to his legal and public sector experience, Mr. Bleich has served on the boards of numerous private organizations, including as the Chair of the California State University Board of Trustees, President of the California State Bar, a member of the Governor’s International Trade and Investment Council, and President of the Bar Association of San Francisco. Mr. Bleich is a long-time California resident.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement2118
 
Back to Contents
 

Nora Mead Brownell

Age:71

Director Since:April 2019; independent non-executive Chair of the Board of PG&E Corporation since April 2019

Current Board Committees:Executive; Safety and Nuclear Oversight

Current Position:Co-Founder of Espy Energy Solutions LLC (an energy consulting group that provides strategic planning, marketing, business planning, and other consulting services to energy utilities, equipment manufacturers, service providers and financial institutions evaluating energy investments)

Prior Positions:

Ms. Brownell is a former Commissioner of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”), a former member of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission and a former President of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners.

Prior Public Board Service During the Past Five Years:

National Grid (2012 to April 2019); Spectra Energy Partners (2007 to 2018); Oncor, Inc. (2007 to 2014)

Other Board Experience:

Ms. Brownell previously served on the boards of Tangent (2000 to April 2019) and Comverge Inc. (2007 to 2014). Ms. Brownell is also currently a director of Morgan Stanley Infrastructure Advisory Board and of Mead Family Investments (previously Times Publishing Co.) (1996 to present), and she previously served as a director of Direct Energy Advisory Board (2014 to 2017) and of New World Capital Advisory Board (2009 to 2016).

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Ms. Brownell is a former Commissioner of the FERC, a former member of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission and a former President of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners. During her time at FERC, Ms. Brownell oversaw the transition of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation to FERC oversight after Congress passed the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which provided for mandatory electric reliability standards. Ms. Brownell has been an advocate for consumer protection, competitive markets and national energy infrastructure development. She has worked extensively with California stakeholders to resolve market and infrastructure issues.

 

Frederick W. Buckman

Age:73

Director Since:April 2019

Current Board Committees:Audit; Safety and Nuclear Oversight

Most Recent Position:Retired President and Chief Executive Officer of Powerlink Transmission Company (transmission investment for private equity)

Prior Positions:

Mr. Buckman was President and CEO of Shaw Group’s Power Group (engineering firm) (2009 to 2010), a managing partner for utilities at Brookfield Asset Management (alternative asset management company focusing on real estate, renewable power, infrastructure and private equity) (2007 to 2009), President and CEO of Trans-Elect (electric and gas transmission system development) (1999 to 2006), and has held various leadership positions in the utility and energy industry, including President and CEO of Pacificorp (electric energy company) (1994 to 1998) and CMS Energy (natural gas and electric energy company) (1986 to 1994). He also served on the Board of Directors of SmartWires, Inc. (transmission technology company) (2011 to 2019).

Other Board Experience:

Mr. Buckman currently serves as a board member of StanCorp Financial Group Incorporated (insurance and financial services company) and Solomon Corporation (sales and service of transformers and related equipment).

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Mr. Buckman brings over 30 years of experience in the utility, energy, and asset management sectors. In addition to serving as the CEO of two U.S. utilities, Mr. Buckman has extensive experience in utility operation and management, safety assessment, engineering and construction management, project development and nuclear plant design.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement22
Back to Contents
 

Cheryl F. Campbell

Age:59

Director Since:April 2019

Current Board Committees:Safety and Nuclear Oversight (Chair); Compliance and Public Policy; Executive; Finance

Current Position:Consultant, Executive Director, Gold Shovel Standard Association (non-profit organization working to reduce damage to underground infrastructure)

Prior Positions:

Ms. Campbell spent 13 years at Xcel Energy, Inc. (utility supplier of electric power and natural gas service operating in eight Western and Midwestern states), most recently serving as the Senior Vice President, Gas and President and CEO of West Gas Interstate (a FERC-regulated pipeline owned by Xcel Energy) from 2011 to 2018. Prior to Xcel Energy Inc., Ms. Campbell worked for approximately 20 years at Coastal Corporation (El Paso Corporation) (provider of natural gas and related energy products) where she held various roles, including director.

Other Board Experience:

Ms. Campbell currently serves as a board member of Hoffman Southwest (a private equity-owned provider of water flow inspection, repair and cleaning services) (2018 to present). Ms. Campbell previously served as a member of the Engineering Advisory Committee of the University of Colorado College of Engineering, a member of the Gas Pipeline Advisory Committee to the Department of Transportation and a member of the Colorado Oil and Gas Association Board.

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Ms. Campbell has 35 years of energy experience in midstream, interstate pipelines and utilities. During her tenure at Xcel Energy, Ms. Campbell developed Xcel Energy’s risk management, regulatory, environmental and operating plans for its gas assets while improving operating and financial results across the enterprise. Ms. Campbell also developed the same programs for WestGas InterState while she was serving as its President and CEO. Her experience includes strategic planning, operations, regulatory and risk management. Ms. Campbell is a champion of public and employee safety and served on the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Gas Pipeline Advisory Committee from 2013 to 2018, providing guidance to the Secretary of Transportation on the safety of the nation’s gas pipeline infrastructure. Ms. Campbell also served as a member of the independent panel assessing the enterprise risk management and overall safety of the 11 gas utilities in Massachusetts in the aftermath of the September 2018 explosions and fires in Merrimack Valley.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement23
Back to Contents
 

Fred J. Fowler

Age:73

Director Since:March 2012

Current Board Committees:Finance; Safety and Nuclear Oversight

Most Recent Position:Retired Chairman of the Board, Spectra Energy Partners, LP (master limited partnership that owns natural gas transmission and storage assets)

Other Current Public Company Boards:Encana Corporation (natural gas producer) since 2010 (serves on corporate responsibility, environment, health and safety committee, and human resources and compensation committee); DCP Midstream Partners, LP (master limited partnership that owns, operates, acquires, and develops midstream energy assets) since 2015 (serves on audit committee)

Prior Positions:

In addition to serving as Chairman of the Board of Spectra Energy Partners, LP (2008 to 2013), Mr. Fowler was President and CEO of Spectra Energy Corp (natural gas gathering and processing, transmission and storage, and distribution company) (2006 to 2008) and served as a director of that company. Before that, he held various executive positions with Duke Energy Corporation (gas and electric energy company) and its subsidiaries and predecessor companies, including President and COO of Duke Energy.

Prior Public Board Service During the Past Five Years:

Spectra Energy Partners, LP (2008 to 2017)

Other Board Experience:

Mr. Fowler is the former Chairman of the Board of the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America and a former director of the Gas Research Institute, the Gas Technology Institute, and the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations.

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Mr. Fowler brings extensive knowledge and over 45 years of experience in utility company operations, including safety, natural gas and gas liquids production, transportation and marketing, and electricity generation, transmission and distribution. He brings leadership, management, and business skills developed as an executive and a director of numerous public and privately held companies.

 

William D. Johnson

Age:65

Director Since:May 2019 (Utility)

Current Position:CEO and President, PG&E Corporation

Prior Positions:

Mr. Johnson served as President and CEO of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) from 2012 to April 2019. Prior to his tenure at the TVA, Mr. Johnson was the Chairman, President and CEO of Progress Energy.

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Mr. Johnson brings over 20 years of utility experience and leadership as a utility industry executive. During his six-year tenure at TVA, he was responsible for leading the nation’s largest public utility in its mission of providing energy, environmental stewardship and economic development across a seven-state region. During Mr. Johnson’s time at TVA, the organization achieved the best safety records in its 85-year history and has been a perennial top decile safety performer in the utility industry. In that same period, retirement of more than half of TVA’s coal generation, resulting in a reduction of TVA’s carbon omissions by about 50% over the last decade. He was responsible for leading the generation of more than 50% of TVA’s energy from non-greenhouse gas emitting sources. He also oversaw TVA’s expansion into utility scale solar in recent years, with the addition of approximately 1,000 megawatts (mWs), and pursued the modernization of its hydro assets to increase the overall amount of renewable resources. TVA’s renewable portfolio includes almost 2,400 mWs of wind and solar and 5,800 mWs of hydro capacity. Throughout his career in the electric utilities industry, Mr. Johnson has collaborated closely with elected officials and other community leaders to deliver safe and reliable electricity to millions of customers.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement24
Back to Contents
 

Michael J. Leffell

Age:60

Director Since:April 2019

Current Board Committees:Nominating and Governance (Chair); Compliance and Public Policy; Executive

Current Position:Founder, Portage Partners LLC (a privately held company focused on sourcing, analyzing and monitoring non-traditional investment opportunities) and Chairman of Canoe Software (a financial technology company)

Prior Positions:

Prior to founding Portage Partners in 2010, Mr. Leffell was the Deputy Executive Managing Member of Davidson Kempner Capital Management, a global institutional investment management firm.

Prior Public Board Service During the Past Five Years:

Genco Shipping and Trading Limited (a publicly traded transportation services company) (2014 to 2016)

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Mr. Leffell has over 20 years of experience participating in the restructuring of multiple businesses under Chapter 11. In addition to serving as the Deputy Executive Managing Member of Davidson Kempner Capital Management, Mr. Leffell also co-managed the Distressed Investment strategy, including multiple positions in a broad range of large complex corporate restructuring and domestic and international bankruptcies that often implicated complex litigation.

 

Kenneth Liang

Age:57

Director Since:April 2019

Current Board Committees: Compensation; Finance 

Most Recent Position:Former senior Managing Director and Head of Restructurings, Oaktree Capital Management (a global alternative investment management firm with expertise in credit strategies)

Prior Positions:

From Oaktree’s formation in 1995 until June 2001, Mr. Liang was Oaktree’s General Counsel. Before that, he served as a Senior Vice President at TCW Group.

Prior Public Board Service During the Past Five Years:

Tribune Media (media/entertainment/real estate company) (2013 to 2015); STORE Capital Corporation (a real estate investment trust) (2012 to 2016)

Other Board Experience:

Mr. Liang served as chairman of the board of Excel Maritime (dry bulk shipping company) (2014 to 2018). He also served on the boards of Chassix (automotive parts company) (2016 to 2018) and of Pulse Electronics (mobile electronics company) (2015 to 2018). Mr. Liang has also served on the board of Flintridge Preparatory School (2012 to 2018).

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Mr. Liang was a senior Managing Director and Head of Restructurings at Oaktree Capital Management’s Opportunities Funds, Oaktree’s largest investment strategy fund. Mr. Liang retired from Oaktree in April 2018 after being with Oaktree since its inception over 20 years ago. Mr. Liang joined Oaktree at its formation in 1995 as an original equity holder and served as Oaktree’s General Counsel until June 2001. Mr. Liang has extensive U.S. and international experience as a significant stakeholder in prominent and complex restructurings of many troubled businesses inside and outside of Chapter 11 and in court-supervised reorganizations, including Enron, Energy Future Holdings, Tribune and Caesars Entertainment. Mr. Liang holds a J.D. from Georgetown University and a B.S. from the University of Southern California, has been a long-time California resident and has close family relatives who live in PG&E Corporation’s service area.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement25
Back to Contents
 

Dominique Mielle

Age:50

Director Since:April 2019

Current Board Committees: Audit (Chair); Executive

Most Recent Position:Former Partner and Senior Portfolio Manager, Canyon Partners LLC (an investment manager that specializes in value-oriented special situation investments for institutional investors)

Other Current Public Company Boards: Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (mortgage REIT investment firm) since 2018 (serves on the compensation committee (chair), audit committee and nominating and corporate governance committee); Studio City International since 2018 (serves on the nominating and corporate governance committee (chair), compensation committee and audit and risk committee)

Prior Positions:

Ms. Mielle was a partner and senior portfolio manager at Canyon Partners, where she worked from 1998 to 2017. Before 1998, she worked at various investment banks, including Libra Investments, Lehman Brothers and Credit Lyonnais.

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Ms. Mielle has played key roles in complicated bankruptcies where public safety and the economic well-being of the public were critical issues requiring extensive engagement with government entities, regulatory agencies and affected communities. Ms. Mielle was a member of the creditors’ committee for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and also served as a restructuring committee member of American Airlines, Continental Airlines, Delta Airlines, Northwest Airlines and United Airlines in the wake of the September 11 attacks. Ms. Mielle earned an MBA from Stanford University. She is a long-time California resident.

 

Meridee A. Moore

Age:61

Director Since:April 2019

Current Board Committees:Compensation (Chair); Executive; Finance; Nominating and Governance

Current Position:Founder, CEO and Chief Investment Officer of Watershed Asset Management (a San Francisco-based alternative asset manager)

Other Current Public Company Boards: Blackrock Capital Investment Corporation since 2017 (serves on the audit committee and governance & compensation committee)

Prior Positions:

Before founding Watershed Asset Management, Ms. Moore was a Partner and Portfolio Manager at Farallon Capital Management (a global institutional investment firm).

Other Board Experience:

Ms. Moore currently serves as a board member of Nextgen Climate America (NextGen Policy Center) (a California-based climate policy non-profit) (2014 to present) and as a director on the investment advisory board of Fiduciary Counselling Inc. Ms. Moore has served as a trustee of Right to Play International (2003 to 2018), Right to Play US (2004 to 2019), and Grace Cathedral (2011 to 2018). Ms. Moore also served on the boards of Morgans Hotel Group (2005 to 2007) and AMF Bowling Worldwide (2001 to 2003).

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Ms. Moore has over 25 years of investment and restructuring experience over a wide range of industries. She is the Founder, CEO and Chief Investment Officer of Watershed Asset Management, a San Francisco-based alternative asset manager. Watershed managed capital for institutional investors for 15 years. Ms. Moore has invested and participated in numerous restructurings in and out of Chapter 11, including PG&E Corporation’s restructuring in 2001. Ms. Moore is a long-time California resident.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement26
Back to Contents
 

Eric D. Mullins

Age:56

Director Since:September 2016

Current Board Committees:Audit; Safety and Nuclear Oversight

Current Position:Co-CEO of Lime Rock Resources, L.P. (private equity investment firm that acquires, operates, and improves oil and natural gas properties in the U.S.) since 2005

Other Current Public Company Boards:Anadarko Petroleum Company (independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company) since May 2012 (serves on audit committee (chair) and executive committee)

Prior Positions:

Prior to co-founding Lime Rock Resources, L.P. in 2005, Mr. Mullins worked in the investment banking division of Goldman Sachs & Co. for 15 years, most recently as managing director in the firm’s Energy and Power Group, where he led numerous financing, structuring, and strategic advisory transactions for public and private oil and gas exploration and production companies.

Other Board Experience:

Mr. Mullins currently serves as a member of the Baylor College of Medicine Board of Trustees.

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Mr. Mullins brings operational, business development, and mergers and acquisition experience in the energy sector, as well as director and audit committee experience from his other public company board service. He also brings strategic management, leadership, and corporate financial expertise developed as an executive in the investment banking industry working with both public and private companies in the natural resources and utilities sector.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement27
Back to Contents
 

Kristine M. Schmidt

Age:55

Director Since:April 2019

Current Board Committees:Compliance and Public Policy (Chair); Executive; Nominating and Governance; Safety and Nuclear Oversight

Most Recent Position:Former Chief Executive Officer of Peak Utility Services Group (utility services contractor)

Prior Positions:

Ms. Schmidt was the President, founder and owner of Swan Consulting Services (a consulting company that provides strategic, regulatory and advisory services to utilities and equipment and services related businesses in the electricity and natural gas utility industry) from 2015 to 2018. Before that, she was President of ITC Great Plains and Vice President at ITC Holdings (independent electric high voltage transmission owner and operator).

Other Board Experience:

Ms. Schmidt served as a member of the Western Energy Imbalance Market Governing Board (which has the primary governance responsibility and decisional authority for the interstate wholesale energy imbalance market in the western region). Ms. Schmidt also served on the board of Peak Utility Services Group in 2018.

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Ms. Schmidt has over 35 years of experience in the electricity industry, having worked for and consulted with some of the largest public utilities throughout the United States. Over the last 25 years, Ms. Schmidt’s experience was primarily in the regional wholesale market arena and high voltage transmission development and regulatory policies. The regional wholesale markets are critical across the United States to efficiently and cost-effectively integrate large scale renewables. Ms. Schmidt has served as a FERC Commissioner Advisor, addressing national policies and reforms resulting from the California Energy Crisis and FERC’s expanded authority from the Energy Policy Act, among other key policy issues. Ms. Schmidt was the Chair of the inaugural Western Energy Imbalance Market (WEIM) Governing Body, which promotes the integration of surplus renewables energy into the grid, and was a member of the board with governance responsibility over the wholesale energy imbalance market in the western region, including California. Ms. Schmidt was previously CEO of Peak Utility Services Group, a leading utility construction service provider. She was also a corporate officer with the nation’s largest independent high voltage transmission company, ITC Holdings Corporation, and the President of ITC Great Plains, which has the highest percentage of utility scale wind power in the nation. Ms. Schmidt has also held various senior management responsibilities for public utilities, including Xcel Energy, and served on the board of Peak Utility Services Group.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement28
Back to Contents
 

Alejandro D. Wolff

Age:62

Director Since:April 2019

Current Board Committees:Compensation; Compliance and Public Policy

Previous Position:Former Managing Director, Gryphon Partners (global advisory firm focused on emerging and frontier markets)

Other Current Public Company Boards:Albemarle Corporation (public specialty chemicals company) since 2015 (serves on the Health, Safety and Environment committee and as chair of the executive compensation committee); Versum Materials (public specialty chemicals company) since 2016 (serves as the lead independent director and chair of the governance and nominating committee)

Prior Positions:

Mr. Wolff served in the U.S. State Department for 34 years, including serving as the U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Chile from 2010 to 2013 and the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations from 2005 to 2010.

Other Board Experience:

Mr. Wolff currently serves as a board member of JetSMART Holdings Limited (private airline operating in South America) (2017 to present). Mr. Wolff is also an advisory board member of the Counter Extremism Project.

Experience, Skills, and Expertise:

Alejandro D. Wolff brings decades of experience in high-level political, economic, and security issues from his 34-year career in the U.S. State Department. His has experience managing natural disaster, conflict, and terrorist-response situations, and a successful negotiating record of bridging differences among numerous constituencies with competing interests. As Ambassador to the Republic of Chile, Mr. Wolff promoted U.S.-origin renewable energy alternatives for Chile, including solar power. Mr. Wolff currently serves as a director of Albemarle Corporation (“Albemarle”), a global specialty chemicals company. As a member of Albemarle’s Health, Safety & Environment Committee, Mr. Wolff brings considerable knowledge of clean energy, sustainability, renewable energy and electricity storage. Mr. Wolff also serves as the Lead Independent Director and Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of Versum Materials, an electronic materials company with operations in California, and as a director of JetSMART Holdings, an airline in South America. Mr. Wolff was a long-term resident of California, graduated from the University of California, Los Angeles, and continues to have close ties to California.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement29
Back to Contents

Corporate Governance

PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s corporate governance practices provide a framework within which the Boards and management can pursue strategies that will drive long-term value for the companies and their respective shareholders. The foundation for these practices is the independent nature of each Board and its fiduciary responsibility to the company’s shareholders. These practices are reviewed against industry trends and input from the companies’ institutional investors and other shareholders.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

Corporate governance practices are documented in Guidelines that are adopted by the Boards of PG&E Corporation and the Utility. The Guidelines are reviewed and updated from time to time as recommended by the Nominating and Governance Committee, and were last updated in April 2019. Other corporate governance practices also are set forth in the charters of the various committees of the Corporation and Utility Boards (see “Website Availability of Governance Documents” on page 105).

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

Chair of the Board – Duties; Executive Session Meetings

At both PG&E Corporation and the Utility, the Chair of the Board is a member of the Board. The Chair’s primary duty is to preside over meetings of the Board, including special meetings. The Chair also is responsible for setting meeting agendas and representing the Board in any meeting with major shareholders. Additionally, the Chair is consulted regarding Board nominees and the composition and chairmanship of Board committees.

At both companies, the independent directors meet at each regularly scheduled Board meeting in executive session. These executive session meetings generally are chaired by the independent Chair of the Board (or if the Chair is not independent, by the independent lead director). Nora Mead Brownell is PG&E Corporation’s independent non-executive Chair of the Board, and Jeffrey L. Bleich is the Utility’s independent non-executive Chair of the Board. Ms. Brownell chairs executive session meetings of the Corporation’s independent directors as well as concurrent executive session meetings of the Corporation’s and the Utility’s independent directors; Mr. Bleich chairs executive session meetings of the Utility’s independent directors only. The independent Chair establishes the agenda for each executive session meeting, and also determines which, if any, other individuals (including members of management) attend each meeting.

Chair of the Board and CEO Positions

Each company’s Board maintains a flexible policy regarding board leadership structure, including whether the offices of Chair and CEO (or President, if the office of CEO is not filled) should be separate and, if the roles are separate, whether the Chair should be elected from management or from among the non-management directors. The Board regularly assesses the appropriateness of the Board’s leadership structure, given the specific facts at the time of assessment.

PG&E Corporation

At PG&E Corporation, the positions of Chair and CEO have been separate since March 1, 2017. In April 2019, Nora Mead Brownell became PG&E Corporation’s independent non-executive Chair of the Board. Separating the roles of Chair and CEO allows the CEO (Bill Johnson) to continue to focus on the business of PG&E Corporation and its strategic priorities during this time of transition, while the Chair leads the Board of Directors. Among other things, Ms. Brownell’s extensive utility, regulatory, and leadership experience will allow her to support the CEO during this time of transition, while serving as an effective link between the Board and the CEO.

2019 Joint Proxy StatementINDEPENDENCE30
Back to Contents

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

At the Utility, the positions of Chair and principal executive officer have been separated since January 2008. In April 2019, Jeffrey L. Bleich became the independent non-executive Chair of the Board. Nickolas Stavropoulos retired as President of the Utility on August 30, 2018. The office of President has not been filled since that time, and since April 12, 2019, the functions of the office of Utility President have been allocated among the following three individuals: Michael Lewis (Senior Vice President, Electric Operations), Jesus Soto, Jr. (Senior Vice President, Gas Operations), and Jim Welsch (Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer). Under this interim structure, all three individuals are principal executive officers of the Utility. Continuing to separate the Chair and principal executive officer roles preserves continuity during this period of transition at the Utility. In addition, the Utility is able to benefit from the complementary skill sets and business experiences of the independent non-executive Chair (Mr. Bleich) and the principal executive officers (Messrs. Lewis, Soto, and Welsch). As a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation, the Utility also benefits from the fact that Ms. Brownell is a member of the Utility Board, as well as from her perspective as PG&E Corporation Chair. Pursuant to the CPUC’s affiliate rules, no individual may serve as Chair of the Board, CEO, or President, or in a functionally equivalent position, of both PG&E Corporation and the Utility.

Independent Lead Director

At each company, if the Chair is not independent, then the independent directors must elect an independent lead director from among the independent chairs of the standing PG&E Corporation and Utility Board committees. Currently, each company has an independent Chair, and neither company has an independent lead director.

For more information on the criteria and specific duties of a lead director, please see each company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines (see “Website Availability of Governance Documents” on page 105).

2019 Joint Proxy Statement31
Back to Contents

BOARD AND DIRECTOR GENERAL INDEPENDENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

 

On both PG&E Corporation’s Board, andall of the Utility’s Board, at least 75 percent of thecurrent non-employee directors are independent as requireddefined by each company’s Guidelines.the NYSE. The definitions of “independence” are identical for each company, are set forthindependence found in each company’sthe Corporation and Utility’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and reflect the applicable NYSE definitions. Each company’s Guidelinesdefinitions and are available on the company’s website (see “Website Availability of Governance Documents” on page 105).website.

 

A majorityOn the Utility's Board, all of PG&E Corporation’sthe current non-employee directors also are independent as defined by the NYSE. The Utility Board is exempt from NYSE American rules requiring that at least a majority of the directors meet thethat stock exchange’s definition of “independent director” because PG&E Corporation holds approximately 96 percent of the voting power of the Utility and the Utility is a “controlled” subsidiary.

 

The Boards of the Corporation and the Utility have determined that each of the following director nominees is independent according to the applicable company’s Guidelines: Richard R. Barrera, Jeffrey L. Bleich, Nora Mead Brownell, Frederick W. Buckman, Cheryl F. Campbell, Fred J. Fowler, Michael J. Leffell, Kenneth Liang, Dominique Mielle, Meridee A. Moore, Eric D. Mullins, Kristine M. Schmidt, and Alejandro D. Wolff. PG&E Corporation and the Utility also have determined that from January 1, 20182020 to the date of this Proxy Statement, each of the following past directors was independent while serving on the Boards, according to the applicable company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines: Lewis Chew, Jeh C.Richard R. Barrera, Jeffrey L. Bleich, Nora Mead Brownell, Fred J. Fowler, William D. Johnson, Richard C. Kelly, Roger H. Kimmel, RichardMichael J. Leffell, Dominique Mielle, Meridee A. Meserve, Forrest E. Miller, Benito Minicucci, Rosendo G. Parra, Barbara L. Rambo,Moore, Eric D. Mullins, Kristine M. Schmidt, and Anne Shen Smith. (Jeh C. Johnson, who resigned as a director ofAlejandro D. Wolff.

We found no transactions or relationships that would compromise any non-employee director’s general independence during 2020. We considered that (1) during 2020 the Utility on December 7, 2017, served on the Board of the Corporation as of January 1, 2018 but did not stand for reelection at the Corporation’s 2018 annual meeting of shareholders and served through the last day of his term, May 22, 2018. Roger H. Kimmel served on the Boards of the Corporation and the Utility but resigned from both Boards on January 14, 2019. The remaining past directors left the Boards in April 2019.)

In assessing each director’s and director nominee’s independence, the companies considered transactions between PG&E Corporation or the Utility and their respective directors and director nominees, their immediate family members, and certain entities with which the directors, director nominees, or their immediate family members were affiliated. These transactions primarily involved (a) the Utility’s provision of utility services at rates or charges fixed in conformity with law or governmental authority and (b)paid membership fees paid(less than $10,000) to a non-profit entity affiliated withon which one of the companies’ non-employee directors (in amounts belowserved as interim executive officer at the $10,000 threshold for Audit Committee review pursuant tobeginning of 2020; and (2) that one former non-employee director had a family member who is a non-partner executive at the companies’ Related Party Transaction Policy), which the Boards determined were not material andindependent auditor, but who did not affect the director’sprovide audit or director nominee’s independence.attest services.

 

There are no family relationships between any director of the Corporation or the Utility, executive officer of the Corporation or the Utility, or person nominated or chosen to become a director or executive officer of the Corporation or the Utility.

 

2019 Joint Proxy Statement

32
Back to Contents

COMMITMENT TO OUR BOARD COMMITTEE DUTIES

 

The BoardsDuring 2020, there were 38 meetings of the PG&E Corporation Board. Each of the current Corporation directors attended 95 percent or more of the aggregate of all meetings of the Corporation Board and of the Corporation Board committees held during the time in which that director served during 2020.

During 2020, there were 38 meetings of the Utility have numerous permanent standing committees, which support each Board’s basic responsibilities.Board. Each Board also may establish temporaryad hoccommittees, subcommittees, or other informal governing bodies from time to time.

Each Board’s permanent standing committees are described below. For each of these committees, the applicable company’s Board has adopted a formal charter that sets forth the committee’s duties and responsibilities; current copies of the charters are available oncurrent Utility directors attended 95 percent or more of the companies’ websites (see “Website Availabilityaggregate of Governance Documents” on page 105).

Where a committee exists at PG&E Corporation only, that committee’s responsibilities include assisting and advisingall meetings of the Utility Board on matters withinand of the committee’s scope of responsibility.Utility Board committees held during the time in which that director served during 2020.

 

Committee Name(1)CompanyPrimary Duties/Scope of Responsibility
ExecutivePG&E Corporation and UtilityExercises powers and performs duties of the applicable Board, subject to limits imposed by state law.
Audit(2)PG&E Corporation and UtilityOversees and monitors:
Integrity of the company financial statements, and financial and accounting practices
Internal controls over financial reporting, and external and internal auditing programs
Selection and oversight of the companies’ Independent Auditor
Compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, in concert with other Board committees
Related party transactions
With the assistance of other Board committees, risk management and assessment
CompensationPG&E CorporationOversees matters relating to compensation and benefits, including:
Compensation for non-employee directors
Development, selection, and compensation of policy-making officers
Annual approval of the corporate goals and objectives of the PG&E Corporation CEO and the Utility CEO (or if the Utility CEO office is not filled, any Utility President or Principal Executive Officer)
Management evaluation and officer succession
Employment, compensation, and benefits policies and practices
Potential risks arising from compensation policies and practices
Retention and oversight of the Committee’s independent compensation consultants, legal counsel, or other advisors
Compliance and Public PolicyPG&E CorporationCoordinates the compliance-related oversight of the various committees of the Boards, including:
The companies’ compliance and ethics program
Compliance with laws, regulations, and internal policies and standards
Internal or external compliance reviews, investigations, or audits
Oversees public policy, sustainability, and corporate responsibility issues that could affect customers, shareholders, or employees, including:
Energy and utility policy positions
Environmental protection, quality, and compliance
Community relations programs, activities, and contributions
Political contributions and political activities
Workforce development and diversity and inclusion
Supplier diversity
FinancePG&E CorporationOversees matters relating to financial and investment planning, policies, and risks, including:
Strategic plans and initiatives
Financial and investment plans and strategies(3)
Dividend policy
Proposed capital projects and divestitures
Financing plans
Use of derivative instruments
Major commercial banking, investment banking, financial consulting, insurance, and other financial relationships
Major financial risk exposures

2019 Joint Proxy Statement33
Back to Contents
Committee Name(1)CompanyPrimary Duties/Scope of Responsibility
Nominating and GovernancePG&E CorporationOversees matters relating to selection of directors and corporate governance, including:
Recommending Board candidates, including reviewing skills and characteristics required of Board members
Selection of the chairmanship and membership of Board committees, and the nomination of a lead director of each company’s Board, if necessary
Corporate governance matters, including the companies’ governance principles and practices, and the review of shareholder proposals
Evaluation of the Boards’ performance and effectiveness
Safety and Nuclear OversightPG&E Corporation and UtilityOversees matters relating to safety, operational performance, and compliance issues related to the Utility’s nuclear, generation, gas and electric transmission, and gas and electric distribution operations and facilities (“Operations and Facilities”), including:
Principal risks arising out of the Operations and Facilities, the process used by management to analyze and identify these risks, and the effectiveness of programs to manage or mitigate these risks
The Corporation’s and the Utility’s goals, programs, policies, and practices with respect to promoting a strong safety culture
Periodically visiting the Utility’s nuclear and other operating facilities
(1)This chart provides information regarding duties for the Boards’ permanent standing committees. Each of the Corporation and Utility Boards also has established an ad hoc committee to assist the Board and its committees in a review of issues related to the Chapter 11 Cases.
(2)Established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
(3)Each year, the Finance Committee presents for the PG&E Corporation and the Utility Boards’ review and/or concurrence (1) a multi-year financial outlook for the Corporation and the Utility that, among other things, summarizes projected financial performance and establishes the basis for the annual budgets, and (2) an annual financial performance plan that establishes financial objectives and sets operating expense and capital spending budgets that reflect the first year of the multi-year financial outlook. Members of the Boards receive a monthly report that compares actual to budgeted financial performance and provides other information about financial and operational performance.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement34
Back to Contents

COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP, INDEPENDENCE, AND QUALIFICATIONSUnder each company’s Guidelines, directors are expected to attend annual meetings of that company’s shareholders. There was no annual meeting held in 2020 for either company, due to the companies’ Chapter 11 proceedings.

 

The current membership of PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s standing Board committees as of the date of this Proxy Statement is shown in the table below.

 Executive
Committees
Audit
Committees
Compensation
Committee
Compliance
and Public
Policy
Committee
Finance
Committee
Nominating
and
Governance
Committee
Safety and
Nuclear
Oversight
Committees
Independent Directors:       
Richard R. BarreraXX    
Jeffrey L. Bleich(1)X  X  X
Nora Mead Brownell(2)X     X
Frederick W. Buckman X    X
Cheryl F. CampbellX  XX 
Fred J. Fowler    X X
Michael J. LeffellX  X  
Kenneth Liang  X X  
Dominique Mielle(3)X     
Meridee A. MooreX  XX 
Eric D. Mullins(3) X    X
Kristine M. SchmidtX   XX
Alejandro D. Wolff  XX   
Employee Directors:       
William D. Johnson(4)X      
Number of Meetings in 2018 (PG&E Corporation/Utility where applicable)0/08/836636/6

 Committee Chair

(1)Chair of the Utility Executive Committee only. Independent non-executive Chair of the Utility Board.
(2)Chair of the Corporation Executive Committee only. Independent non-executive Chair of the PG&E Corporation Board.
(3)Independent audit committee financial expert, as defined by the SEC and applicable stock exchanges, and as determined by the Boards. Background information on each audit committee financial expert can be found in the director biographies beginning on page 21.
(4)Member of Utility Board and Executive Committee only.

Committee Membership Requirements

Each of the permanent standing committees (other than the Executive Committees) is composed entirely of independent directors, as defined in the applicable company’s Guidelines and the committee’s charter. In addition, the Audit Committees, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee are composed entirely of independent directors, as required and defined by the NYSE. Because the Utility is a “controlled” subsidiary of PG&E Corporation for purposes of the NYSE American standards, the Utility is not subject to NYSE American rules that otherwise would require that the Utility’s Board committees responsible for executive compensation and governance be comprised of “independent” directors, as defined by NYSE American, and would impose requirements on the Utility’s director nomination and compensation-setting processes.

Each member of the Audit Committees and each member of the Compensation Committee also satisfies heightened independence standards established by SEC rules and applicable stock exchange requirements regarding independence of audit committee members and compensation committee members. Each member of the Audit Committees also is financially literate. Each “audit committee financial expert” is identified in the above table, and has accounting and related financial management expertise.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement35
Back to Contents

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During fiscal year 2018, the members of the Compensation Committee were Forrest E. Miller (Chair), Richard C. Kelly, Rosendo G. Parra and Barbara L. Rambo. There were no impermissible interlocks or inside directors on the Compensation Committee.

DIRECTOR SERVICE ON OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS

 

If a director is considering serving on the board of another public company (in addition to PG&E Corporation, the Utility, and their respective subsidiaries), that director must inform the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Chair of the Board of the Corporation and/or the Utility, as applicable, before accepting membership on any such board. Unless otherwise approved by the applicable Board, (1) a director may not serve on more than three public company boards (in addition to the Corporation and Utility Boards) and (2) a director who is the principal executive officer of a public company (including the Corporation and the Utility) may not serve on more than two public company boards in addition to the board of his or her employer. For these purposes, the Boards of the Corporation and the Utility would count as one board.

 

If an Audit Committee member simultaneously serves on the audit committees of three or more public companies other than PG&E Corporation, the Utility, and their respective subsidiaries, that Committee member must inform the applicable company’s Board. In order for that member to continue serving on the Audit Committees, each Board must affirmatively determine that the simultaneous service does not impair that committee member’s ability to serve effectively on the applicable Audit Committee.

 

All members of the Boards are in compliance with the above policies regarding service on other public company boards, as well as on audit committees of other public company boards.

DIRECTOR MEETING ATTENDANCE DURING 2018

During 2018, there were 23 meetings of the PG&E Corporation Board. Each of the incumbent Corporation directors attended 95% or more of the aggregate of all meetings of the Corporation Board and of the Corporation Board committees on which that director served during 2018.

During 2018, there were 23 meetings of the Utility Board. Each of the incumbent Utility directors attended 95% or more of the aggregate of all meetings of the Utility Board and of the Utility Board committees on which that director served during 2018.

Each member of the Board of PG&E Corporation or the Utility is expected to attend that company’s annual meetings of shareholders. With the exception of one director, all 12 then-current directors attended the Corporation’s 2018 annual meeting, and all 12 then-current directors attended the Utility’s 2018 annual meeting. Jeh Johnson was a member of the PG&E Corporation Board at the time of the 2018 annual meeting (which was the last day of his term), but was not renominated for election at, and did not attend, that meeting.

DIRECTOR NOMINATION PROCESS

As part of the companies’ commitment to change, the Boards of PG&E Corporation and the Utility conducted a board refreshment process to add fresh perspectives to the Boards to help address the serious challenges the companies face now and in the future. Although the Boards of the Corporation and the Utility historically sought to balance board refreshment with established board experience, the Corporation and the Utility are facing extraordinary challenges resulting from the 2017 and 2018 Northern California wildfires. In light of these extraordinary challenges, the Corporation and the Utility determined to make substantial changes to their respective Boards.

On January 4, 2019, the Corporation Board issued a press release announcing that, as part of a series of changes to reinforce the companies’ commitment to safety and improvement, the Corporation Board was conducting a board refreshment process that included searching for new directors at both the Corporation and the Utility. The Nominating and Governance Committee engaged Spencer Stuart, a leading national search firm, to assist the Nominating and Governance Committee in identifying and evaluating potential new director nominees.

As a result of the board refreshment process, in April 2019, eleven new directors joined two continuing directors on the Boards of PG&E Corporation and the Utility, with eight of ten then-incumbent directors stepping down. Mr. Johnson joined the Utility Board in May 2019.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement3619
 
Back to Contents

The following sections of this Proxy Statement describe PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s ordinary course director nomination process, which differs in some respects from the substantial board refreshment process culminating in April 2019.Our Governance Practices

 

Company Nominees – Characteristics and QualificationsWe believe our current governance practices provide the foundation for excellence. Our practices include:

 

All non-executive directors are independent, includingBoard chairsRegular executive sessions without management
All independent committees (other than ExecutiveCommittees)Ongoing director education
Proxy access provisions consistent with market standardsBoard oversight of key areas, including risk,cybersecurity, safety, sustainability, and compliance andethics
Director over-boarding policy prohibiting service onmore than three other boardsExecutive and director stock ownership guidelines
Majority vote for directors, with mandatory resignationpolicy and plurality carve-out for contested electionsOne share, one vote
Policy limiting obtaining certain types of services fromthe independent auditorBoard input into agendas
Annual Board and Committee evaluationsConfidential voting policy for uncontested elections
No anti-takeover poison pill - shareholder approvalrequired for adoptionNo supermajority vote requirements

In general,

Many of our governance practices are documented in the Guidelines adopted by the Boards of PG&E Corporation and the Utility each select nominees for director basedand available on recommendations receivedour website. These Guidelines are reviewed and updated from time to time as recommended by the Nominating and Governance Committee.

LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

PG&E Corporation 

The Committee’s recommendations are based upon a reviewpositions of Chair and principal executive officer have been separated since March 2017. In July 2020, Robert C. Flexon became the independent non-executive Chair of the qualificationsCorporation Board. The Corporation Board believes that it is appropriate to separate the Chair and CEO positions, so that the PG&E Corporation CEO (Ms. Poppe) can focus on management of the business and execution of key strategic initiatives, while Mr. Flexon leads the Board’s independent oversight of management.

Mr. Flexon’s responsibilities include presiding over meetings of the Corporation Board, candidatesincluding special meetings, as well as executive session of the Corporation’s independent directors and consultation withconcurrent executive session meetings of the Corporation and Utility Boards.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

The positions of Chair and principal executive officer have been separated since January 2008. In July 2020, Dean L. Seavers became the independent non-executive Chair of the Utility Board. As of March 2021, no single individual serves as the Utility’s principal executive officer, and the Utility Board has allocated the duties and powers of the office of the Utility President to both Adam L. Wright, who since February 2021 has served as the Utility’s Executive Vice President, Operations and Chief Operating Officer, and Marlene Santos, who since March 2021 has served as the Utility’s Executive Vice President and Chief Customer Officer. Separating the roles of Chair and principal executive officer allows the Utility to preserve continuity while continuing to attract and retain top talent and allows customers and other stakeholders to benefit from the complementary skill sets and business experiences of Mr. Seavers, Mr. Wright, and Ms. Santos. As a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation, the Utility also benefits from the fact that Mr. Flexon is a member of the Utility Board. Pursuant to the CPUC’s affiliate rules, no individual may serve as Chair of the Board, CEO, or President, or in a functionally equivalent position, of both PG&E Corporation and the Corporation or the Utility, as applicable, and with the Corporation CEO.Utility.   

 

The Nominating and Governance Committee’s goal is to create for each company a balanced and multi-disciplinary Board composed of qualified, dedicated, ethical, and highly regarded individuals who have experience relevant to the company’s operations, understand the complexitiesMr. Seavers’ responsibilities include presiding over meetings of the company’s business environment,Utility Board only, including special meetings and possess capabilities to provide valuable insight, judgment, and oversight. The Committee also considers overall independence of the Boards, as defined in each company’s Guidelines.

The Committee considers factors such as diversity, age, skills, and any other factors that it deems appropriate, and annually reviews and recommends to the Boards the appropriate skills and characteristics required of Board members, given the current composition and needs of each company’s Board. Since 2018, the Committee has considered specific safety experience as an assessment factor in its director nomination process, and the extent to which nominees (both individually and as a group) possess the experience, skills, and expertise shown in the chart on page 19. In its consideration of diversity, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Boards seek to include a diversity of backgrounds, perspectives and skills among the Boards’ members, as well as applicable legal requirements. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews the composition of the companies’ Boards and Board committees, including with respect to the companies’ commitment to the diversity of the Boards.

Under each company’s Board of Directors retirement policy, the Boards may not designate any person as a candidate for election or re-election as a director after such person has reached the age of 75, unless the applicable company’s Board determines that it is in the best interests of the company to re-nominate that director. Under this policy, the Boards also consider tenure, and generally target an average tenure for all directors of 10 years or less. In general, the Nominating and Governance Committee will recommend, and the Boards will re-nominate, an existing director for re-election if the Committee and the Boards each believe that the individual would continue to be a productive and effective contributor to the Boards.

Director Nominee Selection Process

executive session.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement3720
 
Back to Contents

Company Nominees – SourcesLead Independent Director

At each company, if the Chair is not independent, then the independent directors must elect a lead independent director from among the independent chairs of the standing PG&E Corporation and Utility Board committees. Currently, each company has an independent Chair, and so neither company has a lead independent director.

COMMITTEES AND MEMBERSHIP

Committee Responsibilities

The Boards of PG&E Corporation and the Utility have permanent standing committees, which support each Board’s basic responsibilities, with formal charters that set forth their responsibilities. Each Board also may establish temporary ad hoc committees, subcommittees, or other informal governing bodies from time to time.

Where a committee exists at PG&E Corporation only, that committee’s responsibilities include assisting and advising the Utility Board on matters within the committee’s scope of responsibility.

 

As shown in the diagram above,needs of the Nominatingenterprise change, the composition and Governance Committee accepts recommendationsresponsibilities of the committees may change, particularly as the inter-connected nature of many of the responsibilities continues to manifest. Consolidation of some of the committees may allow for director nominees from a variety of sources, including independent executive search firms, shareholders, management,directors to apply their skills more broadly and Board members. The Committee uses the same criteria to review all candidates recommended for nomination at the annual meetings, including candidates recommended by shareholders.

Shareholders may recommend a person for the Committee to consider as a nominee for director of PG&E Corporation or the Utility, as applicable, by writing to that company’s Corporate Secretary. Each such recommendation must include:connect related oversight responsibilities.

 

Committee Name1.CompanyA brief descriptionPrimary Duties/Scope of Responsibility
ExecutivePG&E Corporation and UtilityExercises powers and performs duties of the candidate,applicable Board, subject to limits imposed by state law.
Audit(1)PG&E Corporation and UtilityOversees and monitors:

Integrity of the company financial statements, and financial and accounting practices

Internal controls over financial reporting, and external and internal auditing programs
Selection and oversight of the companies’ Independent Auditor
Compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, in concert with other Board committees
Related party transactions
CompensationPG&E CorporationOversees matters relating to compensation and benefits, including:
Compensation for non-employee directors
Development, selection, and compensation of policy-making officers
Annual approval of the corporate goals and objectives of the PG&E Corporation CEO and the Utility CEO (or if that position is not filled, the principal executive officer(s))
Management evaluation and officer succession planning
Employment, compensation, and benefits policies and practices
Compliance andPublic PolicyPG&E CorporationCoordinates compliance-related oversight and oversees public policy, sustainability, and corporate responsibility issues, including:
The companies’ compliance and ethics program
Energy and utility policy positions
Environmental protection and sustainability
Community relations programs, activities, and contributions
Political contributions and political activities
Workforce development and diversity and inclusion

 

2.The candidate’s name, age, business address, and residence address,

3.The candidate’s principal occupation and the class and number of shares of the company’s stock owned by the shareholder and the candidate,

4.Any other information that would be required under the rules of the SEC in a proxy statement listing the candidate as a nominee for director, and

5.Any material interest that the shareholder has in the candidate’s nomination.

Recommended candidates may be required to provide additional information. The companies also may request additional information regarding the candidate or the shareholder, consistent with the information requirements applicable to shareholder nominations.

The following nominees for election at the 2019 Annual Meetings who have not previously stood for election were recommended by the Corporation shareholders: Barrera, Campbell, Brownell, Buckman, Leffell, Liang, Mielle, Moore, Schmidt, and Wolff. The following nominees for election at the 2019 Annual Meetings who have not previously stood for election were initially identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee’s independent executive search firms: Bleich and Johnson.

Shareholder Nominations

On February 17, 2016, the PG&E Corporation Board adopted proxy access bylaw provisions that permit shareholders owning 3 percent or more of the Corporation’s outstanding common stock for at least three years to nominate the greater of two directors or 20 percent of the Board, and to include these nominees in the Corporation’s proxy materials. The number of shareholders who may aggregate their shares to meet the ownership threshold is limited to 20. Nominations are subject to the eligibility, procedural, and disclosure requirements set forth in the Corporation’s bylaws.

Shareholders of either company who wish to nominate directors directly at an annual meeting in accordance with the procedures in the applicable company’s bylaws should follow the instructions under “2020 Annual Meetings - Can shareholders introduce proposals (other than proxy access proposals, but including director nominations) during the 2020 annual meetings?” on page 106.

BOARD AND COMMITTEE SELF-EVALUATIONS

The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees the process for evaluating and assessing the performance of the PG&E Corporation and Utility Boards, as applicable, including Board committees. At least annually, each Board or the Nominating and Governance Committee conducts an evaluation to determine whether the applicable Board as a whole and its committees are functioning effectively.

If the evaluation is conducted by the Nominating and Governance Committee, that Committee presents its conclusions to the applicable full Board for review and concurrence.

For each of the Corporation and the Utility, the Board evaluation includes an assessment of the Board’s contribution as a whole and of specific areas in which the Board and/or management believes that a better contribution could be made. The evaluation also considers any feedback that might be received from individual directors regarding the performance of the chair. The Audit Committees, the Compensation Committee, the Compliance and Public Policy Committee, the Finance Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, and the Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees conduct annual self-evaluations. The Nominating and Governance Committee may request the results of any Board committee evaluation for consideration in the Board evaluation.

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement3821
 
Back to Contents
Committee NameCompanyPrimary Duties/Scope of Responsibility
Finance(2)PG&E CorporationOversees matters relating to financial and investment planning, policies, and risks, including:
Financial and investment plans and strategies, including a multi-year financial outlook
Dividend policy
Proposed capital projects and divestitures
Financing plans
Nominating andGovernancePG&E CorporationOversees matters relating to selection of directors and corporate governance, including:
Recommendation of Board candidates, including a review of skills and characteristics required of Board members
Selection of the chairs and membership of Board committees, and the nomination of a lead director of each company’s Board, as necessary
Corporate governance matters, including the companies’ governance principles and practices, and the review of shareholder proposals
Evaluation of the Boards’ performance and effectiveness
Safety and NuclearOversightPG&E Corporation and UtilityOversees matters relating to safety, risk, wildfire safety, and operational performance, including:
Safety programs, promotion of safety culture, and long-term and short-term safety plans
Wildfire risk reduction and performance against the wildfire safety commitments made by the Utility
Operational performance and risks related to the Utility’s nuclear, generation, and gas and electric transmission and distribution facilities
Technology and CybersecurityPG&E CorporationOversees matters related to the deployment and use of technology, as well as cybersecurity risks, including:
Deployment of technology linked to operational performance
Cybersecurity measures and controls
Evaluation of new technology
(1)Established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
(2)Each year, the Finance Committee presents for the PG&E Corporation and the Utility Boards’ review and/or concurrence (1) a multi-year financial outlook for the Corporation and the Utility that, among other things, summarizes projected financial performance and establishes the basis for the annual budgets, and (2) an annual financial performance plan that establishes financial objectives and sets operating expense and capital spending budgets that reflect the first year of the multi-year financial outlook. Members of the Boards receive a monthly report that compares actual to budgeted financial performance and provides other information about financial and operational performance.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   22
Back to Contents

Committee Membership Requirements

Committee Membership

Reflects membership as of April 8, 2021.

 Audit(1)CompFinanceNominating &
Governance
Safety &
Nuclear
Oversight(1)
Compliance
& Public
Policy
Technology &
Cyber
security
Executive(1)
R. Bahri      
C. Campbell    
K. Cooper     
J. Denecour      
M. Ferguson        
R. Flexon      
C. Fugate      
A. Harris      
M. Niggli      
D. Seavers      
W. Smith       
D. Treseder      
B. Wilson      
J. Woolard       
Number of Meetings in 202061614611104

(1)Meetings of the Corporation and Utility committees are concurrent, and numbers reflect numbers for both committees.

Independent Committee MemberCommittee Chair

The Audit Committees, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee annually considersare composed entirely of independent directors, as required and defined by the formatNYSE.

Each of the evaluations, including whetherstanding committees (other than the Executive Committees) is composed entirely of independent directors, as defined in the applicable company’s Guidelines and the Committee’s charters.

The Utility is a third-party facilitator should“controlled” subsidiary of PG&E Corporation for purposes of the NYSE American standards. Therefore, the Utility is not subject to NYSE American rules that otherwise would require that the Utility’s Board committees responsible for executive compensation and governance consist of “independent” directors, and would impose requirements on the Utility’s director nomination and compensation-setting processes. 

Each member of the Audit Committees and each member of the Compensation Committee also satisfies heightened independence standards established by SEC rules and applicable stock exchange requirements regarding independence of audit committee members and compensation committee members. There were no impermissible interlocks or inside directors on the Compensation Committee.

Each member of the Audit Committees also is financially literate. The following Audit Committee members have been identified as audit committee financial experts (and background information for each audit committee financial expert can be used. Since 2015, the evaluation process has included:found in their director biographies beginning on page 8:

 

1.Rajat BahriOne-on-one interviewsRobert C. FlexonBenjamin F. Wilson

Members of the Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees are required to have special expertise in one of the following areas (pursuant to an agreement reached with the CPUC):

Specific substantial expertise related to wildfire safety, wildfire prevention, and/or wildfire mitigation
Specific substantial expertise related to the safe operation of a natural gas distribution company
Specific substantial expertise related to enterprise risk management, including cyber security, and/or experience with each director to solicit each director’s input regarding Board and committee performance. Interview topics also address the annual performance of the PG&E Corporation CEO and the Utility Principal Executive Officer(s). The Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Chairs of the Boards conduct the one-on-one interviews with each director.nuclear safety

 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   2.The Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Chairs of the Boards provide Board Committee feedback to each Committee Chair.23

3.The Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Chairs of the Boards, and the PG&E Corporation CEO discuss the results of the one-on-one interviews.

Back to Contents4.Each Committee and the full Board conduct separate self-evaluations that include actionable follow-up items for the coming year.

RISK MANAGEMENTOVERSIGHT

 

SinceThe Boards oversee and provide guidance on the San Bruno tragedy in 2010,business, and monitor the performance of the Utility and the Corporation. The Boards have continuously soughtdelegated responsibility for day-to-day business operations to enhance the quality of oversight for risk management, compliance, and safety. In addition to receiving regular deep dive reviews of enterprise-level risks, risk management at the companies has transitioned from a largely qualitative approach to a quantitative one. This approach continues to evolve with the development and use of operational risk modeling to support data-driven decision making – a direction supported by the CPUC.senior management.

Risk

 

In recent years,2020, PG&E took significant steps to enhance risk management, including appointing a Chief Risk Officer with significant experience in managing operational risk and further strengthening risk-modeling capabilities that rigorous strategic process has begun to explicitly recognize risks from a changing climate, including heat waves, more frequentinform the planning and extreme storms and wildfires, drought, subsidence, and rising sea levels. In 2017, we launched an arrayexecution of foundational work to helpmitigate PG&E’s highest operational risks. PG&E receives regular feedback from the Utility anticipateCPUC and planother stakeholders about its risk management practices. This feedback is used to continue working to improve the use of quantitative models to distinguish risk at greater levels of detail, including taking into consideration low-frequency, high-consequence events in risk assessment. For example, PG&E has recently developed and implemented machine learning capabilities for changingits wildfire risk models enabling an evolution from static to dynamic models that are informed by fire ignition probability and potential wildfire consequences, including considering fast-burning fuels, predictive fire behavior, and buildings and population density impacts. The recently implemented risk models further improve upon the fire spread predictive capabilities by incorporating fire scars from actual wildfires, including consideration of prevailing weather conditions, topography, and climate-change related events.

In 2018, the Utility engaged independent expertsfuels. These models are being used to advise on best practices ininform key wildfire safety. Recommendations will inform the prioritizationsafety measures, such as enhanced vegetation management and resourcingsystem hardening, as part of critical risk mitigation work and will feed into the nextPG&E’s 2021 Wildfire Mitigation Plan, to be filed withwhich is focused on addressing the CPUC, which now is an annual requirement.

As described below,highest risk areas for mitigation as the companies’ risk management governance structures allow risks to be assessed both under a Board-directed review process and also from a “bottoms-up” approach that allows operational experts to add their knowledge and identify emerging issues for the companies.

Further, and as described more fully on pages 39–41, the companies have also strengthened board and management-level duties with regards to related aspects of risk oversight and management, including board oversight for compliance and ethics, and safety.

Board-Level Dutiestop-most priority.  

 

The Boards oversee the companies’ enterprise risk management policiesprocess through reports and programsdiscussions regarding key risk areas provided by management at Board and management has day-to-day responsibility for assessing and managing exposure to various risks.

Committee meetings. Enterprise risks are reviewed at least annually by the Boards’ Audit Committees. The Audit Committees also oversee the guidelines and policies that govern the processes by which major risks are assessed and managed, and allocate responsibility for oversight for specific risk categories is allocated to various Board committees, (and this allocation is reviewed once every 12 months), consistent with the substantive scope of each committee’s charter. Each such committee provides a report of its activities to the applicable Board.Boards. The specific allocation of Board-level risk oversight was last reviewed by the Audit Committees in 2018, resultingDecember 2020, and is reviewed at least annually.

Board and Committee Risk Oversight Responsibilities
Audit: Oversees enterprise risk program, and guidelines and policies that govern the processes by which major risks are assessed and managed. Allocates oversight of specific risks to CommitteesSafety and Nuclear Oversight: Oversees risks arising from operations, including safety, electric, gas and generation operations, and risks associated with facilities, wildfire, and emergency response
Finance Committee: Oversees risks associated with financial markets and liquidityTechnology and Cybersecurity: Oversees risks associated with cybersecurity and cyber attacks
Compensation Committee: Oversees potential risks arising from the companies’ compensation policies and practicesBoards: Oversee risks associated with major investments and strategic initiatives 

The Boards’ role in (1) reassignment ofrisk oversight was not considered by either Board when assessing that Board’s leadership structure.

Cybersecurity

PG&E Corporation and the Utility have identified cybersecurity as a key enterprise risk. Oversight for Climate Resiliencethis risk tois exercised jointly by the Technology and Cybersecurity Committee and the Safety and Nuclear Oversight (SNO)Committees. At each meeting, the Technology and Cybersecurity Committee receives updates from PG&E Corporation’s Chief Information Officer. These reports describe cybersecurity threats, defenses, and data analytics that impact the companies’ most critical assets, as well as mitigations employed, such as incident response exercises and annual training programs for all employees. The Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees fromof both PG&E Corporation and the Finance Committee, (2)Utility jointly participate in cybersecurity risk reviews to promote alignment in operations and asset management in the additionimplementation of mitigations designed to reduce the risk of cybersecurity threats.

Safety

The Boards believe the safety of employees, contractors, customers and the public is the top priority for the PG&E Corporation Chief Executive Officer, the senior management team, and PG&E management. PG&E’s Chief Safety Officer has broad responsibilities to implement safety programs and culture, and as part of the following risks to the list of top enterprise risks explicitly assigned to theBoards’ oversight of Board committees: distribution overhead conductor, motor vehicle safety, and transmission overhead conductor, and (3) renaming of various risk categories. Generally the SNO Committees are allocated oversight responsibility for operational risks, and the Finance Committee is allocated oversight responsibility for business and financial risks. Most recently, the committees have been allocated oversight responsibility for the following types of enterprise risks:function,

 

Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees: climate-related, safety, cybersecurity, reliability, operations and facilities (including wildfire), emergency response, and records management.
Finance Committee: business model.

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement3924
 
Back to Contents

Thethe Boards and their respective committees also have specific oversight responsibility for risk management inengage directly with the following additional areas:

The Boards evaluate risks associated with major investments and strategic initiatives, with assistance from the Finance Committee.

Each company’s Audit Committee discusses the guidelines and policies that govern the processes for assessing and managing major risks (including the Enterprise and Operational Risk Management (“EORM”) program that is discussed in more detail below), allocates to other Board committees the specific responsibility to oversee identified enterprise risks, generally oversees regulatory and legal compliance risks, and considers risk issues associated with overall financial reporting and disclosure processes.

The Finance Committee discusses risk exposures related to energy procurement, including energy commodities and derivatives,Chief Safety Officer and other enterprise risks, as assigned byoperational leaders within the Auditcompanies on the development and implementation of these programs. The Boards’ Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees (as described above).

that maintain joint responsibility with the Boards for safety oversight at the companies. The Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees discuss risks relatedreceive regular safety reports from management that include performance metrics, reporting on serious incidents, and actions to the safety of the Utility’s nuclear, electric, gas,improve employee, contractor, customer, and other operations and facilities, and oversees other enterprise risks, as assigned by the Audit Committees (as described above).

The Compensation Committee oversees potential risks arising from the companies’ compensation policies and practices.

Other risk oversight responsibilities also have been allocated, consistent with the overall substantive scope and duties of each Board and their respective committees.public safety.

 

This allocation of Board-level risk oversight was last reviewed by the Audit Committees in April 2018, and is scheduled for review again in 2019.

The Boards’ role in risk oversight has had no significant effect on either Board’s leadership structure.

Management-Level Duties

Management has the day-to-day responsibility for identifying, assessing, and managing PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s exposure to various enterprise and operational risks. These risks range from asset-related risks to market and credit risks to public, employee, and contractor safety risks. The Chief Risk Officer’s organization provides the framework to assess risks and to facilitate management decision making.

For enterprise and operational risks, the EORM program specifies the use of a risk assessment methodology called the Bowtie Analysis to facilitate the calculation of a risk score, which reflects the probability of the risk event occurrence given the historical frequency of key risk drivers and the potential consequences of the risk event. Risk consequences are measured in terms of potential impacts to safety (public, employee, or contractor), gas or electric reliability, the environment, and the company’s financials. The risk scoring methodology assigns a 50 percent weighting to potential safety consequences to ensure that top safety risks receive senior management’s attention.

The risk score then serves as a baseline from which to assess the need for further risk reducing actions and to assess the effectiveness of those actions over time. The goal of the EORM program is to demonstrate measurable risk reduction across the portfolio of enterprise and operational risks.

With respect to supporting the Boards’ oversight activities:

Management provides various reports toIn 2020, the Boards and their respective committees regarding different elementsCommittees oversaw the Utility’s Wildfire Mitigation Plan. The Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees continued to receive regular updates on the execution of the Wildfire Mitigation Plan, engage with senior leadership, and report out to the Board on a regular basis on progress. In addition, the Chair of the Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees personally interacts with the CPUC on an ad hoc basis to provide insight on the Wildfire Mitigation Plan. Other significant focus areas in the past two years have included worker and public safety, safety culture, safe nuclear operations, and evaluation of top enterprise risks, such as risks to key assets, facilities, and technologies.

As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis below, the Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees work closely with the Compensation Committee in the selection of the safety performance metrics for inclusion in the short-and long-term incentive compensation plans, and in the evaluation of performance to determine individual awards.

ESG

At PG&E, corporate risk management programssustainability as business strategy is integral to delivering on the Triple Bottom Line of people, planet, and activities,prosperity underscored by strong operational performance. We believe that integrating and is responsivemanaging ESG topics, such as addressing climate change, into PG&E’s business strategy, creates long-term value for PG&E, and for our customers, communities, coworkers, and other stakeholders. Mitigating and adapting to requests made by the Boardsimpacts of climate change presents opportunities for growth for our business and economic opportunity in our communities, and highlights the committees.

The companies’ EORM program identifies and evaluatesneed to adopt a longer-term perspective about potential risks facingposed by climate change and to incorporate a resilience mindset and approach. The Boards oversee safety, climate change, and other ESG topics, with the enterprise, and nominates specific enterprise risks for Board-level oversight. The EORM program as a whole is implemented by management and overseen by the Audit Committees, which assign Board-level responsibility for oversightsupport of specific enterprise risks to committees of either company’s Board.
In 2017, the company established a Vice President-level Risk Management Committee that meets monthly and provides strategic guidance and direction for the EORM program, makes recommendations to senior management on key aspects of risk management, and conducts regular deep dives into specific risks.
committees.

 

2019The BoardsOversee ESG risks and opportunities, including legislation and the direction of the companies’ clean energy strategies and programs, such as renewable energy, distributed energy resources, and electric vehicle infrastructure.
Review corporate goals related to safety, reliability, and people management.
Participate in ERG events to support the companies’ diversity and inclusion initiatives.
Compliance and Public PolicyOversees corporate sustainability issues, such as environmental compliance and leadership, climate change resilience, community investments, workforce development, and diversity and inclusion.
Includes annual reviews of PG&E’s sustainability practices and performance.
Safety and Nuclear OversightOversee the risks associated with the impact of climate change on operations, assets and facilities, and planned mitigations.
Oversee the companies’ programs related to public, employee and contractor safety, and operational excellence.
Nominating and GovernanceOversees consideration of diversity when identifying nominees to the Board.
Compensation CommitteeApproves incentive compensation structures, which reinforce sustainability commitments.
Oversees diversity and inclusion in workforce planning and management succession.
Finance CommitteeApproves capital budgets and investments in zero-carbon technologies and grid modernization.
Technology and Cybersecurity CommitteeOversees technology investments that support a zero-carbon future.  

For additional information regarding PG&E’s sustainability efforts and progress, please see our online Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Report 2020, which can be accessed at the sustainability portion of PG&E Corporation’s website at www.pgecorp.com/sustainability.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement4025
 
Back to Contents
Each line of business (“LOB”) within the companies has its own risk and compliance committee. These LOB committees review the enterprise and operational risks, and the compliance requirements within that LOB; review and approve risk analysis and mitigation strategies; and track mitigation progress and results. In many cases, compliance requirements are in place to mitigate a particular risk and are a starting point for reducing risk further. Each LOB risk and compliance committee is led by a senior officer and must include the LOB risk manager and compliance manager, and risk and compliance representatives from the companies’ Chief Ethics and Compliance Office and the Chief Risk Office.
Annually, the Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer and the Vice President, Internal Audit and Chief Risk Officer facilitate a senior management discussion of progress made in risk and compliance management, objectives for the coming year relative to the overall goal of the programs, i.e., measurable risk reduction and demonstrable compliance performance. In addition, the senior management team approves the company’s enterprise risk list taking into consideration any material changes to risks identified throughout the year. Following review with the senior management team, these risks become an important factor in the development of each LOB’s strategy and budget proposals.
PG&E Corporation and the Utility have a Vice President, Internal Audit and Chief Risk Officer who functionally reports to the Audit Committees. This officer attends Board and Board committee meetings, and provides regular reports regarding various aspects of the companies’ risk management policies, programs, and activities.

Compensation Risk Analysis

As discussed in more detail in the CD&A, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant assists PG&E Corporation and the Utility with a review of the design of the companies’ incentive plans relative to general compensation plan risk factors (or the potential for unintended consequences).

BOARD OVERSIGHT

Compliance and Ethics

During 2015, as part of PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s commitment to strengthen their compliance and ethics program and performance, the companies restructured the governance for managing compliance and ethics to highlight and delineate more clearly the responsibilities for the implementation, coordination, and monitoring of their compliance and ethics program.

Board-level oversight is shared by the Boards and their committees. The Compliance and Public Policy Committee coordinates the compliance-related oversight of the Boards, including, but not limited to: overseeing and evaluating the effectiveness of the companies’ compliance and ethics program; reviewing periodic reports from management about the companies’ compliance with laws, regulations, and internal policies and standards; and monitoring that management consistently communicates its commitment to an effective compliance and ethics program. The Audit Committees also assist the Boards with monitoring and overseeing compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including reviewing matters that may impact the companies’ financial statements. The Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees review the companies’ significant compliance risks, including those risks and issues related to the companies’ nuclear, generation, gas and electric transmission, and gas and electric distribution operations and facilities.

This compliance governance structure helps promote a consistent approach to compliance and ethics across Board committees and the companies. The Compliance and Public Policy Committee works with management to regularly view and discuss compliance and ethics issues, including but not limited to reviews or reported compliance violations and employee misconduct. The Audit Committees, the Compliance and Public Policy Committee, and the Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees meet jointly at least twice a year to, among other things, coordinate and discuss the companies’ compliance and ethics program and monitor that significant compliance and ethics issues are reviewed and considered by the appropriate Board committees.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement41
Back to Contents

At the management level, the companies’ Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer (CECO), in partnership with the lines of business, has day-to-day responsibility for overseeing and monitoring the company-wide compliance and ethics program. The lines of business are responsible for program implementation within their respective subject matter areas, and regularly report to the CECO on compliance and ethics matters, including through cross-functional officer committees that review, discuss, and make decisions regarding the companies’ compliance and ethics related work. Management also has compliance and ethics committees at the level of the functional business units that provide strategic guidance on, and oversight of, their respective compliance and ethics programs, which may include the programs and systems designed to prevent, detect, mitigate, and remediate non-compliance. The CECO has direct access to the Chair of the Compliance and Public Policy Committee and may be required to report to the Committee on requested matters. The CECO also reports to the Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees regarding activities relating to establishment of and performance on compliance and ethics metrics related to operations and facilities.

The CECO also oversees matters arising from the Utility’s 2016 criminal convictions, stemming from the 2010 San Bruno gas pipeline explosion. These include the Utility’s federal probation and independent third-party Monitorship. The Compliance and Ethics group communicates regularly with the Boards on these topics and provides the Boards updates following the Monitor’s semi-annual reports on the Utility’s progress towards satisfying its obligations under the terms of its sentencing. The monitor also provides its periodic report to the Boards and regularly attends Board meetings.

Political Contributions

 

The Compliance and Public Policy Committee reviews PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s political contributions and recommends Board approval limits for political contributions from the companies to candidates, measures, initiatives, political action committees, and certain other organizations that may engage in activities involving elections. All political contributions from the companies are made in full compliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. The Compliance and Public Policy Committee also directs preparation of an annual report summarizing political contributions and certain other expenditures made by the companies during the preceding year.

In 2021, PG&E Corporation Employees EnergyPAC, funded by PG&E Corporation and Utility employee voluntary contributions, updated its political contributions policy after conducting a series of listening sessions with employees and members. The updated criteria for contributions require candidates to share company values such as diversity and inclusion and the need to protect the environment, and ask whether the candidate is prepared to work in a bipartisan fashion. The new criteria also disqualify candidates who promote hate, violence, or discrimination.

Additional information regarding each company’s political engagement policies and political contributions is available on PG&E Corporation’s website. at www.pgecorp.com/corp/about-us/corporate-governance/corporation-policies/ political-engagement.page.  

 

Corporate Sustainability

The Compliance and Public Policy Committee has primary oversight of corporate sustainability issues, such as environmental compliance and leadership, climate change resilience, community investments, workforce development, and diversity and inclusion. This includes an annual review of PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s sustainability practices and performance. Other committees of the Boards address other components of the companies’ sustainability commitment, such as public and employee safety, operational excellence and investments to enable a low-carbon future. In addition, the Compensation Committee approves the structure of any STIP or LTIP, which can help reinforce the companies’ sustainability commitment by rewarding eligible employees for achievement of business goals.

Within management, the Chief Sustainability Officer of the Utility is responsible for developing and coordinating the companies’ corporate sustainability initiatives and overseeing the companies’ corporate sustainability reporting and performance measurement. This is done in coordination with other members of senior management who are responsible for functions such as supply chain management, environmental compliance, and customer energy solutions.

In 2017, the companies introduced a new framework defining our mission, vision, and culture, developed through extensive outreach and interactions with our employees, customers, and other stakeholders. Our vision of a sustainable energy future is focused on meeting the challenge of climate change while providing affordable energy for all customers.

During 2018, the companies demonstrated continued progress toward the sustainability goals. For example, during the year, 38.9 percent of the Utility’s electricity came from renewable energy sources including solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, and small hydroelectric sources, exceeding California’s annual renewable energy target of 28 percent. In addition, the Utility spent $2.98 billion with suppliers, service providers or contractors meeting the criteria for the Utility’s Supplier Diversity Program in 2018, accounting for 41.43 percent of its total procurement. The Utility also brought the total number of interconnected private solar customers to nearly 400,000—about 20 percent of the nation’s private rooftop solar.

For additional information regarding PG&E Corporation’s sustainability efforts and progress, please see our comprehensive online Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Report 2018, which can be accessed at the sustainability portion of PG&E Corporation’s website at www.pgecorp.com/sustainability.

2019 Joint Proxy StatementMANAGEMENT SUCCESSION42
Back to Contents

Safety

The PG&E Corporation and Utility Boards are responsible for oversight of safety. Specifically, the Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees of the Boards are responsible for overseeing and reviewing policies, practices, goals, issues, risks, and compliance relating to safety, including public, employee, and contractor safety. This responsibility includes, among other things, overseeing goals, programs, policies and practices with respect to promoting a strong safety culture, and monitoring the impact of changes in laws and regulations affecting safety, including, for example, the Community Wildfire Safety Program. The Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees also monitor and review the adequacy and direction of the corporate safety function.

In addition, the Compensation Committee, with advice from the Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees, selects appropriate safety metrics for inclusion in executive compensation program and plans, and may adjust individual award amounts to reflect, among other reasons, safety performance. The Compliance and Public Policy Committee reviews compliance with safety requirements as part of its general oversight for compliance. The Finance Committee, as part of its responsibility for reviewing proposed major capital projects, reviews capital projects and programs with safety implications, such as projects and programs to enhance public or employee safety.

Within management, all officers, including the PG&E Corporation CEO and the Utility President (or the Utility officers fulfilling the President’s functions), are responsible for safety and the instillation of safety culture. More specifically, the Chief Safety Officer (“CSO”) is responsible for the occupational health and safety of employees and contractors and partners with the lines of business to develop and monitor the enterprise-wide safety program at PG&E Corporation and the Utility. Currently, the CSO reports directly to the Corporation CEO, and also reports regularly to the Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees, which in turn serve as a direct channel of communication between the CSO and the full Boards. The CSO also may be requested to provide reports to the full Boards regarding safety matters.

The Safety and Health organization partners with the lines of business to develop and monitor the enterprise-wide safety program at PG&E Corporation and the Utility, by helping guide safety process improvements; developing and deploying new initiatives, training, technology, incident investigation protocols, compliance programs, and metrics; and conducting industry benchmarking to identify best safety practices.

The following management-level committees and teams are also involved in safety governance:

Enterprise Safety Committee: Guides safety strategy and promotes continuous improvement in safety performance. The Committee meets regularly to review performance and address gaps and barriers to improvement. Members include senior leaders of the Corporation and the Utility, and leaders from the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the Engineers and Scientists of California labor unions.
Line of Business Safety Councils: Responsible for executing plans to reduce exposure to potential safety incidents. The Councils are composed of management, union, and grassroots team members. These efforts are supported by grassroots safety teams comprised of frontline employees who share ideas and partner to come up with solutions to reinforce a strong and proactive safety culture.

Management Succession

 

At least annually, the PG&E Corporation and Utility Boards each reviewreviews the applicable company’s plan for CEO succession, both in the ordinary course of business and in response to emergency situations. Each company’s Board also develops a profileprofiles of appropriate responsibilities, attributes, and requirements for the position of CEO,principal executive officer positions, which reflects the Corporation’s and the Utility’sreflect that company’s business functions, vision, and strategy. Potential candidates for CEOprincipal executive officer positions may be identified internally within the companies in consultation with the Compensation Committee (which oversees the evaluation of management) and the CEO, as well as externally through various sources, including independent third-party consultants.

 

The succession planning process also addresses the continuing development of appropriate leadership skills for internal candidates for CEO, as well as candidates for other leadership positions within the companies. The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing the CEO’s long-range plans for officer development and succession for PG&E Corporation and the Utility.Utility, in connection with its review of officer elections, promotions, and compensation matters during the year.

 

2019 Joint Proxy Statement43
Back to Contents

Throughout 2018,2020, the Compensation Committee addressed management succession and executive development in connection with its review of officer elections, promotions, and compensation matters during the year.

 

As announced on April 3, 2019, William “Bill” Johnson has been named Chief Executive OfficerEVALUATIONS

Board and President of PG&E CorporationCommittee Evaluation Process

Our Boards and began his new role on May 2, 2019. WithCommittees evaluate their own effectiveness throughout the assistance ofyear. Directors conduct a leading search firm, Spencer Stuart,formal evaluation process annually, developed by the PG&E Corporation Board of Directors conducted a national search for a new CEO,Nominating and Governance Committee and administered by the Board is confident that Bill Johnson is the right person to lead the company during this critical time. Mr. Johnson brings substantial safety and operational expertise from his extensive career in the energy industry. With more than a decade of combined chief executive experience at two large utility companies, Mr. Johnson has a deep understanding of managing risk and the responsibility of keeping customers safe. Most recently, he served as President and CEOChair of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), where he was responsible for leading the nation’s largest public utilityCorporation Board, in its mission of providing energy, environmental stewardship and economic development across a seven-state region. During Mr. Johnson’s time at TVA, the organization achieved the best safety records in its 85-year history and has been a perennial top decile safety performer in the utility industry. In that same period, Mr. Johnson led the retirement of more than half of TVA’s coal generation, resulting in a reduction of TVA’s carbon omissions by about 50% over the last decade. He was responsible for leading the generation of more than 50% of TVA’s energy from non-greenhouse gas emitting sources. He also oversaw TVA’s expansion into utility scale solar in recent years,partnership with the additionChair of approximately 1,000 megawatts (mWs),the Utility Board. The Boards carefully evaluate the effectiveness of the Boards, the Committees, and pursuedindividual directors, and include a formal check in mid-year on the modernizationeffectiveness of its hydro assetsimplemented changes to increase the overall amount of renewable resources. TVA’s renewable portfolio includes almost 2,400 mWs of wind and solar and 5,800 mWs of hydro capacity. Throughout his career in the electric utilities industry, Mr. Johnson has collaborated closely with elected officials and other community leaders to deliver safe and reliable electricity to millions of customers.help ensure accountability for improvements.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   26
Back to Contents

 

DIRECTOR ORIENTATION AND CONTINUING EDUCATION

 

New directorsDirectors regularly receive information on subjects that would assist them in discharging their duties.duties both in formal Board and committee meetings and on an ad hoc basis in response to PG&E or industry events or expressed areas of interest or growth. Topics include business operations; safety, risk management, and cybersecurity; corporate governance matters; legal proceedings and the regulatory and policy landscape; sustainability goals and activities; financial performance; and other key stakeholder issues.

 

On April 9 and 10, 2019,In July 2020, as part of the Board refreshment process,onboarding of new directors, the PG&E Corporation and Utility Boards hadhosted several topic-specific onboarding sessions and a two-day on-site onboarding session and Board meeting during which the new directors and the continuing directors met together, and with companyPG&E officers, to, among other things, discuss the overall context for the companies’ current situation share key information,and establish the Boards’ governance framework, and discuss areas of focus for the next 90 days. As part of the Boards’ continuing onboarding process, the new directors are being provided with materials and presentations regarding, among other things, business operations for each of the Utility’s lines of business; safety, risk management, and cybersecurity; corporate governance matters; legal proceedings (including the Utility’s probation); the wildfire liabilities, risks, and response; the Chapter 11 Cases; the regulatory and legal landscape; California carbon reduction goals and other policy matters; financial performance and corporate finance matters; and other key stakeholder issues.framework.

 

Directors also periodically receive briefing sessions or materials at regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetings on subjects and developments relevant to exercise of their Board and committee duties. Each director also receives information regarding opportunities for continuing education and is expected to stay current on important developments pertaining to such director’s function and duties to the companies by attending such programs as appropriate or otherwise.

 

2019 Joint Proxy Statement

44
Back to Contents

COMMUNICATING WITH DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Shareholder EngagementSHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

 

PG&E Corporation and the Utility value our shareholders’ views and are committed to ongoing constructive dialogue with shareholders to advance the long-term viability and interests of the companies.

 

We regularly provide opportunities for dialogue with shareholders to further promote the exchange of ideas regarding corporate governance and other issues. In addition, our outreach efforts with the Corporation’s largest shareholders, whowhich collectively hold a majority of the outstanding common stock, include discussions with members of senior management and the Boards, as applicable, ongoing meetings with our investor relations team, and other institutional shareholder forums.

 

PG&E Corporation has had a record of Board responsiveness to shareholders, demonstrated by the Board’s voluntary adoption of proxy access bylaw provisions in 2016, as well as the refreshment of the entire Boards of Directors since 2010.shareholders. Since the beginning of 2018,2020, the Boards and management have engaged in the following shareholder engagement activities:

 

Starting in 2018, Board members conducted in-person governance meetings focused on critical environmental, social, and governance issues that relate to the long-term strategy of the Corporation. Meetings focused on top active and passive shareholders, to gain insights and feedback on our business strategy and governance model.

•   Meetings, calls, and other direct communication

•   Engagement during Board refreshment

•   Engagement during quarterly earnings calls and other significant events

 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   27
Officers regularly engaged with top institutional shareholders regarding significant events such as quarterly earnings calls, financial activities and announcements, and significant legal filings.
Back to Contents

Various company representatives reached out to representatives of the passive and current shareholder base seeking alterative views and approaches to Board refreshment.

Correspondence with Directors and OfficersCORRESPONDENCE

 

Under the companies’ Corporate Governance Guidelines, available on our website, the independent Chairs of the Boards are responsible for responding to written communications that are directed to the Boards from shareholders and other parties. Section 3234 of each company’s Guidelines provides more details on these communications. (See “Website Availability of Governance Documents” on page 105).

 

Correspondence to directors and executive officers should be sent to the applicable company’s principal executive office, in care of the Corporate Secretary. Consistent with procedures adopted and approved by the Boards, the Corporate Secretary will forward to the independent lead director or the independent non-executive Chair any communications addressed to the Board of Directors as a body or to all of the independent or non-management directors in their entirety, and such other communications as the Corporate Secretary, in his or her discretion, determines is appropriate. The Corporate Secretary also will receive communications directed to individual directors or officers, including the independent non-executive Chair, or the independent lead director, and will forward those as appropriate.

 

The address of the principal executive office for each company is:

 

PG&E Corporation

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

77 Beale Street, P.O. Box 770000

San Francisco, California 94177

 

2019 Joint Proxy Statement

45
Back to Contents

Compensation of Non-Employee DirectorsCOMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

 

TheEach of the Boards of PG&E Corporation and the Utility each establishestablishes the level of compensation for that company’s non-employee directors, based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee. Directors who also are currentserve as employees of either company receive no additional compensation for concurrent service as directors.

 

The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the amount and form of compensation paid to non-employee directors of PG&E Corporation and the Utility. As part of this review, the Committee reviews the compensation provided to the companies’ non-employee directors as compared to other comparable U.S. peer companies (including both other utilities and companies within the S&P 250), with the objective of ensuring that non-employee director compensation is:

 

Market-competitive in terms of annual compensation value, and
Consistent with emerging market practices and trends.
Market-competitive in terms of annual compensation value, and
Consistent with emerging market practices and trends

 

Compensation paid to non-employee directors for 20182020 for service on the Boards and their committees iswas based upon periodic compensation reviews conducted in consultation with the Committee’s executive compensation consultant for 2020, Pay Governance LLC. The Compensation Committee’s most recent reviews of non-employee director compensation were conducted in December 2017, December 2018, and February 2019. See “2019 Non-employee Director Compensation Program” beginning on page 48. The Compensation Committee used Pay Governance’s benchmark analyses of director compensation at utility and Fortune 500 companies and Willis Towers Watson analysis of director compensation at companies undergoing Chapter 11 restructuring.July 2020.

 

2018Non-Employee Director Total 2020 Compensation Summary

 

The following table summarizesframework was in effect from July 1, 2020. Additional details are provided in the principal components of compensation paid or granted to individuals for their service as non-employee directors of PG&E Corporation and the Utility during 2018.sections that follow.

 

Name Fees
Earned
Or Paid in
Cash ($)(1)
 Stock
Awards
($)(2)
 Option
Awards
($)(3)
 All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
 Total
($)
L. Chew 170,000 139,965   96 310,061
F. Fowler 120,000 139,965   96 260,061
J. C. Johnson(5) 47,143 0   96 47,239
R. C. Kelly 235,000 259,972   96 495,068
R. H. Kimmel 135,000 139,965   96 275,061
R. A. Meserve 135,000 139,965   96 275,061
F. E. Miller 170,000 139,965   96 310,061
B. Minicucci(6) 60,000 0   40 60,040
E. D. Mullins 120,000 139,965   96 260,061
R. G. Parra 120,000 139,965   1,096 261,061
B. L. Rambo 135,000 139,965   96 275,061
A. S. Smith 120,000 139,965   1,096 261,061
(1)Represents receipt of retainers described below following this table.
(2)Represents the grant date fair value of RSUs granted in 2018 measured in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation” (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). Grant date fair value is measured using the closing price of PG&E Corporation common stock on the date of grant. In 2018, each non-employee director who was elected at the 2018 annual meetings of shareholders and was in office as of May 22, 2018—except the Chair of the PG&E Corporation Board—received 3,208 RSUs with a grant date value of $139,965. The Chair of the PG&E Corporation Board received 5,042 RSUs with a grant date value of $219,982. The aggregate number of stock awards outstanding for each non-employee director at December 31, 2018 was: Mr. Chew 3,208, Mr. Fowler 3,208, Secretary Johnson 0, Mr. Kelly 6,046, Mr. Kimmel 3,208, Dr. Meserve 3,208, Mr. Miller 3,208, Mr. Minicucci 0, Mr. Mullins 3,208, Mr. Parra 3,208, Ms. Rambo 3,208, and Ms. Smith 3,208.
(3)No stock options were granted in 2018. The aggregate number of option awards outstanding for each non-employee director at December 31, 2018 was: Mr. Chew 0, Mr. Fowler 0, Ms. Herringer 0, Secretary Johnson 0, Mr. Kelly 0, Mr. Kimmel 0, Dr. Meserve 0, Mr. Miller 4,090, Mr. Minicucci 0, Mr. Mullins 0, Mr. Parra 0, Ms. Rambo 0, and Ms. Smith 0.
Annual Retainer Per Quarter Annual
Non-Employee Directors(1) $30,000 $120,000
Corporation Chair of the Board $25,000 additional $100,000 additional
Utility Chair of the Board(1) $5,000 additional $20,000 additional
Committee Chair Additional Retainers(2)    
Audit Committees(1) $7,500 $30,000
Compensation Committee $5,000 $20,000
Safety and Nuclear Oversight (SNO) Committees $5,000 $20,000
Finance, Compliance and Public Policy, and Technology and Cybersecurity Committees(1) $3,750 $15,000
Special Committee Additional Retainer    
As determined by the applicable Board (none paid during 2020)    

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement4628
 
Back to Contents
(4)Represents (i) premiums paid for accidental death and dismemberment insurance, and (ii) matching gifts, paid or payable for 2018, to qualified organizations pursuant to the Matching Gifts Program, which establishes a set fund for matching eligible gifts made by employees and directors on a dollar-for-dollar basis, up to a total of $1,000 per calendar year per individual, as follows: Mr. Parra $1,000 and Ms. Smith $1,000.Annual Equity Award(3)
Non-Employee Directors(5)Secretary Johnson retired from the Corporation Board effective May 21, 2018.n/a$140,000
Corporation Chair of the Board(1)(6)Mr. Minicucci joinedn/a$80,000 additional
Per-Meeting Fees
No meeting fees for attendance at Board, Board committee, or shareholder meetings
Special Committee Per-Meeting Fees(1)
As determined by the PG&E Corporation and Utility Boards effective July 1, 2018.applicable Board (none paid during 2020)

 

Non-Employee Director Total 2018 Compensation Summary

 Per QuarterAnnual
Annual Retainer
Non-Employee Directors(1)$30,000$120,000
Corporation Chair of the Board$25,000 additional$100,000 additional
Utility Chair of the Board(1)$7,500 additional$30,000 additional
Committee Chair Additional Retainers
Audit Committees(1)$12,500$50,000
Compensation Committee$5,000$20,000
Other Permanent Standing Committees(1)$3,750$15,000
Special Committee Additional Retainer
As determined by the applicable Board (none paid during 2018)
Annual Equity Award
Non-Employee Directorsn/a$140,000
Corporation Chair of the Board(1)n/a$80,000 additional
Per-Meeting Fees
No meeting fees for attendance at Board, Board committee, or shareholder meetings
Special Committee Per-Meeting Fees(1)
As determined by the applicable Board (none paid during 2018)

(1)No additional retainer, equity award, or per-meeting fee will be paid by the Utility for any quarter during which the director is paid a retainer, equity award, or per-meeting fee from the Corporation for the same role.
(2)No additional retainer is paid for directors serving as members on Board committees.
(3)For 2020, the value of the annual LTIP award was pro-rated to reflect service from the July 1, 2020 election of new Board members through the anticipated date of the 2021 annual meeting.

 

Retainers and Fees

 

Retainers and fees are paid as described in the above summary table.table above. Any director who serves on the PG&E Corporation Board, Audit Committee, Executive Committee, or Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committee does not receive additional retainers for concurrent service on the Utility Board, Audit Committee, Executive Committee, or Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committee, as applicable.

 

Effective January 1, 2018, (1) a quarterly retainer of $7,500 was approved forJuly 29, 2020, the non-executive Chair of the Board of the Utility and (2) the quarterly retainer for the Chair of the Compensation Committee increased to $5,000 (from $3,750), and the quarterly retainers for the Chairs of the Finance Committee and the Compliance and Public Policy Committee increased to $3,750 (from $2,500).following director compensation program changes were implemented:

 

Technology and Cybersecurity Committee Chair retainer of $15,000 introduced in association with the establishment of a new Board committee
Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees Chair retainer increased from $15,000 to $20,000 reflecting expanded scope of responsibility
Audit Committees Chair retainer decreased from $50,000 to $30,000 reflecting market benchmarks
Equity awards granted in 2020 were pro-rated to reflect the period of service from July 1, 2020, to May 2021

Non-Employee Director Stock-Based Compensation

 

Under the 2014 LTIP, each non-employee director of PG&E Corporation is entitled to receive annual awards of stock-based compensation. Pursuant to the terms of the 2014 LTIP, as approved by PG&E Corporation’s shareholders, the annual value of equity awards provided to any one non-employee director is limited to $400,000 in any calendar year.

 

Awards for 20182020 were granted on May 22, 2018.August 3, 2020, and were pro-rated to reflect the fact that most members of the Board were elected on July 1, 2020. Each non-employee director’s award—other than that for the Chair of PG&E Corporation—had a total aggregate value of $140,000$116,662 (rounded down to reflect awards equivalent to whole units with values equivalent to whole shares of PG&E Corporation common stock) and consisted of RSUs that were granted to each non-employee director after his or her election to the Board. The award for the Chair of PG&E Corporation had a total aggregate value of $220,000$183,329 (rounded down to reflect awards equivalent to whole units with values equivalent to whole shares of PG&E Corporation common stock) and consisted of RSUs that were granted

2019 Joint Proxy Statement47
Back to Contents

after his or her election to the Board. These RSUs will vest at the earlier of the end of the director’s annual elected termMay 22, 2021, or one year after the date of grantthe 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (or other annual election of directors) and are then will be settled as shares of PG&E Corporation common stock. RSUs also will vest and be settled upon the director’s death or disability, or if there is both a Change in Control (as defined on page 74)A-1) and the director is terminated.ceases to be on the Board for any reason other than the director’s resignation. Otherwise, RSUs are forfeited if the director ceases to be a member of the Board prior to vesting. Non-employee directors also may elect to defer settlement of vested RSUs.

 

Effective January 1, 2018,As approved by the total aggregate value of the annual awardBankruptcy Court, in lieu of stock-based compensation during 2019, a replacement equity award (Replacement Award) was granted to the non-executive Chair of the Boardnon-employee directors for 2019. The Replacement Awards were granted at a specified dollar value and settled in post-reorganization equity of PG&E Corporation was increasedimmediately following emergence from Chapter 11 on June 30, 2020. The Replacement Award values were based on the value of annual equity awards paid to $220,000 (from $140,000). In addition, in December 2017, a $40,000 supplemental RSU award was approved for the non-executive Chairnon-employee directors prior to commencement of the Board of PG&E Corporation. UnderChapter 11 Cases, as specified in the LTIP, and pro-

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   29
Back to Contents

rated for directors who joined the PG&E Corporation Equity Grant Date Policy,Board after the supplemental RSU award wasJune 2019 annual meeting. The Replacement Awards were granted as dollar values effective November 13, 2019, and covered services as non-employee directors for 2019, but were not converted into stock-based equivalents until emergence from Chapter 11 on February 12, 2018.July 1, 2020, and thus are reflected in this Proxy Statement, in the 2020 Director Compensation table, below. Replacement Awards were forfeitable upon a separation from service prior to the effective date of the Corporation’s Plan of Reorganization, except in the event of the recipient’s death, disability (as defined in section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code), resignation in connection or anticipation of the confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization, the Nominating and Governance Committee’s approval of vesting in connection with any resignation or removal, or a separation from service relating to a change in control. The award vestedReplacement Awards were not reflected in prior tabular disclosures relating to non-employee director compensation granted during 2019.

2020 Director Compensation

The following table summarizes the principal components of compensation paid or granted to individuals for their service as non-employee directors of PG&E Corporation and the Utility during 2020. William L. Smith received compensation in 2020 for his service both as a non-employee director and as Interim CEO and President of PG&E Corporation from June 30 to December 31, 2020. In accordance with SEC guidance, all compensation paid to Mr. Smith for his service as non-employee director and as Interim CEO and President is provided only in the Summary Compensation Table and other executive compensation disclosures starting on February 12, 2019.page 69. None of the compensation paid during 2020 to Mr. Smith for his service as non-employee director or as Interim CEO and President is reflected in the Director Compensation Table below.

 NameFees
Earned
Or Paid in
  Cash ($)(1)
 Stock
Awards
($)(2)
 Option
Awards
($)(3)
 All Other
Compensation
($)
 Total
($)
Rajat Bahri(4)60,000 116,662     176,662
Cheryl F. Campbell137,500 256,663     394,163
Kerry W. Cooper(4)60,000 116,662     176,662
Jessica L. Denecour(4)67,500 116,662     184,162
Admiral Mark Ferguson III(4)70,000 116,662     186,662
Robert C. Flexon(4)117,500 183,329     300,829
W. Craig Fugate(4)60,000 116,662     176,662
Arno L. Harris(4)60,000 116,662     176,662
Michael R. Niggli(4)60,000 116,662     176,662
Dean L. Seavers(4)77,500 116,662     194,162
Oluwadara J. Treseder(4)60,000 116,662     176,662
Benjamin F. Wilson(4)75,000 116,662     191,662
John M. Woolard127,500 221,663     349,163
Richard R. Barrera(5)67,500 140,001     207,501
Jeffrey L. Bleich(6)75,000 140,001     215,001
Nora Mead Brownell(5)110,000 219,998     329,998
Fred J. Fowler(5)60,000 140,001     200,001
Michael J. Leffell(5)67,500 140,001     207,501
Dominique Mielle(7)85,000 140,001     225,001
Meridee A. Moore(5)70,000 140,001     210,001
Eric D. Mullins(5)60,000 140,001     200,001
Kristine M. Schmidt(5)67,500 140,001     207,501
Alejandro D. Wolff(5)60,000 140,001     200,001

(1)Represents receipt of retainers described above under “Non-Employee Director Total 2020 Compensation Summary.”

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   30
Back to Contents
(2)Represents the grant date fair value of equity awards granted to non-employee directors of PG&E Corporation in 2020, measured in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation” (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). Grant date fair value for RSUs is measured using the closing price of PG&E Corporation common stock on the date of grant. The table above includes two separate equity awards provided in 2020: (i) awards for 2020 and (ii) replacement awards for 2019.
(i)Each non-employee director who was elected effective July 1, 2020 in connection with PG&E Corporation’s emergence from Chapter 11—except the Chair of the PG&E Corporation Board—received 12,820 RSUs with a grant date value of $116,662. The Chair of the PG&E Corporation Board received 20,146 RSUs with a grant date value of $183,329. These values reflect the proration of service from July 2020 through May 2021. The aggregate number of stock awards outstanding for each non-employee director at December 31, 2020 was: Mr. Bahri, Ms. Campbell, Mr. Cooper, Ms. Denecour, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Fugate, Mr. Harris, Mr. Niggli, Mr. Seavers, Ms. Treseder, Mr. Wilson, and Mr. Woolard, 12,820 each, and Mr. Flexon, 20,146.
(ii)Each non-employee director who was elected at the 2019 annual meetings—except the Chair of the PG&E Corporation Board—received a stock award with a grant date value of $140,001, which converted to 15,504 shares of PG&E Corporation stock upon vesting and settlement following emergence from Chapter 11 in July 2020. The Chair of the PG&E Corporation Board received a stock award with a grant date value of $219,998, which converted to 24,363 shares of PG&E Corporation stock upon vesting and settlement. Mr.  Woolard, who joined the Board in October 2019, received a stock award with a pro-rated grant date fair value of $105,001, which converted to 11,628 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock upon vesting and settlement.
(3)No stock options were granted in 2020. No option awards were outstanding as of December 31, 2020.
(4)Mr. Bahri, Ms. Cooper, Ms. Denecour, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Flexon, Mr. Fugate, Mr. Harris, Mr. Niggli, Mr. Seavers, Ms. Treseder, and Mr. Wilson joined the PG&E Corporation Board effective July 1, 2020. These individuals also joined the Utility Board effective July 1, 2020, with the exception of Ms. Denecour, Mr. Flexon, and Mr. Niggli, who joined the Utility Board on October 28, 2020.
(5)Mr. Barrera, Ms. Brownell, Mr. Fowler, Mr. Leffell, Ms. Moore, Mr. Mullins, Ms. Schmidt, and Mr. Wolff resigned from the PG&E Corporation and Utility Boards effective July 1, 2020.
(6)Mr. Bleich resigned from the PG&E Corporation and Utility Boards effective May 1, 2020. (7) Ms. Mielle resigned from the PG&E Corporation and Utility Boards effective June 30, 2020.

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

Non-employee directors of PG&E Corporation are expected to own shares of PG&E Corporation common stock having a dollar value of at least five times the value of the then-applicable annual Board retainer. If any non-employee director is on the Utility Board only, then that director also may satisfy his or her stock ownership obligation with Utility preferred stock. Directors generally have five years to meet the guidelines. Ownership includes beneficial ownership of common stock, as well as RSUs and common stock equivalents. These guidelines were adopted to more closely align the interests of directors and each company’s shareholders.

 

Deferral of Retainers and Fees

 

Under the PG&E Corporation 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, directors of PG&E Corporation and the Utility may elect to defer all of their retainers, all of their meeting fees, or both. Directors who participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan may elect either to (1) convert their deferred compensation into common stock equivalents, the value of which is tied to the market value of PG&E Corporation common stock, or (2) have their deferred compensation deemed to be invested in the Utility Bond Fund (which is described in the narrative following the “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation—2018”2020” table beginning on page 84)77).

 

Reimbursement for Travel and Other Expenses

 

Directors of PG&E Corporation and the Utility are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attending Board, Board committee, or shareholder meetings, or participating in other activities undertaken on behalf of the Corporation or the Utility.

 

Retirement Benefits from PG&E Corporation or the Utility

 

The non-employee directors of the Boards of PG&E Corporation and the Utility are not provided retirement benefits.

 

2019 Non-employee Director Compensation Program

In connection with the companies’ financial situation, in late 2018 the companies retained Willis Towers Watson (“WTW”) as an independent consultant for the discrete, targeted purpose of advising the Compensation Committee, the Boards, and management with respect to incentive plans, retention plans, and non-employee director compensation for companies undergoing financial restructurings.

On January 29, 2019, PG&E Corporation and the Utility each filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 in the Bankruptcy Court. Post-petition, the companies can continue to pay regular cash directors’ fees under the non-employee director compensation program in the ordinary course of business but may be limited in the ability to issue additional equity compensation to non-employee directors.

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement4831
 
Back to Contents

Item No. 2: Amendment to Increase the Maximum Size of the Corporation’s Board to 15 Directors

The Corporation Charter as currently in effect provides that the Corporation Board shall consist of a maximum of thirteen (13) directors and a minimum of seven (7) directors, as prescribed by the Corporation bylaws. Pursuant to Section 902 of the California Corporations Code, an amendment to the Corporation Charter may be adopted if approved by the Board and approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, either before or after the approval by the Board.

The Corporation Board asks its shareholders to approve the following (the “Charter Amendment Proposal”):

RESOLVED that part I of the third paragraph of the Corporation Charter be amended and restated as follows:

“The Board of Directors of the Corporation shall consist of such number of directors, not less than eight (8) nor more than fifteen (15), as shall be prescribed in the Bylaws.”

The Charter Amendment Proposal will increase the maximum number of directors on the Corporation Board to 15 and increase the minimum number of directors on the Corporation Board to 8. The Charter Amendment Proposal will not affect the Corporation Board’s existing power to amend the bylaws to increase or reduce the size of the Corporation Board within the limits set by the Corporation Charter.

The Corporation Board believes that increasing the size of the Corporation Board is in the best interest of the Corporation and its shareholders. The Corporation Board also believes that the Charter Amendment Proposal will allow for more diverse perspectives on the Board and will enhance the overall collective effectiveness of the Corporation Board. This increase will allow all 14 individuals nominated by the Corporation Board to serve as directors on the Corporation Board with one additional vacant seat to be filled in the future as appropriate.

The Board of Directors of PG&E Corporation Unanimously Recommends a VoteFOR the Charter Amendment Proposal.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement49
Back to Contents
 

Item No. 3: Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm forOur Auditors

ITEM NO. 2: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyCORPORATION AND PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

 

The Audit Committees of PG&E Corporation and the Utility each havehas selected and appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte & Touche”) as the independent auditor for that company to audit the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, and to audit the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2021. Deloitte & Touche is a major national accounting firm with substantial expertise in the energy and utility businesses. Deloitte & Touche has served as the independent auditors for PG&E Corporation and the Utility since 1999.

 

One or more representatives of Deloitte & Touche are expected to be present at the annual meetings. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if they wish and are expected to be available to respond to questions from shareholders.

 

Each company’s Board believes that thisthe appointment of Deloitte & Touche is in the best interests of that company and its shareholders.

 

PG&E Corporation and the Utility are not required to submit these appointments to a vote of their shareholders. However, the Boards of Directors believeeach Board believes that requesting shareholder ratification of this selection is a good corporate governance practice. If the shareholders of either PG&E Corporation or the Utility do not ratify the appointment, the applicable Audit Committee will investigate the reasons for rejection by the shareholders and will reconsider the appointment. Even if a company’s shareholders ratify the selection, the applicable Audit Committee, in its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of that company and its shareholders.

 

The Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Unanimously Recommend a VoteFOR the Proposal to Ratify the Appointment of Deloitte & Touche.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement5032
 
Back to Contents

Information Regarding the Independent Auditor forINFORMATION REGARDING THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FOR PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyCORPORATION AND PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

 

Selection and Oversight of the Independent Auditor

 

Each Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, replacement, compensation, and oversight of the work of the independent auditor. The Audit Committees review the scope of the audit, including the terms of the engagement. The independent auditor reports directly to the Audit Committees; at each Audit Committee meeting, the independent auditor meets separately with the Audit Committees, without management present.

 

Annually, each Audit Committee also evaluates the independence, qualifications, and performance of the independent auditor, taking into account the opinions of management and the internal auditors. To help ensure continuing independence of the independent auditor, the Audit Committees also consider whether there should be rotation of the independent auditor. In accordance with SEC rules, the lead audit partner may provide a maximum number of five consecutive years of service to the companies. Consistent with that requirement, Deloitte & Touche assigned a new lead auditor to lead the integrated audit of PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s financial statements, starting in 2017. The Audit Committees reviewed and evaluated the new lead auditor as part of their annual process for reviewing the independent auditor.

 

For 2019,2021, the Audit Committees selected Deloitte & Touche as the companies’ independent auditor, following consideration of the following factors and criteria: (1) status as a registered public accounting firm and is subject to oversight by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; (2) status as a “Big Four” public accounting firm, nationally and internationally recognized as an expert in accounting and auditing; (3) having one of the largest utility practices of the “Big Four” public accounting firms; (4) having made a strong commitment to supporting supplier diversity; (5) having significant experience with the companies; and (6) having an experienced team, including the lead partner, familiar with the industry, assigned to the companies’ engagements. The Audit Committees also considered (1) Deloitte & Touche’s quality control report, (2) Deloitte & Touche’s discussion of its independence, and (3) a review of Deloitte & Touche’s proposed audit plan (including draft engagement letter) for 2019.2021.

 

Although Deloitte & Touche has been the companies’ independent auditor since 1999, in 2015 and at the Audit Committees’ direction, the companies solicited bids from accounting firms to conduct the external audits of the companies’ financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2016. The bids were evaluated by the Auditor Selection Committee, which was comprisedconsisted of members from the companies’ accounting, internal auditing, regulatory, operational, sourcing, and legal functions. The bids were evaluated with respect to four key factors: firm capabilities and background, firm resources and audit plan, supplier diversity plans, and pricing. Upon consideration of the information provided by the Auditor Selection Committee, each Audit Committee appointed Deloitte & Touche as the independent auditor for the year ending December 31, 2016.

 

Fees Paid to the Independent Auditor During 20182020 and 20172019

 

The Audit Committees have reviewed the audit and non-audit fees that PG&E Corporation, the Utility, and their respective controlled subsidiaries have paid to the independent auditor (including subsidiaries and affiliates), in order to consider whether the nature and relative value of those fees are compatible with maintaining the firm’s independence.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement5133
 
Back to Contents

Table 1: Fees Billed to PG&E Corporation

 

(Amounts include Fees Billed to the Utility and its Subsidiaries shown in Table 2 below)

 

2018201720202019
Audit Fees$5.505 million$4.67 million$7.962 million$6.351 million
Audit-Related Fees$0.245 million$0.15 million$0.130 million$0.169 million
Tax Fees$0$0$0
All Other Fees$0$0$0

 

Table 2: Fees Billed to the Utility and its Subsidiaries

 

(Amounts are included in Fees Billed to PG&E Corporation shown in Table 1 above)

 

2018201720202019
Audit Fees$4.896 million$3.94 million$6.953 million$5.715 million
Audit-Related Fees$0.245 million$0.15 million$0.130 million$0.150 million
Tax Fees$0$0$0
All Other Fees$0$0$0

 

Audit Fees

 

Audit fees billed for 20182020 and 20172019 relate to services rendered by Deloitte & Touche and its affiliates in connection with reviews of Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q,10-Q; certain limited procedures on registration statements,statements; the audits of the annual financial statements of PG&E Corporation and its subsidiaries and the Utility and its subsidiaries,subsidiaries; the audits of both PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, andAct; advice regarding adoption of new accounting pronouncements; support for statutory or regulatory filings or engagements and regulators’ reviews of auditor workpapers.workpapers; procedures related to the California wildfires and participation in the wildfire fund established under Assembly Bill 1054 (AB 1054); and services rendered for post-bankruptcy matters.

 

The increase in audit fees billed for 2020 as compared to 2019 is primarily due to an increase in billings related to post-bankruptcy matters of approximately $530,000 and an increase related to the Utility’s and PG&E Corporation’s integrated annual audits and quarterly reviews of approximately $285 thousand and $50 thousand, respectively, in 2020.

Audit-Related Fees

 

Audit-related fees billed in 20182020 and 20172019 relate to services rendered by Deloitte & Touche and its affiliates for nuclear decommissioning trust audits, consultations on financial accounting and reporting standards, required agreed-upon procedure reports related to contractual obligations of the Utility and its subsidiaries, advice regarding proposed transactions, advice regarding adoption of new accounting pronouncements, training, and advice concerning internal controls surrounding new applications, systems, or activities.

 

Tax FeesThe decrease in audit-related fees billed in 2020 as compared to 2019 is primarily due to a decrease in billings related to consultations on financial accounting and reporting standards in 2020.

 

Deloitte & ToucheTax Fees and its affiliates provided no services in this category during 2018 and 2017.

All Other Fees

 

Deloitte & Touche and its affiliates provided no services in this categorythese categories during 20182020 and 2017.2019.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement5234
 
Back to Contents

Obtaining Services from the Independent Auditor

 

Annual Review and Pre-Approval of Services

 

For each fiscal year, each Audit Committee approves a list of services that will be obtained during that year by the applicable company and its controlled subsidiaries and affiliates from the independent auditor (including its affiliates). The approved services generally are consistent with the descriptions below:

 

Category Description
Audit services Audit and review of annual and quarterly financial statements, expressing opinions on the conformity of the audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, auditing management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and services that only the independent auditor reasonably can provide (e.g., comfort letters, statutory and regulatory audits, attest services, consents, assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC, and assistance with new accounting standards, laws, and regulations).
Audit-related services Assurance and related services that traditionally are performed by the independent auditor (e.g., agreed-upon procedure reports related to contractual obligations and financing activities, consulting regarding accounting pronouncements, nuclear decommissioning trust audits, and attest services).
Tax services Advice relating to compliance, tax strategy, tax appeals, and specialized tax issues, all of which also must be permitted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Non-audit services None.

 

The Audit Committees also approve maximum fee amounts for each type of approved service.

 

As part of the review process, the Audit Committees assess, among other things, the impact of that service on the independent auditor’s independence.

 

During 2018, management adopted a policy of retaining Deloitte & Touche, Deloitte Consulting, or their subsidiaries or affiliates (together, “Deloitte”) for non-audit services only if the services (1) do not impair Deloitte & Touche’s independence, in fact or appearance, and are permitted by any rules regarding auditor independence, and (2) when aggregated, total amounts paid per year by the companies to Deloitte for “tax service” and “other services” (non-audit services) will be no more than 20 percent of the expected amounts that the companies will pay to Deloitte for “audit services” and “audit-related services.”

 

Mid-Year Monitoring and Approval of Additional Services

 

During the year, management periodically updates each Audit Committee as to the extent to which the approved services have already been provided. The Audit Committees also must approve (1) any proposed new services that were not approved during the annual review and (2) any increase in authorized fee amounts for previously approved services.

 

Delegation of Pre-Approval Authority

 

Each Audit Committee has delegated to its Committee Chair, or to any other independent Committee member if the Chair is not available, the authority to pre-approve services provided by the applicable company’s independent auditor. These pre-approvals must be presented to the full Audit Committee at theits next regularly scheduled Committee meeting.

 

Services Provided During 20182020 and 20172019

 

During 20182020 and 2017,2019, all services provided by Deloitte & Touche to PG&E Corporation, the Utility, and their consolidated affiliates were approved consistent with the applicable pre-approval procedures.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement5335
 
Back to Contents

Report of the Audit CommitteesREPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEES

 

The Audit Committees (“Committees”) of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company are comprisedmade up of independent directors and operate under written charters adopted by their respective Boards. The members of the Audit Committees of PG&E Corporation and the Utility are identical. At both PG&E Corporation and the Utility, management is responsible for internal controls and the integrity of the financial reporting process.

 

The Committees reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements of PG&E Corporation and the Utility with management and the independent auditor. The Committees also discussed with the independent auditorsauditor the matters that are required to be discussed by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) Auditing Standard No. 1301—Communications with Audit Committees.(PCAOB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP was the independent auditor for PG&E Corporation and the Utility in 2018.2020. Deloitte & Touche LLP provided to the Committees the written disclosures and letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding an independent auditor’s communications with an audit committee concerning independence and non-audit services, and the Committees discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP that firm’s independence.

 

Based on the Committees’ review and discussions described above, the Committees recommended to the respective Boards and their delegates that the audited consolidated financial statements for PG&E Corporation and the Utility be included in the PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

February 25, 2021

 

Audit Committees of the Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company

 

February 19, 2019Benjamin F. Wilson, Chair

Rajat Bahri
Kerry W. Cooper

Lewis Chew, Chair
RichardRobert C. Kelly
Forrest E. Miller
Eric D. Mullins(1)Flexon

 

(1)The four names listed above reflect the composition of the Audit Committees as of February 19, 2019, the date of this report of the Audit Committees.

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement5436
 
Back to Contents
 

Our Pay

Item No. 4:3: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation for PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company

 

PG&E Corporation and the Utility each askasks their respective shareholders to approve the following:

 

RESOLVED that the compensation paid for 20182020 to the company’s executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table of this Joint Proxy Statement, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the accompanying narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.

 

Each of PG&E Corporation and the Utility each believebelieves that its executive compensation policies and practices for 20182020 were effective in tying a significant portion of pay to performance, while providing competitive compensation to attract, retain, and motivate talented executives, and alignaligning the interests of our executive officers with those of our shareholders.

 

In establishing PG&E Corporation’s officer compensation programs for 20182020 (which also cover officers of the Utility), the Compensation Committee established three objectives. These objectives, and how these objectives were met for 2018,2020, are discussed in the CD&A, which can be found immediately following this Item No. 4.3. These objectives are summarized below.

 

A significant portion of every officer’s compensation should be tied directly to PG&E Corporation’s performance, without promoting excessive risk-taking.

With the exception of base salary and perquisites, all elements of 20182020 annual officer compensation were tied to corporate operational and/or financial performance and, therefore, provided a direct connection between compensation and performance in the achievement of both key operating results and long-term shareholder value. For Geisha J. Williams,William L. Smith, who served as the PG&E Corporation Interim CEO and President during 2018,on December 31, 2020, approximately 8986 percent of 20182020 target compensation was tied to corporate performance. For the other NEOs, approximately 7561 percent of average 20182020 target compensation was tied to corporate performance.

 

The Compensation Committee’s independent general compensation consultant during 2020, Pay Governance LLC, advised that for 20182020 there were no material issues regarding PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s executive compensation programs, and that the design of the companies’ incentive pay plans posed a low risk. As such, incentive plan design posed a low likelihood of incenting employees to engage in behaviors that are likely to have an adverse material impact on the companies.

A significant component of officer compensation should be tied to PG&E Corporation’s long-term performance for shareholders, in the form of long-term incentive awards.

The annual long-term incentive awards for 2018 were comprised2020 consisted of 2050 percent performance shares using a relative TSR measure, 10customer experience metrics and 50 percent performance shares using apublic safety measure, 5 percent performance shares usingmetrics. Additionally, the 2020 awards include a financial measure, 45stability modifier based on relative total shareholder return (TSR) and ranging from 75 percent RSUs, and 20to 125 percent, stock options.which will be applied to the final performance results for all metrics underlying performance shares. Performance shares granted in 20182020 will vest, if at all, at the end of a three-year period, and their value is also tied to the price of PG&E Corporation common stock. In addition, the value of performance shares using athe TSR measuremodifier is tied to the relative three-year performance of PG&E Corporation common stock price appreciation and dividends paid, as compared to the TSR of companies in the 20182020 Performance Comparator Group. RSUs vest over a three-year period, and their value is tied directly to the price of PG&E Corporation common stock. Stock options vest over three years and only have cash value if the price of PG&E Corporation common stock upon exercise exceeds the stock option exercise price.

 

Target cash compensation (base salary and target short-term incentive) should be competitive with the median target cash compensation for comparable officers in the 20182020 Pay Comparator Group.

Target cash compensation for 2018NEOs in 2020 generally was within a range of 158 percent above to 156 percent below the corresponding market median for companies in the 20182020 Pay Comparator Group.

 

This vote is non-binding and is required by Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. PG&E Corporation and the Utility each currently plan to submit this vote to shareholders annually and expect to next submit this matter to shareholders in connection with next year’s annual shareholder meeting. If the shareholders of either company do not approve this proposal, the Compensation Committee and members of management will investigate the reasons for disapproval and will consider those reasons when developing future executive compensation programs, practices, and policies.

 

The Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Unanimously Recommend a VoteFOR This Proposal to Approve the Compensation of Each Company’s Executive Officers Named in the Summary Compensation Table, as Described in This Joint Proxy Statement.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement5537
 
Back to Contents

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of PG&E Corporation is comprised of independent directors and operates under a written charter adopted by the PG&E Corporation Board. The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing and establishing officer compensation policies for PG&E Corporation, the Utility, and their subsidiaries.COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the section of this Joint Proxy Statement entitled “CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis”Analysis with management. Based on itsthis review, the related discussions, and discussion with management,such other matters deemed relevant, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Boards of PG&E Corporation and the UtilityDirectors that the “CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis” sectionAnalysis be included in this Joint Proxy Statement.Statement for the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

February 19, 2019Mark E. Ferguson III (Chair)

Jessica L. Denecour

Forrest E. Miller, Chair
RichardRobert C. Kelly
Rosendo G. Parra
Barbara L. Rambo(1)Flexon

Dara J. Treseder

 

(1)The four names listed above reflect the composition of the Compensation Committee as of February 19, 2019, the date of this Compensation Committee report.

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement5638
 
Back to Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This CD&A describes the companies’ compensation philosophy, executive compensation program, (CD&A) provides our shareholders and how the NEOs were compensated in 2018. The CD&A discusses:

1.Performance and Pay Highlights

2.Compensation Program Objectives and Competitive Market Review

3.Risk and Governance Approach

4.2018 NEO Compensation Structure

5.2019 NEO Compensation Structure

6.Committee Conclusion

Detailed information regarding 2018 NEO compensation can be found in the Executive Officer Compensation Information section following this CD&A. 

1.PERFORMANCE AND PAY HIGHLIGHTS

Corporate Performance Overview

Much like 2017, 2018 was an extremely difficult year for PG&E Corporation, the Utility, and ourother stakeholders with respect to recent wildfires in California. The devastating 2017 and 2018 wildfires impacted our customers and communities on an unprecedented level.information about PG&E Corporation’s stock price declinedand Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s performance, compensation framework, compensation decisions, and associated governance for our Named Executive Officers (NEOs) in the wake of the October 2017 Northern California wildfires and dropped precipitously after the November 2018 Camp fire. This resulted in steeply negative total shareholder return on a one-, three-, and five-year basis. Although 2018 earnings from operations were above target,(1) we have reported a combined $14.0 billion in pre-tax charges related to2020 at both the 2018 Camp fire and the 2017 Northern California wildfires for fiscal 2018, with full year GAAP net losses of $6.9 billion. On January 29, 2019, PG&E Corporation and the Utility each voluntarily filed for reorganization under Chapter 11.(together, the companies or PG&E).

1.  Executive Summary 40
2.  Overview40
3.  Compensation Design 44
4.  Compensation Governance 48
5.  2020 Compensation Decision and Outcomes 54
6.  Long-Term Incentives 58
7.  2021 Compensation Structure 64
8.  Additional Information66

“Supporting Information” callout boxes are used within the CD&A to provide additional context where appropriate.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   39
Back to Contents

Executive Summary

2020 was a year of transition for the companies. During the year, we emerged from bankruptcy, seated new Board members, and set the foundation for a new PG&E Corporation chief executive officer and a refreshed executive team.
Our leadership took strong and swift actions to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19 on the business. Our priorities were to protect the safety and health of our workforce—particularly our mission-critical frontline workers, maintain the level of service that our customers expect, and promote the resilience of the business. There were no compensation program changes made due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
We delivered solid performance for shareholders. Our fiscal year 2020 non-GAAP Core Earnings per Share was $1.61, in line with guidance.2
Our compensation program is focused on safety and operations. The design of our program is informed by the unique requirements that apply to our companies, including those stemming from our bankruptcy emergence and the commitments applicable under our Plan of Reorganization Order Instituting Investigation (POR OII) with the CPUC, and executive compensation criteria set out in California Assembly Bill 1054 (AB 1054).
The Compensation Committee exercised negative discretion to reduce short-term incentive payouts to 65 percent of target in respect of company performance. Operational performance and financial results combined to produce a formulaic result of 74.6 percent. In view of the companies’ overall safety performance and performance reports from the Federal Monitor, the Compensation Committee elected to exercise negative discretion to reduce short-term incentive payouts for our NEOs to 65 percent of target.
Performance-based long-term incentive awards granted in 2018 did not pay out. Operational performance and financial results combined to produce a formulaic result of 72 percent. The Compensation Committee exercised negative discretion to reduce any remaining performance share payouts for our NEOs to zero, aligning long-term compensation payouts with shareholder outcomes. The discretion applied to results of both short- and long-term incentives will result in a reduction of incentive compensation, in the form of 2020 short-term incentive payments and 2018 performance share payments, to officers for 2020 by an average of 58 percent from target for those elements of incentives.
The Compensation Committee continues to evolve our program. The Compensation Committee focused its work on redesigning performance metrics to focus on results. For the 2021 short-term incentive, we are capping payouts at 200 percent of target and removing the individual performance modifier. For our 2021 long-term awards, we have reintroduced restricted stock units for executives not subject to the executive compensation criteria of AB 1054 and reduced the maximum payout opportunity for performance share units to 200 percent. We also adjusted several short- and long-term metrics to increase the focus on operational, results-oriented outcomes and provide for better alignment with our commitments to stakeholders.

Overview

 

Our Companies

PG&E Corporation is a holding company whose primary operating subsidiary is the Utility, a public utility operating in northern and central California. The magnitudeUtility generates revenues mainly through making investments in operating assets and earning an authorized rate of our financial challenges are reflected in our executive compensation outcomesreturn on those assets through regulated rates for the year. Performance awards tiedsale and delivery of electricity and natural gas to 2016-2018 TSR resultedcustomers. The compensation program described in no payout, outstanding stock options are currently entirely underwater,this CD&A applies to PG&E Corporation and unvested restricted stock unit (RSU) grants are worth 38 percent of value as of April 1, 2019. Our Compensation Committee (“Committee”) exercised discretionthe Utility, with the same philosophy, structure, metrics, and goals applying to reduce 2018 Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP) payouts to zero, although we performed above target with respect to certain operational and compliance, safety, customer service, and financial goals. Our executives’ realized pay for the year is substantially lower than the value at grant, representing the strong alignment of their interests with those of our shareholders.both.

 

As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, the 2019 executive compensation program may differ significantly from that in prior years. In addition, certain compensation provided to executive officers during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases may be subject in certain instances to approval by the Bankruptcy Court. The Committee has been working with its advisors, including WTW, to review the 2019 executive compensation program in an effort to balance the financial situation facingDecember 31, 2020, the companies with the need to continue to recruit and retain qualified executives to guide the companies through a periodhad approximately 24,000 regular employees, nine of uncertainty, including the unpredictabilitywhom were employees of the stock price and the resulting effect on the incentive and retentive value of equity-based awards. In February 2019, the Committee determined that the NEOs will not participate in the 2019 STIP and expects that the companies will continue to evaluate all aspects of the 2019 executive compensation program, including base salary, short- and long-term incentives, and other benefits.PG&E Corporation.

 

(1)2PG&E Corporation discloses historical financial results and bases guidance on “earnings from operations” in order to provide a measure that allows investors to compare the underlying financial performance of the business from one period to another, exclusive of items that management believes do not reflect the normal course of operations. Earnings from operations are not a substitute or alternative for income available for common shareholders presented in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”)(GAAP) (see Exhibit A at the end of this CD&A for a reconciliation of results based on earnings from operations to results based on income available for common shareholders in accordance with GAAP).

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement57

Back to Contents

We remain committed to providing safe and reliable gas and electric services to our customers. The safety of our employees, our customers, and our communities are of utmost importance to us and we are taking active steps to reduce wildfire risk and assist in rebuilding efforts. As a part of those efforts, we are conducting enhanced inspections of our electric transmission and distribution systems in high fire-threat areas. We recognize the importance of recruiting and retaining talented leaders as we enter this next phase as a company, and have appointed Mr. Johnson as our new Chief Executive Officer and President. As a result of the Board’s previously announced Board refreshment process, in April 2019 eleven new directors joined two continuing directors on the Board of PG&E Corporation and the Utility, with eight of ten then-incumbent directors stepping down. Mr. Johnson joined the Board of Pacific Gas and Electric Company on May 2, 2019 concurrently with stepping into his role as Chief Executive Officer and President of PG&E Corporation. We believe that these steps position us to continue to improve our safety and operational effectiveness.

Short-Term Performance and Pay

2018 SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN RESULTS

The STIP is the annual cash incentive plan for executives. Performance is measured against targets previously approved by the Compensation Committee.

Overall safety performance, measured with respect to certain pre-set compliance, employee, and operational safety goals exceeded target. More specifically, performance for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant Reliability and Safety Indicator met the stretch goal for both units. Performance for the Public Safety Index exceeded target through focused effort from the Vegetation Management group and contractors to maintain continuous compliance through numerous quality control and quality assurance audits across the system. Performance for the Asset Records Duration Index exceeded target through increased accountability, work visibility, and focus by the clerical, construction, estimating, and mapping teams. Specifically, increased utilization of real-time reports allowed immediate visibility to orders with issues, so actions could be taken to reduce cycle times. Performance for the Gas In-Line Inspection and Upgrade Index exceeded target through successful completion of medium- and high-risk projects. Performance for the Gas Dig-Ins Reduction measure exceeded stretch goal due to a 3.5 percent decrease in dig-ins with a 13.5 percent increase in volume of Underground Service Alert tickets compared to the same period in 2017. Performance for the Serious Injuries and Fatalities (SIF) Corrective Action Index exceeded target through good performance on timely completion of corrective actions and completed SIF investigation reports.

Customer performance was above stretch goal. Record reliability satisfaction perception and significantly improved pricing satisfaction boosted 2018 performance. Customer focus and customer service satisfaction also significantly improved in 2018 along with several other key survey drivers. Additionally, the Utility met estimating and construction cycle time targets approximately 91 percent of the time due to a focus by the Restoration & Construction teams to prioritize schedules based on customers’ needs.

Financial performance as measured by earnings from operations exceeded the year-end target, primarily driven by the expected cost recovery of insurance premiums above amounts included in authorized revenues as a result of the CPUC authorizing a Wildfire Expense Memorandum Account, and tax favorability associated with the 2017 tax return, partially offset by higher emergency and restoration costs.

Overall company STIP results resulted in a final company performance score of 1.601.

After reviewing overall company performance in light of the devastating 2018 Camp fire, the hardships incurred by communities and others, and the companies’ financial circumstances including the need to seek relief under Chapter 11, management recommended that the Committee exercise its discretion and reduce the company performance score to zero. The Committee and Boards accepted the recommendation andno 2018 STIP awards were paid.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement5840
 
Back to Contents

Long-Term PerformanceOur Named Executive Officers

PG&E Corporation (positions as of 12/31/2020)
William L. SmithChristopher A. FosterJohn R. SimonWilliam D. Johnson
Interim Chief Executive
Officer and President(1)
Vice President and Interim
Chief Financial Officer(2)
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and
Chief Ethics & Compliance
Officer(3)
Former Chief Executive
Officer and President(4)
Jason P. WellsJanet C. Loduca
Former Executive Vice
President and Chief
Financial Officer(5)
Former Senior Vice President
and General Counsel, PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas
and Electric Company(6)
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (positions as of 12/31/2020)
Michael A. LewisDavid S. ThomasonJames M. WelschAndrew M. Vesey
Interim President(7)Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and
Controller
Senior Vice President,
Generation and Chief
Nuclear Officer
Former Chief Executive
Officer and President(8)

Ms. Loduca was an NEO of the Utility in addition to PG&E Corporation. Messrs. Lewis and Vesey were NEOs of PG&E Corporation in addition to the Utility.
Notes.(1)Effective June 30, 2020.
(2)Effective September 26, 2020. From January 1 through March 8, 2020, Mr. Foster was Vice President, Investor Relations. From March 9 through September 25, 2020, Mr. Foster was Vice President, Treasury & Investor Relations.
(3)Title effective August 15, 2020. From January 1 through August 14, 2020, Mr. Simon was Executive Vice President, Law, Strategy & Policy.
(4)Retired effective July 1, 2020.
(5)Resigned effective September 26, 2020.
(6)Separated effective August 16, 2020.
(7)Effective August 1, 2020. From January 1 through July 31, 2020 Mr. Lewis was Senior Vice President, Electric Operations.
(8)Separated effective August 4, 2020.

Leadership Changes

The companies experienced several significant leadership transitions during 2020. Mr. Johnson retired as CEO and PayPresident of PG&E Corporation effective July 1 and the PG&E Corporation Board appointed Mr. Smith on an interim basis from June 30 until the start date of a new CEO. Additionally, Mr. Vesey, Ms. Loduca, and Mr. Wells all left employment with the companies during the year.

In association with these changes the Compensation Committee reviewed and approved interim compensation arrangements and retention awards for select NEOs. Further details can be found in the “Interim CEO Compensation,” 2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes” and “Retention Awards” sections, starting on page 61, 54 and 60 respectively.

In November 2020, Patricia K. Poppe was hired as the new CEO of PG&E Corporation, effective January 4, 2021.

 

Our equity-based incentive plan is designedResponse to link executive performance to long-term shareholder returns. Awards consist of (1) performance shares which cliff-vest following a three-year performance period, (2) RSUs with time-based vesting, and (3) stock options with time-based vesting.COVID-19

 

2016 Performance Share Result - TSR

Fifty percent of long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) awards granted in 2016 were allocated to performance shares with the payout determined by comparing PG&E Corporation’s TSR to that ofThe COVID-19 pandemic added operational challenges for the companies in its 2016 Performance Comparator Group. PG&E Corporation’s TSR ranked below all companies in the 2016 Performance Comparator Group2020. As providers of an essential service we are committed to maintaining business continuity and services for the three-year period from 2016benefit of the communities in which we operate. Leadership acted quickly to 2018, resulting in no payout in 2019 with respect to these performance shares.

TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN (TSR) PERFORMANCE
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2018

2016 Performance Share Result – Safety and Affordability

Ten percent of LTIP awards granted in 2016 were allocated to performance shares withprotect the payout determined by measuring performance against equally-weighted safety and affordability goals. Safety performance,health of our dedicated workforce, particularly our mission-critical frontline workers, implementing policies such as measured byremote working where possible, the 2016 through 2018 Lost Workday Case Rate, was belowprovision of PPE for our field workers, enhanced healthcare benefits, and interim time off and leave policies, all to maintain the threshold target. Affordability, as measured by three-year efficiency gains versus a $100 million target, achieved a 2.0 score. The overall result was a 100 percent payout in 2019 for these performance shares, which represented 10 percentlevel of the total target LTIP grant value for 2016.

2016-2018 SAFETY AND AFFORDABILITY RESULTS

service that our customers expect.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement5941
 
Back to Contents

CEO Realizable CompensationPerformance Highlights

 

The Compensation Committee believes that analyzing realizable pay is important in understanding the relationship between the targeted compensation that2020 performance year was approvedone of transition for the CEOcompanies. In addition to our exit from bankruptcy, executive team changes, renewed focus on safety, and focus on reliability and reducing operational risk, we also recommitted to the citizens of California that we would lead from the front on issues of climate change, wildfire mitigation, and environmental sustainability.

The companies took responsibility for a series of devastating wildfires caused by our electric equipment, including the 2018 Camp fire. The Utility pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter in the deaths of the 84 people who lost their lives in that tragedy and settled billions of dollars in damage claims by fire victims as well as cities, counties, and other public entities.

In August, California experienced some of the most severe weather in recent history, including extreme heat, dangerously high winds, and a “lightning siege” that ignited wildfires across the Utility’s service territory. These events strained the capacity of the state’s electric grid, forcing the independent system operator to impose “rolling backouts” affecting hundreds of thousands of PG&E Corporationcustomers. Dangerous weather conditions recurred throughout the summer, fall, and into the compensation that was actually earned, or may still be earned, based on company performance.winter, necessitating several PSPS events, many of which affected the same communities multiple times.

 

ForWithin our challenging operating environment, the past three yearscompanies succeeded in aggregate, CEO realizable pay was 48 percentachieving many of target. Target compensationthe performance objectives set for each year includes salary, non-equity incentives at target, the value of stock awards granted (at grant date fair market value), change in pension value, and all other compensation.

Realizable compensation for each year includes salary, non-equity incentives earned, the value of stock awards (using the December 31, 2018 stock price for vested awards or, for outstanding unvested awards, the expected value at vesting based on the December 31, 2018 stock price), change in pension value, and all other compensation. Based on the significant reduction in TSR following 2017 and 2018 catastrophic wildfire events, no payouts are assumed for performance shares granted in 2017 and 2018 using a TSR measure. Target payouts are assumed for performance shares granted in 2017 and 2018 using safety and affordability or financial goals.

Effective March 1, 2017, Ms. Williams replaced Anthony F. Earley, Jr. as CEO of PG&E Corporation. The following chart presents Mr. Earley’s compensation for 2016 and Ms. Williams’ compensation for 2017 and 2018.

CEO TARGET AND REALIZABLE COMPENSATION
(2016 - 2018) IN $ MILLIONS

2020:

 

2.COMPENSATION PROGRAM OBJECTIVES, PROCESS, AND COMPETITIVE MARKET REVIEWWe laid the groundwork for further improvements in the wildfire management program in 2021. We committed to ensuring that our PSPS events would be targeted and focused, and demonstrated clear year-over-year improvements that received positive feedback from the CPUC.
We exited bankruptcy, expedited the resolution of wildfire victims’ claims, and successfully closed major regulatory cases at both the state and federal level.
We seated a diverse, deeply experienced Board at each company, and began recruiting new members for the companies’ executive teams, naming Patricia K. Poppe as the incoming CEO of PG&E Corporation in November.

 

2018 Officer Compensation Program Objectives

The Compensation Committee established PG&E Corporation’s officer compensation program for 2018 to meet three primary objectives:However, the companies’ 2020 performance also fell short in several key areas:

 

We experienced five employee and contractor fatalities, including a helicopter crash that claimed three lives.
Performance-Based Pay—A significant portionBoth the safety shutoffs and the state-mandated rolling blackouts contributed to frequent and extended service interruptions.
Our gas operations recorded several large overpressure incidents that, while managed safely, did not reflect our standards or expectations.
The year’s extreme weather contributed to a number of total compensation is at risk based onfire ignitions connected to PG&E Corporationequipment.
Throughout 2020, and individual performance. Short-continuing into 2021, the Utility continued to face questions and long-term incentives reflectcriticism from the federal judge overseeing its probation. The judge expressed his view that the Utility was not complying with conditions linked to the vegetation management and safety customer, operational,metrics detailed in the Utility’s Wildfire Mitigation Plan. With the concurrence of the US Attorney’s Office and financial goals, and long-term shareholder returns, without promoting excessive risk-taking.the CPUC, these concerns were resolved when the Utility agreed to new conditions of probation ultimately approved by the court.

 

Shareholder Alignment—A significant component of every officer’s compensation is tied directly to PG&E Corporation’s performance for shareholders. Performance is defined as TSR, measured by stock price appreciation and dividends paid, relative to companies in the Performance Comparator Group.

Market-Competitive Compensation Levels—Target cash compensation (base salary and short-term incentive) should be competitive with the median target cash compensation for comparable officers in the Pay Comparator Group.

PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s 2018 compensation policies and practices described below and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement are designed to meet these objectives. These objectives for 2018 were largely unchanged from 2017.

The Committee also considers shareholder advisory votes as part of its review of executive compensation programs and practices. In May 2018, PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s shareholders approved the companies’ NEO compensation for 2017 with votes of 94.9 percent and 99.9 percent, respectively. The Committee considered these results and, given the level of shareholder support, made no material changes to compensation policies in 2018.

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement6042
 
Back to Contents

Executive Officer Compensation-Setting ProcessCompensation Framework

Our core compensation program, which consists of base salary, a cash-based short-term incentive, and an equity-based long-term incentive, is applied consistently to both PG&E Corporation and the Utility. This compensation framework applied to all NEOs during the year other than the former CEO and President of PG&E Corporation, who was subject to a three-year agreement based on the prevailing bankruptcy conditions in 2019, and the Interim CEO and President of PG&E Corporation, whose pay arrangements reflected the transitionary nature of the role.

Core Pay Component and Rationale2020 NEO Target Direct
Compensation Mix(1)
2020 Performance MeasuresPerformance
Period
Form of
Payment
Base Salary
Fixed pay to attract and retain talent;
takes account of scope, performance and experience
   N/AN/ACash
Short-Term Incentive
Variable pay to incent and recognize performance in areas of short-term strategic importance

 Electric Operations

 Gas Operations

 Generation

 Additional Public Safety & Reliability

Financial Stability

Individual Performance Modifier

Specific metrics associated witheach category; see below

One yearCash
Long-Term Incentives
Equity-based pay to incent and
recognize performance in areas of long-term strategic importance, promote retention and stability, and align executives with shareholders

 Customer Satisfaction Score

 PSPS Notification Accuracy

 System Hardening

 Substation Enablement

Relative TSR Modifier

Three yearsPSUs
In addition to these core direct components of compensation, NEOs receive modest perquisites, are eligible to participate in post-employment benefit programs on terms broadly similar to our other employees, and are covered by an executive severance plan.
Notes.(1)Reflects target compensation for our NEOs who remained in employment on December 31, 2020, other than Mr. Smith given his unique and temporary compensation arrangements as Interim CEO and President.

From time to time, the Compensation Committee might also approve cash or equity awards in addition to the annual incentive awards. Typically, these include awards to new hires, promotional awards, or retention awards. One-time awards were made during 2020 to address retention concerns and reflected the fact that certain individuals took on expanded roles following NEO departures. Further details on the operation of all elements of compensation in 2020, including awards related to expanded duties and retention, can be found in the “2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes” section starting on page 54.

Looking Ahead

2021 is expected to be a year of significant change and rebuilding for the companies, with Ms. Poppe’s appointment as CEO of PG&E Corporation and a new executive leadership team leading the companies in a post-bankruptcy environment. On joining PG&E Corporation, Ms. Poppe immediately began meeting with customers, policymakers, investors, and co-workers across the companies to gather insights on how to improve outcomes, reduce risk, and rebuild trust. Her approach centers on results that deliver benefits across the “Triple Bottom Line” of People, Planet, and Prosperity, underpinned by our safety mindset and supported by consistent operational performance.

For 2021, the Compensation Committee has maintained a compensation structure broadly consistent with 2020, with changes to performance metrics and weightings to reflect priorities for the year ahead with an emphasis on results. These changes reinforce important areas of operational focus, including increased emphasis on safety, while maintaining alignment with the criteria of AB 1054 and our commitments under the POR OII.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   43
Back to Contents

As the Boards and refreshed executive team continue to refine our long-term strategic objectives, the Compensation Committee will work to help ensure that our compensation philosophy and practices appropriately focus on operational, financial, safety, and customer-centered priorities that represent the stakeholders we serve. During 2021, we plan to re-engage with investors, proxy advisors, regulators, and other constituencies to gather feedback on our executive compensation programs. We will also conduct a comprehensive review of our compensation philosophy, programs, and practices to help ensure strong alignment with the interests of our shareholders, customers, and stakeholders, and competitive pay-for-performance positioning. Further information about our 2021 compensation design can be found in the “2021 Compensation Structure” section starting on page 64.

Compensation Design

Compensation Objectives

Our companies’ mission is to deliver safe, reliable, affordable, and clean electricity and gas to our customers. Our focus on customer welfare, prioritizing both public and employee safety, is central to how we operate and reflected in our executive officer compensation program design. We believe that focusing on those attributes of our business will lead to long-term value creation for our shareholders. This focus also aligns with the criteria under AB 1054 and our commitments under the POR OII.

To be successful, we need to attract, motivate, and retain executives with the necessary skills and experience, who are aligned with our vision, and who can deliver on our commitments to all stakeholders. Four fundamental objectives form the foundation of our compensation program.

ObjectiveHow we achieve this1
Pay for performanceA significant portion of total compensation is at-risk and based on performance – in 2020 an average of 61 percent of NEO target compensation was at-risk
Short- and long-term incentives are earned based on performance reflecting safety, customer, operational, and financial goals, including shareholder returns
Metrics and goals are designed so as not to promote excessive risk-taking
Align with shareholdersEquity-based compensation, the value of which reflects movements in our stock price, accounted for an average of 47 percent of NEO target compensation in 2020
Total shareholder return relative to our Performance Comparator Group is used as a performance measure or modifier (applies to 2018 and 2020 PSU awards; no awards were made in 2019)
Provide market competitive payTarget cash compensation should be competitive with the median for comparable roles in our Pay Comparator Group
Comply with legal requirementsThe officer compensation structure is designed and reviewed to reflect both the letter and spirit of legal requirements
Notes.(1)Reflects target compensation for our NEOs who remained in employment on December 31, 2020, other than Mr. Smith given his unique and temporary compensation arrangements as Interim CEO and President.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   44
Back to Contents

Compensation Policies and Practices

We are focused on creating an effective compensation program that successfully aligns our key strategic objectives with the interests of our shareholders and broader stakeholders. To reinforce this, we have adopted policies and practices that guide our compensation practices as summarized below.

We Do…We Do Not…
Pay for performance | Majority of compensation is at risk, linked to company performance and shareholder interestsPay tax gross-ups | No tax gross-ups are provided, except for those generally available to all management employees, such as for one-time relocation expenses upon hire
Engage with shareholders | Ongoing discussionswith key institutional investors, including on thetopic of compensation(1)Permit hedging or pledging | Our policy prohibits hedging and pledging of either company’s stock
Require meaningful ownership | Executives subject to share ownership and retention requirementsReprice stock options | Any repricing would require advance shareholder approval
Engage an independent consultant | The Compensation Committee engages a consultant and annually assesses independenceProvide additional service credits | No granting of additional service under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
Operate clawback provisions | Incentive compensation and severance for certain officers is subject to clawback or restrictionPay unearned dividends | No dividends or dividend equivalents are paid on unvested equity awards
Have a double trigger | Change in control severance requires a change in control and involuntary termination (includes constructive termination for good reason)Provide excessive benefits or perquisites | Benefits and perquisites are limited, reflecting market norms
Notes.(1)Engagement related to executive compensation was temporarily suspended during bankruptcy proceedings and will recommence in 2021.

Commitment to Compliance

 

The Utility is subject to AB 1054, a California law which, among other things, sets out certain criteria regarding the design of the Utility’s executive compensation program. Although these criteria only apply to the Utility’s executive officers as defined in AB 1054, the criteria also have influenced the executive compensation design and arrangements for officers at both companies. There are also additional executive compensation requirements that the Utility is subject to as a result of the POR OII.

Supporting Information: California Assembly Bill 1054 Considerations 

AB 1054 is legislation applying to the Utility that addresses the dangers and devastation from catastrophic wildfires in California caused by electric utility infrastructure. There are two subsections setting forth criteria regarding executive compensation with which the Utility complies. These criteria apply specifically to a subset of Utility officers and influence the design of our programs more broadly at both the Utility and PG&E Corporation.

Supporting Information: Chapter 11 Considerations - Plan of Reorganization Order Instituting Investigation

The POR OII is the process by which the CPUC reviewed and approved the companies’ Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization. As part of the POR OII, the Utility is subject to additional requirements regarding executive compensation that apply specifically to a subset of Utility officers, and we have designed our programs to comply with these requirements, as described below.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   45
Back to Contents
Requirement(1)How We Achieve This(2,3)
Compensation should be structured to promote safety as a priority and to ensure public safetyIncentive plan metrics are weighted toward customer and workforce welfare, placing a priority on public safety
All long-term incentive awards also incent customer and workforce welfare indirectly due to their exposure to absolute and relative stock performance
A significant portion of long-term incentive compensation shall be based on safety, customer satisfaction, engagement, and welfare; the remaining portion may be based on financial performance or other considerationsPSU metrics promote customer experience and public safety
Compensation should be structured to promote utility financial stabilityIncentive plan metrics collectively promote customer, public, and workforce safety, thus contributing indirectly to financial stability
Short-term incentive includes a core earnings per share metric, a measure sensitive to dilution incurred during emergence from Chapter 11
Long-term incentive awards are subject to a financial or relative TSR metric, either as a modifier or standalone measure, that reduces payouts if our relative returns lag those of other energy companies
Incentive compensation should be based on meeting performance metrics that are measurable and enforceableIncentive plan metrics are designed to be objective, measurable, enforceable, and auditable
Metrics are predominantly outcome-based, focused on end results rather than operational activity or effort
Guaranteed cash compensation should be limited, with the primary portion of executive officers’ compensation based on the achievement of objective performance metricsCompensation structure emphasizes at-risk, performance-based variable pay, making up an average of 61 percent of NEO target compensation in 2020
Short- and long-term incentives constitute at least 50 percent of target compensation; as noted above, in 2020, on average 61 percent of NEO target pay was at-risk variable pay
Long-term incentive awards are aligned with shareholders and are performance-based through share price exposure (all equity-based compensation) and the application of performance metrics (PSUs)
The compensation structure must not include any guaranteed monetary incentivesShort- and long-term incentives are entirely at risk
The only guaranteed cash payments are base salary and a modest stipend in lieu of broader, market-typical perquisites
The compensation should include a significant long-term element based on the electrical corporation’s long-term performance and value, held or deferred for at least three yearsLong-term incentive awards represent a significant portion of total compensation
Performance-based equity is subject to a three-year performance period
Performance-based equity is subject to a three-year hold from the date of grant
Ancillary compensation that is not aligned with shareholder and taxpayer interests in the electrical corporation should be minimal or eliminatedExecutives receive modest stipends in lieu of perquisites
These are de minimis in value and aligned with stakeholder interests as they are aligned with market norms within the industry, and thus contribute to the attraction and retention of talent
Notes.(1)This is an abbreviated summary of some of the criteria and not intended to be comprehensive or contain formal legal definitions.
(2)Unless noted otherwise, comments pertain to compensation arrangements post-Chapter 11 emergence, given the restrictions placed on practices during Chapter 11.
(3)Unless otherwise noted, target compensation refers to salary, target short-term incentive and the target annual long-term incentive award with percentages reflecting target compensation for our NEOs who remained in employment after December 31, 2020, other than Mr. Smith given his unique and temporary compensation arrangements as Interim CEO and President.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   46
Back to Contents

Strategic Alignment

It is important that the performance metrics used in our officer compensation setting processframework align with our strategic priorities if we are to be effective in paying for 2018 was consistent with that in prior years. Each year, the independent membersperformance and demonstrating accountability. Our performance metrics reflect our focus on customer welfare, prioritizing both public and employee safety including contributing to long-term sustainable value for our shareholders.

The majority of both our short- and long-term incentive plan metrics are connected to our focus on customer welfare, prioritizing public and employee safety. These metrics are described below.

Additional details regarding each of the applicable Board, basedlisted performance measures can be found in the discussions of “Short-Term Incentives” and “Long-Term Incentives” below.

2020 Performance MetricShort-TermLong-TermWhy This Matters
ELECTRIC OPERATIONS
Reportable fire ignitionsPublic safety measure of the results of work to mitigate wildfire risk
Electric asset failurePublic safety and reliability measure of the results of work to mitigate wildfire and system failure risks
Distribution circuit sectionalizationPublic safety and reliability measure of mitigation of the scope and impact of, and risks associated with, PSPS events
GAS OPERATIONS
Large overpressure eventsPublic safety measure of the results of work to mitigate the risk of loss of gas containment
Total gas dig-ins reductionsPublic safety measure of the results of work to mitigate the risk of loss of containment from underground gas transmission and distribution facilities
GENERATION
Safe dam operating capacityPublic safety measure of the results of work to mitigate the risk of large uncontrolled water release
Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP) reliability and safety indicatorPublic safety measure of the results of work to reduce the risk of a nuclear core damaging event with the potential for radiological release; composite metric of 11 performance indicators
WORKFORCE SAFETY
Days away, restricted, and transferred rateEmployee safety measure of the results of reduced risk of workforce injuries; reflects Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) record keeping requirements
RELIABILITY
Gas customer emergency responsePublic safety measure of work to reduce risk and increase reliability of service by promoting prompt responses to customer calls, or notifications reporting a gas odor, or gas emergency
911 emergency responsePublic safety measure of the percentage of incidents where Utility personnel arrive onsite within 60 minutes of a 911 call; promotes prompt response times that reduce public safety risks and frees up public agency resources to respond to other emergency situations
Customers experiencing multiple interruptionsCustomer experience measure of the results of efforts to promote system reliability
System hardeningPublic safety and reliability measure assessing actions taken to mitigate the risk of catastrophic wildfires
Substation enablementPublic safety and reliability measure promoting and assessing success in efforts to reduce the scope and customer impact of PSPS events
CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE
Customer satisfactionCustomer experience measure of satisfaction with the services offered by the companies
Public safety power shutoff (PSPS) notificationsCustomer experience measure of advance and accurate notification of PSPS outages

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   47
Back to Contents

Our incentive programs also incorporate metrics and goals reflecting our financial stability.

Supporting Information: What “Financial Stability” Means for Us
Our business model generates revenue through making investments in operating assets and earning an authorized rate of return on those assets through regulated rates, or “cost of service ratemaking.” There is no guarantee that regulated rates will yield the authorized rate of return; only by managing costs within the framework of authorized rates can we deliver value to shareholders. With limited exceptions, we do not make more money by selling more electricity and gas. Reducing our operating cost, which is tied to customer affordability through our rate-setting process, is directly aligned with creating shareholder value.

2020 Performance Metric
FINANCIAL STABILITYShort-TermLong-TermWhy This Matters
Non-GAAP core earnings per shareMeasure to promote and assess financial stability; aligns with cost efficiency; promotes customer affordability; financial stability critical to continued provision of services to customers
Relative TSRMeasure to assess relative value created for our shareholders, providing an indirect external assessment of our performance in all other areas. In 2020 relative TSR was used as a modifier rather than a metric

Compensation Governance

Role of the Compensation Committee’s adviceCommittee

The Compensation Committee is made up of at least three, and recommendation, approvecurrently four, independent directors who collectively have the amountsdelegated authority to oversee matters relating to defined compensation, benefits, and human capital issues. In discharging their duties, the Compensation Committee receives input from the management teams and external independent consultants as appropriate.

The core activities of the Compensation Committee include:

Recommending the total target compensation for the CEO of PG&E Corporation and the CEO of the Utility (or, if the Utility CEO office is not filled, the Utility President or equivalent). Such approvals are made following a review(or equivalent officer(s)) to the relevant Board for approval, informed by reviews of comparative data, advice from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant,consultants, and an assessment of individual performance, objectives, and scope of responsibilities. The Committee also approves the amounts of total target compensation for all other executive officers based upon a review of comparative data, advice from its independent compensation consultant, and recommendations from the Corporation CEO and the Utility CEO (or, if the Utility CEO office is not filled, the Utility President or equivalent), as applicable. The Committee uses comparative data throughout the year to set the total target compensation of new executive officers. The Committee also reviews other benefits provided to executive officers.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   48
Back to Contents
Approving the total target compensation for all other executive officers based on similar contextual inputs and proposals from the PG&E Corporation CEO and the Utility President (or equivalent officer(s)), as applicable. The PG&E Corporation CEO has the authority to approve compensation within the guidelines approved by the Compensation Committee for lower-level officers (excluding Section 16 Officers) and non-officer employees.
Approving compensation guidelines based on input from management for different categories of employees, including target short- and long-term incentive opportunities, an aggregate cap on the value of long-term incentive awards, and the terms and conditions that will apply to long-term incentive awards made during the year.
Administering the Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP), under which equity-based awards are made, with the ability to delegate ministerial matters to management.
Reviewing and approving the performance metrics and associated goals proposed by management, for the short- and long-term incentive awards.

 

The PG&E Corporation Board has delegated to the Compensation Committee the authority to administer the 2014 LTIP, under which equity-based awards have been made. In addition, the Corporation Board has delegated to the Corporation CEO the authority to grant LTIP awards to certain eligible participants within the guidelines adopted by the Committee.Role of Management

 

The PG&E Corporation CEO and the Utility CEOPresident (or if the Utility CEO office is not filled, the Utility President or equivalent)equivalent officer(s)) are generally attend a portion of eachinvited to Compensation Committee meetingmeetings but excuse themselves from the Committee’s deliberations or decisions with respect todo not participate in discussions on their own pay. Atcompensation. In certain areas, as described above, the Committee’s request, the Corporation CEOCompensation Committee welcomes these officers’ feedback on NEO performance given their knowledge of executives’ contributions and the Utility CEO (or, if the Utility CEO office is not filled, the Utility President or equivalent) review with the Committee the performance of the other NEOs. The Corporation CEO and the Utility CEO (or, if the Utility CEO office is not filled, the Utility President or equivalent), as applicable, also recommend adjustments, if any, in base pay, annual incentive awards, and LTIP awards for the other NEOs.

These recommendations are givengives this feedback appropriate weight by the Committeeconsideration in the executive compensation-setting process, given each CEO’s and President’s direct knowledge of the performance and contributions of each NEO.process. The Compensation Committee may exercise its discretion to accept, reject, or modify their recommendationsfeedback based on the Compensation Committee members’ collective assessment of the NEOs’ performance and pay position relative to the peer group, as well asgroups, and PG&E Corporation’s overall financial and operating performance and other factors that the Compensation Committee deems appropriate.

 

The Compensation Committee may delegate its authority with respect to ministerial matters under the 2014 LTIP to the PG&E Corporation CEO or the PG&E Corporation Senior Vice President, Human Resources.Use of Consultants and Advisors

 

The PG&E Corporation Board has delegated to the Corporation CEO the authority to approve compensation, within guidelines approved byTo assist in discharging its duties, the Compensation Committee to lower-level officers—excluding Section 16 Officers—and to non-officer employees. With respect to equity awards, such Committee-approved guidelines include the LTIP annual award value ranges for different categories of employees,retains an aggregate cap on the value of awards for any given year, and the terms and conditions of all LTIP awards to be made during the year. The guidelines also specify the grant date for annual LTIP awards. Actual awards are made within the range of target LTIP values previously approved by the Committee.

Consultants and Advisers

The Compensation Committee retains independent compensation consultantsconsultant to adviseprovide advice and data, including advising and reviewing annual executive compensation arrangements and individual compensation packages. From September 2014 through the Committee on compensation programs and practices, including pay levels for non-employee directors and for officers.

For establishing 2018 compensation,end of 2020, the Compensation Committee retained Pay Governance, LLC (“Pay Governance”) as itsan independent consultant forto provide advice on general compensation issues. NeitherDuring this period Pay Governance nor any of its affiliates provided anydid not provide services to management of PG&E Corporation, the Utility,either company or their respective affiliates, although Pay Governance has maintainedwas invited to maintain a working relationship with management in order to effectively fulfill Pay Governance’s primaryan advisor role as adviser to the Compensation Committee. Pay Governance is a nationally recognized independent firm providing consulting assistance to corporations to develop compensation programs for senior executives, key employees,During and boardsin respect of directors. Pay Governance was first selected as the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant in September 2014, following the Committee’s review of numerous candidate firms.

During 2018,2020, Pay Governance advised the Compensation Committee on the following matters:

 

Non-employee director compensation,

Executive compensation competitive market,

2019 Joint Proxy Statement61Non-employee director compensation
Market competitiveness of executive officer compensation
Emerging trends and best practices in executive pay and corporate governance
Performance goal and metric selection
Compensation risk
Shareholder advisory firms’ pay and performance analyses
Disclosures relating to compensation
Severance and change-in-control practices and policies
Chapter 11 compensation-related matters
Back to Contents
Executive compensation emerging trends and best practices,

Shareholder advisory firms’ pay and performance analyses,

Compensation risk analysis,

Proxy statement disclosures relating to compensation,

Severance and change-in-control practices and policies,

Corporate governance best practices relating to compensation, and

Compensation matters relating to CEO transition.

 

In late 2018,addition, for 2020, the companies retainedengaged Willis Towers Watson (“WTW”) as an independent consultant for the discrete, targetedspecific purpose of advising the Compensation Committee, the Boards of Directors, the Compensation Committee and management with respect toon incentive plans, retention plans, and non-employee director compensation for companies undergoing financial restructurings. WTW received $150,000Fees in fees during 2018 for such services. WTWrespect of this work totaled $198,000 in 2020. Willis Towers Watson also has historically provided the companies with customaryprovides actuarial and consulting services with respect to employee compensation and benefit plan administration. WTW received $2.3administration, with fees totaling $2.35 million for such services during 2018.in 2020. The WTWWillis Towers Watson representatives who workworked on the targeted executive and director compensation issues for the companies have no relationships with PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s BoardBoards’ members andor executive management, (otherother than through the provisionsprovision of such targeted consulting services)this advice, and are independent of the WTW team working on ordinary course mattersongoing customary services for the companies. Compensation that would be received by the WTWWillis Towers Watson executive and director compensation team is not directly tied to the other fees paid to WTWWillis Towers Watson by PG&E Corporation and the Utility.

 

The Compensation Committee determined that no conflicts of interest were raised by the work of Pay Governance or WTWWillis Towers Watson during 2018.2020.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   49
Back to Contents

In the fourth quarter of 2020 the Compensation Committee conducted a review of executive compensation advisory firms. This reflected the healthy governance practice of conducting a periodic review, and providing an opportunity to consider the merits of engaging the perspective of a new independent consultant. After careful consideration of a number of well-qualified nationally-recognized independent executive compensation consultants, Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC was selected to advise the Compensation Committee as of January 1, 2021. The Compensation Committee assessed Meridian’s independence and determined that no conflict of interests exist.

 

The Compensation Committee may also has discretion to engage other compensation consultants, as well as legal counsel, and other advisers, although it did not do so during 2018. The Committee will consider any advisers’ and consultants’after consideration of their independence and whether the work of any compensation consultants will raise any conflictpotential for conflicts of interest. PG&E Corporation pays the reasonable compensation costs for any such advisers and consultants. Management may also retain separate compensation consultants.

 

Management also may retain compensation consultants to assist management andShareholder Engagement

Feedback from shareholders is an important consideration for the Compensation Committee in connectionwhen reviewing and setting compensation for our executive officers. In a typical year, this feedback is collected through two primary channels:

Directly through proactive engagement with our major shareholders and stakeholders throughout the year, and
Indirectly through the results of our say-on pay vote.

In 2020 our direct engagement with shareholders specific to executive compensation matters.was limited prior to our emergence from bankruptcy.

 

2018 NEO

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   50
Back to Contents

Compensation Competitive Market Reviewand Risk

The Compensation Committee annually reviews an assessment of the general risk factors associated with the companies’ compensation policies and practices to determine whether they encourage inappropriate risk-taking. The Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant in 2020, Pay Governance, assisted in this review. The Compensation Committee also receives advice from the Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees of the companies’ respective Boards of Directors.

Annual Risk AssessmentSafety and Nuclear Oversight
Committees’ Input
Compensation Risk Mitigation
Policies and Practices

Annual risk assessment conducted by Pay Governance covered:

•  Compensation structure and mix

•  Incentive plan structures

•  Other pay plans

•  Governance of plan design and administration oversight

•  Target and maximum opportunities

•  Nature and mix of performance metrics

•  Risk of earnings manipulation

•  Compensation Committee/Board discretion to reduce or eliminate performance

•  Advice regarding appropriate safety and operational incentive measures

•  Assessment of emphasis on and overlap/consistency in safety metrics and weightings, and the extent to which these metrics and weightings support an organization-wide focus on safety

•  Executive stock ownership guidelines

•  Clawback policy

•  Hedging and pledging policy

•  Severance and change-in-control benefits

•  Incentive goal-setting approach

Pay Governance concluded that the companies’ compensation warrangements have a low-risk profile. The companies believe compensation programs and policies are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on either PG&E Corporation or the Utility.

 

For 2018,2020, Pay Governance concluded that there were no material issues regarding the companies’ executive pay programs, and that the design of the companies’ incentive pay plans has a low risk of encouraging employees to take risks that could potentially have material adverse consequences to the organization. The Pay Governance conclusion extends to the CEOs and Presidents (and equivalent officers) of PG&E Corporation and the Utility and the other NEOs who participated in the incentive arrangements during 2020. Based on this, the companies concluded that the risks arising from the overall compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on either PG&E Corporation or the Utility.

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines

We believe that stock ownership further aligns the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders, encouraging executives to consider the long-term performance and prospects for our companies. Our guidelines require senior executive officers to achieve and maintain a minimum investment in PG&E Corporation common stock, expressed as a percentage of their base salary. Until an executive meets the applicable guideline, the executive is subject to a 50 percent holding requirement in relation to the net shares realized after tax withholding from the vesting of RSUs or PSUs. In assessing compliance, unvested RSUs are counted if the executive is eligible for retirement under the award’s terms.

The current guidelines are as follows:

RolesGuideline
(% of Base Salary)
CEO, PG&E Corporation         600%
President, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Executive Vice Presidents300%
Other Executive Officers150%

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   51
Back to Contents

Clawback

The Executive Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy is a robust policy that enables the Compensation Committee used a Pay Comparator Group of publicly traded gas and electric utilitiesBoards to evaluate market practice and assess PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s competitive pay position, supplemented by data for the broader energy services sector or general industry, as appropriate. All elements of NEO total direct pay (base pay and short- and long-term incentive targets) were compared individually andrecoup payments made to Section 16 Officers across both companies in aggregatedefined circumstances, including no-fault scenarios that would negatively impact our shareholders. The policy remains under periodic review to the applicable benchmark data.help ensure continued relevance.

WhatWhy

  Short-term incentives

  Long-term cash incentives

  Equity-based incentives

  Financial restatement with the SEC for any of the three most recently completed fiscal years

  A material miscalculation with respect to the amount of any payment

  Individual involvement in fraud or misconduct that caused material financial or reputational harm

 

The 2012 Officer Severance Policy, as amended, further enables the Committee and Boards to recoup severance rights, payments, and benefits provided executive officers across both companies (including executive officers as defined in AB 1054), in defined circumstances.

WhatWhy
Severance benefitsIndividual misconduct materially contributes to PG&E Corporation or Utility felony conviction relating to public health or safety or company financial misconduct

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

The Insider Trading Policy prohibits certain hedging and pledging activities conducted by the companies’ Board members, officers, and designated employees who are subject to a quarterly earnings blackout period or event-specific blackout period. The policy covers equity instruments related directly or indirectly to either company or their subsidiaries. Covered individuals may not engage in short sales, transactions in publicly traded options, or hedging or monetization transactions; hold securities in a margin account; or pledge securities as collateral for a loan.

Use of Market Data

The Compensation Committee refers to two peer groups: one for benchmarking pay and the other for measuring the companies’ relative performance. Distinct groups are maintained to help ensure each is relevant for its primary purpose. In particular, larger companies may be reasonable comparators for performance but not for compensation levels.

Pay
Comparator

Group
Provides insights into compensation levels and design within companies that PG&E Corporation and the Utility compete with for talent and that are similar in terms of size and business operations.
Comprises publicly traded gas and electric energy companies, primarily based on the constituents of the Philadelphia Utility Index administered by NASDAQ.
Supplemented by pay practice data from surveys for the broader energy services sector and general industry companies based on survey data.
Performance
Comparator
Group
Provides comparative benchmark for PG&E Corporation‘s total shareholder return performance, and other relative industry-standard benchmarks that might be considered in goal setting.
Comprises publicly traded gas and electric energy companies that are categorized consistently by the investment community as “regulated” and have a market capitalization of at least $6 billion.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   52
Back to Contents

Each year the Compensation Committee approves the constituents of the pay and performance comparator groups. Informed by recommendations from the independent compensation consultant the Compensation Committee approved the following comparator groups for 2020, which were unchanged relative to the prior respective groups.

CompanyPayPerformance
AES Corporation
Alliant Energy Corporation
Ameren Corporation
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
CMS Energy Corporation
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
Dominion Resources, Inc.
DTE Energy Company
Duke Energy Corporation
Edison International
Entergy Corporation
Evergy, Inc.
Eversource Energy
Exelon Corporation
FirstEnergy Corp.
NextEra Energy, Inc.
NiSource Inc.
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation
Public Service Enterprise Group
Sempra Energy
Southern Company
WEC Energy Group, Inc.
Xcel Energy Inc

Consistent with prior years, the groups differ from the constituents of the Philadelphia Utility Index to maximize relevance for companies as follows:

American Water Works, El Paso Electric and Pinnacle West Capital Corporation were removed due to dissimilar business models or relative size.
Sempra Energy was added to the pay comparator group and WEC Energy was added to both groups given their direct relevance, despite not being included in the Index.

In reviewing pay data the Compensation Committee does not adhere strictly to formulas or survey data to determine the actual mix and amounts of compensation. TheWhen referencing positioning against market data the Compensation Committee also considers various additional factors including each NEO’s scope of responsibility and organizational impact, experience, and performance, as well as PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s overall safety, operating, and financial results.results in reaching decisions. This flexibility is important in supporting the overall pay-for-performance philosophy and in meeting the Compensation Committee’s objectives of attracting, retaining, and motivating a talented executive leadership team.

 

In setting 2018 compensation levels, base pay and short-term incentive targets were aligned with the market median.Incentive Plan Goal Setting

 

Target annual LTIP award values for 2018 reflect long-termTo be successful in aligning pay with performance it is important that performance goals are set appropriately within our incentive award trendsplans. For each of the market. Specifically, performance share awards usingmetrics used in our incentive plans the Compensation Committee reviews a TSR metric are designed to (1) provide payouts commensurate with PG&E Corporation’s TSR performance as compared tocomprehensive analysis that typically sets out the 2018 Performance Comparator Group, and (2) deliver long-term incentive compensation at approximately the 60thpercentile level of the 2018 Pay Comparator Group, upon achievement of 60thpercentile TSR performance as compared to the 2018 Performance Comparator Group. If the Corporation’s TSR performance is at the median level of the 2018 Performance Comparator Group, participants will realizefollowing, on a payout below target award values. Actual amounts realized by NEOs depend on the Corporation’s performance, as measured by stock price and relative TSR performance as compared to the 2018 Performance Comparator Group and by actual safety and financial performance as compared to established targets. Stock options only have value if the price of PG&E Corporation common stock upon exercise exceeds the stock option strike price.metric-specific basis:

 

2019Data on historic performance, showing multi-year trends;
Projected performance on a multi-year basis, driven by workplans and anticipated timing of milestone achievements;
Target setting methodology, with recommended ranges around the target to establish threshold and maximum goals; and
Degree of change in the proposed threshold, target, and maximum goals as compared with the prior year.

While the Compensation Committee monitored the impact of COVID-19 during the year, no changes were made to our incentive metrics or goals for 2020. This reflected the important role that the companies played for our direct and indirect customers during 2020, and no change in the standards was expected despite the significant challenges faced.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement6253
 
Back to Contents

Pay Comparator Group2020 Compensation Decision and Outcomes

 

For 2018, the Pay Comparator Group used to benchmark compensation elements consisted of all companies listed in the Philadelphia Utility Index, with two replacements. Sempra Energy and WEC Energy Group, Inc.During 2020 there were used as comparators in place of American Water Works, due to its dissimilar business model, and El Paso Electric because, with annual revenues under $1 billion, it is too small to be a reasonable comparator. The Philadelphia Utility Index, which is administered by NASDAQ, consists of a group of 20 companies (including PG&E Corporation) that are selected by NASDAQ based on having a primary business in the electric utility sector and meeting minimum market capitalization criteria.

A total of 19 companies were included in the 2018 Pay Comparator Group.

AES Corporation

Ameren Corporation

American Electric Power Company, Inc.

CenterPoint Energy, Inc.

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Dominion Resources, Inc.

DTE Energy Company
Duke Energy Corporation

Edison International

Entergy Corporation

Eversource Energy

Exelon Corporation

FirstEnergy Corp.

NextEra Energy, Inc.
Public Service Enterprise Group

Sempra Energy

Southern Company

WEC Energy Group, Inc.

Xcel Energy Inc.

In addition, supplemental data for the broader energy services segment, adjusted for PG&E Corporation’s revenues, was provided by WTW from its proprietary Energy Services executive compensation survey, which includes information from over 100 energy services companies. Due to the proprietary nature of the data, WTW did not disclose the companies matching individual benchmark positions.

Performance Comparator Group

Each year, PG&E Corporation and the Utility also identify a Performance Comparator Group that is used only for evaluating PG&E Corporation’s relative TSR performance to determine payouts for LTIP performance shares. In determining the composition of the Performance Comparator Group for 2018, the Compensation Committee decided that the Performance Comparator Group will include companies (1) that are categorized consistently by the investment community as “regulated,” as opposed to “less regulated,” based on analysis of revenue sources (i.e., the companies have business models similar to the Corporation and the Utility), and (2) that have a market capitalization of at least $4 billion. The Committee first selected companies listed on the Philadelphia Utility Index that meet these criteria and then selected additional companies that also meet these criteria. A total of 15 companies were included in the Performance Comparator Group for performance shares granted in 2018.

Alliant Energy CorporationDTE Energy CompanyPinnacle West Capital Corporation
Ameren CorporationDuke Energy CorporationSCANA Corporation
American Electric Power Company, Inc.Edison InternationalSouthern Company
CMS Energy CorporationEversource EnergyWEC Energy Group, Inc.
Consolidated Edison, Inc.NiSource Inc.Xcel Energy Inc.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement63
Back to Contents
3.RISK AND GOVERNANCE APPROACH

The companies’ compensation programs emphasize sound governance practices. Our executive compensation practices, as aligned with best practices, include:

Our Compensation PracticesNOT Our Compensation Practices
Pay for Performance.A majority of compensation is “at risk” and linked to shareholder interests.   No Unearned Dividends Paid.No dividends or dividend equivalents are paid on unvested equity awards.
Shareholder Outreach.Discussions with key institutional investors on a regular basis.No Repricing of Options and Stock AppreciationRights.Repricing requires shareholder approval.     
Clawback Policy.Clawback policy with a three-year reach-back triggered by (1) financial restatement, (2) material miscalculation of performance measure, or (3) fraud or misconduct resulting in material financial or reputational harm to either company.Revised February 2018 and February 2019.No Tax Gross-Ups.No tax gross-ups are provided, except for limited programs generally available to all management employees.
Double Trigger.Change-in-control severance requires a “double trigger.”  No Hedging or Pledging.Policy restricts hedging and pledging of either company’s stock.
Realizable Pay.The Compensation Committee reviews tally sheets and considers realizable pay.No Additional Service Credit.Policy against granting additional credited service under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.  
Limited Severance Benefits.Benefits are limited to one times base salary plus target STIP bonus, pro-rata vesting of performance shares, and one-year continued vesting of RSUs and options.
Compensation Consultant.The Compensation Committee engages an independent consultant and has a policy concerning independence.
 Ownership Guidelines.Share ownership and retention requirements (6X base salary for the CEO; 1.5X to 3X for other NEOs, except Mr. Thomason).

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines

The 2010 Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines are designed to encourage seniorseveral departures among our executive officers, to achieve and maintain a minimum investment in PG&E Corporation common stock at levels set by the Compensation Committee, and to further align executive interests with thoseothers stepping into roles on an interim basis. The impact of PG&E Corporation’s shareholders. Executive stock ownership guidelines are increasingly viewed as an important element of a company’s governance policies.

For NEOs in 2018, the stock ownership target for Ms. Williams was six times base salary, the target for Messrs. Malnight, Wells, and Simon was three times base salary, and the target for Messrs. Soto and Hogan was one and one-half times base salary. Mr. Thomason is not subject to stock ownership guidelines. Prior to his retirement, the stock ownership target for Mr. Stavropoulos was three times base salary.

Until an executive meets the applicable stock ownership guideline, he or she must retain 50 percent of the net shares realized from the vesting of RSUs or stock units (including performance shares), after accounting for tax withholding. For calculating compliance with the guidelines, unvested RSUs and unvested stock units are not considered, except in the case of RSUs after a participant is retirement-eligible (as defined in the applicable award agreement).

Clawback Policy

In February 2018, and again in February 2019, the Compensation Committee approved changes to the Clawback Policy, broadening the scope of events to which recoupment applies, including events not predicatedthese interim duties on a restatement. The policy now provides the Committee and Boards with the discretion to seek recoupment of payments made to a Section 16 Officer under the following circumstances:

if either company restates financial statements that were filed with the SEC for any of the past three completed fiscal years, or

if during any of the past three completed fiscal years a material miscalculation occurred with respect to the amount of any payment made to an individual who was a Section 16 Officer, or

if any individual in the past three fiscal years engaged in fraud or other misconduct, and such fraud or misconduct caused material financial or reputational harm to either company.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement64
Back to Contents

Compensation Risk Analysis

Pay Governance assists PG&E Corporation and the Utility with a review of the design of the companies’ incentive plans relative to general compensation plan risk factors. The companies reviewed the overall compensation pay structure, the overall mix of compensation vehicles, the structure of the incentive plans, other company pay plans, and governance for oversight of program design and administration. With respect to incentive plan structure, the companies specifically examined target and maximum compensation payable from each plan, the nature and mix of performance measures, the governance structure, the risk of earnings manipulation posed by the incentive structure, and the extent to which the NEO pay program rewards short-term decisions at the risk of long-term performance. The companies also generally considered other compensation policies (such as clawback and anti-hedging policies), other compensation plans relating to severance and change-in-control benefits, and compensation governance.

For 2018, Pay Governance concluded that there were no material issues regarding the companies’ executive pay programs, and that the design of the companies’ incentive pay plans has, overall, a low-risk profile.

To further ensure appropriate incentive metrics, the Compensation Committee also receives advice from the Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees regarding appropriate safety and operational incentive measures.

Based on the foregoing, PG&E Corporation and the Utility concluded that the risks arising from the companies’ overall compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on either the Corporation or the Utility.

Tax Deductibility

With the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code no longer permits companies to deduct certain qualified performance-based executive compensation. As a result, in establishing compensation for 2018, the Committee no longer considered the tax deductibility limitations imposed by section 162(m).

Despite the new limits on the deductibility of performance-based compensation, the Committee continues to believe that a significant portion of NEO compensation should be tied to company performance.

4.2018 COMPENSATION STRUCTURE

Named Executive Officers

Named Executive Officers of PG&E Corporation for 2018 (positions as of December 31, 2018)

Geisha J. Williams—CEO and President, PG&E Corporation
Jason P. Wells—Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, PG&E Corporation
John R. Simon—Executive Vice President and General Counsel, PG&E Corporation
Jesus Soto, Jr.—Senior Vice President, Gas Operations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Steven Malnight—Senior Vice President, Energy Supply and Policy, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Nickolas Stavropoulos—Special Advisor, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (previously President and COO, Pacific Gas and Electric Company through August 31, 2018; employment ended September 30, 2018)

Named Executive Officers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for 2018 (positions as of December 31, 2018)

Ms. Williams and Messrs. Wells, Simon, Soto, Malnight, and Stavropoulos are considered NEOs of the Utility. The other NEOs of the Utility for 2018 are:

Patrick Hogan—Senior Vice President, Electric Operations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
David S. Thomason—Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller, Pacific Gas and Electric Company

As of December 31, 2018, three individuals concurrently served as PEOs of the Utility: Patrick Hogan, Steven Malnight, and Jesus Soto.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement65
Back to Contents

2018 Officer Compensation Program

NEOs received the following types of compensation during 2018.

TypeComponentKey Elements
CashBase SalaryDetermined annually, though merit increase adjustments, or lump sum in lieu of an adjustment, may be made mid-year.
Short-Term IncentiveBased on corporate performance against pre-established operational and performance goals that are set annually.
The Boards and the Compensation Committee have discretion to adjust payments (e.g., for external factors or individual performance) and to reduce awards to zero.
EquityRSUsGenerally have a three-year vesting period (one-third at the end of each year) while employed or after retirement.
Performance Shares Generally vest after a three-year performance period (while employed or after retirement).
Payout is based on TSR relative to 15 peer companies selected by the Compensation Committee and achievement of safety and financial goals.
Stock OptionsGenerally have a three-year vesting period (one-third at the end of each year) while employed or after retirement.
Exercise price based on closing price of PG&E Corporation common stock on grant date.
Post-EmploymentPensionNEOs receive benefits based on their base pay and number of years of service, subject to limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Service.
Vested benefits are payable at the later of age 55 or separation from service.
Benefits may be reduced unless at least 35 years of service or age 65.
Supplemental PensionEligible NEOs receive benefits based on their base pay plus short-term incentive, and the number of years of service.
Benefits may be reduced unless at least 35 years of service or age 65, at time of separation, and are reduced by amounts payable from the tax-qualified pension plan.
Vested benefits are payable at the later of age 55 or separation from service.
Deferred CompensationOfficers elected after December 31, 2012 (Messrs. Hogan and Thomason) participate in the Defined Contribution Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (DC-ESRP) rather than the supplemental pension plan described above.
For eligible NEOs, each time salary or STIP is paid, the company credits the participant’s non-qualified deferred compensation account with an amount equal to 7 percent of the payment.
DC-ESRP account balances, including earnings, are distributed to the participant in up to 10 annual installments following the end of employment.
OtherPerquisitesLimited perquisites include safety- and security-based car transportation services for the PG&E Corporation CEO and the Utility President; on-site parking; executive health services; partial subsidy of financial services; accidental death and dismemberment insurance; and otherde minimis perquisites provided under a pre-approved perquisite policy.
Lump-sum annual cash stipend paid in lieu of providing broader perquisite benefits.
Also may include the following items that are available to other management employees: health club fee reimbursement and relocation services.

The following charts illustrate the percentage of target 2018 compensation allocated to base salary plus cash perquisite allowance, short-term incentives, and long-term incentives for the PG&E Corporation CEO and for the other NEOs on average. (Short-term incentives are shown at target payout levels, and long-term equity incentives are shown at 100 percent payout.)

2019 Joint Proxy Statement66
Back to Contents

For 2018, the Compensation Committee believes that these proportions of base salary relative to target short-term and long-term incentives provided the right mix to attract, retain, and motivate officers with the necessary skills and experience for the development and successful operation of PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s businesses. They also provided a direct connection between compensation and performance in both the achievement of key operating results and long-term shareholder value, as more fully described below.

A greater portion of the PG&E Corporation CEO’s 2018 target2020 compensation is tied to the long-term performance of PG&E Corporation, which the Committee believes is appropriate given the CEO’s role.

Compensation paid to the NEOs was consistent with the types and forms of compensation provided during 2018 to all executive officers of the companies.

Components of 2018 Officer Compensation – Cashdiscussed below.

 

Base Salary

 

For NEO compensation, the base salary component falls within a range of 10 percent to 40 percent of target total compensation, dependingBase salaries are reviewed on officer level.

This is consistent with the Compensation Committee’s objective of tying a significant portion of every NEO’s compensation directly to PG&E Corporation’s performance for shareholders through short-terman annual basis and long-term incentives.

For 2018, the Committee approved a base salary increase budget of 3.25 percent. The comparative data indicated that the companies in the Pay Comparator Group expected to provide officers a 3.20 percent average salary increase in 2018.

In the case of NEOs, the base salary at PG&E Corporation and the Utility are targeted to be within a competitive range of between 15 percent above and 15 percent below (the “15 percent band”)market median for comparable roles in the medianPay Comparator Group. In determining each NEO’s base salary of the appropriate benchmark position.consideration is given to role scope and individual experience and performance. The Compensation Committee believes that this level of comparability to the market is appropriate and consistent with its pay philosophy of taking into consideration factors other than market data in establishing individual pay levels, while delivering cash compensation that is competitive with the market.

 

In 2019, as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, no executive officers received an increase. For 2020, increases ranged from 0 to 15 percent, with an average of 5.8 percent. Increases reflected market realignment, changes in role scope, and promotions. Salaries were effective March 1, 2020, unless otherwise noted.

NEO Role (as of 12/31/20) 2020 Salary(1) Increase(2) 
William L. Smith Interim Chief Executive Officer and President, PG&E Corporation  $1,500,000 N/A 
Michael A. Lewis Interim President, Pacific Gas and Electric Company  $556,500 5.0% 
Christopher A. Foster(3) Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer, PG&E Corporation  $345,000 15.0% 
David S. Thomason(4) Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Controller, Pacific Gas and Electric Company  $350,000 7.7% 
John R. Simon Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer, PG&E Corporation  $726,280 4.5% 
James M. Welsch Senior Vice President, Generation and Chief Nuclear Officer, Pacific Gas and Electric Company  $577,700 6.0% 
William D. Johnson Former Chief Executive Officer and President, PG&E Corporation  $2,500,000 0.0% 
Andrew M. Vesey Former Chief Executive Officer and President, Pacific Gas and Electric Company  $1,000,000 0.0% 
Jason P. Wells Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, PG&E Corporation  $674,100 7.0% 
Janet C. Loduca Former Senior Vice President and General Counsel, PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company  $615,250 7.0% 

Notes.(1)Annualized salary as of December 31, 2020, or date of termination if applicable.
(2)Increase relative to salary as of December 31, 2019.
(3)Salary increased from $300,000 to $318,000 effective March 1, 2020 in association with annual merit review. Salary increased from $318,000 to $345,000 effective March 9, 2020 in association with the addition of responsibility for Treasury to Mr. Foster’s role. As Interim Chief Financial Officer of PG&E Corporation, Mr. Foster received an additional monthly fee of $20,000 starting September 26, 2020, which is not included in his salary.
(4)Salary increased from $325,000 to $334,750 effective March 1, 2020 in association with annual merit review. Salary increased from $334,750 to $350,000 effective August 1, 2020 in association with promotion.

Short-Term Incentives

 

The STIPOur Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP) is designed to drive the companies’ business objectives and strategic priorities, providing an at-risk component of pay. NEOs and other eligible employees may earn annual performance-basedopportunity for a cash incentive compensation underpayout reflecting the STIP based on achievement of financial and operational goals approved by the Committee and an individual executive’s achievements forresults achieved during the year. The Committee retains complete discretion to determineplan focuses on quantifiable outcome-based metrics in the overall company score and pay all STIP awards to NEOs and other eligible employees. This includes discretion to reduce the final scorea modifier for individual performance based on any and all measures downward to zero.year-end rating.

 

2018 STIP Structure and Results

For 2018, the Committee adopted a STIP structure that continued PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s focus on improving public and employee and contractor safety and customer satisfaction. The weights of the components – Safety, Customer Satisfaction, and Financial – were unchanged from 2017 at 50 percent, 25 percent, and 25 percent, respectively.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement6754
 
Back to Contents

The Safety component was structuredCompensation Committee establishes an annual target opportunity, expressed as a percentage of an individual’s base salary, set with reference to providemarket median practices in our Pay Comparator Group. Target opportunities for the NEOs eligible to participate in the program in 2020 ranged from 45 percent to 85 percent of salary. In respect of the company score, achieving threshold performance will earn a strong focus onpayout at 50 percent of target and achieving maximum performance will earn a payout at 150 percent of target. After the safetyapplication of employees, customers, and communities. It was madethe individual performance modifier, awards can be earned up to 187.5 percent of five subcomponents: (1) Nuclear Operations Safety, (2) Electric Operations Safety, (3) Electric and Gas Operations Safety, (4) Gas Operations Safety, and (5) Employee Safety. Three new safety measures were added for 2018 – Public Safety Index with a weight of 10 percent, Asset Mapping Duration Index with a weight of 10 percent, and Safe Driving Rate with a weight of 5 percent.target.

 

The Customer SatisfactionCompensation Committee retains complete and sole discretion to adjust any performance formula or score, including to zero, on any and all incentive plan performance measures were designedor modifiers for any reason, including consideration of (without limitation) performance with respect to incent employees to be more responsive to customers’ needs. One new customer satisfaction measure was added for 2018 – Customer Connection Cycle Time with a weight of 10 percent.safety, compliance, and ethics.

 

As in prior years, corporate financial performance was measured by PG&E Corporation’s actual earnings from operations compared to budget.

Supporting Information: CEO Compensation Considerations
In 2019, our CEOs and Chapter 11 insiders were not eligible to participate in the STIP. Mr. Johnson’s three-year compensation arrangement entered into at the time reflected this limitation. Mr. Smith also did not receive an award under the 2020 STIP given the transitionary nature of his role as Interim CEO and President of PG&E Corporation. Further details can be found in the “Interim CEO Compensation” section starting on page 61.

Each STIP measure has a threshold, target, and maximum level of performance used to arrive at a score ranging from zero to 2.0 for that measure. Performance below the minimum performance level, or threshold, results in a zero score. Performance at the threshold results in a STIP score of 0.5. Target performance results in a STIP score of 1.0, and performance at or above the maximum established level results in a score of 2.0. A score of 1.0 provides 100 percent of an executive’s target payout. Performance at the threshold and maximum levels delivers 50 percent and 200 percent of targeted payout, respectively. Linear interpolation is used to determine scores for performance between threshold and target, and between target and maximum.

 

The STIP overallCompensation Committee established 2020 metrics across six performance scoreareas, weighted 75 percent towards metrics that focus on underlying objectives tied to customer welfare and safety, and 25 percent towards financial stability, which itself is inherently tied to our safety performance.

In determining and approving the sum of the weighted cumulative average scores forappropriate performance onmetrics in each of these performance areas the STIP measures.

An NEO’s final STIP score also may be increased or decreased by an individual performance modifier, which can range from 0 percent to 150 percent. The individual performance modifier is determined by theCompensation Committee based upon the PG&E Corporation CEO’s assessment of an executive’s performance, or the applicable Board’s assessment in the case of the CEO’s or the Utility President’s (or equivalent officer’s) performance, for the year.considered factors including:

For 2018, the measures and related weightings, thresholds, targets, maximums, and results for calculating the STIP performance score were as follows:

2018 STIP Measures Weight Threshold Target Maximum Result Score Weighted
Average
Score
SAFETY COMPONENT (50%)              
Nuclear Operations Safety              
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Reliability and Safety Indicator              
Unit 1 Reliability and Safety Indicator 2.5% 85.3 96.4 100.0 100.0 2.000 0.050
Unit 2 Reliability and Safety Indicator 2.5% 85.3 87.6 90.0 90.0 2.000 0.050
Electric Operations Safety              
Public Safety Index 10% 0.5 1.0 2.0 1.9 1.888 0.189
Gas and Electric Operations Safety              
Asset Records Duration Index 10% 0.5 1.0 2.0 1.3 1.268 0.127
Gas Operations Safety              
Gas In-Line Inspection and Upgrade Index 5% 0.5 1.0 2.0 1.5 1.483 0.074
Gas Dig-ins Reduction 5% 2.0 1.91 1.8 1.6 2.000 0.100
Employee Safety              
Serious Injuries and Fatalities (SIF) Corrective Action Index 10% 0.5 1.0 2.0 1.6 1.600 0.160
Safe Driving Rate 5% 6.7 6.5 6.1 no results 0.000 0.000
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION COMPONENT (25%)              
Customer Satisfaction Score 15% 74.0 75.0 76.5 77.3 2.000 0.300
Customer Connection Cycle Time 10% 15 10 8 6 2.000 0.200
FINANCIAL COMPONENT (25%)              
Earnings from Operations (EFO) (in millions) 25% 95%
of Budget
 $1,976 (Budget) 105%
of Budget
 $2,016 1.404 0.351
  100%           1.601

 

2019The alignment with our fundamental belief that safety is paramount, complemented by a focus on customer welfare across all aspects of our business.
The interaction between metrics to help ensure they collectively drive the right behaviors. For example, an overly narrow focus on reporting might result in employees failing to seek appropriate medical treatment for work-related injuries in order to keep reported injury metrics low.
Guidance from the CPUC reinforcing the priority placed on outcome-based metrics for alignment with reducing the companies’ highest-priority risks, such as the risk of catastrophic events like wildfires, dam failures, or gas explosions.
The companies’ ability to establish robust threshold, target, and maximum achievement milestones.
The proportion of metrics that are outcome-based, as opposed to metrics that are based on operational activity or effort.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement6855
 
Back to Contents

The measuresAs described in the foregoing table are defined below.earlier “Incentive Plan Goal Setting” section on page 53, in approving performance goals, the Compensation Committee references a range of factors including historic performance inclusive of multi-year trends; projected performance driven by workplans and anticipated timing of milestone achievements; the target-setting methodology, with recommended ranges around target to establish threshold and maximum goals; and the degree of change the proposed goals represent versus the prior year.

 

Diablo Canyon Power Plant Reliability and Safety Indicator—Year-end score for the Utility’s Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 and 2 based on 11 performance indicators developed by the nuclear industry for nuclear power generation.

Public Safety Index—A weighted index of three programs that evaluate compliance in the CPUC High Fire-Threat District (HFTD).

Asset Records Duration Index—An equally-weighted index comprised of Gas and Electric Asset Record Duration Indices tracking the average number of days to complete the as-built process of capital and expense jobs.

Gas In-Line Inspection and Upgrade Index—Index measuring the Utility’s ability to complete planned in-line inspections and pipeline retrofit projects.

Gas Dig-ins Reduction—Number of third-party dig-ins to the Utility’s gas assets per 1,000 Underground Service Alert tickets.

Serious Injuries and Fatalities (SIF) Corrective Action Index—Index measuring two equally-weighted measures of response to SIF events: (1) Quality of Corrective Actions, and (2) Timely Completion of Corrective Actions.

Safe Driving Rate—The total number of Vehicle Safety Technology (VST) in-vehicle performance monitor alerts for hard braking and hard acceleration per thousand miles driven.

Customer Satisfaction Score—Overall satisfaction of customersEach metric has a clear definition with the products and services offered by the Utility, as measured through an ongoing survey.

Customer Connection Cycle Time—The 12-month average Service Planning and Construction cycle time for electric residential Express Connections New Business Work requested by Utility customers.

Earnings from Operations (EFO)—PG&E Corporation’s actual earnings from operations, excluding items impacting comparability compared to budget. The measurement is non-GAAP. Please see Exhibit A for a reconciliation of PG&E Corporation’s earnings from operations to income available for common shareholders in accordance with GAAP.

Individual Awards Determination

STIP cash awards to NEOs are calculated as follows:pre-approved calculation methodology.

 

Metric1.DetermineDefinition(1)
Reportable fire ignitionsReportable fire incidents where (i) ignition is associated with the executive’s individual STIP target, which isUtility’s transmission and/or distribution powerlines, (ii) something other than Utility facilities burned, and (iii) the NEO’s base salary earnedfire traveled more than one meter from the ignition point
Electric asset failureFailure incidents of electric distribution, transmission, and substation underground and overhead assets resulting in sustained outages, including (i) distribution and distribution substation asset failures limited to high risk threat district (HRFD) areas, and (ii) transmission and transmission substation asset failures system-wide
Distribution circuit sectionalizationTimely installation and operationalization of sectionalization devices
Large overpressure eventsNumber of large overpressure events (when gas pressure exceeds the maximum allowable operating pressure), with pre-established pressure limits
Total gas dig-ins reductionsNumber of gas dig-ins (damage that occurs during the year multipliedexcavation activities and results in a repair or replacement of an underground gas facility) per 1,000 Underground Service Alert (third party public service program) tickets received for gas
Safe dam operating capacityOperating capability of mechanical equipment used as main control to reduce enterprise risk of large uncontrolled water release, calculated with reference to controlled outlet days forced out and controlled outlet days available
DCPP reliability and safety indicatorYear-end score based on 11 performance indicators developed by the individual’s STIP participation rate.nuclear industry for nuclear power generation applied to all U.S. nuclear power plans
Gas customer emergency responseNumber of minutes from the time the Utility is notified to the time the Utility personnel or another qualified first responder arrives onsite to the location
911 emergency responsePercentage of incidents where Utility personnel arrive onsite within 60 minutes of receiving a 911 call
Customers experiencing multiple interruptionsNumber of customers who experience five or more sustained service interruptions, both planned and unplanned
Days away, restricted, and transferred rateNumber of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recordable cases that have resulted in at least one lost workday or one day of job restriction or transfer; excludes fatalities
Non-GAAP core earnings per shareActual GAAP earnings from operations less non-core items, meaning items that (i) management does not consider representative of ongoing earnings, and (ii) affect comparability of financial results between periods. See Exhibit A for a list of non-core items.

 

Notes.2.(1)Calculate the overall enterprise-wide STIP performance score, which can range from 0 to 2.0These are abbreviated summary definitions and is calculated based on final results compared to the threshold, target, and maximum ofmay not reflect complete details, including certain exclusions, for each weighted measure.

3.Multiply the STIP target by the performance score to determine the calculated company award.

4.Multiply the calculated company award by the NEO’s individual performance modifier.

5.The Committee (and the independent members of the PG&E Corporation and Utility Boards of Directors in the case of the CEO and any President (or equivalent) of the respective companies) approves all final awards and has discretion to adjust all STIP awards.metric.

 

For 2018,The metrics and associated goals were initially proposed in February 2020 and approved after emergence from Chapter 11 in July 2020. The Compensation Committee did not make any adjustments in response to COVID-19 given the Committee approved NEO participation rates that ranged from 45 percentimperative to 130 percentcontinue operating at a high standard and to meet the needs of base salary (the 130 percent participation rate applies only toour customers through the PG&E Corporation CEO). This range is within the 15 percent band of the Pay Comparator Group’s median annual incentive participation rates.

For 2018, the Committee and the independent members of each of the PG&E Corporation and Utility Boards of Directors exercised their discretion to adjust awards for NEOs and the PG&E Corporation CEO and Pacific Gas and Electric Company principal executive officers, setting the company score to zero. No STIP awards were paid to NEOs for 2018.crisis.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement6956
 
Back to Contents

Long-Term IncentivesIn the first quarter of 2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed and certified the following results for the company score:

 

Long-Term Incentive Awards Granted in 2018

Performance Metric 

Weight

  

Threshold

(25%)

  

Target

(100%)

 

Maximum

(150%)

  

Actual

  

Unweighted

Score

 

Weighted

Score

 
Electric Operations 25%               0.202 
Reportable fire ignitions 10%  105  101 96  148  0.000   
Electric asset failure 10%  2,328  2,166 2,058  1,823  1.500   
Distribution circuit sectionalization 5%  October 1  September 1 June 1  August 26  1.033   
Gas Operations 15%               0.113 
Large overpressure events 7.5%  8  6 4  9  0.000   
Total dig-ins reductions 7.5%  1.53  1.44 1.28  1.11  1.500   
Generation 10%               0.097 
Safe dam operating capacity 5%  96.92% 97.70% 98.92%  98.77%  1.439   
DCPP reliability and safety indicator 5%  92.5  95.0 97.5  92.5  0.500   
Additional Public Safety & Reliability 10%               0.084 
Gas customer emergency response 3.3%  22.0  20.8 20.0  20.5  1.188   
911 emergency response 3.3%  95.5% 96.5% 97.5%  97.2%  1.345   
Customers experiencing multiple interruptions 3.3%  3.28%  3.12% 3.05%  3.56%  0.000   
Workforce Safety 15%               0.000 
Days away, restricted, and transferred rate 15%  1.19  0.90 0.81  1.34  0.000   
Financial Stability 25%               0.188 
Non-GAAP core earnings per share 25%  1.53  1.61 1.69  1.61  1.000   
2020 Overall Short-Term Incentive Plan Company Score       0.746 
2020 Overall Short-Term Incentive Plan Company Score for NEOs (after discretion)    0.650 

 

LTIP awards (both annualIn reviewing company and mid-year) are granted consistent withNEO performance for 2020, the PG&E Corporation Equity Grant Date Policy (see discussion below under “Equity Grant Dates”).Compensation Committee considered the totality of circumstances over the year, including but not limited to:

 

Award Type/MeasureWeightThe Utility’s overall public and workforce safety, which included five fatalities from the company and contractor workforces;
Performance Shares35%
Total Shareholder Return (20%)  
Safety: Serious InjuriesThe possibility that Utility assets were the ignition source of the Zogg fire, which resulted in four public fatalities and Fatalities (SIF)property damage;
  
Effectiveness of Corrective Actions (10%)Compliance fines levied against the Utility by regulators; and
  
Financial: Earnings from Operations (5%)
Nonqualified Stock Options – Time Based Vesting20%
Restricted Stock Units – Time Based Vesting45%Reports provided to the Boards by the Federal Monitor on the Utility’s operational and safety performance.

 

In February 2018,addition to discussions with management, the Compensation Committee (andconsulted with independent compensation consultants and outside legal counsel to review the independent membersrange of actions taken by other utilities in comparable circumstances.

Based upon the totality of the PG&E Corporation Board in the case of Ms. Williams,circumstances described above, management’s proposal, and the independent members of the Utility Board in the case of Mr. Stavropoulos) approved annual LTIP awards for 2018, which were granted in May 2018.

Target annual LTIP award values for 2018 for the NEOs were determined based on competitive market data, internal equity considerations, and advice from Pay Governance. The annual LTIP awards for 2018 granted to the NEOs were comprised of 35 percent performance shares using relative TSR, safety, and financial measures, 20 percent nonqualified stock options, and 45 percent RSUs.

For 2018, the Committee believes that this allocation of performance shares, stock options and RSUs closely aligned NEO compensation with long-term PG&E Corporation performance and shareholder value. Because performance shares, stock options and RSUs each vest over a three-year period and increase or decrease in value depending on the performance of PG&E Corporation common stock, these awards are at risk based on corporate performance, and align the interests of NEOs with performance for shareholders.

Additional details regarding performance shares, stock options and RSUs are provided below.

Performance Shares – TSR

Performance shares are hypothetical shares of PG&E Corporation common stock tied directly to PG&E Corporation’s performance for shareholders, and generally vest only at the end of a three-year performance period.

The number of performance shares with a TSR measure granted in May 2018 to each NEO was determined by multiplying 35 percent of the NEO’s actual annual LTIP award value for 2018 by 20 percent and dividing the result by the grant date fair value of a performance share as determined by a Monte Carlo simulation.

Performance shares with a TSR measure granted in May 2018 will vest, if at all, following completion of the three-year performance period starting January 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2020 and upon certification of performance results byextensive consideration, the Compensation Committee which will occur no later than March 14, 2021. The payout value of any vesteddetermined to exercise its discretion to materially reduce incentive compensation paid to all NEOs and officers for the STIP 2020 performance shares will be based on PG&E Corporation’s TSR relative toyear and the 2018 Performance Comparator Group for the period. The payment forLTIP performance shares will beperiod ending in 2020. These actions resulted in a reduction of incentive compensation, in the form of stock2020 STIP payments and will be calculated2018 performance share payments, to officers for 2020 by multiplying (1)an average of 58 percent from target for those elements of incentives.

The Compensation Committee arrived at the numberoverall reduction in part by reducing the STIP company score for NEOs and officers from 0.746 to 0.650. The Compensation Committee also reduced the payout with respect to the PSUs awarded in 2018 as described further in the “Assessment of vested2018 Performance Share Awards” section below.

In respect of individual performance, shares by (2)for the 2020 performance year, a payout factormodifier is applied based on the Corporation’s relative TSRannual performance compared to the Performance Comparator Group.ratings. The following payments reflect approved individual performance modifiers, and were approved in respect of 2020 performance.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement7057
 
Back to Contents

As shown

NEO 

Target Incentive

(percent of

Base)

 

Target

Incentive

 

Company

Score

 

Individual
Performance

Modifier

 

Actual

Incentive

 

Actual

Incentive

(percent of

Target)

Michael A. Lewis 60% $343,931 0.650 100% $223,555 65%
Christopher A. Foster 45% $151,645 0.650 110% $108,426 72%
David S. Thomason(1) 50% $160,057 0.650 110% $114,441 72%
John R. Simon 75% $540,800 0.650 125% $439,400 81%
James M. Welsch 60% $343,350 0.650 110% $245,495 72%

Notes.(1)Target opportunity increased from 45% to 50% effective August 1, 2020 in association with promotion.

Following her separation from the companies, Ms. Loduca received a 2020 short-term incentive payment based on actual company performance, pro-rated for her time in role prior to separation. Mr. Wells received no short-term incentive payments for 2020 performance, consistent with his resignation from PG&E Corporation. Following his separation from the Utility, Mr. Vesey received a lump-sum payment equivalent to his target payout under the 2020 short-term incentive plan and waived his right to a pro-rated 2020 short-term incentive payout reflecting company performance at the end of the performance period. Additional details regarding severance benefits can be found in the following 2018 Performance Share Payout Scale, payoutssections entitled “Potential Payments—Termination Without Cause” beginning on page 83.

Long-Term Incentives

2020 Long-Term Incentive Awards

Our LTIP awards are designed to measure our success in ensuring operational continuity and employee engagement through a focus on customer welfare and our financial stability. For 2020, awards were made solely in the form of performance shares are linked toperformance-based equity. Reflecting our emergence from Chapter 11, the Compensation Committee approved target grant values in March 2020, which were converted into PSUs in July based on the average closing price of PG&E Corporation’s TSR performance compared to the Performance Comparator Group.60thpercentile performance is required for a 100 percent payout.

2018 PERFORMANCE SHARE PAYOUT SCALE
NUMBER OF COMPARATOR COMPANIES IN TOTAL = 15
       
Peer Company Rank  Company Performance
Percentile
  Rounded
Payout
1  100  200%
2  93  200%
Maximum  90  200%
3  87  189%
4  80  167%
5  73  144%
6  67  122%
7 andTarget  60  100%
8  53  86%
9  47  71%
10  40  57%
11  33  43%
12  27  29%
Threshold  25  25%
13  20  0%
14  13  0%
15  7  0%

Interpolation will be used if PG&E Corporation’s TSR performance does not fall directly on one of the listed performance percentiles.

Performance Shares – Safety and Financial

The number of performance shares with safety and financial measures granted in March 2018 to each NEO was determined by multiplying 35 percent of the NEO’s actual annual LTIP award value for 2018 by 15 percent and dividing the result by the closing price of a share of PG&E Corporation common stock on March 1, 2018.the first 15 consecutive trading days following emergence.

 

Performance shares with safetyMetrics were quantifiable, and financial measures granted in March 2018where possible outcome-based, and will vest, if at all, following completion ofbe measured over the three-year performance period startingfrom January 1, 2018 and2020 to December 2022. Awards can be earned depending on performance over the three-year period ending December 31, 20202022, and upon certificationwill vest, subject to performance, three years after the grant date, in accordance with the three-year holding period for equity required under AB 1054. Dividend equivalents, if any, are accrued and paid in cash at the end of quantifiablethe performance results byperiod, on earned shares only. In 2020, the Compensation Committee which will occur no later than March 14, 2021. The measures were designed to provide a direct focus on long-term safety and financial goals. The payout value of any vested performance shares will be based on achievement of safety and financial goals. The safety measure measures the total number of repeat SIF actual or potential injury or near-hit events per 200,000 hours worked. The financial measure compares Earnings from Operations (EFO) per share in 2018, 2019, and 2020 to the mid-point of the guidance rangeestablished annual target opportunities for each year. In the event that guidance is not issued until after February of the target year, the target will be set based on the Board-approved EFO forecast for the year. Awards pay out at 25 percent for threshold (95 percent of mid-point) performance, 100 percent for target (mid-point) performance, and 200 percent for maximum (105 percent of mid-point) performance. Interpolation will be used if results do not fall directly on the minimum, target, or maximum goal. The payment for performance shares will be in the form of stock and will be calculated by multiplying (1) the number of vested performance shares by (2) a payout factor based on achievement of performance goals.

Restricted Stock Units

RSUs are hypothetical shares of stock that are settled inNEO, expressed as an equal number of shares of PG&E Corporation common stock, and generally vest only if the officer remains employed over the vesting period. Because the value of RSUs varies with the price of PG&E Corporation common stock, RSUs align officers’ interests with those of shareholders (i.e., stock price appreciation and dividends). The multi-year vesting period also serves a retention purpose. The number of RSUs granted in March 2018 to each NEO was determined by multiplying the NEO’s actual annual LTIP award value for 2018 by 45 percent and dividing the result by the closing price of a share of PG&E Corporation commonabsolute dollar values.

 

2019NEORole

2020 Target

Long-Term

Incentive

Michael A. Lewis(1)Interim President, Pacific Gas and Electric Company$700,000
Christopher A. FosterVice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer, PG&E Corporation$300,000
David S. ThomasonVice President and Chief Financial Officer and Controller, Pacific Gas and Electric Company$400,000
John R. SimonExecutive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer, PG&E Corporation$1,750,000
James M. WelschSenior Vice President, Generation and Chief Nuclear Officer, Pacific Gas and Electric Company$650,000
Andrew M. Vesey(2)Former CEO and President, Pacific Gas and Electric Company$2,250,000
Jason P. Wells(3)Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, PG&E Corporation$1,750,000
Janet C. Loduca(4)Former Senior Vice President and General Counsel, PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company$1,200,000
Notes.(1)Consists of a base award of $650,000 and a supplementary award of $50,000 reflecting Interim President duties a portion of 2020.
(2)Separated effective August 4, 2020; reflecting the terms of separation, Mr. Vesey was not granted a 2020 long-term incentive award.
(3)Resigned effective September 26, 2020; forfeited 2020 long-term incentive award.
(4)Separated effective August 16, 2020; pro-rated award remains subject to the original award terms for severance.

Compensation Committee retains complete and sole discretion to adjust any performance formula or score, including to zero, on any and all incentive plan performance measures or modifiers for any reason.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement7158
 
Back to Contents

Supporting Information: CEO Compensation Considerations

In 2019, our CEOs and Chapter 11 insiders were not eligible to participate in the LTIP. Mr. Johnson’s three-year compensation arrangement entered into at the time reflected this limitation. Mr. Smith also did not receive an annual LTIP award on the same terms as other executives in 2020 given the transitionary nature of his role as Interim CEO and President of PG&E Corporation. Further details can be found in the “Interim CEO Compensation” section starting on page 61.

Supporting Information: Chapter 11 Considerations

The addition of 30 million shares to be made available for issuance under the 2021 LTIP was approved by the Bankruptcy Court in connection with the Plan of Reorganization and further approved by PG&E Corporation’s Board on April 28, 2020. Under California law, approval of the additional shares for the 2021 LTIP as part of the reorganization was deemed to be approved by PG&E Corporation’s shareholders.

stock on March 1, 2018. Annual RSU

In determining the performance metrics for the 2020 awards grantedthe Compensation Committee considered a range of factors similar to those noted above in 2018 will vest in three tranches, with one-third vesting on the first business day of March of eachrespect of the three years followingSTIP. These included alignment with our core focus on customer welfare; the grant date. The $500,000 retention RSU award granted to Mr. Soto on June 26, 2018 vests one-third on June 26, 2020interaction with other metrics under the short- and two-thirds on June 26, 2021. The $300,000 promotional RSU award granted to Mr. Malnight on September 4, 2018 vests on September 4, 2020.

Nonqualified Stock Options

A stock option is the right to acquire shares at a fixed exercise price for a fixed time. The exercise price of each option is based on the closing price of the stock on the NYSE on the date of grant. Options vest and become exercisable ratably during each of the three years following the grant date. Options expire at the close of business ten years after the date of grant, after which time the options cease to be exercisable. Because the value of stock options varies with the price of PG&E Corporation common stock and because options have a ten-year expiration period, stock options align officers’ interests with those of shareholders while reflecting a longer-term view oflong-term incentive programs; the companies’ business environment. The numberability to establish robust goals; and the extent to which the metrics measure outcomes in an objective manner. Four equally weighted metrics were approved for the 2020 awards, with a relative TSR modifier that could adjust the level of stock options granted in March 2018payout up or down by up to each NEO was determined by multiplying the NEO’s actual annual LTIP award value by 2025 percent, and dividing the result by the Black-Scholes American Call model value per sharedepending on the date of grant.

Performance Shares Vested in 2018PG&E Corporation’s relative performance.

 

The three-yearCompensation Committee retains complete discretion to adjust the formula and results and the final score, including to zero, on any and all incentive plan performance cyclemeasures for annual performance share awards that were granted in 2015 under the 2006 LTIP ended on December 31, 2017. These awards vested on March 1, 2018, and payouts are reported in this Proxy Statement in the table entitled “Option Exercises and Stock Vested During 2018” on page 82.any reason.

 

For that performance period, PG&E Corporation’s TSR fell between 13th and 14th rank when compared to the 14 companies in the 2015 Performance Comparator Group. This ranking resulted in no payout with respect to the 2015 performance share awards using a TSR measure. PG&E Corporation’s TSR performance for the three-year period was 4.5 percent, as compared to the median TSR of 45.0 percent among the 2015 Performance Comparator Group companies for the same period.

 

Performance Shares Vested in 2019

Performance Metric and DefinitionWeightThreshold
(25%)
Target
(100%)
Maximum
(200%)
Customer Satisfaction Score | Customer responses to “How would you rate the products and/or services offered by PG&E?” in a quarterly survey conducted by a third party25%71.772.374.4
PSPS Notification Accuracy | Percentage of PSPS-affected customers who receive notifications at least 12 hours in advance of a PSPS outage25%98.0%99.0%99.9%
System Hardening | Completion of (i) rebuild of overhead circuitry to current hardening design standards; (ii) targeted undergrounding; or (iii) elimination of overhead circuitry25%919 miles1,021 miles1,225 miles
Substation Enablement | The number of substations, out of a possible 64 substations, that are “energizable” during a transmission-level PSPS event25%30 substations40 substations50 substations

 

Fifty percentWhile our success in delivering safe and reliable services to customers is the core focus of the 2020 PSU awards, granted under the LTIP in 2016 were allocatedlevel of vesting may be modified to performance shares using a relative TSR measure. The three-year performance cycle ended on December 31, 2018. These awards vested on February 19, 2019 and any payouts for these awards would be expected to be reflected in the 2019 proxy statement. For that period, PG&E Corporation’s TSR fell lowest when compared to the 14 companies in the 2016 Performance Comparator Group. This ranking resulted in no payout with respect to the 2016 performance share awards using a TSR measure. PG&E Corporation’s TSR performance for the three-year period was negative 50.5 percent, as compared to the median TSR of 51.2 percent among the 2016 Performance Comparator Group companies for the same period. A 20-day average is used to determine the beginning and ending values for the calculation.

Ten percent of awards granted under the LTIP in 2016 were allocated to performance shares with the payout determined by measuring performance against equally-weighted safety and affordability goals. Safety performance,reflect our financial stability as measured by the 2016 through 2018 Lost Workday Case Rate was below the threshold target. Affordability, as measured by three-year efficiency gains versus a $100 million target, achieved a 2.0 score, with savings of $279 million, which is significantly above the $200 million maximum target. The overall result was a 100 percent payout in 2019 for these performance shares, which represented 10 percent of the total 2016 target LTIP award.relative TSR.

2016 Safety and Affordability Measures Weight Threshold Target Maximum Result Score Weighted
Average
Score
SAFETY COMPONENT              
2016-2018 Lost Workday Case Rate 50% 0.247 0.215 0.201 0.392 0.000 0.000
AFFORDABILITY COMPONENT              
3-Year Efficiency Gains (in millions) 50% $75 $100 $200 $279 2.000 1.000
  100%           100%

 

2019Performance Metric and DefinitionWeightThreshold
0.75x
Target
1.00x
Maximum
1.25x
PG&E Corporation’s TSR compared to a group of select comparator companies(1)Modifier25th percentile50th percentile80th percentile

Notes: (1)Comparator companies included: Alliant Energy Corporation, Ameren Corporation, American Electric Power Company, Inc., CMS Energy Corporation, Consolidated Edison, Inc., DTE Energy Company, Duke Energy Corporation, Edison International, Evergy, Inc., Eversource Energy, NiSource Inc., Pinnacle West Capital Corporation, Southern Company, WEC Energy Group, Inc., and Xcel Energy Inc. See “Use of Market Data” section on page 52 for details on peer group selection.

Actual performance relative to the goals approved by the Compensation Committee will be disclosed following the conclusion of the three-year performance period and certification of results in the first quarter of 2023.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement7259

 
Back to Contents

Assessment of 2018 Performance Share Awards

The three-year performance period for the 2018 PSU awards concluded on December 31, 2020. The 2018 PSUs were subject to three performance metrics reflecting strategic priorities at the time of grant: relative TSR, safety, and earnings from operations per share. In the first quarter of 2021, the Compensation Committee assessed performance over the three-year performance period, and similar to the STIP, no adjustments were made to account for the impact of COVID-19 as the Compensation Committee did not believe this was a relevant consideration.

Performance MetricWeight(3)Threshold
(25%)
Target
(100%)
Maximum
(200%)
Actual
Performance
Formula-
Based
Payout
Actual
Payout
PG&E Corporation’s TSR compared to a group of select comparator companies(1)57%25th
Percentile
60th
Percentile
90th
Percentile
0th
percentile
0%0%
Serious Injury and Fatality (SIF) actual, potential injury or near-hit events29%≥122111≤10181200%0%
Earnings from operations per share based on average annual performance(2)14%95% of
Target
Guidance105% of
Target
99% of
Target
98%0%
Total weighted payout     72%0%

Notes:(1)Comparator companies included: Alliant Energy Corporation, Ameren Corporation, American Electric Power Company, Inc., CMS Energy Corporation, Consolidated Edison, Inc., DTE Energy Company, Duke Energy Corporation, Edison International Eversource Energy, NiSource Inc., Pinnacle West Capital Corporation, SCANA Corporation, Southern Company, WEC Energy Group, Inc., Xcel Energy Inc.
(2)This measure is non-GAAP: Adjusted to exclude items that impacted comparability as described in “Exhibit A,” starting on page 67.
(3)Weights in the table are expressed as a percentage of the PSU component of the 2018 total LTIP award mix (which also included RSUs). PSUs made up 35% of the total LTIP award mix in 2018; PSUs with TSR, SIF, and earnings per share metrics made up 20%, 10% and 5% of total LTIP award mix, respectively.

In reviewing company and NEO performance for 2020, the Compensation Committee considered the totality of circumstances over the year, including but not limited to:

The Utility’s overall public and workforce safety, which included five fatalities from the company and contractor workforces;
The possibility that Utility assets were the ignition source of the Zogg fire, which resulted in four public fatalities and property damage;
Compliance fines levied against the Utility by regulators; and
Reports provided to the Boards by the Federal Monitor on the Utility’s operational and safety performance.

In addition to discussions with management, the Compensation Committee consulted with independent compensation consultants and outside legal counsel to review the range of actions taken by other utilities in comparable circumstances.

Based upon the totality of the circumstances described above, management’s proposal, and extensive consideration, the Compensation Committee determined to exercise its discretion to materially reduce incentive compensation paid to all NEOs and officers for the STIP 2020 performance year and the 2018 LTIP performance period ending in 2020. These actions resulted in a reduction of incentive compensation, in the form of 2020 STIP payments and 2018 performance share payments, to officers for 2020 by an average of 58 percent from target for those elements of incentives.

The Compensation Committee arrived at the overall reduction in part by reducing the 2018 PSU awards payout for NEOs and officers to zero. The Compensation Committee also reduced the payout in respect of the STIP company score as described further in the “Short-Term Incentives” section above.

Retention Awards

2020 was a transition year for the companies, with our emergence from bankruptcy and changes in our leadership team. In August 2020, the Compensation Committee approved one-time retention awards for four NEOs to secure their continued service. The Compensation Committee believed continuity in leadership was in shareholders’ best interests and that making such awards was a market-typical practice in periods of significant organizational and leadership transition.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   60
Back to Contents

Messrs. Simon and Wells each received an award of RSUs at the value of $1,312,500 scheduled to vest in two equal tranches in August 2021 and August 2022. Following his resignation in September 2020, Mr. Wells forfeited his retention award in full. Messrs. Thomason and Welsch each received an award of PSUs, subject to the same terms and conditions as the 2020 PSU awards, described above, and reflecting our POR OII commitments that precluded the award of RSUs to these NEOs in 2020.

NEOTerms 2020
Retention
Award
David S. ThomasonPSUs subject to the same terms as the 2020 PSU awards     $300,000
John R. SimonRSUs with 50% vesting in August 2021 and 50% vesting in August 2022$1,312,500
James M. WelschPSUs subject to the same terms as the 2020 PSU awards$488,000
Jason P. Wells (1)RSUs with 50% vesting in August 2021 and 50% vesting in August 2022$1,312,500

Notes.(1)Award forfeited in full on resignation effective September 26, 2020.

Interim CEO Compensation

Mr. Johnson retired as CEO and President of PG&E Corporation effective July 1, 2020. From June 30, 2020, Mr. Smith served in the role of Interim CEO and President of PG&E Corporation until Ms. Poppe’s start date.

The Compensation Committee approved a compensation package that reflected the unique and transitionary nature of Mr. Smith’s role. This package comprised an annualized base salary of $1,500,000 and a total target equity award value of $5,000,000, pro-rated to reflect employment in 2020. The equity award combined a grant of RSUs with PSUs:

Compensation
Element
Details
Base Salary$1,500,000 annual base salary
$755,682 received in 2020 in respect of time employed
Short-Term IncentiveNot eligible to participate
RSUs30% of the total equity award value
Award value of $1,500,000
Award vested on the election of a PG&E Corporation CEO in accordance with the approved terms
PSUs70% of the equity award value
Annualized target award value of $3,500,000 pro-rated to reflect employment in 2020; the number of shares vesting was adjusted by 6/12ths to reflect the six full months employed in 2020
The PSU performance score had a threshold, target, and maximum level of performance based on STIP results for 2020, with performance at threshold, target, and maximum levels resulting in 50%, 100% and 200% of target payout, respectively
The PSUs vested upon certification of the performance results by the Compensation Committee in February 2021

As detailed in the “Short-Term Incentives” section starting on page 54, the Compensation Committee exercised its discretion and approved a payout factor of 0.650 in respect of 2020 performance for all NEOs and officers, including Mr. Smith. The Compensation Committee and the independent members of the PG&E Corporation Board applied a 110 percent individual performance modifier to Mr. Smith’s final payout. The Compensation Committee determined this individual performance modifier was appropriate based on the Board’s and the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of Mr. Smith’s performance in 2020, including his leadership during a transitional year for the companies. The 110 percent individual performance modifier aligns with the average modifier applied to other officers. After the proration described above, the below-target payout factor, and the impact of the individual performance modifier, Mr. Smith earned 35.8 percent of the target PSU award.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   61
Back to Contents

Post-Retirement Benefits

PG&E Corporation and the Utility provide retirement benefits to eligible employees, including the NEOs. Eligibility for different plans reflects factors including appointment date and employing entity. Tax-qualified pensions or similar plans, other tax-qualified defined contribution plans (e.g., 401(k) plans), and non-tax-qualified retirement plans for NEOs are common in our Pay Comparator Group, and the Compensation Committee believes these defined benefit and defined contribution plans offer significant recruiting and retention incentives.

The different benefits that NEOs are eligible for are summarized below.

BenefitEligibleKey Features
PG&E Corporation Retirement Savings PlanAll NEOs

   Tax-qualified 401(k) plan

   Maximum matching contribution of 75 cents for each dollar contributed, up to

   6% of base salary for individuals eligible for the final average pay pension benefit

   8% of base salary for individuals eligible for a cash balance pension benefit

   Matching funds above IRS limits contributed to the NEO’s account in the PG&E Corporation 2005 Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, a non-qualified deferred compensation plan

Retirement PlanAll NEOs

   Utility’s tax-qualified defined benefit plan

   Takes the form of either a final average pay pension benefit or a cash balance benefit

   During bankruptcy proceedings, lump sum payments of more than $5,000 were not permitted

PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP)Simon, Wells, Loduca

   Non-tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan

   Frozen to new entrants after 2012

PG&E Corporation Defined Contribution Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (DC-ESRP)Lewis, Thomason, Welsch, Johnson, Vesey

   Non-tax-qualified defined contribution pension plan

   Covers all officers elected on or after January 1, 2013

Upon retirement, NEOs also may be eligible for post-retirement health, welfare, insurance, and other benefits broadly similar to those provided to all employees. Additional details regarding the retirement programs and post-retirement benefits, and the value of pension benefits accumulated as of December 31, 2020, for the NEOs can be found in the table entitled “Pension Benefits – 2020,” the table entitled “Non-qualified Deferred Compensation – 2020,” and the section entitled “Potential Payments – Resignation/Retirement.”

Perquisites

NEOs generally receive limited perquisites that are comparable in value and scope to those provided to executive officers in the Pay Comparator Group. Perquisites are provided to reflect market norms and to enable the executives to effectively discharge their roles. The value of these services is taxable to the recipient and they generally include:

A partial subsidy for financial planning, partial reimbursement of certain health club fees, on-site parking including electric vehicle charging, executive health services, and de minimis value perquisites under a pre-approved policy; and
A lump-sum annual stipend in lieu of providing other market-typical perquisites.

The PG&E Corporation and Utility principal executive officers also received safety-and security-based car transportation services in 2020. In 2021, the ground transportation policy was updated to specify such transportation services are provided only when the executive is traveling for business purposes.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   62
Back to Contents

Severance Benefits

General severance benefits are provided to the NEOs through the Officer Severance Policy and specific incentive plan award agreements and guidelines. The purpose of this policy is to:

Attract and retain senior management by providing severance benefits that are part of a competitive total compensation package;
Provide consistent treatment for all terminated officers;
Minimize potential litigation costs in connection with terminations of employment by conditioning payments upon a general release of claims; and
Focus management on maximizing shareholder value and aligning interests, rather than being distracted by concerns about job security in a potential change-in-control situation.

Change-in-control benefits require a “double trigger” and are not payable based on a change-in-control event alone, which the Compensation Committee believes best reflects shareholder interests and aligns with typical market practices.

Termination
Scenario
EligibleKey Provisions
Termination without causeAll NEOsCash severance of one-times the sum of base salary and STIP target
Pro-rata vesting of PSUs
Continued vesting of unvested RSUs for one year
Continued vesting of stock options for one year, with an exercise period equal to the lesser of one year or the remaining term of the options
Limited COBRA benefits and outplacement services
Termination for cause or resignation when not retirement eligibleAll NEOs(1)Termination for cause or resignation when not retirement eligible:
Forfeits all unvested PSUs, RSUs, and stock options
Forfeits any unpaid dividends associated with long-term incentive awards
Termination following a Change in ControlSmith, Simon, Johnson, Vesey, Wells, LoducaCash severance of two-times the sum of base salary and STIP target
LTIP award agreements detail treatment that accelerate vesting of all awards on a change of control (CIC) if either (1) the officer is severed in connection with the CIC, or (2) the award is not continued, assumed, or substituted
Lewis, Foster, Thomason, WelschGeneral severance benefits only (i.e. those set out above, not related to a change in control)
LTIP award agreements detail treatment that accelerate vesting of all awards on a CIC if either (1) the officer is severed in connection with the CIC, or (2) the award is not continued, assumed, or substituted

Notes.(1)Messrs. Simon and Welsch are eligible for retirement.

The Golden Parachute Restriction Policy requires shareholder approval of certain defined executive severance payments provided in connection with a change in control of PG&E Corporation, to the extent that those payments exceed 2.99 times the sum of a covered officer’s base salary and target short-term incentive award.

The Officer Severance Policy also permits reduction and repayment of severance benefits from certain officers, with certain triggers.

Specifically, the Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and the Utility will have:

a right to cancel, reduce, or require forfeiture of severance payments or benefits from (1) executive officers of either company in the event of a felony conviction of either company related to public health and safety or financial misconduct by either company following its July 1, 2020 emergence from Chapter 11 (Company Conviction), provided that an affected executive officer was serving as an executive officer of the convicted company at the time of the conduct leading to the Company Conviction; or (2) either company’s CEO or CFO if that company is required to restate its financial statements due to that company’s material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements as a result of misconduct, provided that the individual was serving as CEO or CFO during the period covered by the restatement; and
a right to recoup or require reimbursement or repayment of severance rights, payments, and benefits from executive officers in the event such executive officers engaged in misconduct that materially contributed to some of the actions or omissions on which a Company Conviction is based.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   63
Back to Contents

Additional details regarding severance benefits can be found in the sections entitled “Potential Payments—Termination Without Cause” beginning on page 83, and “Potential Payments—Severance in Connection with Change in Control” beginning on page 84.

2021 Compensation Structure

Following emergence, and the appointment of our restructured Board, the Compensation Committee focused on areas that would begin to shape our 2021 compensation programs. This included the attraction, employment, and compensation of the Corporation’s new CEO and the metrics and goals for our 2021 short- and long-term incentive programs.

Chief Executive Officer Appointment

In November 2020, Ms. Poppe was appointed CEO of PG&E Corporation effective January 4, 2021. As disclosed in our November 18, 2021 Form 8-K filingwith the SEC, the independent members of the Corporation Board approved an annual compensation arrangement in association with her role as CEO, as well as one-time make-whole and inducement awards to secure her employment.

Annual Compensation

The key aspects of Ms. Poppe’s initial annual compensation, set out in an offer letter that also provides for a five-year term with automatic annual renewals, are as follows:

Compensation
Element
Details
Base Salary$1,350,000 annual base salary
Short-Term
Incentive
130% target opportunity
Subject to the metrics described in the “Incentive Compensation” section below
Long-Term
Incentive
Target award value of $9,250,000 for 2021
Made according to the terms of the annual LTIP design approved by the Compensation Committee

Ms. Poppe will be eligible under our existing perquisite and benefit programs.

Perquisites will be in line with those provided to the other executive officers, including a lump-sum stipend of $35,000 in lieu of providing certain market-typical benefits.
One-time benefits linked to her appointment and relocation including up to six family roundtrips to the Corporation’s headquarters, $26,202 in costs related to specific limited relocation activities, and reimbursement of legal expenses up to $25,000.
Post-retirement benefits will be provided under the PG&E Corporation Retirement Savings Plan (a tax-qualified 401(k) plan), the Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan, and the PG&E Corporation Defined-Contribution Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan.
Severance benefits will be provided for under the Officer Severance Policy.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   64
Back to Contents

One-Time Compensation

In addition, to secure Ms. Poppe’s appointment, the independent members of the PG&E Corporation Board approved two one-time awards intended to compensate her for compensation that was forfeited with her prior employer. The Compensation Committee has determined that such payments are in line with market standards and believes they were appropriately structured to protect shareholder interests through the application of clawback provisions and the ability to reduce payments if certain awards were not in fact forfeited on joining PG&E Corporation.

AwardMaterial DetailsDesign Considerations
$31,924,949
RSU award

   RSUs vest in two equal tranches on the first and second anniversaries of grant

   Intended to replace certain long-term equity awards with Ms. Poppe’s former employer

   Award will be reduced to the extent the awards being replaced are ultimately received from her former employer

   Approved values heavily informed by compensation forfeited to join the Corporation

   83% granted in the form of equity, providing immediate alignment with shareholders’ interests with vesting over two years

   Awards include the ability to reduce or clawback depending on the circumstances

$6,600,000 cash payment

   Intended to replace her 2020 annual bonus from her former employer, one of the long-term stock awards, and certain unvested nonqualified deferred compensation benefits, and to assist with relocation and expenses

   Award is subject to clawback provisions in the event Ms. Poppe resigns, other than for good reason (as defined in the Officer Severance Policy), or is terminated for cause within 12 months of her start date

Incentive Design

For 2021, the Compensation Committee has maintained a broadly consistent incentive compensation structure, with some changes to performance metrics and weightings to reflect priorities for the year ahead. These changes reinforce important areas of operational focus, including increased emphasis on workforce safety, while maintaining alignment with the criteria of AB 1054 and our POR OII commitments. The Compensation Committee followed a rigorous process while reviewing metrics and performance goals, including thoughtful deliberations with the Corporation’s CEO, the companies’ Chief Risk Officer, and the companies’ Chief Safety Officer, and a review of safety-related measures with the Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees.

Short-Term Incentive Plan

For 2021, we have eliminated the individual performance modifier to place greater emphasis on the success of the team rather than the individual. To better align with market, the maximum payout under the STIP will be capped at 200 percent of target.

In respect of the company score, the weightings associated with our operational performance and reliability and with workforce safety performance areas will increase, reflecting our continued focus on outcome-oriented and risk reduction metrics that prioritize the service provided to our customers and the safety of our workforce. Minor changes have been made to metric definitions, with the inclusion of new metrics in areas relating to wire-down events, average speed of answer for incoming calls regarding emergencies, and serious injuries and fatalities events, investigations, and corrective actions.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   65
Back to Contents

Long-Term Incentive Plan

For 2021, the Compensation Committee approved changes to the metrics that resulted in incorporating TSR performance as a weighted metric rather than a modifier, which reduces the maximum opportunity available under the plan from 250 percent of target (200 percent maximum score times 125 percent maximum modifier) to 200 percent of target (no modifier). This better aligns the plan design with market. Minor changes have been made, including adding new metrics to assess our success in reducing wildfire risk based on our enhanced vegetation management work, and a metric related to achieving affordability for customers through efficiency in operations.

For 2021, the Compensation Committee also reintroduced RSUs in the LTIP for officers not subject to AB 1054 to realign the plan to competitive market practices and promote enhanced employee retention.

Additional Information

Equity Grant DatesDate Policy

 

The PG&E Corporation Equity Grant Date Policy, as last amended in September 2017, generally provides that annual LTIP awards, if any, are granted once per year on March 1 (or if that day is not a business day, then on the following business day). The PG&E Corporation Board or the Compensation Committee may determine a different grant date if appropriate or necessary.

The grant date for non-annual equity awards to employees (such as for newly hired or newly promoted officers or awards made for retention, recognition, or other purposes) is the later of (1) the date that the non-annual award is approved by the independent members of the PG&E Corporation or Utility Board, the Compensation Committee, or the PG&E Corporation CEO, as applicable, (2) the effective date of the LTIP award recipient’s employment, promotion, or recognition, or (3) the date otherwise specified by the applicable Board, the Compensation Committee, or the PG&E Corporation CEO. If the grant date of any non-annual LTIP award would occur during a trading blackout period, as defined under the PG&E Corporationcompanies’ Insider Trading Policy, then the actual grant date will be the first business day after the trading blackout period ends.

 

Other ElementsUse of Executive Compensation in 2018

Perquisites and Related CompensationNon-GAAP Financial Metrics

 

NEOs generally receive incentive awards that are subject to earnings metrics that are considered “Non-GAAP financial measures” under SEC rules and regulations. “Exhibit A,” starting on page 67, explains how these measures are calculated from our audited financial statements.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

The Compensation Committee sets NEO compensation in accordance with our compensation philosophy and continues to believe that attracting, retaining, and motivating our employees with a limited rangecompensation program that supports long-term value creation is in the best interests of our shareholders. In reaching decisions on executive compensation, the Compensation Committee considers the tax and accounting consequences. With the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code no longer permits companies to deduct certain qualified performance-based executive compensation. As a result, in establishing compensation, the Compensation Committee no longer considered the tax deductibility limitations imposed by Section 162(m). Despite the new limits on the deductibility of performance-based compensation, the Compensation Committee continues to believe that a significant portion of NEO compensation should be tied to company performance.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   66
Back to Contents

EXHIBIT A

Reconciliation of PG&E Corporation’s Consolidated Income Available for Common Shareholders in Accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) to Earnings from Operations.

For the year ended December 31, 2020.

(in millions, except per share amounts)Earnings 

Per Share

Amounts

(Diluted)

PG&E Corporation Earnings on a GAAP basis$ (1,318) $(1.05)
Items Impacting Comparability:(1)   
Amortization of wildfire fund contribution(2)297 0.24
Investigation remedies(3)223 0.18
Bankruptcy and legal costs(4)2,651 2.11
2019-2020 Wildfire-related costs, net of insurance(5)213 0.17
Prior period net regulatory recoveries(6)(46) (0.04)
PG&E Corporation Earnings from Operations(7)$ 2,020 $1.61

(1)“Items impacting comparability” represent items that management does not consider part of the normal course of operations and that affect comparability of financial results between periods. Items impacting comparability reconcile earnings from operations with Consolidated Income Available for Common Shareholders as reported in accordance with GAAP. All amounts presented in the table above are tax adjusted at PG&E Corporation’s statutory tax rate of 27.98 percent for 2020, except for certain costs that are not tax deductible, as identified in the following footnotes. Amounts may not sum due to rounding.
(2)The Utility recorded costs of $413 million (before the tax impact of $116 million) associated with the amortization of wildfire fund contributions related to Assembly Bill 1054.
(3)The Utility recorded costs of $296 million (before the tax impact of $73 million) associated with investigation remedies. This includes $231 million (before the tax impact of $62 million) related to the Order Instituting Investigation into the 2017 Northern California Wildfires and the 2018 Camp Fire (Wildfire OII) settlement, as modified by the Decision Different dated April 20, 2020 ($10 million of Wildfire OII system enhancement costs are not tax deductible). The Utility also incurred restoration and rebuild costs of $36 million (before the tax impact of $10 million) associated with the town of Paradise (2018 Camp fire). The Utility also recorded costs of $29 million (before the tax impact of $1 million) for system enhancements related to the Locate and Mark OII ($25 million of Locate and Mark OII system enhancement costs are not tax deductible).

(in millions, pre-tax)

Twelve Months Ended

December 31, 2020

Wildfire OII disallowance and system enhancements$ 231
Paradise restoration and rebuild36
Locate and Mark OII system enhancements29
Investigation remedies$ 296

(4)PG&E Corporation and the Utility recorded costs of $2.8 billion (before the tax impact of $125 million) associated with bankruptcy and legal costs. This includes $1.7 billion (before the tax impact of $41 million) related to exit financing costs ($1.5 billion of exit financing costs are not tax deductible). Also, the Utility recorded a $619 million reduction to the deferred tax asset related to the value of PG&E Corporation’s common stock transferred to the Fire Victim Trust. PG&E Corporation and the Utility also incurred legal and other costs of $486 million (before the tax impact of $84 million); $184 million of legal and other costs were treated as not tax deductible.

(in millions, pre-tax)

Twelve Months Ended

December 31, 2020

Exit financing$ 1,672
Fire Victim Trust tax valuation619
Legal and other costs486
Bankruptcy and legal costs$ 2,776

(5)The Utility incurred costs, net of probable insurance recoveries, of $296 million (before the tax impact of $84 million) associated with 2019-2020 wildfires. This includes accrued charges for third-party claims of $625 million (before the tax impact of $175 million) related to Kincade fire, and $275 million (before the tax impact of $77 million) related to Zogg fire. The Utility also incurred costs of $35 million (before the tax impact of $10 million) for clean-up and repair costs related to Kincade fire. In addition, the Utility incurred legal and other costs of $6 million (before the tax impact of $2 million) related to Kincade fire, as well as $4 million (before the tax impact of $1 million) related to Zogg fire. These costs were partially offset by probable insurance recoveries of $430 million (before the tax impact of $120 million) related to Kincade fire, as well as $219 million (before the tax impact of $61 million) related to Zogg fire.

(in millions, pre-tax)

Twelve Months Ended

December 31, 2020

2019 Kincade fire-related costs, net of insurance:

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   67
Back to Contents
(in millions, pre-tax)

Twelve Months Ended

December 31, 2020

Third-party claims$ 625
Utility clean-up and repairs35
Legal and other costs6
Insurance recoveries(430)
2020 Zogg fire-related costs, net of insurance:
Third-party claims275
Legal and other costs4
Insurance recoveries(219)
Total 2019-2020 Wildfire-related costs, net of insurance$ 296

(6)The Utility recorded net revenue of $64 million (before the tax impact of $18 million) associated with prior period net regulatory recoveries. This includes $31 million (before the tax impact of $9 million) for allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) capital structure impact on 2019 revenues. The Utility also incurred $70 million (before the tax impact of $20 million) for the impact of the Transmission Owner (TO) 20 settlement on 2019 revenues and the TO18 FERC order on 2017, 2018, and 2019 revenues. Also, as a result of the 2011 Gas Transmission and Storage (GT&S) capital audit, the Utility recorded revenues of $103 million (before the tax impact of $29 million) related to the recovery of capital expenditures from 2011 through 2014 above amounts adopted in the 2011 GT&S rate case.

(in millions, pre-tax)

Twelve Months Ended

December 31, 2020

AFUDC capital structure impact$ (31)
TO proceedings impact70
2011 GT&S capital audit(103)
Prior period net regulatory recoveries$ (64)

(7)“Earnings from operations” is a non-GAAP financial measure and is calculated as income available for common shareholders less items impacting comparability as described in Note (1) above. PG&E Corporation uses earnings from operations to understand and compare operating results across reporting periods for various purposes, including internal budgeting and forecasting, short- and long-term operating plans, and employee incentive compensation. PG&E Corporation believes that non-GAAP earnings from operations provide additional insight into the underlying trends of the business allowing for a better comparison against historical results and expectations for future performance. Earnings from operations is not a substitute or alternative for GAAP measures such as consolidated income available for common shareholders and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   68
Back to Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION INFORMATION

Summary Compensation Table – 2020

This table summarizes the principal components of compensation paid or granted during 2020 (including cash incentives earned for corporate performance in 2020 but paid in 2021). This table also includes information disclosed in the 2019 Form 10-K/A and 2019 Joint Proxy Statement for compensation paid or granted to certain officers during 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Name and
Principal Position
 Year Salary
($)(1)
 Bonus
($)
 Stock
Awards
($)(2)
 Option
Awards
($)(3)
 Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)(4)
 Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred

Compensation
Earnings
($)(5)
 All Other
Compensation
($)(6)
 Total
($)
William L. Smith(a)
Interim Chief Executive Officer and President, PG&E Corporation
 2020 755,682 0 5,105,000 0 0 21,354 292,179 6,174,215
                  
                  
Michael A. Lewis(b)
Interim President, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
 2020 973,069 0 699,993 0 223,555 22,011 163,793 2,082,421
 2019 474,855 125,000 0 0 0 15,603 81,785 697,243
                  
Christopher A. Foster(c)
Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer, PG&E Corporation
 2020 438,095 0 300,001 0 108,426 166,195 67,636 1,080,353
                  
                  
David S. Thomason
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
 2020 353,853 0 700,002 0 114,441 303,438 55,516 1,527,251
 2019 331,250 0 0 0 0 275,136 52,973 659,359
 2018 323,718 0 260,039 65,001 0 0 59,900 708,658
John R. Simon(d)
Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer, PG&E Corporation
 2020 768,786 0 3,062,499 0 439,400 790,616 67,543 5,128,845
 2019 749,031 0 0 0 0 728,771 69,696 1,547,499
 2018 599,000 0 1,800,090 450,007 0 203,765 71,766 3,124,628
James M. Welsch
Senior Vice President, Generation and Chief Nuclear Officer, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
 2020 606,437 0 1,137,995 0 245,495 283,136 86,127 2,359,190
 2019 533,181 0 0 0 143,563 298,748 95,257 1,070,749
                  
William D. Johnson(e)
Former Chief Executive Officer and President, PG&E Corporation
 2020 1,532,963 0 0 0 0 23,238 199,542 1,755,742
 2019 1,657,609 3,000,000 2,333,358 11,102,001 0 22,400 414,474 18,529,842
                  
Andrew M. Vesey(f)
Former Chief Executive Officer and President, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
 2020 666,596 0 0 0 0 24,480 2,939,494 3,630,569
 2019 371,212 1,000,000 833,558 0 0 21,159 147,842(7) 2,373,771
                  
Jason P. Wells(g)
Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, PG&E Corporation
 2020 722,042 0 3,062,499 0 0 95,227 54,491 3,934,259
 2019 630,000 0 0 0 0 525,086 60,866 1,215,952
 2018 625,000 0 2,000,122 500,001 0 0 72,151 3,197,274

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   69
Back to Contents

Summary Compensation Table – 2020(Continued)

Name and

Principal Position

 Year 

Salary

($)(1)

 

Bonus

($)

 

Stock

Awards

($)(2)

 

Option

Awards

($)(3)

 

Non-Equity

Incentive

Plan Compensation

($)(4)

 

Change in

Pension

Value and

Nonqualified

Deferred
Compensation

Earnings

($)(5)

 

All

Other
Compensation

($)(6)

 

Total

($)

Janet C. Loduca(h) 2020 583,924 0 1,200,004 0 261,189 510,881 1,150,910 3,706,908
Former Senior Vice President and General Counsel, PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company 2019 636,995 0 0 0 0 526,675 58,430 1,222,101
                  
                  

(a)Effective June 30, 2020, Mr. Smith became Interim Chief Executive Officer and President of PG&E Corporation.
(b)Mr. Lewis served as Senior Vice President, Electric Operations of Pacific Gas and Electric Company until July 31, 2020. Effective August 1, 2020, Mr. Lewis became Interim President of Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
(c)Mr. Foster served as Vice President, Investor Relations of PG&E Corporation until March 8, 2020. Effective March 9, 2020, Mr. Foster became Vice President, Treasury & Investor Relations of PG&E Corporation. Effective September 26, 2020, Mr. Foster became Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer of PG&E Corporation.
(d)Mr. Simon served as Executive Vice President, Law, Strategy & Policy of PG&E Corporation until August 14, 2020. Effective August 15, 2020, Mr. Simon became Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer of PG&E Corporation.
(e)Effective July 1, 2020, Mr. Johnson retired from PG&E Corporation.
(f)Effective August 4, 2020, Mr. Vesey separated from the Utility.
(g)Effective September 26, 2020, Mr. Wells resigned from PG&E Corporation.
(h)Effective August 16, 2020, Ms. Loduca separated from the companies.
(1)Includes payments for accrued vacation.
(2)Represents the grant date fair value of performance shares and RSUs measured in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, without considering an estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting. For performance shares using safety and affordability measures, and for RSUs, grant date fair value is measured using the closing price of PG&E Corporation common stock on the grant date. If the highest level of performance conditions were achieved, the estimated maximum grant date value of performance shares granted in 2020 would be: Mr. Smith $8,750,008, Mr. Lewis $1,749,983, Mr. Foster $750,007, Mr. Thomason $1,750,011, Mr. Simon $4,375,008, Mr. Welsch $2,844,991, Mr. Johnson $0, Mr. Vesey $0, Mr. Wells $4,375,008, and Ms. Loduca $3,000,011. For Mr. Smith, also includes the value of RSUs he received as a non-employee director in 2019, as further described in footnote 2(ii) to the “2020 Director Compensation” table on page 31, and the section entitled “Non-Employee Director Stock-Based Compensation” on page 30.
(3)Represents the grant date fair value of stock options based on a Black-Scholes American Call valuation model. No stock options were granted in 2020.
(4)Amounts represent payments received or deferred in 2021, 2020, and 2019 for achievement of corporate and organizational objectives in 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively, under the STIP.
(5)Amounts reported for 2020 consist of (i) the change in pension value during 2020 for all NEOs and (ii) the above-market earnings on compensation deferred into the PG&E Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan and invested in the AA Utility Bond Fund for Mr. Simon only ($15,569). The AA Utility Bond Fund accrues interest based on the long-term corporate bond yield average for AA utilities reported by Moody’s Investors Service. The above-market earnings are calculated as the difference between actual earnings from the AA Utility Bond Fund investment option and hypothetical earnings that would have resulted using an interest rate equal to 120 percent of the applicable federal rate.
(6)Amounts reported for 2020 consist of (i) perquisites and personal benefits (Mr. Smith $84,300, Mr. Lewis $50,099, Mr. Foster $54, Mr. Thomason $1,296, Mr. Simon $8,987, Mr. Welsch $54, Mr. Johnson $2,042, Mr. Vesey $1,935, Mr. Wells $6,052, and Ms. Loduca $9,323), (ii) a lump-sum annual stipend paid in lieu of providing perquisite benefits, with the exception of perquisite benefits noted in the chart below (Mr. Smith $35,000, Mr. Lewis $20,000, Mr. Foster $15,000, Mr. Thomason $15,000, Mr. Simon $25,000, Mr. Welsch $20,000, Mr. Johnson $35,000, Mr. Vesey $25,000, Mr. Wells $25,000, and Ms. Loduca $25,000), (iii) company contributions to defined contribution retirement plans (Mr. Smith $43,750, Mr. Lewis $71,771, Mr. Foster $52,503, Mr. Thomason $39,040, Mr. Simon $32,448, Mr. Welsch $65,809, Mr. Johnson $162,500, Mr. Vesey $76,349, Mr. Wells $22,075, and Ms. Loduca $16,947), (iv) tax-restoration payments to reflect additional taxation on relocation benefits (Mr. Smith $69,129 and Mr. Vesey $182) and temporary housing (Mr. Lewis $21,923), (v) severance payments earned upon separation from service (Mr. Vesey $2,863,209, Ms. Loduca $1,098,801), (vi) retainer provided to Mr. Smith for service as a member of the Boards of Directors from January 1 through June 30, 2020 ($60,000), and (vii) the value of interest paid on 2019 and 2020 dividends whose payout had been delayed until after the companies’ July 2020 emergence from Chapter 11 (Mr. Foster $79, Mr. Thomason $180, Mr. Simon $1,108, Mr. Welsch $264, Mr. Wells $1,364, and Ms. Loduca $239),
(7)This number has increased slightly since our 2019 10-K/A to reflect updated assumptions on the applicable tax rates.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   70
Back to Contents

Summary Compensation Table – 2020(Continued)

The following chart provides additional information regarding certain perquisites and personal benefits typically encompassing a partial subsidy for financial planning services from a third-party financial advisory firm, partial reimbursementthat are included in the Summary Compensation Table and discussed in section (i) of certain health club fees, on-site parking, executive health services, andfootnote 6. Additionally, NEOs may receive de minimis incidental perquisites under a pre-approved perquisite policy. The PG&E Corporation CEOpolicy (including company-paid insurance, service awards, electric vehicle charging, and the Utility President also may receive safety-and security-based car transportation services. The magnitude of these perquisites, including the lump-sum payment described in the following paragraph, is comparable to that provided to executive officers of companies in the Pay Comparator Group, and the value of these services is taxable to the recipient.similar benefits).

  

Transportation

Services

($)

 

Fitness

($)

 

Executive

Health

($)

 

Financial

Services

($)

 

Relocation

Services

($)

W. L. Smith 3,814 0 0 0 80,459
M. A. Lewis 1,135 0 0 0 48,910
C. A. Foster 0 0 0 0 0
D. S. Thomason 0 0 0 0 0
J. R. Simon 0 322 0 8,136 0
J. M. Welsch 0 0 0 0 0
W. D. Johnson 1,070 0 0 0 945
A. M. Vesey 1,899 0 0 0 0
J. P. Wells 0 0 0 5,584 0
J. C. Loduca 0 308 0 8,520 0

 

The Compensation Committee (and the independent membersabove perquisites and personal benefits consist of the PG&E Corporation Boardfollowing:

Transportation services for Messrs. Smith, Lewis, Johnson, and Vesey to help ensure their safety and security while serving in the positions of CEO of PG&E Corporation and President of the Utility, consisting of car transportation for commute and incidental non-business travel. Amounts include the prorated salary and benefits burden of the drivers, and vehicle costs. The provision of such services in 2021 has been limited to business-related travel only.
The value of reimbursements for health club fees, pursuant to a program available to certain management employees, including non-officers.
The cost of executive health services provided to executive officers. Amounts vary among officers, reflecting (i) the decisions of each individual officer regarding the specific types of tests and consultations provided, and (ii) the exact value of reimbursed expenses. Such benefit was suspended during 2020 due to lack of provider availability during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Fees paid to partially subsidize financial services provided by an independent contractor selected by PG&E Corporation to provide such services.
The cost to PG&E Corporation and the Utility, as applicable, for relocation assistance services, which may include moving services, payments to a third-party home sale assistance firm (which may include inspection, appraisal, and other costs related to the sale of the home, third-party service fees, etc.), mortgage subsidies, and commuting expenses during the relocation process. Recipients of relocation assistance also received tax reimbursement payments (Mr. Smith $69,129, and Mr. Lewis $21,923) with respect to this benefit in accordance with a broad-based program that provides relocation benefits to all employees. Such tax restoration payments are reflected in section (iv) of footnote 6 above.

In addition to the perquisite benefits described above, NEOs are given a set stipend that each NEO may use as the officer sees fit. The stipend is intended to cover miscellaneous items in each NEO’s discretion (such as membership in professional organizations). The amount of this stipend is included in the case of Ms. Williams, and the independent members of the Utility BoardSummary Compensation Table in the case“All Other Compensation” column and is addressed in section (ii) of Mr. Stavropoulos)footnote 6. NEOs also approved a 2018 lump-sum annual stipend amount for each executive officer consistent with 2017, which ranged from $15,000 to $35,000 (the upper end applicable only to Ms. Williams). This stipend is provided in lieu of providing the NEOs with additional perquisite benefits. The NEOs have discretion to use this stipend as they see fit.

The PG&E Corporation CEO is authorized to use private aircraft for business travel under appropriate circumstances. The Utility’s Corporate Aircraft Use policy prohibits use of Utility aircraft for personal travel.

Post-Retirement Benefits

NEOs arewere eligible to receive retirement benefits under the Utility’s tax-qualified defined benefit plan (“Retirement Plan”),on-site parking, which also provides benefitswas provided at no additional incremental cost to other eligible employees of PG&E Corporation and the Utility.

Please see the CD&A beginning on page 39 for additional information regarding the elements of compensation discussed above, including information regarding salary, short-term incentives, and long-term incentives. Additional information regarding grants of LTIP awards can be found in the narrative following the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2020” table.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   71
Back to Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2020

This table provides information regarding incentive awards and other stock-based awards granted during 2020 to NEOs.

    Committee / Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
 Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
    Board Action Threshold Target Maximum Threshold Target Maximum or Units Awards
Name Grant Date Date ($) ($) ($) (#) (#) (#) (#)(3) ($)(4)
W. L. Smith(5) 11/13/2019 9/25/2019             11,628 105,001
  8/3/2020 7/29/2020             163,934 1,499,996
  8/3/2020 7/29/2020       191,257 382,514 956,285   3,500,003
M. A. Lewis     171,966 343,931 644,871          
  3/2/2020 3/4/2020       35,519 71,038 177,595   649,998
  3/2/2020 3/4/2020       2,732 5,464 13,660   49,996
C. A. Foster     75,822 151,645 284,334          
  3/2/2020 3/4/2020       16,394 32,787 81,968   300,001
D. S. Thomason     80,029 160,057 300,107          
  3/2/2020 3/4/2020       21,858 43,716 109,290   400,001
  3/2/2020 8/13/2020       16,394 32,787 81,968   300,001
J. R. Simon     270,400 540,800 1,014,000          
  3/2/2020 3/4/2020       95,629 191,257 478,143   1,750,002
  8/14/2020 8/13/2020             139,479 1,312,497
J. M. Welsch     171,675 343,350 643,781          
  3/2/2020 3/4/2020       35,519 71,038 177,595   649,998
  3/2/2020 8/13/2020       26,667 53,333 133,333   487,997
W. D. Johnson(6)     0 0 0         0
A. M. Vesey(7)     249,603 499,206 936,012         0
J. P. Wells     183,962 367,924 689,857          
  3/2/2020 3/4/2020       95,629 191,257 478,143   1,750,002
  8/14/2020 8/13/2020             139,479 1,312,497
J. C. Loduca     200,914 401,829 753,429          
  3/2/3030 3/4/2020       65,574 131,148 327,870   1,200,004

(1)Compensation opportunity granted for 2020 under the STIP. Actual amounts earned are reported in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column. Threshold represents a 0.5 enterprise-wide STIP performance score and a 100 percent individual performance modifier. Maximum reflects a 1.5 enterprise-wide STIP performance score and a 125 percent individual performance modifier.
(2)Represents performance shares granted in 2020 under the 2014 LTIP. Threshold equals 0.5 times target. Maximum equals 2.0 times target and a 125 percent financial stability modifier based on TSR.
(3)Represents RSUs granted in 2020 under the 2014 LTIP. For Mr. Smith only, includes RSUs received as a non-employee director in 2019, as further described in footnote 2(ii) to the “2020 Director Compensation” table on page 31, and the section entitled “Non-Employee Director Stock-Based Compensation” on page 30. Such awards were granted following receipt of approval from the Bankruptcy Court, and consistent with the Equity Grant Date Policy.
(4)For RSUs and performance shares, the grant date fair value is based on the PG&E Corporation stock price at close on the grant date.
(5)Mr. Smith did not participate in the STIP in 2020.
(6)Mr. Johnson did not participate in the STIP and did not receive any grants under the LTIP in 2020.
(7)Mr. Vesey did not receive an LTIP award for 2020, according to the terms of his separation agreement.

Detailed information regarding compensation reported in the tables entitled “Summary Compensation Table” and “Grants of Plan-Based Awards,” including the relative amounts apportioned to different elements of compensation, can be found in the CD&A. Information regarding specific grants and arrangements is provided below.

Annual awards for 2020 were approved in March 2020, subject to approval from the Bankruptcy Court. As such, the awards were not formally provided until after the companies’ emergence from Chapter 11, at which time they were ratified by the refreshed Compensation Committee.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   72
Back to Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2020(Continued)

STIP Awards

Information regarding the terms and basis of 2020 STIP awards can be found in the CD&A.

Performance Shares

Performance shares granted in 2020 will vest, if at all, upon certification of performance against preestablished operational and financial measures at the end of the three-year performance period from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Upon vesting, performance shares are settled in shares of PG&E Corporation common stock, net of the number of shares having a value equal to required withholding taxes. The specific payout formulas are discussed in the CD&A.

Each time that a cash dividend is paid on PG&E Corporation common stock, an amount equal to the cash dividend per share multiplied by the number of performance shares granted to the recipient will be accrued on behalf of the recipient. At the end of the vesting period, the amount of any accrued dividend equivalents will be increased or decreased by the same payout factor used to increase or decrease the number of vested performance shares for the period.

Restricted Stock Units

No annual RSU awards were granted in 2020. The $1,312,500 RSU retention award granted to Mr. Simon on August 14, 2020, vests one-half on August 14, 2021, and one-half on August 14, 2022. Upon vesting, RSUs are settled in an equivalent number of shares of PG&E Corporation common stock, net of the number of shares having a value equal to required withholding taxes. All RSUs may be subject to earlier vesting or forfeiture upon certain events, in accordance with the terms of the grant. The $1,312,500 RSU retention award granted to Mr. Wells on August 14, 2020, was forfeited upon Mr. Wells’ resignation on September 26, 2020.

Each time that a cash dividend is paid on PG&E Corporation common stock, an amount equal to the cash dividend per share multiplied by the number of outstanding RSUs granted to the recipient will be accrued on behalf of the recipient. Any accrued dividends are paid in cash at the time the related RSUs are settled.

Mr. Smith received RSUs in 2019 as a non-employee director, as further described in footnote 2(ii) to the “2020 Director Compensation” table on page 31, and the section entitled “Non-Employee Director Stock-Based Compensation” on page 30.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   73
Back to Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End – 2020

This table provides additional information regarding performance shares, stock options, and RSUs that were held as of December 31, 2020, by the NEOs, including awards granted prior to 2020. Any awards described below that were granted in 2020 also are reflected in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table.

  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable(1)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable(2)
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
  Number
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not

Vested
(#)(3)
   Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)(4)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)(5)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(4)
 
W. L. Smith 0 0      136,748(6)   1,703,880   0   0 
M. A. Lewis 2,696 1,349 42.51 8/1/2028  971(6)  12,099   191,255(7)   2,383,037 
C. A. Foster 2,607 1,304 41.26 3/1/2028  1,651(6)  20,571   81,968(7)  1,021,321 
D. S. Thomason 4,236 2,118 41.26 3/1/2028  1,182(6)  14,728   191,258(7)  2,383,075 
J. R. Simon 29,326 14,663 41.26 3/1/2028  147,659(6)  1,839,831   478,143(7)  5,957,662 
J. M. Welsch 6,517 3,259 41.26 3/1/2028  1,818(6)  22,652   310,928(7)  3,874,163 
W. D. Johnson 272,266 0 25.00 8/14/2023  0   0   0   0 
  340,333 0 40.00 8/14/2023  0   0   0   0 
  363,022 0 50.00 8/14/2024  0   0   0   0 
A. M. Vesey 0 0    0   0   0   0 
J. P. Wells 0 0    0   0   0   0 
J. C. Loduca 4,888 2,444 41.26 8/16/2021  1,364(6)  16,995   63,753(7)  794,362 
(1)For all NEOs except Mr. Johnson, consists of unexercised stock options from awards granted in 2018. For Mr. Johnson, consists of unexercised vested performance-based stock options from awards granted in 2019.
(2)Consists of unvested stock options from awards granted in 2018. Such options vested on March 1, 2021.
(3)Includes (a) performance shares granted in 2018 for which the performance period ended on December 31, 2020 and for which the reported number reflects a 0 percent payout, and (b) unvested RSUs. See the CD&A for additional details regarding awards granted in 2020.
(4)Value based on the December 31, 2020 per-share closing price of PG&E Corporation common stock of $12.46.
(5)Consists of unvested performance shares granted in 2020. Consistent with SEC rules, the number of shares is presented assuming maximum performance for 2020 awards using operational measures and maximum performance for the financial stability modifier based on TSR. See the CD&A for additional details regarding awards granted in 2020.
(6)Disclosed below is the vesting schedule for each of the RSU and earned PSU awards described above.
(7)Disclosed below is the vesting schedule for each of the unearned PSU awards described above.

      VESTING SCHEDULE   
Name Award Date Award Type 2/25/2021 3/1/2021 8/1/2021 8/13/2021 12/3/2021 8/13/2022 Total 
W. L. Smith 08/03/2020 Earned PSU 136,748           136,748 
M. A. Lewis 08/01/2018 RSU     971       971 
C. A. Foster 03/01/2018 RSU   728         728 
  12/03/2018 RSU         923   923 
D. S. Thomason 03/01/2018 RSU   1,182         1,182 
J. R. Simon 03/01/2018 RSU   8,180         8,180 
  08/14/2020 RSU       69,739     69,739 
  08/14/2020 RSU           69,740 69,740 
J. M. Welsch 03/01/2018 RSU   1,818         1,818 
J. C. Loduca 03/01/2018 RSU   1,364         1,364 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   74
Back to Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End – 2020(Continued)

      VESTING SCHEDULE
Name Award Date Award Type 3/14/2023 Total 
M. A. Lewis 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 177,595 177,595 
  03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 13,660 13,660 
C. A. Foster 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 81,968 81,968 
D. S. Thomason 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 109,290 109,290 
  03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 81,968 81,968 
J. R. Simon 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 478,143 478,143 
J. M. Welsch 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 177,595 177,595 
  03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 133,333 133,333 
J. C. Loduca 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 63,753 63,753 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During 2020

This table provides additional information regarding the amounts received during 2020 by NEOs upon vesting or transfer of restricted stock and other stock-based awards.

  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
 Value
Realized on
Exercise ($)
  Number
of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)(1)
 Value
Realized
on
Vesting
($)(1)
 
W. L. Smith      175,562 2,026,307 
M. A. Lewis      971 9,079 
C. A. Foster      2,457 37,175 
D. S. Thomason      2,457 40,855 
J. R. Simon      16,680 276,887 
J. M. Welsch      3,307 54,299 
W. D. Johnson      96,240 1,724,621 
A. M. Vesey      42,499 734,295 
J. P. Wells      17,589 290,568 
J. C. Loduca      6,233 90,052 

(1)Reflects performance shares that vested on February 25, 2020, and RSUs that vested on March 1, 2020, July 1, 2020, August 1, 2020, November 12, 2020, November 18, 2020, and December 3, 2020. Also includes the value of dividends upon vesting. No dividends have been paid, nor dividend equivalents accrued, since December 2017.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   75
Back to Contents

Pension Benefits – 2020

This table provides information for each NEO relating to accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2020, under any plan that provides for payments or other benefits at, after, or relating to retirement.

Name Plan Name  Number
of Years
Credited
Service (#)
   Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefits ($)
   Payments
During
Last Fiscal
Year ($)
 
W. L. Smith Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  0.5   21,354   0 
M. A. Lewis Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  2.4   48,669   0 
C. A. Foster Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  9.3   476,597   0 
D. S. Thomason Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  19.1   1,192,504   0 
J. R. Simon Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  13.7   3,384,324   0 
  PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  13.7   264,755   0 
J. M. Welsch Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  36.8   2,887,832   0 
W. D. Johnson Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  1.2   45,638   0 
A. M. Vesey Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  0.9   45,638   0 
J. P. Wells Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  13.5   1,454,815   0 
  PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  13.5   235,895   0 
J. C. Loduca Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  20.3   2,399,067   0 
  PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  20.3   217,972   0 

Additional information regarding compensation reported in the “Pension Benefits” table, and any associated policies, can be found in the CD&A. The present value of accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2020, is determined assuming that the NEOs retire at the earliest unreduced retirement age, using mortality and interest assumptions consistent with those used in preparing PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s financial statements. The RP-2014 “Employees” mortality table was used without collar or amount adjustments (adjusted to 2011 using a variation of MP-2014). Rates were projected on a generational basis from 2011 using a variation of MP-2014. Interest discount rates of 2.77 percent and 2.57 percent were used for the Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan benefits are in the form of either a final average pay pension benefit or a cash balance benefit. All NEOs except Messrs. Hogan(Retirement Plan) and Thomason also are eligible to receive benefits under the PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”)(SERP), respectively.

For 2020, the pension benefits described in the above table are provided to officers under two plans.

The Utility provides retirement benefits to all its employees, including its officers, under the Retirement Plan, which is a non-tax-qualifiedtax-qualified defined benefit pension planplan. The Retirement Plan historically also has provided benefits to a significant number of PG&E Corporation’s employees and officers. As of April 1, 2007, all PG&E Corporation employees and officers are eligible to participate in the Retirement Plan.

The Retirement Plan has two forms of benefit. With respect to the Retirement Plan’s final pay benefit formula, a participating officer may begin receiving tax-qualified pension benefits at age 55, but benefits will be reduced unless the individual has at least 35 years of service. At age 65, a participant becomes eligible for an unreduced pension, irrespective of the years of service. Between age 55 and age 65, any pension benefit may be reduced based on the number of years of service, and in accordance with the Retirement Plan’s early retirement reduction factors. The normal benefit formula is 1.7 percent of the average annual salary for the last 36 months of service multiplied by years of credited service. The default form of benefit is a single-life annuity for participants who are unmarried at retirement or a 50 percent joint spousal annuity for married participants. However, other types of joint pensions are available, and participants may designate non-spousal joint pensioners (subject to spousal consent).

Effective January 1, 2013, a cash balance benefit was added to the Retirement Plan. Employees hired or re-hired on or after January 1, 2013, participate in the cash balance benefit. Employees hired before January 1, 2013, were given a one-time opportunity during 2013 to irrevocably select to switch to the cash balance benefit on a going-forward basis, effective January 1, 2014, or to retain the final pay benefit to which they were otherwise entitled. On the last day of each year (or on the date of benefit commencement, if earlier), an employee’s cash balance account is credited with pay credits based on a point system of age plus service and eligible pay during the year. At the end of each calendar quarter, the account is credited with interest credits, based on an average of the 30-year Treasury rates for the three months before the calendar quarter. Special interest credit rules apply in the quarter in which the benefit payment commences. The default forms of payment are similar to those under the final pay benefit formula. Additionally, however, a cash balance participant may elect a lump-sum payout that is eligible for rollover into an Individual Retirement Account or other tax-advantaged employer plan. Cash balance participants may elect to receive their vested benefit when they leave employment with any participating employer, regardless of whether they have attained age 55. No current NEOs elected to switch to the cash balance benefit.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   76
Back to Contents

Pension Benefits – 2020(Continued)

PG&E Corporation’s non-qualified SERP provides benefits to certain officers and key employeesemployees. The SERP benefit formula is 1.7 percent of the Corporationaverage of the three highest combined salary and its subsidiaries, includingannual STIP payments during the Utility, with an additional pension benefit. These plans are described in the section entitled “Pension Benefits—2018” beginning on page 82.

In February 2010, the Committee adopted a policy against crediting additionallast 10 years of service, for participantsmultiplied by years of credited service, less the amount of the participant’s benefit from the Retirement Plan. Payments are in the SERP.form of a single-life annuity or, at the election of the officer, a joint spousal annuity. Normal retirement age is 65. Benefits may begin earlier, on the later of the NEO’s reaching age 55 or separation from service with the companies, subject to reduction depending on years of credited service, in accordance with the Retirement Plan’s early retirement reduction factors. Payments are reduced by amounts payable from the Retirement Plan.

 

Effective January 1, 2013, SERP participation was closed to new participants. Individuals who diddo not participate in the SERP but who wereare newly hired or promoted to officer after January 1, 2013, aremay be eligible for non-tax-qualified defined contribution pension payments underto participate in the 2013 PG&E Corporation Defined Contribution Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (“DC-ESRP”).(DC-ESRP), a non-tax-qualified deferred compensation plan. All NEOs with the exception of Messrs. HoganSimon and Thomason were the only NEOs whoWells and Ms. Loduca participate in the DC-ESRP. The DC-ESRP is described in more detail inSee the sectiontable entitled “Non-qualified Deferred Compensation – 2018”Compensation—2020” beginning on page 84.77 and the accompanying narrative for additional DC-ESRP details.

At December 31, 2020, Messrs. Smith and Lewis were eligible for early retirement under the Retirement Plan. The cash balance benefit does not include an early retirement reduction.

At December 31, 2020, Mr. Simon was eligible for early retirement under the Retirement Plan and the SERP. If Mr. Simon had retired on December 31, 2020, his benefit under both plans would have been subject to an early retirement reduction of 27 percent.

At December 31, 2020, Mr. Welsch was eligible for retirement with unreduced benefits under the Retirement Plan.

Messrs. Johnson and Vesey’s benefits under the Retirement Plan cash balance benefit were unreduced when their employment ended. Mr. Wells’ and Ms. Loduca’s benefits under the Retirement Plan and the SERP were subject to reductions of 30 percent and 26 percent, respectively, when their employment ended.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation – 2020

This table provides information for 2020 for each NEO regarding such individual’s accounts in non-qualified defined contribution plans and other deferred compensation plans as of December 31, 2020. The table presents balances from both the PG&E Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan for deferrals made prior to January 1, 2005, and the PG&E Corporation 2005 Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan (together, the SRSP Plans) for deferrals made on and after January 1, 2005, and from the PG&E Corporation Defined Contribution Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (DC-ESRP). The below descriptions pertain to 2020.

Name PLAN  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(1)
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(2)
   

Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY

($)(3)

   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distribution
($)
   Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)(4)
 
W. L. Smith SRSP Plans  0   0   0   0   0 
  DC-ESRP  0   43,750   2,326   0   46,076 
M. A. Lewis SRSP Plans  0   22,260   2,590   0   41,877 
  DC-ESRP  0   38,646   12,764   0   98,741 
C. A. Foster SRSP  0   5,175   1,552   0   14,511 
  DC-ESRP  0   37,338   18,423   0   95,145 
D. S. Thomason SRSP Plans  0   10,328   56,976   0   374,675 
  DC-ESRP  0   23,764   25,340   0   158,009 
J. R. Simon SRSP Plans  0   19,623   121,405   0   1,987,245 
J. M. Welsch SRSP Plans  0   12,926   4,586   0   45,714 
  DC-ESRP  0   40,058   19,724   0   270,870 
W. D. Johnson SRSP Plans  0   60,375   0   0   60,375 
  DC-ESRP  0   87,500   26,573   0   219,982 
A.M. Vesey SRSP Plans  0   20,613   643   0   27,006 
  DC-ESRP  0   41,111   9,457   0   77,299 
J. P. Wells SRSP Plans  0   12,295   31,194   0   216,649 
J. C. Loduca SRSP Plans  0   10,327   17,571   0   131,536 

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement7377
 
Back to Contents

NEOsNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation – 2020 (Continued)

(1)In 2020, as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, no deferrals were allowed.
(2)The amounts shown were earned and reported for 2020 as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.
(3)Represents earnings from the SRSP Plans and the DC-ESRP described below. Includes the following amounts that were reported for 2020 as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table: Mr. Simon $15,569.
(4)Includes the following amounts that were reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for 2020 and prior years: Mr. Smith (DC-ESRP) $43,750, Mr. Lewis (SRSP Plans) $39,287, Mr. Lewis (DC-ESRP) $71,886, Mr. Foster (SRSP Plans) $5,175, Mr. Foster (DC-ESRP) $37,338, Mr. Thomason (SRSP Plans) $262,177, Mr. Thomason (DC-ESRP) $114,430, Mr. Simon (SRSP Plans) $1,769,678, Mr. Welsch (SRSP Plans) $23,806, Mr. Welsch (DC-ESRP) $86,481, Mr. Johnson (SRSP Plans) $60,375, Mr. Johnson (DC-ESRP) $189,583, Mr. Vesey (SRSP Plans) $28,636, Mr. Vesey (DC-ESRP) $67,096, Mr. Wells (SRSP Plans) $158,719, and Mr. Loduca (SRSP Plans) $27,549.

Under the SRSP Plans, officers may defer 5 percent to 75 percent of their base salary, and otherall or part of their perquisite allowance, STIP payment, and performance share award if settled in cash. During the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases, no employee deferrals were allowed. Such employee deferrals resumed after the companies’ emerged from Chapter 11, starting with compensation that will be earned in 2021.

PG&E Corporation also will contribute an amount equal to any employer contributions due under the 401(k) plan that were not made due to limitations under Internal Revenue Code Sections 401(m), 401(a)(17), or 415. Under the SRSP Plans, officers may elect deferrals to be distributed in 1 to 10 installments commencing in January of the year following termination of employment. For deferrals made in 2005 and employeesthereafter, distributions may commence seven months after termination of employment or in January of a year specified by the officer. Earlier distributions may be made in the case of an officer’s death. The plan administrator may, in its discretion, permit earlier withdrawals as requested by participants to meet unforeseen emergencies.

Under the DC-ESRP, each time salary or STIP is paid, PG&E Corporation credits the participant’s account with an amount equal to 7 percent of the payment. Benefits vest after three years of cumulative service with the companies, and benefits are paid in a single lump sum upon the officer’s separation from service commencing as soon as reasonably practicable, following a date seven months after the separation from service. Officers may also elect deferrals to be distributed in 2 to 10 equal annual installments. Earlier distributions may be made in the case of an officer’s death.

Earnings on amounts in participant accounts under the SRSP Plans and the DC-ESRP are eligiblecalculated based on the performance of the following funds available in the 401(k) plan:

Fund Name2020 Return
Bond Index Fund7.64%
Emerging Markets Enhanced Index Fund7.48%
International Stock Index Fund8.05%
Large Company Stock Index Fund18.36%
Money Market Investment Fund0.47%
Retirement Income Fund9.74%
Short Term Bond Index Fund3.35%
Small Company Stock Index Fund32.64%
Target Date Fund 202011.15%
Target Date Fund 202515.09%
Target Date Fund 203017.58%
Target Date Fund 203518.47%
Target Date Fund 204019.02%
Target Date Fund 204519.48%
Target Date Fund 205019.92%
Target Date Fund 205519.88%
Target Date Fund 206019.89%
Target Date Fund 2065n/a
Total US Stock Index Fund20.83%
U.S. Government Bond Index Fund5.8%
World Stock Index Fund16.86%

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   78
Back to Contents

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation – 2020(Continued)

Other available measures are the PG&E Corporation Phantom Stock Fund, which mirrors an investment in PG&E Corporation common stock (2020 return of 14.97 percent), and the AA Utility Bond Fund. The AA Utility Bond Fund accrues interest based on the long-term corporate bond yield average for AA utilities reported by Moody’s Investors Service (yields reported during 2020 ranged from 2.30 percent to participate3.32 percent). Pre-2005 deferrals under the SRSP Plans are limited to the Large Company Stock Index Fund, the PG&E Corporation Phantom Stock Fund, and the AA Utility Bond Fund. In general, the earnings measures are selected by the officer for the SRSP Plans and independent from such selections in the 401(k) plan, and may be reallocated subject to restrictions imposed by regulations of the SEC. However, deferrals of Special Incentive Stock Ownership Premiums received under the prior Executive Stock Ownership Program before December 31, 2012, may only be invested in the PG&E Corporation Phantom Stock Fund and may not be reallocated.

Potential Payments upon Resignation, Retirement, Savings Plan (“RSP”),Termination, Change in Control, Death, or Disability

The NEOs are eligible to receive certain benefits upon termination, or when a tax-qualified 401(k) plan.Change in Control (as defined in the Officer Severance Policy) occurs and either (1) the officer’s employment is terminated (including constructive termination by the officer for good reason) in connection with the Change in Control, or (2) the acquiring company does not continue or assume outstanding LTIP awards or substitute the LTIP awards with substantially equivalent awards.

The following table estimates potential payments for each NEO as if, effective December 31, 2020, that individual’s employment was terminated or an acquiror did not assume, continue, or grant substitute awards for LTIP awards previously granted by PG&E Corporation providesor the Utility. Estimates assume that the value of any stock-based compensation received was $12.46 per share, which was the closing price of PG&E Corporation common stock on December 31, 2020. The table generally excludes (1) payments for services already rendered (such as unpaid and earned salary), which would be due to the NEO even if the individual had remained employed with the companies, (2) post-retirement benefits that would be available to employees generally, and (3) any deferred compensation that was previously earned but would become payable due to the termination (these deferred amounts are reflected in the table entitled “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation”).

The value of actual cash and equity received on or shortly after December 31, 2020, would be less than the “total” amount listed below because (1) pension benefits are paid over time in the form of a maximum matching contributionlife annuity, and (2) stock awards reflected in the table will be payable only after vesting, which may occur in subsequent years.

Name Resignation/
Retirement
($)
  Termination
For Cause
($)
  Termination
Without Cause
($)
  Change in
Control
($)(1)
  Death or
Disability
($)(2)
 
W. L. Smith                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits  22,800   22,800   22,800   22,800   22,800 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)  0   0   1,703,880   1,703,880   1,703,880 
Severance Payment  0   0   1,500,000   3,000,000   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)  0   0   0   0   0 
Health Care Insurance  0   0   0   0   0 
Career Transition  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Total  22,800   22,800   3,246,180   4,746,180   1,726,680 
M. A. Lewis                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits  53,462   53,462   53,462   53,462   53,462 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)  0   0   329,837   965,314   965,314 
Severance Payment  0   0   890,400   890,400   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)  0   0   223,555   223,555   223,555 
Health Care Insurance  0   0   53,968   53,968   0 
Career Transition  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Total  53,462   53,462   1,570,722   2,206,199   1,242,331 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   79
Back to Contents

Potential Payments upon Resignation, Retirement, Termination, Change in Control, Death, or Disability(Continued)

Name Resignation/
Retirement
($)
  Termination
For Cause
($)
  Termination
Without Cause
($)
  Change in
Control
($)(1)
  Death or
Disability
($)(2)
 
C. A. Foster                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits  461,612   461,612   461,612   461,612   274,853 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)  0   0   156,747   429,097   429,097 
Severance Payment  0   0   500,250   500,250   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)  0   0   108,426   108,426   108,426 
Health Care Insurance  0   0   50,487   50,487   0 
Career Transition  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Total  461,612   461,612   1,297,022   1,569,373   812,377 
D. S. Thomason                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits  1,110,085   1,110,085   1,110,085   1,110,085   640,143 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)  0   0   332,470   967,955   967,955 
Severance Payment  0   0   525,000   525,000   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)  0   0   114,441   114,441   114,441 
Health Care Insurance  0   0   53,968   53,968   0 
Career Transition  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Total  1,110,085   1,110,085   2,155,464   2,790,949   1,722,539 
J. R. Simon                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits  3,546,668   3,546,668   3,546,668   3,546,668   2,559,967 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)  828,328   0   1,765,225   4,222,893   4,222,893 
Severance Payment  0   0   1,270,990   2,534,160   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)  439,400   0   439,400   439,400   439,400 
Health Care Insurance  0   0   53,968   53,968   0 
Career Transition  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Payment in Lieu of Post-Retirement Life Insurance  710,402   710,402   710,402   710,402   0 
Total  5,524,798   4,257,070   7,806,152   11,526,991   7,222,260 
J. M. Welsch                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits  2,887,832   2,887,832   2,887,832   2,887,832   1,561,183 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)  539,207   0   539,207   1,572,315   1,572,315 
Severance Payment  0   0   924,320   924,320   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)  245,495   0   245,495   245,495   245,495 
Health Care Insurance  0   0   39,079   39,079   0 
Career Transition  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Payment in Lieu of Post-Retirement Life Insurance  566,045   566,045   566,045   566,045   0 
Total  4,238,579   3,453,877   5,221,478   6,254,586   3,378,993 

(1)Payments made in connection with a Change in Control may require shareholder approval, pursuant to the PG&E Corporation Golden Parachute Restriction Policy, discussed below. If excise taxes are levied in connection with Internal Revenue Code Section 4999, the aggregate benefits shown may be reduced to a level that does not trigger the excise tax, but only if doing so would be more beneficial to the officer on an after-tax basis.
(2)For pension payments, the number reflects the value of aggregated benefits upon termination due to death. Pension payments upon termination due to disability would be the same as in the event of resignation.
(3)Reflects the value of outstanding equity awards for which vesting is continued or accelerated due to the termination event. Based on performance through December 31, 2020, no payments would be made with respect to outstanding performance shares granted in 2018. Outstanding performance shares granted in 2020 are included assuming a target payout (100%).
(4)Assumes 2020 STIP performance score of 0.650, and an individual performance modifier for each NEO, as determined by the Boards of PG&E Corporation and the Utility and the Compensation Committee.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   80
Back to Contents

Potential Payments upon Resignation, Retirement, Termination, Change in Control, Death, or Disability(Continued)

Arrangements with Former NEOs

During 2020, the following NEOs separated from service prior to December 31, 2020. In each case the individual was entitled to receive benefits consistent with a termination without cause as described below. Additional benefits, if any are described below

On August 3, 2020, Andrew Vesey entered into a separation agreement, pursuant to which his employment ceased on August 3, 2020. In addition to those benefits typically provided to an individual who was terminated without cause, Mr. Vesey also was granted a cash payment of $850,000, equivalent to his 2020 STIP target value and a cash relocation reimbursement benefit not to exceed $25,000. Mr. Vesey also waived the opportunity for a 2020 STIP payout consistent with payouts typically provided to individuals who are terminated without cause. The value of benefits received due to such separation, calculated as of August 4, 2020, in a manner consistent with the calculations for resignation in the “Potential Payments” table, was $2,887,425.
On August 15, 2020, Ms. Loduca entered into a separation agreement, pursuant to which her employment ceased on August 15, 2020. The value of benefits received due to such separation, calculated as of August 16, 2020, in a manner consistent with the calculations for a termination without cause in the “Potential Payments” table was $4,230,127.

Additionally, on July 1, 2020, Mr. Johnson retired from employment with P&GE Corporation. As a result, Mr. Johnson received benefits consistent with a retirement as described below. The value of 75 centsbenefits received due to such separation, calculated as of July 1, 2020, in a manner consistent with the calculations for each dollar contributed, upresignation in the “Potential Payments” table, was $45,638.

On September 26, 2020, Mr. Wells resigned from employment with PG&E Corporation. As a result, Mr. Wells received benefits consistent with a resignation as described below. The value of benefits received due to 6 percentsuch separation, calculated as of base salarySeptember 26, 2020, in a manner consistent with the calculations for individuals eligibleresignation in the “Potential Payments” table, was $1,899,978.

Pension Benefits in General

If any NEO is terminated for any reason, that officer generally is entitled to receive accrued and vested pension benefits, as described in the final average paynarrative accompanying the “Pension Benefits” table. The value of the pension benefit and up to 8 percent of base salary for individuals eligible for a cash balance pension benefit. To the extent that the Internal Revenue Code limits prevent an NEO from making contributions to his or her RSP account and, as a result, company matching funds are not contributed to that NEO’s RSP account, the matching funds will instead be contributed to the NEO’s accountpaid out over time in the form of an annuity, consistent with payment elections made by the NEO. The qualified plan trust is funded by contributions from both PG&E Corporation 2005 Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan (“SRSP”), aand the Utility. Payments from the non-qualified deferred compensationplan are paid by PG&E Corporation and are reduced by any benefit payable from the qualified plan.

 

Upon retirement, NEOs also may be eligible for post-retirement health, welfare, insurance, and similar benefits, pursuant to plans that generally provide benefits to all employees. Additional details regarding the retirement programs and post-retirement benefits, and theThe value of pension benefits accumulated as of December 31, 2018 for the NEOs, can be foundreported in the table entitled “Pension Benefits—2018” beginning on page 82,above is identical in all termination scenarios, except if an NEO’s employment is terminated due to that officer’s death. In that case, if (1) the table entitled “Non-qualified Deferred Compensation—2018” beginning on page 84,officer was at least 55 years of age, or (2) the combined total of his or her age and the sectionnumber of years worked exceeded 70, then the officer’s surviving spouse or beneficiary would be entitled “Potential Payments—Resignation/Retirement”to an immediate commencement of payment of 50 percent of the single-life pension benefit that would otherwise have been available to the officer at age 65. For all other officers, the value of this pre-retirement survivor’s benefit would be 50 percent of the single life pension benefit that would otherwise have been available to the officer at age 55, and the benefit would commence on page 88.the first of the month after the day that officer would have reached age 55. 

 

Most companies in the 2018 Pay Comparator Group provide tax-qualified pensions or similar plans, other tax-qualified defined contribution plans (e.g., 401(k) plans), and non-tax-qualified retirement plans for NEOs. The Committee believes that these defined benefit and defined contribution plans offer significant recruiting and retention incentives.

Officer Severance Program

General severance benefits are provided to NEOs through the 2012 PG&E Corporation Officer Severance Policy (“Officer Severance Policy”) and specific LTIP award agreements and guidelines. Upon termination by either company (other than for cause), NEOs may be eligible for cash severance payments, continued or accelerated vesting for LTIP awards, and other post-employment benefits. If an NEO is terminated for cause (e.g., for dishonesty, a criminal offense, or violation of a work rule) or resigns before becoming retirement-eligible, the NEO forfeits any unvested performance shares, stock options, and RSUs, and would not receive any associated dividends.

Officer Severance PolicySTIP Awards

 

The purposeInformation regarding the terms and basis of the Officer Severance Policy is to (1) attract and retain senior management by providing severance benefits that are part of a competitive total compensation package, (2) provide consistent treatment for all terminated officers, and (3) minimize potential litigation costs in connection with terminations of employment by conditioning payments upon a general release of claims.

The Officer Severance Policy, in combination with LTIP award agreements generally provides the following benefits upon termination without cause:

Cash severance of one year’s salary and target2020 STIP bonus.
Pro-rata vesting of performance shares.
Continued vesting of unvested RSUs for one year.
Continued vesting of stock options for one year, with an exercise period the lesser of 5 years or the remaining term of the options.
Limited COBRA benefits and outplacement services.

Additional details regarding severance benefitsawards can be found in the section entitled “Potential Payments—Termination Without Cause” beginning on page 90.CD&A.

 

Change in ControlPerformance Shares

 

Providing change-in-control severance benefits is a key partPerformance shares granted in 2020 will vest, if at all, upon certification of performance against preestablished operational and financial measures at the end of the companies’ officer compensation program. Inthree-year performance period from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Upon vesting, performance shares are settled in shares of PG&E Corporation common stock, net of the number of shares having a hostile takeover or other change-in-control situation, it is important for managementvalue equal to remain focused on maximizing shareholder value and aligning management’s interests with shareholders’ interests, and not to be distracted by concerns about job security.required withholding taxes. The specific payout formulas are discussed in the CD&A.

 

Change-in-control benefits requireEach time that a “double trigger”cash dividend is paid on PG&E Corporation common stock, an amount equal to the cash dividend per share multiplied by the number of performance shares granted to the recipient will be accrued on behalf of the recipient. At the end of the vesting period, the amount of any accrued dividend equivalents will be increased or decreased by the same payout factor used to increase or decrease the number of vested performance shares for the period.

Restricted Stock Units

No annual RSU awards were granted in 2020. The $1,312,500 RSU retention award granted to Mr. Simon on August 14, 2020, vests one-half on August 14, 2021, and one-half on August 14, 2022. Upon vesting, RSUs are not payable basedsettled in an equivalent number of shares of PG&E Corporation common stock, net of the number of shares having a value equal to required withholding taxes. All RSUs may be subject to earlier vesting or forfeiture upon certain events, in accordance with the terms of the grant. The $1,312,500 RSU retention award granted to Mr. Wells on August 14, 2020, was forfeited upon Mr. Wells’ resignation on September 26, 2020.

Each time that a change-in-control event alone,cash dividend is paid on PG&E Corporation common stock, an amount equal to the cash dividend per share multiplied by the number of outstanding RSUs granted to the recipient will be accrued on behalf of the recipient. Any accrued dividends are paid in cash at the time the related RSUs are settled.

Mr. Smith received RSUs in 2019 as a non-employee director, as further described below. The Compensation Committee believes thatin footnote 2(ii) to the “double trigger” requirement aligns our change-in-control benefits with shareholder interests“2020 Director Compensation” table on page 31, and reflects current market practices.the section entitled “Non-Employee Director Stock-Based Compensation” on page 30.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement7473
 
Back to Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End – 2020

This table provides additional information regarding performance shares, stock options, and RSUs that were held as of December 31, 2020, by the NEOs, including awards granted prior to 2020. Any awards described below that were granted in 2020 also are reflected in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table.

  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable(1)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable(2)
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
  Number
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not

Vested
(#)(3)
   Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)(4)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)(5)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(4)
 
W. L. Smith 0 0      136,748(6)   1,703,880   0   0 
M. A. Lewis 2,696 1,349 42.51 8/1/2028  971(6)  12,099   191,255(7)   2,383,037 
C. A. Foster 2,607 1,304 41.26 3/1/2028  1,651(6)  20,571   81,968(7)  1,021,321 
D. S. Thomason 4,236 2,118 41.26 3/1/2028  1,182(6)  14,728   191,258(7)  2,383,075 
J. R. Simon 29,326 14,663 41.26 3/1/2028  147,659(6)  1,839,831   478,143(7)  5,957,662 
J. M. Welsch 6,517 3,259 41.26 3/1/2028  1,818(6)  22,652   310,928(7)  3,874,163 
W. D. Johnson 272,266 0 25.00 8/14/2023  0   0   0   0 
  340,333 0 40.00 8/14/2023  0   0   0   0 
  363,022 0 50.00 8/14/2024  0   0   0   0 
A. M. Vesey 0 0    0   0   0   0 
J. P. Wells 0 0    0   0   0   0 
J. C. Loduca 4,888 2,444 41.26 8/16/2021  1,364(6)  16,995   63,753(7)  794,362 
(1)For all NEOs except Mr. Johnson, consists of unexercised stock options from awards granted in 2018. For Mr. Johnson, consists of unexercised vested performance-based stock options from awards granted in 2019.
(2)Consists of unvested stock options from awards granted in 2018. Such options vested on March 1, 2021.
(3)Includes (a) performance shares granted in 2018 for which the performance period ended on December 31, 2020 and for which the reported number reflects a 0 percent payout, and (b) unvested RSUs. See the CD&A for additional details regarding awards granted in 2020.
(4)Value based on the December 31, 2020 per-share closing price of PG&E Corporation common stock of $12.46.
(5)Consists of unvested performance shares granted in 2020. Consistent with SEC rules, the number of shares is presented assuming maximum performance for 2020 awards using operational measures and maximum performance for the financial stability modifier based on TSR. See the CD&A for additional details regarding awards granted in 2020.
(6)Disclosed below is the vesting schedule for each of the RSU and earned PSU awards described above.
(7)Disclosed below is the vesting schedule for each of the unearned PSU awards described above.

      VESTING SCHEDULE   
Name Award Date Award Type 2/25/2021 3/1/2021 8/1/2021 8/13/2021 12/3/2021 8/13/2022 Total 
W. L. Smith 08/03/2020 Earned PSU 136,748           136,748 
M. A. Lewis 08/01/2018 RSU     971       971 
C. A. Foster 03/01/2018 RSU   728         728 
  12/03/2018 RSU         923   923 
D. S. Thomason 03/01/2018 RSU   1,182         1,182 
J. R. Simon 03/01/2018 RSU   8,180         8,180 
  08/14/2020 RSU       69,739     69,739 
  08/14/2020 RSU           69,740 69,740 
J. M. Welsch 03/01/2018 RSU   1,818         1,818 
J. C. Loduca 03/01/2018 RSU   1,364         1,364 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   74
Back to Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End – 2020(Continued)

      VESTING SCHEDULE
Name Award Date Award Type 3/14/2023 Total 
M. A. Lewis 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 177,595 177,595 
  03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 13,660 13,660 
C. A. Foster 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 81,968 81,968 
D. S. Thomason 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 109,290 109,290 
  03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 81,968 81,968 
J. R. Simon 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 478,143 478,143 
J. M. Welsch 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 177,595 177,595 
  03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 133,333 133,333 
J. C. Loduca 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 63,753 63,753 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During 2020

This table provides additional information regarding the amounts received during 2020 by NEOs upon vesting or transfer of restricted stock and other stock-based awards.

  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
 Value
Realized on
Exercise ($)
  Number
of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)(1)
 Value
Realized
on
Vesting
($)(1)
 
W. L. Smith      175,562 2,026,307 
M. A. Lewis      971 9,079 
C. A. Foster      2,457 37,175 
D. S. Thomason      2,457 40,855 
J. R. Simon      16,680 276,887 
J. M. Welsch      3,307 54,299 
W. D. Johnson      96,240 1,724,621 
A. M. Vesey      42,499 734,295 
J. P. Wells      17,589 290,568 
J. C. Loduca      6,233 90,052 

(1)Reflects performance shares that vested on February 25, 2020, and RSUs that vested on March 1, 2020, July 1, 2020, August 1, 2020, November 12, 2020, November 18, 2020, and December 3, 2020. Also includes the value of dividends upon vesting. No dividends have been paid, nor dividend equivalents accrued, since December 2017.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   75
Back to Contents

Pension Benefits – 2020

This table provides information for each NEO relating to accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2020, under any plan that provides for payments or other benefits at, after, or relating to retirement.

Name Plan Name  Number
of Years
Credited
Service (#)
   Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefits ($)
   Payments
During
Last Fiscal
Year ($)
 
W. L. Smith Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  0.5   21,354   0 
M. A. Lewis Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  2.4   48,669   0 
C. A. Foster Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  9.3   476,597   0 
D. S. Thomason Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  19.1   1,192,504   0 
J. R. Simon Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  13.7   3,384,324   0 
  PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  13.7   264,755   0 
J. M. Welsch Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  36.8   2,887,832   0 
W. D. Johnson Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  1.2   45,638   0 
A. M. Vesey Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  0.9   45,638   0 
J. P. Wells Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  13.5   1,454,815   0 
  PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  13.5   235,895   0 
J. C. Loduca Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  20.3   2,399,067   0 
  PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  20.3   217,972   0 

Additional information regarding compensation reported in the “Pension Benefits” table, and any associated policies, can be found in the CD&A. The present value of accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2020, is determined assuming that the NEOs retire at the earliest unreduced retirement age, using mortality and interest assumptions consistent with those used in preparing PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s financial statements. The RP-2014 “Employees” mortality table was used without collar or amount adjustments (adjusted to 2011 using a variation of MP-2014). Rates were projected on a generational basis from 2011 using a variation of MP-2014. Interest discount rates of 2.77 percent and 2.57 percent were used for the Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan (Retirement Plan) and the PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP), respectively.

For 2020, the pension benefits described in the above table are provided to officers under two plans.

The Utility provides retirement benefits to all its employees, including its officers, under the Retirement Plan, which is a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan. The Retirement Plan historically also has provided benefits to a significant number of PG&E Corporation’s employees and officers. As of April 1, 2007, all PG&E Corporation employees and officers are eligible to participate in the Retirement Plan.

The Retirement Plan has two forms of benefit. With respect to the Retirement Plan’s final pay benefit formula, a participating officer may begin receiving tax-qualified pension benefits at age 55, but benefits will be reduced unless the individual has at least 35 years of service. At age 65, a participant becomes eligible for an unreduced pension, irrespective of the years of service. Between age 55 and age 65, any pension benefit may be reduced based on the number of years of service, and in accordance with the Retirement Plan’s early retirement reduction factors. The normal benefit formula is 1.7 percent of the average annual salary for the last 36 months of service multiplied by years of credited service. The default form of benefit is a single-life annuity for participants who are unmarried at retirement or a 50 percent joint spousal annuity for married participants. However, other types of joint pensions are available, and participants may designate non-spousal joint pensioners (subject to spousal consent).

Effective January 1, 2013, a cash balance benefit was added to the Retirement Plan. Employees hired or re-hired on or after January 1, 2013, participate in the cash balance benefit. Employees hired before January 1, 2013, were given a one-time opportunity during 2013 to irrevocably select to switch to the cash balance benefit on a going-forward basis, effective January 1, 2014, or to retain the final pay benefit to which they were otherwise entitled. On the last day of each year (or on the date of benefit commencement, if earlier), an employee’s cash balance account is credited with pay credits based on a point system of age plus service and eligible pay during the year. At the end of each calendar quarter, the account is credited with interest credits, based on an average of the 30-year Treasury rates for the three months before the calendar quarter. Special interest credit rules apply in the quarter in which the benefit payment commences. The default forms of payment are similar to those under the final pay benefit formula. Additionally, however, a cash balance participant may elect a lump-sum payout that is eligible for rollover into an Individual Retirement Account or other tax-advantaged employer plan. Cash balance participants may elect to receive their vested benefit when they leave employment with any participating employer, regardless of whether they have attained age 55. No current NEOs elected to switch to the cash balance benefit.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   76
Back to Contents

Pension Benefits – 2020(Continued)

PG&E Corporation’s non-qualified SERP provides benefits to certain officers and key employees. The SERP benefit formula is 1.7 percent of the average of the three highest combined salary and annual STIP payments during the last 10 years of service, multiplied by years of credited service, less the amount of the participant’s benefit from the Retirement Plan. Payments are in the form of a single-life annuity or, at the election of the officer, a joint spousal annuity. Normal retirement age is 65. Benefits may begin earlier, on the later of the NEO’s reaching age 55 or separation from service with the companies, subject to reduction depending on years of credited service, in accordance with the Retirement Plan’s early retirement reduction factors. Payments are reduced by amounts payable from the Retirement Plan.

Effective January 1, 2013, SERP participation was closed to new participants. Individuals who do not participate in the SERP but who are newly hired or promoted to officer after January 1, 2013, may be eligible to participate in the 2013 PG&E Corporation Defined Contribution Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (DC-ESRP), a non-tax-qualified deferred compensation plan. All NEOs with the exception of Messrs. Simon and Wells and Ms. Loduca participate in the DC-ESRP. See the table entitled “Non-qualified Deferred Compensation—2020” beginning on page 77 and the accompanying narrative for additional DC-ESRP details.

At December 31, 2020, Messrs. Smith and Lewis were eligible for early retirement under the Retirement Plan. The cash balance benefit does not include an early retirement reduction.

At December 31, 2020, Mr. Simon was eligible for early retirement under the Retirement Plan and the SERP. If Mr. Simon had retired on December 31, 2020, his benefit under both plans would have been subject to an early retirement reduction of 27 percent.

At December 31, 2020, Mr. Welsch was eligible for retirement with unreduced benefits under the Retirement Plan.

Messrs. Johnson and Vesey’s benefits under the Retirement Plan cash balance benefit were unreduced when their employment ended. Mr. Wells’ and Ms. Loduca’s benefits under the Retirement Plan and the SERP were subject to reductions of 30 percent and 26 percent, respectively, when their employment ended.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation – 2020

This table provides information for 2020 for each NEO regarding such individual’s accounts in non-qualified defined contribution plans and other deferred compensation plans as of December 31, 2020. The table presents balances from both the PG&E Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan for deferrals made prior to January 1, 2005, and the PG&E Corporation 2005 Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan (together, the SRSP Plans) for deferrals made on and after January 1, 2005, and from the PG&E Corporation Defined Contribution Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (DC-ESRP). The below descriptions pertain to 2020.

Name PLAN  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(1)
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(2)
   

Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY

($)(3)

   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distribution
($)
   Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)(4)
 
W. L. Smith SRSP Plans  0   0   0   0   0 
  DC-ESRP  0   43,750   2,326   0   46,076 
M. A. Lewis SRSP Plans  0   22,260   2,590   0   41,877 
  DC-ESRP  0   38,646   12,764   0   98,741 
C. A. Foster SRSP  0   5,175   1,552   0   14,511 
  DC-ESRP  0   37,338   18,423   0   95,145 
D. S. Thomason SRSP Plans  0   10,328   56,976   0   374,675 
  DC-ESRP  0   23,764   25,340   0   158,009 
J. R. Simon SRSP Plans  0   19,623   121,405   0   1,987,245 
J. M. Welsch SRSP Plans  0   12,926   4,586   0   45,714 
  DC-ESRP  0   40,058   19,724   0   270,870 
W. D. Johnson SRSP Plans  0   60,375   0   0   60,375 
  DC-ESRP  0   87,500   26,573   0   219,982 
A.M. Vesey SRSP Plans  0   20,613   643   0   27,006 
  DC-ESRP  0   41,111   9,457   0   77,299 
J. P. Wells SRSP Plans  0   12,295   31,194   0   216,649 
J. C. Loduca SRSP Plans  0   10,327   17,571   0   131,536 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   77
Back to Contents

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation – 2020 (Continued)

(1)In 2020, as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, no deferrals were allowed.
(2)The amounts shown were earned and reported for 2020 as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.
(3)Represents earnings from the SRSP Plans and the DC-ESRP described below. Includes the following amounts that were reported for 2020 as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table: Mr. Simon $15,569.
(4)Includes the following amounts that were reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for 2020 and prior years: Mr. Smith (DC-ESRP) $43,750, Mr. Lewis (SRSP Plans) $39,287, Mr. Lewis (DC-ESRP) $71,886, Mr. Foster (SRSP Plans) $5,175, Mr. Foster (DC-ESRP) $37,338, Mr. Thomason (SRSP Plans) $262,177, Mr. Thomason (DC-ESRP) $114,430, Mr. Simon (SRSP Plans) $1,769,678, Mr. Welsch (SRSP Plans) $23,806, Mr. Welsch (DC-ESRP) $86,481, Mr. Johnson (SRSP Plans) $60,375, Mr. Johnson (DC-ESRP) $189,583, Mr. Vesey (SRSP Plans) $28,636, Mr. Vesey (DC-ESRP) $67,096, Mr. Wells (SRSP Plans) $158,719, and Mr. Loduca (SRSP Plans) $27,549.

Under the SRSP Plans, officers may defer 5 percent to 75 percent of their base salary, and all or part of their perquisite allowance, STIP payment, and performance share award if settled in cash. During the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases, no employee deferrals were allowed. Such employee deferrals resumed after the companies’ emerged from Chapter 11, starting with compensation that will be earned in 2021.

PG&E Corporation also will contribute an amount equal to any employer contributions due under the 401(k) plan that were not made due to limitations under Internal Revenue Code Sections 401(m), 401(a)(17), or 415. Under the SRSP Plans, officers may elect deferrals to be distributed in 1 to 10 installments commencing in January of the year following termination of employment. For deferrals made in 2005 and thereafter, distributions may commence seven months after termination of employment or in January of a year specified by the officer. Earlier distributions may be made in the case of an officer’s death. The plan administrator may, in its discretion, permit earlier withdrawals as requested by participants to meet unforeseen emergencies.

Under the DC-ESRP, each time salary or STIP is paid, PG&E Corporation credits the participant’s account with an amount equal to 7 percent of the payment. Benefits vest after three years of cumulative service with the companies, and benefits are paid in a single lump sum upon the officer’s separation from service commencing as soon as reasonably practicable, following a date seven months after the separation from service. Officers may also elect deferrals to be distributed in 2 to 10 equal annual installments. Earlier distributions may be made in the case of an officer’s death.

Earnings on amounts in participant accounts under the SRSP Plans and the DC-ESRP are calculated based on the performance of the following funds available in the 401(k) plan:

Fund Name2020 Return
Bond Index Fund7.64%
Emerging Markets Enhanced Index Fund7.48%
International Stock Index Fund8.05%
Large Company Stock Index Fund18.36%
Money Market Investment Fund0.47%
Retirement Income Fund9.74%
Short Term Bond Index Fund3.35%
Small Company Stock Index Fund32.64%
Target Date Fund 202011.15%
Target Date Fund 202515.09%
Target Date Fund 203017.58%
Target Date Fund 203518.47%
Target Date Fund 204019.02%
Target Date Fund 204519.48%
Target Date Fund 205019.92%
Target Date Fund 205519.88%
Target Date Fund 206019.89%
Target Date Fund 2065n/a
Total US Stock Index Fund20.83%
U.S. Government Bond Index Fund5.8%
World Stock Index Fund16.86%

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   78
Back to Contents

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation – 2020(Continued)

Other available measures are the PG&E Corporation Phantom Stock Fund, which mirrors an investment in PG&E Corporation common stock (2020 return of 14.97 percent), and the AA Utility Bond Fund. The AA Utility Bond Fund accrues interest based on the long-term corporate bond yield average for AA utilities reported by Moody’s Investors Service (yields reported during 2020 ranged from 2.30 percent to 3.32 percent). Pre-2005 deferrals under the SRSP Plans are limited to the Large Company Stock Index Fund, the PG&E Corporation Phantom Stock Fund, and the AA Utility Bond Fund. In general, the earnings measures are selected by the officer for the SRSP Plans and independent from such selections in the 401(k) plan, and may be reallocated subject to restrictions imposed by regulations of the SEC. However, deferrals of Special Incentive Stock Ownership Premiums received under the prior Executive Stock Ownership Program before December 31, 2012, may only be invested in the PG&E Corporation Phantom Stock Fund and may not be reallocated.

Potential Payments upon Resignation, Retirement, Termination, Change in Control, Death, or Disability

The NEOs are eligible to receive certain benefits upon termination, or when a Change in Control (as defined in the Officer Severance Policy provides enhanced cash severance benefits ifPolicy) occurs and either (1) the officer’s employment is terminated (including constructive termination by the officer for good reason) in connection with athe Change in Control, (as defined inor (2) the Policy). These enhanced benefits replace general severance benefits and are available only to officers in bands 1acquiring company does not continue or 2, which,assume outstanding LTIP awards or substitute the LTIP awards with substantially equivalent awards.

The following table estimates potential payments for each NEO as ofif, effective December 31, 2018, included Ms. Williams and Messrs. Malnight, Wells, Simon, and Stavropoulos. Covered officers are eligible to receive (1) change-in-control cash severance benefits equal to two times the sum of base salary and target annual STIP bonus, and (2) prorated STIP bonus2020, that individual’s employment was terminated or an acquiror did not assume, continue, or grant substitute awards for the year of termination. Other NEOs receive general severance benefits only.

All LTIP award agreements contain change-in-control provisions that accelerate vesting of all awards if there is a Change in Control, and either the award is not continued, assumed, or substituted, or the recipient’s employment is terminated in connection with a Change in Control. This practice alignspreviously granted by PG&E Corporation and the Utility with market practices and (1) better balances the interests of award recipients and shareholders, (2) provides security for award recipients in a time of uncertainty, and (3) preserves the incentive for award recipients to stay with the Corporation or the UtilityUtility. Estimates assume that the value of any stock-based compensation received was $12.46 per share, which was the closing price of PG&E Corporation common stock on December 31, 2020. The table generally excludes (1) payments for services already rendered (such as unpaid and earned salary), which would be due to the NEO even following a transaction.if the individual had remained employed with the companies, (2) post-retirement benefits that would be available to employees generally, and (3) any deferred compensation that was previously earned but would become payable due to the termination (these deferred amounts are reflected in the table entitled “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation”).

 

The Golden Parachute Restriction Policy requires shareholder approvalvalue of certain executive severance payments (as definedactual cash and equity received on or shortly after December 31, 2020, would be less than the “total” amount listed below because (1) pension benefits are paid over time in the Golden Parachute Restriction Policy) provided in connection with a change in control of PG&E Corporation, to the extent that those payments exceed 2.99 times the sumform of a covered officer’s base salarylife annuity, and target STIP award.(2) stock awards reflected in the table will be payable only after vesting, which may occur in subsequent years.

 

Additional details regarding Change-in-Control benefits can be found in the section entitled “Potential Payments—Severance in Connection with Change in Control” beginning on page 90.

5. 2019 NEO COMPENSATION PROGRAM

On January 29, 2019, PG&E Corporation and the Utility each filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 in the Bankruptcy Court.

As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, the 2019 executive compensation program may differ significantly from that in prior years. In addition, certain compensation provided to executive officers during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases may be subject in certain instances to approval by the Bankruptcy Court. The Committee has been working with its advisors, including WTW, to review the 2019 executive compensation program in an effort to balance the financial situation facing the companies, the need to continue to recruit and retain qualified executives to guide the companies through a period of uncertainty, including the unpredictability of the stock price, and the resulting effect on the incentive and retentive value of equity-based awards. In February 2019, the Committee determined that the NEOs will not participate in the 2019 STIP and expects that the companies will continue to evaluate all aspects of the 2019 executive compensation program, including base salary, short- and long-term incentives, and other benefits.

6. COMMITTEE CONCLUSION

The Compensation Committee believes that the amount and design of executive compensation provided for 2018 to the NEOs of PG&E Corporation and the Utility are consistent with the Committee’s compensation objectives and policies to (1) provide long-term incentives to align shareholders’ and officers’ interests and enhance total return for shareholders, (2) attract, retain, and motivate officers with the necessary mix of skills and experience for the development and successful operation of the Corporation’s and the Utility’s businesses, and (3) compensate NEOs in a competitive, cost-efficient, and transparent manner.

Name Resignation/
Retirement
($)
  Termination
For Cause
($)
  Termination
Without Cause
($)
  Change in
Control
($)(1)
  Death or
Disability
($)(2)
 
W. L. Smith                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits  22,800   22,800   22,800   22,800   22,800 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)  0   0   1,703,880   1,703,880   1,703,880 
Severance Payment  0   0   1,500,000   3,000,000   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)  0   0   0   0   0 
Health Care Insurance  0   0   0   0   0 
Career Transition  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Total  22,800   22,800   3,246,180   4,746,180   1,726,680 
M. A. Lewis                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits  53,462   53,462   53,462   53,462   53,462 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)  0   0   329,837   965,314   965,314 
Severance Payment  0   0   890,400   890,400   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)  0   0   223,555   223,555   223,555 
Health Care Insurance  0   0   53,968   53,968   0 
Career Transition  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Total  53,462   53,462   1,570,722   2,206,199   1,242,331 

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement75

Back to Contents

EXHIBIT A

Reconciliation of PG&E Corporation’s Consolidated Income Available for Common Shareholders in Accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) to Earnings from Operations.

For the year ended December 31, 2018

(in millions, except per share amounts) Earnings  Per Share
Amounts
(Diluted)
 
PG&E Corporation Earnings on a GAAP basis  $(6,851)  $(13.35)
Items Impacting Comparability:(1)        
2018 Camp fire-related costs, net of insurance(2)  6,823   13.20 
2017 Northern California wildfire-related costs, net of insurance(3)  2,090   4.04 
Pipeline related expenses(4)  33   0.06 
2015 Butte fire-related costs, net of insurance(5)  24   0.05 
Reduction in gas-related capital disallowance(6)  (27)  (0.05)
2017 insurance premium cost recoveries(7)  (23)  (0.05)
PG&E Corporation Earnings from Operations(8)  $2,069   $4.00 
(1)“Items impacting comparability” represent items that management does not consider part of the normal course of operations and affect comparability of financial results between periods. Items impacting comparability reconcile earnings from operations with Consolidated Income Available for Common Shareholders as reported in accordance with GAAP.
(2)The Utility incurred costs, net of insurance, of $9.5 billion (before the tax impact of $2.7 billion) during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018 associated with the 2018 Camp fire. This includes accrued charges of $10.5 billion (before the tax impact of $2.9 billion) during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018 related to estimated third-party claims. The Utility also recorded $185 million (before the tax impact of $52 million) during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018 reflecting the accelerated amortization of prepaid insurance premiums for single event coverage policies. In addition, the Utility incurred costs of $169 million (before the tax impact of $47 million) during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018 for clean-up and repair costs. These costs were partially offset by $1.4 billion (before the tax impact of $386 million) recorded during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018 for probable insurance recoveries.
(3)The Utility incurred costs, net of insurance, of $629 million (before the tax impact of $176 million) and $2.9 billion (before the tax impact of $813 million) during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018, respectively, associated with the 2017 Northern California wildfires. This includes accrued charges of $1 billion (before the tax impact of $280 million) and $3.5 billion (before the tax impact of $979 million) during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018, respectively, related to third-party claims. The Utility also recorded $85 million (before the tax impact of $24 million) and $205 million (before the tax impact of $57 million) during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018, respectively, for legal and other costs. In addition, the Utility incurred costs of $40 million (before the tax impact of $11 million) during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 for Utility clean-up and repair costs. These costs were partially offset by $456 million (before the tax impact of $128 million) and $842 million (before the tax impact of $236 million) recorded during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018, respectively, for probable insurance recoveries.
(4)The Utility incurred costs of $11 million (before the tax impact of $3 million) and $46 million (before the tax impact of $13 million) during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018, respectively, for pipeline-related expenses incurred in connection with the multi-year effort to identify and remove encroachments from transmission pipeline rights-of-way.
(5)The Utility incurred costs, net of insurance, of $9 million (before the tax impact of $2 million) and $40 million (before the tax impact of $11 million) during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018, respectively, associated with legal costs for the 2015 Butte fire. These costs were partially offset by $7 million (before the tax impact of $2 million) recorded during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 for contractor insurance recoveries.
(6)The Utility reduced the estimated disallowance for gas-related capital costs that were expected to exceed authorized amounts by $38 million (before the tax impact of $11 million) during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018. The Utility had previously recorded $85 million (before the tax impact of $35 million) in 2016 for probable capital disallowances in the 2015 Gas Transmission and Storage rate case. From 2012 through 2014, the Utility had recorded cumulative charges of $665 million (before the tax impact of $271 million) for disallowed Pipeline Safety Enhancement Plan- related capital expenditures.
(7)As a result of the CPUC’s June 2018 decision authorizing a Wildfire Expense Memorandum Account, the Utility recorded $32 million (before the tax impact of $9 million) during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 for probable cost recoveries of insurance premiums incurred in 2017 above amounts included in authorized revenue requirements.
(8)“Earnings from operations” is a non-GAAP financial measure and is calculated as income available for common shareholders less items impacting comparability as described in Note (1) above. PG&E Corporation uses earnings from operations to understand and compare operating results across reporting periods for various purposes, including internal budgeting and forecasting, short- and long-term operating plans, and employee incentive compensation. PG&E Corporation believes that non-GAAP earnings from operations provide additional insight into the underlying trends of the business allowing for a better comparison against historical results and expectations for future performance. Earnings from operations is not a substitute or alternative for GAAP measures such as consolidated income available for common shareholders and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement7679
 
Back to Contents

Executive Officer Compensation InformationPotential Payments upon Resignation, Retirement, Termination, Change in Control, Death, or Disability(Continued)

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE – 2018

This table summarizes the principal components of compensation paid or granted during 2018 (including cash incentives earned for corporate performance in 2018 but paid in 2019). This table also includes information disclosed in the 2018 and 2017 Joint Proxy Statements for compensation paid or granted to certain officers during 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Name and
Principal Position
YearSalary
($)(1)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
Option
Awards
($)(3)
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)(4)
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(5)
All
Other
Compensation
($)(6)
Total
($)
Geisha J. Williams(a)
Chief Executive Officer and President, PG&E Corporation
20181,079,16706,400,0781,600,003040,341170,2539,289,842
2017991,66706,500,16800996,810108,5758,597,220
2016695,83302,250,0720610,594519,98387,7484,164,230
Jesus Soto Jr.
Senior Vice President, Gas Operations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2018474,33301,220,086180,007088,08852,2922,014,605
Steven E. Malnight(b)
Senior Vice President, Energy Supply and Policy, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2018460,63301,020,086180,007022,01353,8841,736,423
Patrick M. Hogan(c)
Senior Vice President, Electric Operations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2018424,9750640,085160,007013,53795,5871,334,191
Jason P. Wells
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, PG&E Corporation
2018625,00002,000,122500,0010072,1513,197,274
2017583,33302,000,07900462,21362,5093,108,134
2016500,00002,000,1010371,250205,74952,8763,129,976
David S. Thomason
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2018323,7180260,03965,0010059,900708,658
2017301,6500300,0860113,482170,51655,741941,475
2016257,4320300,206087,30293,33937,898776,177
John R. Simon(d)
Executive Vice President and General Counsel, PG&E Corporation
2018599,00001,800,090450,0070203,76571,7663,124,628
2017594,58202,000,0790558,130549,42958,7133,760,933
2016512,50001,500,1020419,738349,33861,4992,843,177
Nickolas Stavropoulos(e)
Special Advisor, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2018628,26602,400,067600,010023,02186,2353,729,871
2017777,50004,250,1510768,539538,69378,3736,413,256
2016660,83302,250,0720579,881375,69267,4973,933,975
Name Resignation/
Retirement
($)
  Termination
For Cause
($)
  Termination
Without Cause
($)
  Change in
Control
($)(1)
  Death or
Disability
($)(2)
 
C. A. Foster                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits  461,612   461,612   461,612   461,612   274,853 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)  0   0   156,747   429,097   429,097 
Severance Payment  0   0   500,250   500,250   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)  0   0   108,426   108,426   108,426 
Health Care Insurance  0   0   50,487   50,487   0 
Career Transition  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Total  461,612   461,612   1,297,022   1,569,373   812,377 
D. S. Thomason                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits  1,110,085   1,110,085   1,110,085   1,110,085   640,143 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)  0   0   332,470   967,955   967,955 
Severance Payment  0   0   525,000   525,000   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)  0   0   114,441   114,441   114,441 
Health Care Insurance  0   0   53,968   53,968   0 
Career Transition  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Total  1,110,085   1,110,085   2,155,464   2,790,949   1,722,539 
J. R. Simon                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits  3,546,668   3,546,668   3,546,668   3,546,668   2,559,967 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)  828,328   0   1,765,225   4,222,893   4,222,893 
Severance Payment  0   0   1,270,990   2,534,160   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)  439,400   0   439,400   439,400   439,400 
Health Care Insurance  0   0   53,968   53,968   0 
Career Transition  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Payment in Lieu of Post-Retirement Life Insurance  710,402   710,402   710,402   710,402   0 
Total  5,524,798   4,257,070   7,806,152   11,526,991   7,222,260 
J. M. Welsch                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits  2,887,832   2,887,832   2,887,832   2,887,832   1,561,183 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)  539,207   0   539,207   1,572,315   1,572,315 
Severance Payment  0   0   924,320   924,320   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)  245,495   0   245,495   245,495   245,495 
Health Care Insurance  0   0   39,079   39,079   0 
Career Transition  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Payment in Lieu of Post-Retirement Life Insurance  566,045   566,045   566,045   566,045   0 
Total  4,238,579   3,453,877   5,221,478   6,254,586   3,378,993 

 

(1)(a)Payments made in connection with a Change in Control may require shareholder approval, pursuant to the PG&E Corporation Golden Parachute Restriction Policy, discussed below. If excise taxes are levied in connection with Internal Revenue Code Section 4999, the aggregate benefits shown may be reduced to a level that does not trigger the excise tax, but only if doing so would be more beneficial to the officer on an after-tax basis.
(2)Effective March 1, 2017, Ms. Williams became CEOFor pension payments, the number reflects the value of aggregated benefits upon termination due to death. Pension payments upon termination due to disability would be the same as in the event of resignation.
(3)Reflects the value of outstanding equity awards for which vesting is continued or accelerated due to the termination event. Based on performance through December 31, 2020, no payments would be made with respect to outstanding performance shares granted in 2018. Outstanding performance shares granted in 2020 are included assuming a target payout (100%).
(4)Assumes 2020 STIP performance score of 0.650, and Presidentan individual performance modifier for each NEO, as determined by the Boards of PG&E Corporation. Ms. Williams resigned from both positions effective January 13, 2019.
(b)Mr. Malnight resigned effective April 12, 2019.
(c)Mr. Hogan retired effective January 28, 2019.
(d)From January 13, 2019 to May 1, 2019 Mr. Simon served as Interim CEO of PG&E Corporation.Corporation and the Utility and the Compensation Committee.

 

(e)Mr. Stavropoulos served as President and Chief Operating Officer, Pacific Gas and Electric Company until August 31, 2018. Effective September 1, 2018, Mr. Stavropoulos became Special Advisor of Pacific Gas and Electric Company. He retired September 30, 2018.
20192021 Joint Proxy Statement7780
 
Back to Contents

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE – 2018Potential Payments upon Resignation, Retirement, Termination, Change in Control, Death, or Disability(Continued)(Continued)

 

(1)Includes payments for accrued vacation.
(2)Represents the grant date fair value of performance shares and RSUs measured in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, without considering an estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting. For performance shares using safety and affordability measures, and for RSUs, grant date fair value is measured using the closing price of PG&E Corporation common stock on the grant date. Assumptions made in valuation of reported performance shares with a relative TSR measure is described in footnote 5 to the table entitled “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2018.” If the highest level of performance conditions were achieved, the estimated maximum grant date value of performance shares granted in 2018 would be: Ms. Williams $7,367,940, Mr. Soto $829,014, Mr. Malnight $829,014, Mr. Hogan $736,910, Mr. Wells $2,302,645, Mr. Thomason $299,364, Mr. Simon $2,072,359, and Mr. Stavropoulos $2,763,028.
(3)Represents the grant date fair value of stock options based on a Black-Scholes American Call valuation model. Assumptions in valuation of stock options are described in footnote 5 to the table entitled “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2018.”
(4)Amounts represent payments received or deferred in 2019, 2018, and 2017 for achievement of corporate and organizational objectives in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, under the STIP.
(5)Amounts reported for 2018 consist of (i) the change in pension value during 2018 (Ms. Williams $39,941, Mr. Soto $88,088, Mr. Malnight $22,013, Mr. Hogan $10,493, Mr. Simon $201,189, and Mr. Stavropoulos $21,926), and (ii) the above-market earnings on compensation deferred into the PG&E Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan and invested in the AA Utility Bond Fund (Ms. Williams $400, Mr. Hogan $3,044, Mr. Simon $2,576, and Mr. Stavropoulos $1,094). The AA Utility Bond Fund accrues interest based on the long-term corporate bond yield average for AA utilities reported by Moody’s Investors Service. The above-market earnings are calculated as the difference between actual earnings from the AA Utility Bond Fund investment option and hypothetical earnings that would have resulted using an interest rate equal to 120 percent of the applicable federal rate.
(6)Amounts reported for 2018 consist of (i) perquisites and personal benefits (Ms. Williams $86,690, Mr. Soto $5,947, Mr. Malnight $5,655, Mr. Hogan $60, Mr. Wells $14,026, Mr. Thomason $60, Mr. Simon $14,811, and Mr. Stavropoulos $28,395), (ii) a lump-sum annual stipend paid in lieu of providing perquisite benefits, with the exception of perquisite benefits noted in the chart below (Ms. Williams $35,000, Mr. Soto $25,000, Mr. Malnight $27,500, Mr. Hogan $25,000, Mr. Wells $30,000, Mr. Thomason $15,000, Mr. Simon $30,000, and Mr. Stavropoulos $30,000), and (iii) company contributions to defined contribution retirement plans (Ms. Williams $48,563, Mr. Soto $21,345, Mr. Malnight $20,729, Mr. Hogan $70,527, Mr. Wells $28,125, Mr. Thomason $44,840, Mr. Simon $26,955, and Mr. Stavropoulos $27,840).

Arrangements with Former NEOs

 

TheDuring 2020, the following chart provides additional information regarding certain perquisites and personalNEOs separated from service prior to December 31, 2020. In each case the individual was entitled to receive benefits thatconsistent with a termination without cause as described below. Additional benefits, if any are included in the Summary Compensation Table and discussed in section (i) of footnote 5. Additionally, NEOs may receive de minimis incidental perquisites under a pre-approved perquisite policy (including company-paid insurance, service awards, and similar benefits).

 Transportation
Services
($)
Security
($)
Fitness
($)
Executive
Health
($)
 Financial
Services
($)
G. J. Williams21,56051,638 5,453 7,980
J. Soto   5,686  
S. Malnight   5,394  
J. P. Wells   5,937 8,029
J. R. Simon  8115,912 8,029
N. Stavropoulos5,460 1,0495,552 8,560

The above perquisites and personal benefits consist of the following:described below

 

Transportation servicesOn August 3, 2020, Andrew Vesey entered into a separation agreement, pursuant to which his employment ceased on August 3, 2020. In addition to those benefits typically provided to an individual who was terminated without cause, Mr. Vesey also was granted a cash payment of $850,000, equivalent to his 2020 STIP target value and a cash relocation reimbursement benefit not to exceed $25,000. Mr. Vesey also waived the opportunity for Ms. Williams and Mr. Stavropoulosa 2020 STIP payout consistent with payouts typically provided to help ensure their safety and security while servingindividuals who are terminated without cause. The value of benefits received due to such separation, calculated as of August 4, 2020, in a manner consistent with the calculations for resignation in the positions of CEO of PG&E Corporation and President of the Utility, consisting of car transportation for commute and incidental non-business travel. Amounts include the prorated salary and benefits burden of the drivers, and vehicle costs.
“Potential Payments” table, was $2,887,425.
Installation and monitoring ofOn August 15, 2020, Ms. Loduca entered into a security system for Ms. Williams’ private residence,separation agreement, pursuant to help ensurewhich her safety and security while serving in the position of CEO of PG&E Corporation.
employment ceased on August 15, 2020. The value of reimbursementsbenefits received due to such separation, calculated as of August 16, 2020, in a manner consistent with the calculations for health club fees, pursuant to a program available to certain management employees, including non-officers.
The cost of executive health services provided to executive officers. Amounts vary among officers, reflecting (i)termination without cause in the decisions of each individual officer regarding the specific types of tests and consultations provided, and (ii) the exact value of reimbursed expenses.
Fees paid to partially subsidize financial services provided by an independent contractor selected by PG&E Corporation to provide such services.“Potential Payments” table was $4,230,127.

 

In additionAdditionally, on July 1, 2020, Mr. Johnson retired from employment with P&GE Corporation. As a result, Mr. Johnson received benefits consistent with a retirement as described below. The value of benefits received due to such separation, calculated as of July 1, 2020, in a manner consistent with the perquisite benefits described above, NEOs are given a set stipend that each NEO may use as the officer sees fit. The stipend is intended to cover miscellaneous items in each NEO’s discretion (such as membership in professional organizations). The amount of this stipend is includedcalculations for resignation in the Summary Compensation Table“Potential Payments” table, was $45,638.

On September 26, 2020, Mr. Wells resigned from employment with PG&E Corporation. As a result, Mr. Wells received benefits consistent with a resignation as described below. The value of benefits received due to such separation, calculated as of September 26, 2020, in a manner consistent with the calculations for resignation in the “All Other Compensation” column and“Potential Payments” table, was $1,899,978.

Pension Benefits in General

If any NEO is addressed in section (ii) of footnote 6. NEOs also were eligibleterminated for any reason, that officer generally is entitled to receive on-site parking, which was provided at no additional incremental cost toaccrued and vested pension benefits, as described in the narrative accompanying the “Pension Benefits” table. The value of the pension benefit will be paid out over time in the form of an annuity, consistent with payment elections made by the NEO. The qualified plan trust is funded by contributions from both PG&E Corporation and the Utility.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement78
Back to Contents

Please see Payments from the CD&A beginning on page 57 for additional information regardingnon-qualified plan are paid by PG&E Corporation and are reduced by any benefit payable from the elements of compensation discussed above, including information regarding salary, short-term incentives, and long-term incentives. Additional information regarding grants of LTIP awards can be found in the narrative following the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2018” table.qualified plan.

 

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2018

This table provides information regarding incentive awards and other stock-based awards granted during 2018 to NEOs.

  Committee Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive

Plan Awards(2)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Exercise
or Base

Price of
Option
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
NameGrant Date
 
Action
Date
 Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
or Units
(#)(3)
Awards
(#)(4)
Awards
($/Sh)
Awards
($)(5)
G. J. Williams   701,4581,402,9174,208,750        
 3/1/20182/21/2018     18,95875,828151,656   2,800,060
 3/1/20182/21/2018        87,252  3,600,018
 3/1/20182/21/2018         156,40341.261,600,003
J. Soto   142,300284,600853,800        
 3/1/20182/20/2018     2,1348,53217,064   315,060
 3/1/20182/20/2018        9,816  405,008
 6/26/20186/26/2018        11,732  500,018
 3/1/20182/20/2018         17,59641.26180,007
S. Malnight   142,565285,130855,390        
 3/1/20182/20/2018     2,1348,53217,064   315,060
 3/1/20182/20/2018        9,816  405,008
 9/4/20188/20/2018        6,382  300,018
 3/1/20182/20/2018         17,59641.26180,007
P. Hogan   126,750253,500760,500        
 3/1/20182/20/2018     1,8977,58415,168   280,050
 3/1/20182/20/2018        8,726  360,035
 3/1/20182/20/2018         15,64141.26160,007
J. P. Wells   234,375468,7501,406,250        
 3/1/20182/20/2018     5,92523,69847,396   875,086
 3/1/20182/20/2018        27,267  1,125,036
 3/1/20182/20/2018         48,87641.26500,001
D. S. Thomason   72,188144,375433,125        
 3/1/20182/20/2018     7713,0816,162   113,772
 3/1/20182/20/2018        3,545  146,267
 3/1/20182/20/2018         6,35441.2665,001
J. R. Simon   224,625449,2501,347,750        
 3/1/20182/20/2018     5,33321,32842,656   787,570
 3/1/20182/20/2018        24,540  1,012,520
 3/1/20182/20/2018         43,98941.26450,007
N. Stavropoulos   262,933525,8671,577,600        
 3/1/20182/21/2018     7,10928,43656,872   1,050,040
 3/1/20182/21/2018        32,720  1,350,027
 3/1/20182/21/2018         58,65241.26600,010
(1)Compensation opportunity granted for 2018 under the STIP. Actual amounts earned are reported in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column. Threshold represents a 0.5 enterprise-wide STIP performance score and a 100 percent individual performance modifier. Maximum reflects a 2.0 enterprise-wide STIP performance score and a 150 percent individual performance modifier.
(2)Represents performance shares granted under the 2014 LTIP. Threshold equals 0.25 times target. Maximum equals 2.0 times target.
(3)Represents RSUs granted under the 2014 LTIP.
(4)Represents stock options granted under the 2014 LTIP.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement79
Back to Contents

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2018(Continued)

(5)For performance shares with a relative TSR measure, the grant date fair value is based on the probable outcome of the applicable performance conditions, measured using a Monte Carlo simulation valuation model. The assumed per-share value for the 2018 annual awards was $34.23. The simulation model applies a risk-free interest rate and an expected volatility assumption. The risk-free rate is assumed to equal the yield on a three-year Treasury bond on the grant date. Volatility is based on historical volatility for the 36-month period preceding the grant date. For stock options, the grant date fair value is based on a Black-Scholes American Call valuation model. The assumed per-share value for the 2018 annual awards was $10.23. The simulation model includes assumptions about dividend policy, duration, and volatility. The dividend policy assumption anticipates a dividend suspension of four years and later resumption of the dividend at the 15-year average dividend yield (3.1%). Expected duration of the options is the midpoint between the average vesting of all the options in an award (two years) and the time to expiration of the award (ten years), or six years. In absence of publicly-available transactions or information associated with implied volatility for a 10-year or 5-year option on PG&E Corporation common stock, volatility was estimated using data on historical volatility and implied volatility extrapolated from options with shorter duration, which provided a range from approximately 19% to approximately 26%; the mid-point of that range (23%) was used for the volatility assumption.  For RSUs and performance shares with safety and financial measures, the grant date fair value is based on the PG&E Corporation stock price at close on the grant date.

Detailed information regarding compensationThe value of pension benefits reported in the tablestable above is identical in all termination scenarios, except if an NEO’s employment is terminated due to that officer’s death. In that case, if (1) the officer was at least 55 years of age, or (2) the combined total of his or her age and the number of years worked exceeded 70, then the officer’s surviving spouse or beneficiary would be entitled “Summary Compensation Table—2018”to an immediate commencement of payment of 50 percent of the single-life pension benefit that would otherwise have been available to the officer at age 65. For all other officers, the value of this pre-retirement survivor’s benefit would be 50 percent of the single life pension benefit that would otherwise have been available to the officer at age 55, and “Grantsthe benefit would commence on the first of Plan-Based Awards in 2018,” including the relative amounts apportioned to different elements of compensation, can be found inmonth after the CD&A. Information regarding specific grants and arrangements is provided below.day that officer would have reached age 55. 

 

STIP Awards

 

Information regarding the terms and basis of 2020 STIP awards can be found in the CD&A.

 

Performance Shares

 

Annual performancePerformance shares granted in 20182020 will vest, if at all, upon certification of performance against preestablished operational and financial measures at the end of athe three-year period.performance period from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Upon vesting, performance shares are settled in shares of PG&E Corporation common stock, net of the number of shares having a value equal to required withholding taxes. For performance shares using a relative TSR measure, the number of shares issued will depend on PG&E Corporation’s TSR relative to the 2018 Performance Comparator Group for the three-year performance period. For performance shares with safety and financial measures, the number of shares issued will depend on achievement of safety and financial goals. The specific payout formulas are discussed in the CD&A.

 

Each time that a cash dividend is paid on PG&E Corporation common stock, an amount equal to the cash dividend per share multiplied by the number of performance shares granted to the recipient will be accrued on behalf of the recipient. At the end of the vesting period, the amount of any accrued dividend equivalents will be increased or decreased by the same payout factor used to increase or decrease the number of vested performance shares for the period.

 

Restricted Stock Units

 

AnnualNo annual RSU awards were granted in May 2018 will vest in three tranches, with one-third vesting on the first business day of March of each of the three years following the grant date.2020. The $500,000$1,312,500 RSU retention award granted to Mr. SotoSimon on June 26, 2018,August 14, 2020, vests one-thirdone-half on June 26, 2020August 14, 2021, and two-thirdsone-half on June 26, 2021. The $300,000 promotional RSU award granted to Mr. Malnight on September 4, 2018, vests on September 4, 2020.August 14, 2022. Upon vesting, RSUs are settled in an equivalent number of shares of PG&E Corporation common stock, net of the number of shares having a value equal to required withholding taxes. All RSUs may be subject to earlier vesting or forfeiture upon certain events, in accordance with the terms of the grant. The $1,312,500 RSU retention award granted to Mr. Wells on August 14, 2020, was forfeited upon Mr. Wells’ resignation on September 26, 2020.

 

Each time that a cash dividend is paid on PG&E Corporation common stock, an amount equal to the cash dividend per share multiplied by the number of outstanding RSUs granted to the recipient will be accrued on behalf of the recipient. AccruedAny accrued dividends are paid in cash at the time that the related RSUs are settled.

 

Stock Options

Annual stock options grantedMr. Smith received RSUs in 2018 will vest2019 as a non-employee director, as further described in three tranches, with one-third vestingfootnote 2(ii) to the “2020 Director Compensation” table on page 31, and the first business day of March of each of the three years following the grant date. Upon vesting, recipients may elect to pay the option exercise price and receive a share of PG&E Corporation stock for each option exercised. Options expire at the close of business ten years after the date of grant, after which time the options cease to be exercisable. The exercise price of each option is basedsection entitled “Non-Employee Director Stock-Based Compensation” on the closing price of the stock on the NYSE on the date of grant.

No tandem dividend equivalents are granted with stock options.page 30.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement8073
 
Back to Contents

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-ENDOutstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End20182020

 

This table provides additional information regarding performance shares, stock options, and RSUs that were held as of December 31, 20182020, by the NEOs, including awards granted prior to 2018.2020. Any awards described below that were granted in 20182020 also are reflected in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2018”Awards” table.

 

  Option Awards  Stock Awards
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable(1)
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
  Number
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(2)
  Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)(3)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)(4)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(3)
 
G. J. Williams   156,403 41.26 3/1/2028   122,411(5)   2,907,261   99,456(6)   2,362,068 
J. Soto   17,596 41.26 3/1/2028   28,455(7)   675,806   11,733(8)   278,665 
S. Malnight   17,596 41.26 3/1/2028   22,491(9)   534,161   11,505(10)   273,238 
P. Hogan   15,641 41.26 3/1/2028   13,999(11)   332,476   10,175(12)   241,662 
J. P. Wells   48,876 41.26 3/1/2028   43,515(13)   1,033,481   30,940(14)   734,813 
D. S. Thomason   6,354 41.26 3/1/2028   5,936(15)   140,980   4,205(16)   99,875 
J. R. Simon   43,989 41.26 3/1/2028   38,712(17)   919,410   28,756(18)   682,961 
N. Stavropoulos   58,652 41.26 10/1/2023   50,998(19)   1,211,203   36,444(20)   865,533 
  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable(1)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable(2)
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
  Number
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not

Vested
(#)(3)
   Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)(4)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)(5)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(4)
 
W. L. Smith 0 0      136,748(6)   1,703,880   0   0 
M. A. Lewis 2,696 1,349 42.51 8/1/2028  971(6)  12,099   191,255(7)   2,383,037 
C. A. Foster 2,607 1,304 41.26 3/1/2028  1,651(6)  20,571   81,968(7)  1,021,321 
D. S. Thomason 4,236 2,118 41.26 3/1/2028  1,182(6)  14,728   191,258(7)  2,383,075 
J. R. Simon 29,326 14,663 41.26 3/1/2028  147,659(6)  1,839,831   478,143(7)  5,957,662 
J. M. Welsch 6,517 3,259 41.26 3/1/2028  1,818(6)  22,652   310,928(7)  3,874,163 
W. D. Johnson 272,266 0 25.00 8/14/2023  0   0   0   0 
  340,333 0 40.00 8/14/2023  0   0   0   0 
  363,022 0 50.00 8/14/2024  0   0   0   0 
A. M. Vesey 0 0    0   0   0   0 
J. P. Wells 0 0    0   0   0   0 
J. C. Loduca 4,888 2,444 41.26 8/16/2021  1,364(6)  16,995   63,753(7)  794,362 
(1)For all NEOs except Mr. Johnson, consists of unexercised stock options from awards granted in 2018. For Mr. Johnson, consists of unexercised vested performance-based stock options from awards granted in 2019.
(2)Consists of unvested stock options from awards granted in 2018, with one-third of each award vesting on March 1, 2019, one-third vesting on March 2, 2020, and one-third vesting2018. Such options vested on March 1, 2021.
(2)(3)Includes (a) performance shares granted in 20162018 for which the performance period ended on December 31, 20182020 and for which the reported number reflects a 1000 percent payout, and (b) unvested RSUs. See the CD&A for additional details regarding awards granted in 2018.2020.
(3)(4)Value based on the December 31, 20182020 per-share closing price of PG&E Corporation common stock of $23.75.$12.46.
(4)(5)Consists of unvested performance shares granted in 2017 and 2018.2020. Consistent with SEC rules, the number of shares is presented assuming thresholdmaximum performance for 2017 and 20182020 awards using a relative TSR measure,operational measures and maximum performance for 2017 and 2018 awards using safety andthe financial measures.stability modifier based on TSR. See the CD&A for additional details regarding awards granted in 2018.
(5)25,178 performance shares vested on February 19, 2019. 47,331 RSUs vested on March 1, 2019, 41,993 RSUs will vest on March 2, 2020, and 29,084 RSUs will vest on March 1, 2021.2020.
(6)29,600Disclosed below is the vesting schedule for each of the RSU and 69,856 performance shares are scheduled to vest in 2020 and 2021, respectively, upon Compensation Committee (“Committee”) certification of performance results, but no later than March 14 of each year.earned PSU awards described above.
(7)9,513 performance shares vested on February 19, 2019. 6,977 RSUs vested on March 1, 2019, 4,961 RSUs will vest on March 2, 2020, 3,910 RSUs will vest on June 26, 2020, 3,272 RSUs will vest on March 1, 2021, and 7,822 RSUs will vest on June 26, 2021.
(8)3,873 and 7,861 performance shares are scheduled to vest in 2020 and 2021, respectively, upon Committee certificationDisclosed below is the vesting schedule for each of performance results, but no later than March 14 of each year.
(9)8,394 performance shares vested on February 19, 2019. 6,641 RSUs vested on March 1, 2019, 4,861 RSUs will vest on March 2, 2020, 6,382 RSUs will vest on September 4, 2020, and 3,272 RSUs will vest on March 1, 2021.
(10)3,644 and 7,861 performance shares are scheduled to vest in 2020 and 2021, respectively, upon Committee certification of performance results, but no later than March 14 of each year.
(11)6,715 performance shares vested on February 19, 2019. 5,722 RSUs vested on March 1, 2019, 4,300 RSUs will vest on March 2, 2020, and 2,909 RSUs will vest on March 1, 2021.
(12)3,189 and 6,987 performance shares are scheduled to vest in 2020 and 2021, respectively, upon Committee certification of performance results, but no later than March 14 of each year.
(13)22,381 performance shares vested on February 19, 2019. 17,806 RSUs vested on March 1, 2019, 13,061 RSUs will vest on March 2, 2020, and 9,089 RSUs will vest on March 1, 2021.
(14)9,108 and 21,832 performance shares are scheduled to vest in 2020 and 2021, respectively, upon Committee certification of performance results, but no later than March 14 of each year.
(15)3,174 performance shares vested on February 19, 2019. 2,252 RSUs vested on March 1, 2019, 210 RSUs will vest on August 8, 2019, 1,778 RSUs will vest on March 2, 2020, and 1,182 RSUs will vest on March 1, 2021.
(16)1,367 and 2,839 performance shares are scheduled to vest in 2020 and 2021, respectively, upon Committee certification of performance results, but no later than March 14 of each year.
(17)16,786 performance shares vested on February 19, 2019. 15,711 RSUs vested on March 1, 2019, 12,152 RSUs will vest on March 2, 2020, and 8,180 RSUs will vest on March 1, 2021.
(18)9,108 and 19,649 performance shares are scheduled to vest in 2020 and 2021, respectively, upon Committee certification of performance results, but no later than March 14 of each year.the unearned PSU awards described above.

 

      VESTING SCHEDULE   
Name Award Date Award Type 2/25/2021 3/1/2021 8/1/2021 8/13/2021 12/3/2021 8/13/2022 Total 
W. L. Smith 08/03/2020 Earned PSU 136,748           136,748 
M. A. Lewis 08/01/2018 RSU     971       971 
C. A. Foster 03/01/2018 RSU   728         728 
  12/03/2018 RSU         923   923 
D. S. Thomason 03/01/2018 RSU   1,182         1,182 
J. R. Simon 03/01/2018 RSU   8,180         8,180 
  08/14/2020 RSU       69,739     69,739 
  08/14/2020 RSU           69,740 69,740 
J. M. Welsch 03/01/2018 RSU   1,818         1,818 
J. C. Loduca 03/01/2018 RSU   1,364         1,364 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement8174
 
Back to Contents
(19)25,178 performance shares vested on February 19, 2019. 20,712 RSUs vested on March 1, 2019, 15,376 RSUs will vest on March 2, 2020, and 10,907 RSUs will vest on March 1, 2021.
(20)10,247 and 26,196 performance shares are scheduled to vest in 2020 and 2021, respectively, upon Committee certification of performance results, but no later than March 14 of each year.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End – 2020(Continued)

      VESTING SCHEDULE
Name Award Date Award Type 3/14/2023 Total 
M. A. Lewis 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 177,595 177,595 
  03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 13,660 13,660 
C. A. Foster 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 81,968 81,968 
D. S. Thomason 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 109,290 109,290 
  03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 81,968 81,968 
J. R. Simon 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 478,143 478,143 
J. M. Welsch 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 177,595 177,595 
  03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 133,333 133,333 
J. C. Loduca 03/02/2020 Unearned PSU 63,753 63,753 

 

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING 2018Option Exercises and Stock Vested During 2020

 

This table provides additional information regarding the amounts received during 20182020 by NEOs upon vesting or transfer of restricted stock and other stock-based awards.

 

  Option Awards  Stock Awards
Name Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
 Value
Realized on
Exercise ($)
  Number
of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)(1)
 Value
Realized
on
Vesting
($)(1)
G. J. Williams      27,022 1,213,615
J. Soto      6,067 272,159
S. Malnight      5,313 237,912
P. Hogan      4,470 203,465
J. P. Wells      10,373 462,565
D. S. Thomason      1,782 79,814
J. R. Simon      13,579 621,873
N. Stavropoulos      18,582 852,299

  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
 Value
Realized on
Exercise ($)
  Number
of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)(1)
 Value
Realized
on
Vesting
($)(1)
 
W. L. Smith      175,562 2,026,307 
M. A. Lewis      971 9,079 
C. A. Foster      2,457 37,175 
D. S. Thomason      2,457 40,855 
J. R. Simon      16,680 276,887 
J. M. Welsch      3,307 54,299 
W. D. Johnson      96,240 1,724,621 
A. M. Vesey      42,499 734,295 
J. P. Wells      17,589 290,568 
J. C. Loduca      6,233 90,052 

 

(1)Reflects performance shares that vested on February 20, 201825, 2020, and RSUs that vested on March 1, 2018,2020, July 1, 2020, August 8, 2018, August 17, 2018,1, 2020, November 12, 2020, November 18, 2020, and September 15, 2018.December 3, 2020. Also includes the value of dividends paid upon vesting. No dividends have been paid, nor dividend equivalents accrued, since December 2017.

 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   75
Back to Contents

PENSION BENEFITSPension Benefits20182020

 

This table provides information for each NEO relating to accumulated benefits as of December 31, 20182020, under any plan that provides for payments or other benefits at, after, or relating to retirement.

 

Name Plan Name Number
of Years
Credited
Service (#)
 Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefits ($)
 Payments
During
Last Fiscal
Year ($)
G. J. Williams Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan 11.1 2,681,061  
  PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan 11.1 441,816  
J. Soto, Jr. Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan 6.6 704,494  
  PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan 6.6 174,649  
S. Malnight Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan 15.1 1,188,912  
  PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan 15.1 208,547  
P. Hogan Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan 5.1 110,633  
J. P. Wells Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan 11.8 944,029  
  PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan 11.8 126,368  
D. S. Thomason Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan 17.1 613,930  
J. R. Simon Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan 11.7 1,758,206  
  PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan 11.7 392,371  
N. Stavropoulos Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan 7.3 1,130,473 21,926
  PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan 7.3 565,910  

2019 Joint Proxy Statement82
Back to Contents

PENSION BENEFITS – 2018(Continued)

Name Plan Name  Number
of Years
Credited
Service (#)
   Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefits ($)
   Payments
During
Last Fiscal
Year ($)
 
W. L. Smith Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  0.5   21,354   0 
M. A. Lewis Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  2.4   48,669   0 
C. A. Foster Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  9.3   476,597   0 
D. S. Thomason Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  19.1   1,192,504   0 
J. R. Simon Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  13.7   3,384,324   0 
  PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  13.7   264,755   0 
J. M. Welsch Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  36.8   2,887,832   0 
W. D. Johnson Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  1.2   45,638   0 
A. M. Vesey Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  0.9   45,638   0 
J. P. Wells Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  13.5   1,454,815   0 
  PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  13.5   235,895   0 
J. C. Loduca Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan  20.3   2,399,067   0 
  PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  20.3   217,972   0 

 

Additional information regarding compensation reported in the “Pension Benefits—2018”Benefits” table, and any associated policies, can be found in the CD&A. The present value of accumulated benefits as of December 31, 20182020, is determined assuming that the NEOs retire at the earliest unreduced retirement age, using mortality and interest assumptions consistent with those used in preparing PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s financial statements. The RP-2014 “Employees” mortality table was used without collar or amount adjustments (adjusted to 2011 using a variation of MP-2014). Rates were projected on a generational basis from 2011 using a variation of MP-2014. Interest discount rates of 4.352.77 percent and 4.292.57 percent were used for the Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan (“Retirement Plan”)(Retirement Plan) and the PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”)(SERP), respectively.

 

For 2018,2020, the pension benefits described in the above table are provided to officers under two plans.

 

The Utility provides retirement benefits to all its employees, including its officers, under the Retirement Plan, which is a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan. The Retirement Plan historically also has provided benefits to a significant number of PG&E Corporation’s employees and officers. As of April 1, 2007, all PG&E Corporation employees and officers are eligible to participate in the Retirement Plan.

 

The Retirement Plan has two forms of benefit. With respect to the Retirement Plan’s final pay benefit formula, a participating officer may begin receiving tax-qualified pension benefits at age 55, but benefits will be reduced unless the individual has at least 35 years of service. At age 65, a participant becomes eligible for an unreduced pension, irrespective of the years of service. Between age 55 and age 65, any pension benefit may be reduced based on the number of years of service, and in accordance with the Retirement Plan’s early retirement reduction factors. The normal benefit formula is 1.7 percent of the average annual salary for the last 36 months of service multiplied by years of credited service. The default form of benefit is a single-life annuity for participants who are unmarried at retirement or a 50 percent joint spousal annuity for married participants. However, other types of joint pensions are available, and participants may designate non-spousal joint pensioners (subject to spousal consent).

 

Effective January 1, 2013, a cash balance benefit was added to the Retirement Plan. Employees hired or re-hired on or after January 1, 2013, participate in the cash balance benefit. Employees hired before January 1, 2013, were given a one-time opportunity during 2013 to irrevocably select to switch to the cash balance benefit on a going-forward basis, effective January 1, 2014, or to retain the final pay benefit to which they were otherwise entitled. On the last day of each year (or on the date of benefit commencement, if earlier), an employee’s cash balance account is credited with pay credits based on a point system of age plus service and eligible pay during the year. At the end of each calendar quarter, the account is credited with interest credits, based on an average of the 30-year Treasury rates for the three months before the calendar quarter. Special interest credit rules apply in the quarter in which the benefit payment commences. The default forms of payment are similar to those under the final pay benefit formula. Additionally, however, a cash balance participant may elect a lump-sum payout that is eligible for rollover into an Individual Retirement Account or other tax-advantaged employer plan. Cash balance participants may elect to receive their vested benefit when they leave employment with any participating employer, regardless of whether they have attained age 55. No current NEOs elected to switch to the cash balance benefit.

 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   76
Back to Contents

Pension Benefits – 2020(Continued)

PG&E Corporation’s non-qualified SERP provides benefits to certain officers and key employees. The SERP benefit formula is 1.7 percent of the average of the three highest combined salary and annual STIP payments during the last 10 years of service, multiplied by years of credited service.service, less the amount of the participant’s benefit from the Retirement Plan. Payments are in the form of a single-life annuity or, at the election of the officer, a joint spousal annuity. Normal retirement age is 65. Benefits may begin earlier, on the later of the NEO’s reaching age 55 or separation from service with the company,companies, subject to reduction depending on years of credited service, in accordance with the Retirement Plan’s early retirement reduction factors. Payments are reduced by amounts payable from the Retirement Plan.

 

Effective January 1, 2013, SERP participation was closed to new participants. Individuals who do not participate in the SERP but who are newly hired or promoted to officer after January 1, 2013, may be eligible to participate in the 2013 PG&E Corporation Defined Contribution Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (“DC-ESRP”)(DC-ESRP), a non-tax-qualified deferred compensation plan. All NEOs with the exception of Messrs. HoganSimon and ThomasonWells and Ms. Loduca participate in the DC-ESRP. See the table entitled “Non-qualified Deferred Compensation—2018”2020” beginning on page 8477 and the accompanying narrative for additional DC-ESRP details.

 

At December 31, 2018, Ms. Williams2020, Messrs. Smith and Lewis were eligible for early retirement under the Retirement Plan. The cash balance benefit does not include an early retirement reduction.

At December 31, 2020, Mr. Simon was eligible for early retirement under the Retirement Plan and the SERP. If Ms. WilliamsMr. Simon had retired on December 31, 2018, her2020, his benefit under both plans would have been subject to an early retirement reduction of 22.7527 percent.

At December 31, 2020, Mr. Stavropoulos’Welsch was eligible for retirement with unreduced benefits under both plansthe Retirement Plan.

Messrs. Johnson and Vesey’s benefits under the Retirement Plan cash balance benefit were unreduced when their employment ended. Mr. Wells’ and Ms. Loduca’s benefits under the Retirement Plan and the SERP were subject to a 13.5reductions of 30 percent reductionand 26 percent, respectively, when histheir employment ended.

 

2019 Joint Proxy Statement83
Back to Contents

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATIONNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation20182020

 

This table provides information for 20182020 for each NEO regarding such individual’s accounts in non-qualified defined contribution plans and other deferred compensation plans as of December 31, 2018.

NamePLANExecutive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(1)
Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(2)
Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)(3)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distribution
($)
Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)(4)
G. J. WilliamsSRSP036,188-88,3260283,899
J. Soto, Jr.SRSP398,53510,745-57,3290778,397
S. MalnightSRSP08,354-1,864033,163
P. HoganSRSP133,73511,47522,3960848,902
 DC-ESRP045,1777,1980202,931
J. P. WellsSRSP018,900-8,9510127,524
D. S. ThomasonSRSP79,1679,713-19,0700242,099
 DC-ESRP030,402-5,788067,916
J. R. SimonSRSP111,62614,93150,12401,711,641
N. StavropoulosSRSP015,600-42,5390417,046

(1)The following amounts were earned and reported for 2018 as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table: Mr. Soto $48,717 and Mr. Thomason $79,167. The following amounts were earned and reported for 2017 as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table: Mr. Thomason $59,167 and Mr. Simon $25,000.
(2)The amounts shown were earned and reported for 2018 as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.
(3)Represents earnings from the supplemental retirement savings plans and the DC-ESRP described below. Includes the following amounts that were reported for 2018 as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table: Ms. Williams $400, Mr. Hogan $3,044, Mr. Simon $2,576, and Mr. Stavropoulos $1,094.
(4)Includes the following amounts that were reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018 and prior years: Ms. Williams $372,625, Mr. Soto $409,280, Mr. Malnight $8,354, Mr. Hogan (SRSP) $147,623, Mr. Hogan (DC-ESRP) $45,809, Mr. Wells $136,475, Mr. Thomason (SRSP) $261,170, Mr. Thomason (DC-ESRP) $73,704, Mr. Simon $1,664,093, and Mr. Stavropoulos $460,679.

2020. The table presents balances from both the PG&E Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan for deferrals made prior to January 1, 2005, and the PG&E Corporation 2005 Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan (together, the “SRSP Plans”)SRSP Plans) for deferrals made on and after January 1, 2005, and from the PG&E Corporation Defined Contribution Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (“DC-ESRP”)(DC-ESRP). The below descriptions pertain to 2018.2020.

Name PLAN  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(1)
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(2)
   

Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY

($)(3)

   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distribution
($)
   Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)(4)
 
W. L. Smith SRSP Plans  0   0   0   0   0 
  DC-ESRP  0   43,750   2,326   0   46,076 
M. A. Lewis SRSP Plans  0   22,260   2,590   0   41,877 
  DC-ESRP  0   38,646   12,764   0   98,741 
C. A. Foster SRSP  0   5,175   1,552   0   14,511 
  DC-ESRP  0   37,338   18,423   0   95,145 
D. S. Thomason SRSP Plans  0   10,328   56,976   0   374,675 
  DC-ESRP  0   23,764   25,340   0   158,009 
J. R. Simon SRSP Plans  0   19,623   121,405   0   1,987,245 
J. M. Welsch SRSP Plans  0   12,926   4,586   0   45,714 
  DC-ESRP  0   40,058   19,724   0   270,870 
W. D. Johnson SRSP Plans  0   60,375   0   0   60,375 
  DC-ESRP  0   87,500   26,573   0   219,982 
A.M. Vesey SRSP Plans  0   20,613   643   0   27,006 
  DC-ESRP  0   41,111   9,457   0   77,299 
J. P. Wells SRSP Plans  0   12,295   31,194   0   216,649 
J. C. Loduca SRSP Plans  0   10,327   17,571   0   131,536 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   77
Back to Contents

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation – 2020 (Continued)

(1)In 2020, as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, no deferrals were allowed.
(2)The amounts shown were earned and reported for 2020 as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.
(3)Represents earnings from the SRSP Plans and the DC-ESRP described below. Includes the following amounts that were reported for 2020 as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table: Mr. Simon $15,569.
(4)Includes the following amounts that were reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for 2020 and prior years: Mr. Smith (DC-ESRP) $43,750, Mr. Lewis (SRSP Plans) $39,287, Mr. Lewis (DC-ESRP) $71,886, Mr. Foster (SRSP Plans) $5,175, Mr. Foster (DC-ESRP) $37,338, Mr. Thomason (SRSP Plans) $262,177, Mr. Thomason (DC-ESRP) $114,430, Mr. Simon (SRSP Plans) $1,769,678, Mr. Welsch (SRSP Plans) $23,806, Mr. Welsch (DC-ESRP) $86,481, Mr. Johnson (SRSP Plans) $60,375, Mr. Johnson (DC-ESRP) $189,583, Mr. Vesey (SRSP Plans) $28,636, Mr. Vesey (DC-ESRP) $67,096, Mr. Wells (SRSP Plans) $158,719, and Mr. Loduca (SRSP Plans) $27,549.

 

Under the SRSP Plans, officers may defer 5 percent to 75 percent of their base salary, and all or part of their perquisite allowance, STIP payment, and performance share award if settled in cash. During the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases, no employee deferrals were allowed. Such employee deferrals resumed after the companies’ emerged from Chapter 11, starting with compensation that will be earned in 2021.

 

PG&E Corporation also will contribute an amount equal to any employer contributions due under the 401(k) plan that were not made due to limitations under Internal Revenue Code Sections 401(m), 401(a)(17), or 415. Under the SRSP Plans, officers may elect deferrals to be distributed in 1 to 10 installments commencing in January of the year following termination of employment. For deferrals made in 2005 and thereafter, distributions may commence seven months after termination of employment or in January of a year specified by the officer. Earlier distributions may be made in the case of an officer’s death. The plan administrator may, in its discretion, permit earlier withdrawals as requested by participants to meet unforeseen emergencies.

 

Under the DC-ESRP, each time salary or STIP is paid, PG&E Corporation credits the participant’s account with an amount equal to 7 percent of the payment. Benefits vest after three years of cumulative service with the companies, and benefits are paid in a single lump sum upon the officer’s separation from service commencing as soon as reasonably practicable, following a date seven months after the separation from service. Officers may also elect deferrals to be distributed in 2 to 10 equal annual installments. Earlier distributions may be made in the case of an officer’s death.

 

2019 Joint Proxy Statement84
Back to Contents

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION – 2018(Continued)

Earnings on amounts in participant accounts under the SRSP Plans and the DC-ESRP are calculated based on the performance of the following funds available in the 401(k) plan:

 

Fund Name20182020 Return
Bond Index Fund0.0%7.64%
Emerging Markets Enhanced Index Fund-14.5%7.48%
International Stock Index Fund-13.8%8.05%
Large Company Stock Index Fund-4.4%18.36%
Money Market Investment Fund1.8%0.47%
Retirement Income Fund-2.8%9.74%
Short Term Bond Index Fund1.5%3.35%
Small Company Stock Index Fund-9.2%
Target Date Fund 2015-3.1%32.64%
Target Date Fund 2020-4.5%11.15%
Target Date Fund 2025-5.9%15.09%
Target Date Fund 2030-6.7%17.58%
Target Date Fund 2035-7.3%18.47%
Target Date Fund 2040-7.9%19.02%
Target Date Fund 2045-8.4%19.48%
Target Date Fund 2050-8.6%19.92%
Target Date Fund 2055-8.6%19.88%
Target Date Fund 2060-8.7%19.89%
Target Date Fund 2065n/a
Total US Stock Index Fund-5.3%20.83%
U.S. Government Bond Index Fund0.5%5.8%
World Stock Index Fund-9.1%16.86%

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   78
Back to Contents

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation – 2020(Continued)

 

Other available measures are the PG&E Corporation Phantom Stock Fund, which mirrors an investment in PG&E Corporation common stock (2018(2020 return of negative 45.714.97 percent), and the AA Utility Bond Fund. The AA Utility Bond Fund accrues interest based on the long-term corporate bond yield average for AA utilities reported by Moody’s Investors Service (yields reported during 20182020 ranged from 3.62.30 percent to 4.43.32 percent). Pre-2005 deferrals under the SRSP Plans are limited to the Large Company Stock Index Fund, the PG&E Corporation Phantom Stock Fund, and the AA Utility Bond Fund. In general, the earnings measures are selected by the officer for the SRSP Plans and independent from such selections in the 401(k) plan, and may be reallocated subject to restrictions imposed by regulations of the SEC. However, deferrals of Special Incentive Stock Ownership Premiums received under the prior Executive Stock Ownership Program before December 31, 2012, may only be invested in the PG&E Corporation Phantom Stock Fund and may not be reallocated.

 

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON RESIGNATION, RETIREMENT, TERMINATION, CHANGE IN CONTROL, DEATH, OR DISABILITYPotential Payments upon Resignation, Retirement, Termination, Change in Control, Death, or Disability

 

The NEOs are eligible to receive certain benefits upon termination, or when a Change in Control (as defined in the Officer Severance Policy) occurs and either (1) the officer’s employment is terminated (including constructive termination by the officer for good reason) in connection with the Change in Control, or (2) the acquiring company does not continue or assume outstanding LTIP awards or substitute the LTIP awards with substantially equivalent awards.

 

2019 Joint Proxy Statement85
Back to Contents

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON RESIGNATION, RETIREMENT, TERMINATION, CHANGE IN CONTROL, DEATH, OR DISABILITY(Continued)

The following table estimates potential payments for each NEO as if, effective December 31, 2018,2020, that individual’s employment was terminated or an acquiror did not assume, continue, or grant substitute awards for LTIP awards previously granted by PG&E Corporation or the Utility. Estimates assume that the value of any stock-based compensation received was $23.75$12.46 per share, which was the closing price of PG&E Corporation common stock on December 31, 2018.2020. The table generally excludes (1) payments for services already rendered (such as unpaid and earned salary), which would be due to the NEO even if the individual had remained employed with the companies, (2) post-retirement benefits that would be available to employees generally, and (3) any deferred compensation that was previously earned but would become payable due to the termination (these deferred amounts are reflected in the table entitled “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation—2018”Compensation”). The table also does not fully take into account changes and restrictions that apply following the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases on January 29, 2019. Please see section 5 of the CD&A for a discussion of the potential future impacts of the Chapter 11 Cases.

 

The value of actual cash and equity received on or shortly after December 31, 20182020, would be less than the “total” amount listed below because (1) pension benefits are paid over time in the form of a life annuity, and (2) stock awards reflected in the table will be payable only after vesting, which may occur in subsequent years.

 

Since Mr. Stavropoulos retired on October 1, 2018, only payments that he received upon retirement are shown.

NameResignation/
Retirement
($)
Termination
For Cause
($)
Termination
Without Cause
($)
Change in
Control
($)(1)
Death or
Disability
($)(2)
 Resignation/
Retirement
($)
 Termination
For Cause
($)
 Termination
Without Cause
($)
 Change in
Control
($)(1)
 Death or
Disability
($)(2)
 
G. J. Williams     
W. L. Smith                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits3,189,5643,189,5643,189,5643,189,5642,002,036  22,800   22,800   22,800   22,800   22,800 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)3,915,46203,915,4623,915,4623,915,462  0   0   1,703,880   1,703,880   1,703,880 
Severance Payment002,495,5004,975,8330  0   0   1,500,000   3,000,000   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)00000  0   0   0   0   0 
Health Care Insurance0048,93948,9390  0   0   0   0   0 
Career Transition0012,00012,0000  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Total7,105,0263,189,5649,661,46512,141,7985,917,498  22,800   22,800   3,246,180   4,746,180   1,726,680 
J. Soto, Jr.     
M. A. Lewis                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits925,248925,248925,248925,248486,800  53,462   53,462   53,462   53,462   53,462 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)00263,787803,096803,096  0   0   329,837   965,314   965,314 
Severance Payment00800,000800,0000  0   0   890,400   890,400   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)00000  0   0   223,555   223,555   223,555 
Health Care Insurance0048,93948,9390  0   0   53,968   53,968   0 
Career Transition0012,00012,0000  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Total925,248925,2482,049,9732,589,2831,289,896  53,462   53,462   1,570,722   2,206,199   1,242,331 
S. Malnight     
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits1,553,1451,553,1451,553,1451,553,145858,796
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)00400,291657,803657,803
Severance Payment00866,2501,620,2600
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)00000
Health Care Insurance0048,93948,9390
Career Transition0012,00012,0000
Total1,553,1451,553,1452,880,6243,892,1471,516,599
P. Hogan   
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits110,633110,633110,633110,633102,004
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)00212,684440,923440,923
Severance Payment00686,400686,4000
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)00000
Health Care Insurance0016,87616,8760
Career Transition0012,00012,0000
Total110,633110,6331,038,5931,266,832542,927

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement8679
 
Back to Contents

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON RESIGNATION, RETIREMENT, TERMINATION, CHANGE IN CONTROL, DEATH, OR DISABILITYPotential Payments upon Resignation, Retirement, Termination, Change in Control, Death, or Disability(Continued)(Continued)

 

NameResignation/
Retirement
($)
Termination
For Cause
($)
Termination
Without Cause
($)
Change in
Control
($)(1)
Death or
Disability
($)(2)
 Resignation/
Retirement
($)
 Termination
For Cause
($)
 Termination
Without Cause
($)
 Change in
Control
($)(1)
 Death or
Disability
($)(2)
 
J. P. Wells   
C. A. Foster                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits997,646997,646997,646576,525  461,612   461,612   461,612   461,612   274,853 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)00664,5931,365,907  0   0   156,747   429,097   429,097 
Severance Payment001,102,5002,197,5000  0   0   500,250   500,250   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)000  0   0   108,426   108,426   108,426 
Health Care Insurance0035,4380  0   0   50,487   50,487   0 
Career Transition0012,0000  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Total997,646997,6462,812,1774,608,4911,942,432  461,612   461,612   1,297,022   1,569,373   812,377 
D. S. Thomason                       
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits605,348605,348605,348342,761  1,110,085   1,110,085   1,110,085   1,110,085   640,143 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)0092,662176,684  0   0   332,470   967,955   967,955 
Severance Payment00471,2500  0   0   525,000   525,000   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)000  0   0   114,441   114,441   114,441 
Health Care Insurance0048,9390  0   0   53,968   53,968   0 
Career Transition0012,0000  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Total605,348605,3481,230,1981,314,220519,445  1,110,085   1,110,085   2,155,464   2,790,949   1,722,539 
J. R. Simon                       
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits2,264,5992,264,5992,264,5991,165,091  3,546,668   3,546,668   3,546,668   3,546,668   2,559,967 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)00579,2961,223,033  828,328   0   1,765,225   4,222,893   4,222,893 
Severance Payment001,056,6502,106,1000  0   0   1,270,990   2,534,160   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)000  439,400   0   439,400   439,400   439,400 
Health Care Insurance0048,9390  0   0   53,968   53,968   0 
Career Transition0012,0000  0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Payment in Lieu of Post-Retirement Life Insurance  710,402   710,402   710,402   710,402   0 
Total2,264,5992,264,5993,961,4845,654,6712,388,124  5,524,798   4,257,070   7,806,152   11,526,991   7,222,260 
N. Stavropoulos   
J. M. Welsch                    
Value of Accumulated Pension Benefits2,174,796    2,887,832   2,887,832   2,887,832   2,887,832   1,561,183 
Value of Stock Awards Vesting(3)1,601,362    539,207   0   539,207   1,572,315   1,572,315 
Severance Payment0    0   0   924,320   924,320   0 
Short-Term Incentive Plan Award(4)0    245,495   0   245,495   245,495   245,495 
Health Care Insurance0    0   0   39,079   39,079   0 
Career Transition0    0   0   19,500   19,500   0 
Payment in Lieu of Post-Retirement Life Insurance  566,045   566,045   566,045   566,045   0 
Total3,776,158    4,238,579   3,453,877   5,221,478   6,254,586   3,378,993 

 

(1)Payments made in connection with a Change in Control may require shareholder approval, pursuant to the PG&E Corporation Golden Parachute Restriction Policy, discussed below. If excise taxes are levied in connection with Internal Revenue Code Section 4999, the aggregate benefits shown may be reduced to a level that does not trigger the excise tax, but only if doing so would be more beneficial to the officer on an after-tax basis.
(2)For pension payments, the number reflects the value of aggregated benefits upon termination due to death. Pension payments upon termination due to disability would be the same as in the event of resignation.
(3)Reflects the value of outstanding equity awards for which vesting is continued or accelerated due to the termination event. Based on performance through December 31, 2018,2020, no payments would be made with respect to outstanding performance shares using a TSR measure. Payments would be made with respect to 100 percent of outstanding performance shares granted in 2016 using safety and affordability measures.2018. Outstanding performance shares granted in 2017 and 2018 using safety, affordability, and financial measures2020 are included assuming a 100 percent payout.target payout (100%).
(4)Assumes 20182020 STIP performance score of 0,0.650, and an individual performance modifier for each NEO, as determined by the Boards of PG&E Corporation and the Utility and the Compensation Committee for all officers.Committee.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement8780
 
Back to Contents

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON RESIGNATION, RETIREMENT, TERMINATION, CHANGE IN CONTROL, DEATH, OR DISABILITYPotential Payments upon Resignation, Retirement, Termination, Change in Control, Death, or Disability(Continued)(Continued)

Arrangements with Former NEOs

During 2020, the following NEOs separated from service prior to December 31, 2020. In each case the individual was entitled to receive benefits consistent with a termination without cause as described below. Additional benefits, if any are described below

On August 3, 2020, Andrew Vesey entered into a separation agreement, pursuant to which his employment ceased on August 3, 2020. In addition to those benefits typically provided to an individual who was terminated without cause, Mr. Vesey also was granted a cash payment of $850,000, equivalent to his 2020 STIP target value and a cash relocation reimbursement benefit not to exceed $25,000. Mr. Vesey also waived the opportunity for a 2020 STIP payout consistent with payouts typically provided to individuals who are terminated without cause. The value of benefits received due to such separation, calculated as of August 4, 2020, in a manner consistent with the calculations for resignation in the “Potential Payments” table, was $2,887,425.
On August 15, 2020, Ms. Loduca entered into a separation agreement, pursuant to which her employment ceased on August 15, 2020. The value of benefits received due to such separation, calculated as of August 16, 2020, in a manner consistent with the calculations for a termination without cause in the “Potential Payments” table was $4,230,127.

Additionally, on July 1, 2020, Mr. Johnson retired from employment with P&GE Corporation. As a result, Mr. Johnson received benefits consistent with a retirement as described below. The value of benefits received due to such separation, calculated as of July 1, 2020, in a manner consistent with the calculations for resignation in the “Potential Payments” table, was $45,638.

On September 26, 2020, Mr. Wells resigned from employment with PG&E Corporation. As a result, Mr. Wells received benefits consistent with a resignation as described below. The value of benefits received due to such separation, calculated as of September 26, 2020, in a manner consistent with the calculations for resignation in the “Potential Payments” table, was $1,899,978.

 

Pension Benefits in General

 

If any NEO is terminated for any reason, that officer generally is entitled to receive accrued and vested pension benefits, as described in the narrative accompanying the “Pension Benefits—2018”Benefits” table. The value of the pension benefit will be paid out over time in the form of an annuity, consistent with payment elections made by the NEO. The qualified plan trust is funded by contributions from both PG&E Corporation and the Utility. Payments from the non-qualified plan are paid by PG&E Corporation and are reduced by any benefit payable from the qualified plan.

 

The value of pension benefits reported in the table above is identical in all termination scenarios, except if an NEO’s employment is terminated due to that officer’s death. In that case, if (1) the officer was at least 55 years of age, or (2) the combined total of his or her age and the number of years worked exceeded 70, then the officer’s surviving spouse or beneficiary would be entitled to an immediate commencement of payment of 50 percent of the single-life pension benefit that would otherwise have been available to the officer at age 65. For all other officers, the value of this pre-retirement survivor’s benefit would be 50 percent of the single life pension benefit that would otherwise have been available to the officer at age 55, and the benefit would commence on the first of the month after the day that officer would have reached age 55.

 

Officer Severance Policy

 

The Officer Severance Policy provides for severance payments, treatment of STIP upon severance, and the treatment of certain LTIP awards upon termination with cause, termination without cause, and termination in connection with a Change in Control. Benefits under the Officer Severance Policy are paid by the individual’s former employer.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   81
Back to Contents

Potential Payments upon Resignation, Retirement, Termination, Change in Control, Death, or Disability(Continued)

 

Potential Payments – Resignation/Retirement

 

LTIP Awards

 

Unvested performance shares, stock options, and RSUs generally are cancelled upon resignation, unless that individual’sthe holder’s resignation qualifies as a “retirement.” For these purposes, “retirement” for the NEOs means a termination of employment, other than for cause, when an employee is at least 55 years old and has been employed for at least the last fiveeight consecutive years immediately before termination.termination (five years for awards made to prior to 2020). If the individualholder “retires,” then:

 

Unvested performance shares continue to vest and will become payablepro-rata, based on the number of months the holder was employed during the performance period. Any vested performance shares are settled, if at all, at the end of the applicable performance period, in the same manner as if the officer remained employed.
for active employees.
Unvested annual RSU awards continue to vest and will become payable as if the officer remained employedfor 12 months after retirement (unless retirement occurs within two years following a Change in Control, in which case shares underlying the RSUs vest and are paid out within 60 days following the retirement).
Unvested annual stock options continue to vest for 12 months after retirement and will become exercisable according to their normal vesting schedule as ifmay be exercised for the officer remained employedshorter of the remaining term or five years (unless retirement occurs within two years following a Change in Control, in which case all options vest immediately and may be exercised for the shorter of the remaining term or five years.years).

 

With respect to the RSUsretention award granted as a promotional award to Mr. StavropoulosWells in May 2017,August 2020, the retirement provision does not apply and unvested RSUs were cancelled at the time his employment ended.

 

Ms. Williams was the only NEOMessrs. Simon and Welsch were eligible for retirement under the LTIP as of December 31, 2018. Mr. Stavropoulos was retirement-eligible at the time his employment ended.2020.

 

STIP

 

If an NEO resigns or retires on or after December 31 of a performance year, that officer will be entitled to receive a lump-sum STIP payment for that calendar year.

 

If an NEO resigns prior to December 31 of any calendar year, potential STIP payments for that year generally are forfeited. However, if the NEO is at least 55 years of age at the time of resignation, then potential STIP payments will be treated in the same manner as for a “retirement.”

 

2019 Joint Proxy Statement88
Back to Contents

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON RESIGNATION, RETIREMENT, TERMINATION, CHANGE IN CONTROL, DEATH, OR DISABILITY(Continued)

If an NEO retires before December 31 of any calendar year, then the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, approve providing the retired NEO with a lump-sum STIP payment for that calendar year. Any such STIP payment generally would reflect actual earnings, and thus be prorated to reflect the amount of time that the retired NEO was employed during the performance period.

 

Any STIP payment generally would reflect the STIP performance score applicable to active employees and would be paid by the former employer at the same time as for active employees.

 

Post-Retirement Life Insurance Benefits

 

Upon retirement (as defined under the qualified pension plan), all employees of PG&E Corporation, the Utility, and certain subsidiaries are eligible to receive a life insurance coverage benefit under the Post-Retirement Life Insurance Plan of Pacific Gas and Electric Company. If an employee retires at age 55 or older with at least 15 years of service (“qualifying retirement”)(qualifying retirement) with the companies and their respective subsidiaries, the employee may qualify for a different “benefit level” and the value of the benefit may increase. Each retiree’s applicable “benefit level” is determined based on factors such as the participant’s position with the company at retirement and the date of hire or promotion. Prior to December 31, 2008, upon qualifying retirement, certain benefit levels also permitted the retiree to elect to receive the benefit in the form of a lump-sum cash payment equal to the present value of the insurance coverage benefit. Participants no longer may elect the cash payment upon retirement, but certain individuals who were employees as of December 31, 2008, and who were likely upon retirement to qualify for the benefit levels that previously offered the cash alternative were given the opportunity to make a one-time election as to whether to receive future benefits (if any) as insurance coverage or in the form of a lump-sum cash payment. Benefits are paid by the former employer.

 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   82
Back to Contents

Potential Payments upon Resignation, Retirement, Termination, Change in Control, Death, or Disability(Continued)

Upon qualifying retirement, Ms. WilliamsMessrs. Simon and Mr. SimonWelsch each would receive a lump-sum cash benefit equal to the present value of a post-retirement life insurance policy with coverage equal to his or her last 12 months of salary. Upon qualifying for retirement, all other NEOsMessrs. Smith, Lewis, Foster, and Thomason each would be entitled to receive a life insurance benefit in the amount of $50,000.

Upon retirement on July 1, 2020, Mr. Johnson received a life insurance benefit in the amount of $8,000. 

 

Potential Payments – Termination for Cause

 

If an officer is terminated for cause, all outstanding performance shares and RSUs are cancelled, stock options are forfeited, no severance payment is available, and the officer is not eligible to receive a STIP payment for that year.

 

As provided in the Officer Severance Policy, in general, an officer is terminated “for cause” if the employer determines in good faith that the officer has engaged in, committed, or is responsible for:

 

Serious misconduct, gross negligence, theft, or fraud against PG&E Corporation and/or the officer’s employer,
Refusal or unwillingness to perform his or her duties,
Inappropriate conduct in violation of the Corporation’s equal employment opportunity policy,
Conduct that reflects adversely upon, or making any remarks disparaging of, the Corporation, its Board, officers, or employees, or its affiliates or subsidiaries,
Insubordination,
Any willful act that is likely to injure the reputation, business, or business relationship of the Corporation or its subsidiaries or affiliates, or
Violation of any fiduciary duty, or breach of any duty of loyalty.

 

With respect to vesting of LTIP awards, “cause” generally is determined in the sole discretion of PG&E Corporation, and typically includes dishonesty, a criminal offense, or violation of a work rule.

 

2019 Joint Proxy Statement89
Back to Contents

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON RESIGNATION, RETIREMENT, TERMINATION, CHANGE IN CONTROL, DEATH, OR DISABILITY(Continued)

Potential Payments – Termination Without Cause

 

LTIP Awards

 

Termination provisions are described in the Officer Severance Policy and LTIP award agreements.

 

Unvested performance shares generally vest based on actual performance proportionately based on the number of months during the performance period that the officer was employed divided by 36 months. Any vested performance shares are settled, if at all, at the end of the applicable performance period.
period, in the same manner as for active employees.
Unvested RSUs generally continue to vest for 12 months.
Unvested stock options that would have vested over the 12 months following termination will continue to vest. Vested stock options may be exercised for the shorter of one year or the remaining term.

 

However, ifIf the officer is at least 55 years of age with at least five years of service, his or her termination without cause is treated as a retirement under the terms of the LTIP.LTIP rather than as described in this section. (Please see the section entitled “Potential Payments—Resignation/ Retirement” for a discussion of vesting provisions.) Ms. Williams was

Messrs. Simon and Welsch were the only NEONEOs eligible for retirement under the LTIP as of December 31, 2018. Mr. Stavropoulos was retirement-eligible at the time his employment ended.2020.

 

Severance Payment

 

All NEOs would be entitled to a lump-sum payment of one times annual base salary and STIP target.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   83
Back to Contents

Potential Payments upon Resignation, Retirement, Termination, Change in Control, Death, or Disability(Continued)

 

STIP

 

If an officer is terminated without cause before December 31 of a given year and has at least six months of service in that year, the officer is eligible to receive a prorated lump-sum STIP award for that year. Such STIP payment generally would reflect the STIP performance score applicable to active employees and would be prorated to reflect the amount of time that the officer was employed during the performance period. Payments would be paid by the former employer and at the same time as for active employees.

 

Miscellaneous Benefits

 

The officer is entitled to receive a lump-sum cash payment equal to the estimated value of 18 months of COBRA premiums, based on the officer’s benefit levels at the time of termination (with such payment subject to taxation under applicable law), and career transition services.

 

Covenants

 

In consideration for severance benefits other than those relating to LTIP awards, (1) the officer agrees not to divulge any confidential or privileged information obtained during his or her employment, unless required or permitted by law, (2) the officer agrees that during a period of 12 months following severance, the officer agrees to a covenant to, among other things,will refrain from soliciting customers and employees, (3) the officer agrees to assist in legal proceedings as reasonably required during this period, (4) the officer must sign a release of claims, and (5) the officer must agree not to compete with the companies to the extent permitted by law.

 

Potential Payments – Severance in Connection with Change in Control

 

Change-in-Control benefits require a “double trigger” and are not payable based on a Change-in-Control event alone. Benefits in connection with a Change in Control are provided by the Officer Severance Policy, the LTIPs,LTIP, and related LTIP award agreements and guidelines. Benefits may be limited by the PG&E Corporation Golden Parachute Restriction Policy, which is discussed further below.

 

2019 Joint Proxy Statement90
Back to Contents

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON RESIGNATION, RETIREMENT, TERMINATION, CHANGE IN CONTROL, DEATH, OR DISABILITY(Continued)

Definition of Change in Control

 

A Change in Control occurs upon any of the following events:

 

1.Any person or entity (excluding employee benefit plans or a plan fiduciary) becomes the direct or indirect owner of more than 30 percent of PG&E Corporation’s outstanding common stock.stock;
2.Over any two-year period, a majority of the PG&E Corporation directors in office at the beginning of the period are no longer in office (unless each new director was elected or nominated for shareholder election by at least two-thirds of the remaining active directors who also were in office at the beginning of the period or who were elected or nominated by at least two-thirds of the active directors at the time of election or nomination).;
3.Following any shareholder-approved consolidation or merger of PG&E Corporation, the former Corporation shareholders own less than 70 percent of the voting power in the surviving entity (or parent of the surviving entity).;
4.(a) Consummation of the sale, lease, exchange, or other transfer of all or substantially all of PG&E Corporation’s assets,assets; or
(b) shareholderShareholder approval of a plan of liquidation or dissolution of PG&E Corporation.

 

LTIP Awards

 

Following a Change in Control, LTIP awards generally accelerate or automatically vest if either (a) the successor company fails to assume, continue, or substitute previously granted awards in a manner that preserves the value of those awards, or (b) the award recipient is terminated (including constructive termination) in connection with a Change in Control during a set period of time before or after the Change in Control. Specific acceleration, vesting, and settlement provisions are as follows (subject to any delays necessary to comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A):.

 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   84
Back to Contents

TREATMENT OF UNVESTEDTreatment of Unvested LTIP AWARDS UPON TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE IN CONNECTION WITH A CHANGE IN CONTROLAwards Upon Termination Without Cause in Connection with a Change in Control (CIC)

 

  CIC Occurs and Acquiror Does
Not Assume, Continue, or
Grant Substitute LTIP Awards
 Termination Within
Three Months Before CIC;
Awards Are Assumed,
Continued, or Substituted
 Termination Within
Two Years After
CIC; Awards Are Assumed,
Continued, or Substituted
PerformanceShares Vest upon CIC, payable at end of the performance period, but based on a payout factor measuring TSR for PG&E for the period from the beginning of the performance period to the date of CIC, and assuming safety and affordability performance for other measures was at target Vest upon CIC, payable at the end of the performance period Vest upon termination, payable at the end of the performance period
RSUs Vest upon CIC, settled under the normal schedule Vest upon CIC, settled under the normal schedule (includes any RSUs that would have continued to vest after termination) Vest upon termination, settled within 60 days
Stock
Options
 Vest upon CIC and will be cancelled in exchange for fair value Vest upon CIC; may be exercised within shorter of remaining term or one year Vest upon termination; may be exercised within shorter of remaining term or one year

 

2019 Joint Proxy Statement91
Back to Contents

TREATMENT OF UNVESTED LTIP AWARDS UPON TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE IN CONNECTION WITH A CHANGE IN CONTROL (CIC)(Continued)

Severance Payment

 

The Officer Severance Policy provides enhanced Change-in-Control severance benefits to “covered officers” who are in officer compensation bands 1 or 2. Such covered officers include Ms. Williams, Mr. Malnight, Mr.Messrs. Smith and Simon. Messrs. Johnson, Vesey, and Wells, and Mr. Simon. Mr. Stavropoulos was aMs. Loduca were covered officerofficers prior to the end of histheir employment. If Mr. Soto, Mr. Hogan,Messrs. Lewis, Foster, Thomason, or Mr. Thomason had beenWelsch are terminated without cause in connection with a Change in Control, as of December 31, 2018, each would have beenbe eligible for standard severance benefits as discussed in the section entitled “Potential Payments—Termination Without Cause.”

 

If a covered officer is terminated without cause or is constructively terminated in connection with a Change in Control (which includes termination prior to a Potential Change in Control, as defined in the Officer Severance Policy), the officer generally would be eligible for a lump-sum payment equal to the total of:

 

1.Unpaid base salary earned through the termination date,
2.Any accrued but unpaid vacation pay, and
3.Two times the sum of (a) target STIP for the fiscal year in which termination occurs, and (b) the officer’s annual base salary in effect immediately before either the date of termination or the Change in Control, whichever amount is greater.

However, in connection with the elimination of reimbursement payments for excise taxes levied in connection with Internal Revenue Code Section 4999, eligible officers either (1) are responsible for paying any such excise taxes, or (2) have their aggregate Change-in-Control benefits reduced to a level that does not trigger the excise tax, but only if doing so would be more beneficial to the officer on an after-tax basis.

 

For these purposes, “cause” means:

 

(i)The covered officer’s willful and continued failure to substantially perform the officer’s duties with PG&E Corporation or one of its affiliates, after a written Board demand for substantial performance is delivered to the officer, or
(ii)The willful engagement in illegal conduct or gross misconduct that is materially injurious to PG&E Corporation.

 

Constructive termination includes resignation in connection with conditions that constitute Good Reason as defined in the Officer Severance Policy (which includes, among other things, a material diminution in duties, authority, or base compensation).

 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   85
Back to Contents

Treatment of Unvested LTIP Awards Upon Termination Without Cause in Connection with a Change in Control (CIC)(Continued)

STIP

 

If a covered officer (Messrs. Smith or Simon) is terminated without cause or is constructively terminated in connection with a Change in Control, the Officer Severance Policy provides that the officer will receive a lump-sum payment equal to the officer’s prorated target STIP calculated for the fiscal year in which termination occurs. If Mr. Soto, Mr. Hogan,another officer (Messrs. Lewis, Foster, Thomason, or Mr. Thomason had beenWelsch) is terminated in connection with a Change in Control, as of December 31, 2018, each would have beenbe eligible for STIP payments consistent with the discussion in the section entitled “Potential Payments—Termination Without Cause.”

 

PG&E Corporation Golden Parachute Restriction Policy

 

The Golden Parachute Restriction Policy requires shareholder approval of executive severance payments provided in connection with any change in control, to the extent that those payments exceed 2.99 times the sum of a covered officer’s base salary and target annual bonus. This Policy was adopted by the PG&E Corporation Board in February 2006.

 

The policy applies to the value of cash, special benefits, or perquisites that are due to the executive following or in connection with both (1) a change in control, and (2) the termination or constructive termination of an officer of PG&E Corporation, the Utility, or their respective subsidiaries at the level of Senior Vice President or higher. It does not apply to the value of benefits that would be triggered by a change in control without severance, or to the value of benefits that would be triggered by severance in the absence of a change in control. The Golden Parachute Restriction Policy also does not apply to certain enumerated payments, including, among others, compensation for services rendered prior to termination, tax restoration payments, and accelerated vesting or settlement of equity awards.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement92
Back to Contents

TREATMENT OF UNVESTED LTIP AWARDS UPON TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE IN CONNECTION WITH A CHANGE IN CONTROL (CIC)(Continued)

 

Potential Payments – Termination Due to Death or Disability

 

LTIP Awards

 

If an officer’s employment is terminated due to death or disability, LTIP awards are treated as follows:

 

Unvested performance shares vest immediately. Vested shares are payable, if at all, as soon as practicable after completion of the performance period relevant to the performance shares.
shares, in the same manner as for active employees.
If a participant’s death or disability (as defined under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A) occurs while employed, unvested RSUs vest immediately and will be settled within 60 days.
If a participant’s death or disability (as defined under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A) occurs while employed, unvested stock options vest immediately. Vested stock options may be exercised within the shorter of one year or the remaining term.

 

Vested LTIP awards are payable to the officer’s designated beneficiary(ies) in the case of death, or otherwise in accordance with the officer’s instructions or by law.

 

STIP

 

If an officer’s employment is terminated due to death or disability before December 31 of the STIP performance year, a prorated portion of the target STIP award will become payable to the officer, or, in the case of death, to the officer’s beneficiary(ies), by the former employer and at the same time as STIP payments are made to active employees.

 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   86
Back to Contents

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS’Principal Executive Officers’ (PEO) PAY RATIOPay Ratio20182020

 

The PG&E Corporation PEO’s 20182020 total compensation was $9,289,842.$6,918,533. The total compensation of the median employee was $177,765.$220,954. The ratio of PEO pay to median worker pay for PG&E Corporation was 52:31:1.

 

The Utility PEO’s 2018 total compensation was $1,727,251.$2,642,211. The total compensation of the median employee was $177,765.$220,954. The ratio of PEO pay to median worker pay for the Utility was 10:12:1.

 

December 31, 20182020, was selected as the date to identify the “median employee.” The companies identifiedTo identify the same individual as was identified as the “median employee”median employee on December 31, 2017, for purposes of disclosures in the 2018 Joint Proxy Statement, given that since December 31, 2017, there have been no changes to either company’s employee population or employee compensation arrangements that would result in significant changes to the pay ratio disclosure. To identify the “median employee” on December 31, 2017,2020, Medicare wages from tax records were utilizedused to make the initial identification. At that time, of the companies’ total of 23,361approximately 24,000 employees, an insignificant number (24)(9) were employed by PG&E Corporation, so the same employee was used as the “median employee”median employee for both PG&E Corporation and the Utility in 2017 and again in 2018.Utility. After identifying the median employee, all the elements of compensation, including cash compensation and change in pension value, for 20182020 were combined in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of SEC Regulation S-K.

 

As of December 31, 2018, three individuals concurrently served2020, Mr. Smith was PEO of PG&E Corporation. Because Mr. Smith was only employed for part of 2020 as PEOs of the Utility: Jesus Soto, Senior Vice President, Gas Operations; Steven Malnight, Senior Vice President, Energy Supply and Policy; and Patrick Hogan, Senior Vice President, Electric Operations. To reflect this structure, PEO, compensation was calculated as the average compensation provided to Messrs. Soto, Malnight, and Hogan. Because these three individuals assumed the shared duties of PEO on September 1, 2018, PEOMr. Smith’s compensation, specifically salary, and non-equity incentive plan compensation, was annualized to project the amount of compensation that would have been earned if eachMr. Smith had been in his position for the full year.

As of December 31, 2020, Mr. Lewis was PEO of the PEOsUtility. Because Mr. Lewis was only employed for part of 2020 as PEO, Mr. Lewis’ compensation, specifically salary, was annualized to project the amount of compensation that would have been earned if Mr. Lewis had been in his position for the full year.

 

These ratios are reasonable estimates calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement9387
 
Back to Contents

NEW CEO COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

On April 10, 2019, the Board of the Corporation appointed Bill Johnson as the new Chief Executive Officer and President of the Corporation.

In connection with the appointment, the independent members of the Corporation Board approved the terms and conditions of Mr. Johnson’s compensation arrangements, which are generally described below and are subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, where the Chapter 11 Cases are pending.

During the three-year employment commitment, Mr. Johnson will receive a base salary of $2.5 million annually. Mr. Johnson will also be eligible to receive a one-time transition payment of $3 million on the first day of his employment, which is subject to claw-back in the event Mr. Johnson resigns or is terminated for cause within 12 months of his start date. Further, Mr. Johnson will be eligible for the Corporation’s standard relocation policy for expenses relating to moving to California.

In addition, Mr. Johnson will receive equity incentive compensation consisting of time-based RSUs, performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) and performance-based stock options. Mr. Johnson will receive an annual equity award with a target value of $3.5 million, with 25 percent of such award consisting of RSUs and 75 percent of such award consisting of PRSUs. Additionally, on the first day of his employment, Mr. Johnson will receive a one-time grant of three tranches of performance-based stock options, payable in cash or shares at Mr. Johnson’s option, as follows: (i) tranche 1 consists of a maximum 1.2 million options (i.e., 800,000 options at target level performance) with an exercise price of $25.00 per share exercisable until the fourth anniversary of the grant date, (ii) tranche 2 consists of a maximum 1.5 million options (i.e., 1 million options at target level performance) with an exercise price of $40.00 per share exercisable until the fourth anniversary of the grant date, and (iii) tranche 3 consists of a maximum 1.6 million options (i.e., approximately 1.1 million options at target level performance) with an exercise price of $50.00 per share exercisable until the fifth anniversary of the grant date, in each case subject to forfeiture if Mr. Johnson is terminated for cause.

The performance-based vesting conditions applicable to the PRSUs and stock options will be weighted 65 percent safety-based performance conditions, 25 percent financial-based performance conditions and 10 percent customer-based performance conditions. All of Mr. Johnson’s equity incentive compensation will be subject to claw-back under the Corporation’s recoupment policy. The vesting conditions, including the performance periods and threshold, target and maximum performance levels applicable to the performance-based vesting conditions, and other material terms, including certain anti-dilution protections, of Mr. Johnson’s equity incentive compensation are described in the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 16, 2019 and in other subsequent related disclosures.

Mr. Johnson will also be eligible for severance payments under certain circumstances, as described in the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 16, 2019.

2019 Joint Proxy Statement94
Back to Contents

Item Nos. 5 and 6:ITEM NO. 4: PG&E Corporation Shareholder ProposalsCORPORATION PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE PG&E CORPORATION 2021 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

 

To Be Voted on by PG&E Corporation Shareholders Only

 

The following shareholder proposals and related supporting statements representPG&E Corporation management requests that the views of the shareholders who submitted them, and not the views of PG&E Corporation.Corporation approve the PG&E Corporation 2021 Long-term Incentive Plan (“2021 LTIP”) described below. The 2021 LTIP will become effective upon the later of approval by PG&E Corporation’s shareholders or June 1, 2021 (“Effective Date”).

The PG&E Corporation Board of Directors has unanimously approved the 2021 LTIP to replace the current PG&E Corporation 2014 Long-term Incentive Plan (“2014 LTIP”). Subject to shareholder approval of the proposed 2021 LTIP and upon the Effective Date, no new awards will be granted pursuant to the 2014 LTIP.

The following is not responsible for, anda summary of the principal features of the 2021 LTIP. This summary, however, does not endorse,purport to be a complete description of all of the contentprovisions of any shareholder proposal or supporting statement. The shareholder proposals and supporting statements are includedthe 2021 LTIP. It is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2021 LTIP. A copy of the 2021 LTIP is attached to this Proxy Statement pursuantas Appendix A, and shareholders are urged to SEC proxy Rule 14a-8.read the 2021 LTIP in its entirety.

 

Item No. 5: Shareholder ProposalPurpose

 

Mr. Jing Zhao, 1745 Copperleaf Court, Concord, CA 94519, beneficial ownerThe purpose of 65the 2021 LTIP is to advance the interests of PG&E Corporation and its shareholders by providing key management employees, nonemployee directors, and other eligible participants with stockbased financial incentives to align participants’ interests with the interests of PG&E Corporation’s shareholders in the long-term success of PG&E Corporation.

The adoption of the 2021 LTIP was recommended by the PG&E Corporation Compensation Committee (“Committee”), which is composed entirely of independent directors, as defined in PG&E Corporation’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board has delegated administration of the 2021 LTIP to the Committee.

Request for Shares, Dilution and Overhang

In order to give PG&E Corporation the flexibility to responsibly address its future equity compensation needs, we are requesting that shareholders approve the 2021 LTIP, under which 44 million shares (plus any shares authorized but not covered by an award under the 2014 LTIP as of the effective date of the 2021 LTIP) are authorized for issuance under the plan. The closing price of a share of PG&E Corporation common stock has given notice of his intention to present the following proposal for action at the PG&E Corporation annual meeting:on December 31, 2020 was $12.46.

 

Shareholder Proposal on Corporation Structure Reform

Resolved: shareholders recommend that PG&E Corporation reform PG&E’s structureWhen considering the number of shares to combine with Pacific Gas and Electric Company into one organizationreserve for issuance under one board and one executive team, under applicable law and regulation rules.

Supporting Statement

Accordingthe 2021 LTIP, the Committee reviewed, among other things, the potential dilution to Joint Notice of 2018 Annual Meetings Joint Proxy Statement of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company summary compensation table (p.61), PG&E Corporation’s CEOcurrent shareholders as measured by burn rate and President Ms. Williams took $8,597,220,overhang, projected future share usage, and projected future forfeitures. The projected future usage of shares for long-term incentive awards under the 2021 LTIP was reviewed under scenarios based on a variety of assumptions. Depending on assumptions, the number of shares under the 2021 LTIP, in combination with the shares added back to the plan from forfeitures of awards granted under the 2021 LTIP and added to the plan from forfeitures of awards granted under the 2014 LTIP, is expected to satisfy PG&E Corporation’s and the Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s President and COO Mr. Stavropoulos took $6,413,256, and PG&E Corporation’s Executive Chair(“Utility”) equity compensation needs through at least the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders. The Committee is committed to effectively managing the Board Mr. Earley took $6,012,329 (with early retirement beforenumber of shares reserved for issuance under the end of 2017), totaling $21,022,805 in 2017 when California residents suffered devastating lose and lives from wild fires and other natural and unnatural causes! Mr. Earley also took $11,730,646 in 2016 and $12,198,394 in 2015. Californians cannot afford to award three bosses for one and same poor public utilities service at the same time with such an absurd high compensation.

Furthermore, according to the Wall Street Journal “Better Ways to Measure Your Boss’s Pay” (July 4, 2017): “Summary compensation tables massively understate what executives earn and don’t tell investors what they need to know.” “In 2015—the last year for which full data is available—the average pay of the 500 highest-paid U.S. executives was $17.1 million according to fair-value estimates, but $32.6 million according to realized pay.”

The division of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company is unnecessary for and harmful to public service, and is unethical for two groups of executive officers to award themselves with absurd compensation. There is no such a “joint venture” of public service in other advanced democratic societies.

The Board of Directors of PG&E Corporation Recommends a Vote AGAINST This Proposal.

The Board believes shareholders should vote against this proposal for the following reasons:

With the Corporation’s and the Utility’s January 29, 2019 filing of voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11, any transactions outside of the ordinary course of business, including transactions to alter or restructure the corporate structure of PG&E Corporation and its subsidiary, the Utility, will require approval from the Bankruptcy Court overseeing the companies’ jointly administered Chapter 11 Cases. A company restructuring, if any, likely would be addressed as part of the companies’ Chapter 11 plan(s) of reorganization that must be filed, voted on by holders of impaired claims and equity interests, and confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court before the companies emerge from Chapter 11. PG&E Corporation cannot unilaterally decide to combine with the Utility, even if PG&E Corporation’s shareholders approve such a recommendation, absent Bankruptcy Court approval.2021 LTIP while minimizing shareholder dilution.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement9588
 
Back to Contents

Furthermore, any confirmed Chapter 11 planTypes of reorganization will needIncentive Awards

Under the 2021 LTIP, the Committee has discretion to comport with applicable regulatory requirements,grant options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, performance shares, performance units, restricted stock units, deferred compensation awards, and other stock-based awards as described below. The stock options may be incentive stock options (“ISOs”) intended to qualify for special tax treatment or non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”). SARs may be freestanding or granted in relation to a stock option as a tandem SAR. In addition, non-employee directors are eligible to receive automatic awards (see “Automatic Awards for Non-Employee Directors” below) as well as take into accountdiscretionary awards.

Except with respect to awards to non-employee directors, the numerous intereststype of stakeholders including shareholders, customers, communities servedincentive award being granted, as well as the terms and conditions of the award, is determined by the Committee at the time of grant, consistent with any restrictions in the 2021 LTIP.

Specific awards will be reflected in an applicable agreement between PG&E Corporation and the Utility, regulators, parties affected byparticipant. Those awards will be subject to all applicable terms and conditions of the 20172021 LTIP, and 2018 wildfires, creditors,also may be subject to any other terms and employees. A confirmed Chapter 11 planconditions consistent with the 2021 LTIP, including accelerated vesting or settlement in the event of reorganization could reflect any numbera participant’s death, disability, or a termination of possible corporate structures, from combiningemployment. The provisions of the various agreements entered into one entity, splitting up into many different entities, or maintainingunder the status quo.2021 LTIP do not need to be identical.

 

In this environment, it is not practical or meaningful for shareholders at the 2019 annual meeting to recommend combiningEligibility

All employees (including officers) of PG&E Corporation, its subsidiaries, and the Utility based on executive compensation concerns. Rather, it isaffiliates are eligible to participate in the best interests2021 LTIP. Consultants are also eligible to receive incentive awards under the 2021 LTIP. Non-employee directors of PG&E Corporation are eligible to receive automatic awards and discretionary awards. Under certain circumstances, prospective employees, directors, and consultants are also eligible for awards.

As of March 22, 2021, there were 15 current or former officers of PG&E Corporation, 49 current or former officers of PG&E Corporation subsidiaries (who are not also officers of PG&E Corporation), 948 current or former employees of PG&E Corporation and its shareholders forsubsidiaries (who are not officers), and 14 current or former non-employee directors of PG&E Corporation participating in the Corporation to2014 LTIP.

Administration

The Committee will administer the 2021 LTIP. Among other powers, the Committee generally will have the flexibility and timepower to:

Determine the eligible participants who will be granted incentive awards,
Determine the amount and type of award,
Determine the applicable fair market value of PG&E Corporation common stock,
Determine the terms and conditions of awards,
Construe and interpret the 2021 LTIP, and
Make all other determinations relating to the 2021 LTIP, to the extent permitted by applicable law and subject to certain restrictions specified in the 2021 LTIP.

The Board of Directors also may delegate to formulate and file a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization that (i) addresses and resolves the wildfire claims that have been asserted against it, (ii) enables PG&E Corporation andCEO the Utilityauthority to provide prudent and efficient servicemake awards to certain eligible participants within the guidelines adopted by the Committee. The Committee may delegate authority to the Utility’s customers andCEO or the senior officer responsible for human resources with respect to properly invest in its businessministerial matters.

Automatic awards to provide safe and reliable service and to further mitigate future wildfire risks, (iii) enablesnon-employee directors of PG&E Corporation will be made strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the Utility2021 LTIP, and discretionary awards, if any, to help restore and rebuild communities affectednon-employee directors will be approved by the wildfires, and (iv) maximizes value and positions PG&E Corporation and the Utility for long-term viability.Board.

 

For these reasons,Effective Date and Duration of the 2021 LTIP

The 2021 LTIP will become effective upon approval by PG&E Corporation shareholders, and will have a term of 10 years from shareholder approval, unless it is terminated sooner according to the terms of the 2021 LTIP. ISOs may only be granted within 10 years of the date that the PG&E Corporation Board unanimously recommends a voteAGAINST this proposal.

Item No. 6: Shareholder Proposal

Mr. John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278, beneficial owner of 80 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock, has given notice of his intention to presentapproved the following proposal for action at the PG&E Corporation annual meeting:

Proposal 6 – Improve Shareholder Proxy Access

Shareholders request that our board of directors take the steps necessary to enable as many shareholders as may be needed to aggregate their shares to equal 3% of our stock owned continuously for 3-years in order to make use of our shareholder proxy access provisions.

Under current provisions, even if the 20 largest public pension funds were able to aggregate their shares, they would not meet the 3% criteria for a continuous 3-years at most companies examined by the Council of Institutional Investors. Additionally many of the largest investors of major companies are routinely passive investors who would be unlikely to be part of the proxy access shareholder aggregation process. Our company has a 20 participant limit for shareholder proxy access.

Under this proposal it is likely that the number of shareholders who participate in the aggregation process would still be a modest number due to the rigorous rules our company adopted for a shareholder to make an application to qualify as one of the aggregation participants. Plus it is easy for our management to reject potential aggregating shareholders because management simply needs to find lacking one item from a list of requirements.

This proposal deserves added attention since the price of PG&E stock fell 50% in one-month. Our Board of directors needs refreshment with a healthy concern for risk management of PG&E and a complete culture change. It seems unlikely that Board refreshment will be originating from the Chairman of our Nomination Committee, Richard Kelly. Mr. Kelly has been retired for 13-years and does not work on any other major Board of Directors to keep his skills up-to-date.

According to a San Francisco Chronicle article:

PG&E endured a turbulent ride on Wall Street as its legal and regulatory challenges continue to mount since the 2018 Camp fire broke out. Shares were at $25 – nearly half their opening price the day the fire started.

The 2018 Camp fire survivors have filed multiple suits against PG&E in San Francisco and Butte County, and a federal judge overseeing PG&E’s probation because of the 2010 San Bruno pipeline blast has opened a new, wildfire-related line of inquiry.

At the same time, the California Public Utilities Commission has said it wants to expand an investigation into PG&E’s safety culture, originally born out of the San Bruno fallout, to include wildfires.

PG&E also faces the prospect that its equipment may be found responsible for starting the Tubbs Fire, the most destructive of the devastating 2017 Wine Country wildfires. The cause of that fire is still under investigation, but investigators have said PG&E equipment started 17 other fires that burned through Northern California in 2017.2021 LTIP.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement9689
 
Back to Contents

Please vote yes:Shares Subject to the 2021 LTIP

 

Improve Shareholder Proxy Access – Proposal 6Subject to adjustment for certain events affecting the stock of PG&E Corporation (such as stock splits, stock dividends, or similar events), a maximum of 44 million shares of PG&E Corporation common stock, plus any shares authorized but not covered by an award under the 2014 LTIP as of the effective date of the 2021 LTIP, will be reserved for use under the 2021 LTIP. Shares subject to awards (including, after the effective date, those outstanding under the 2014 LTIP) that expire or are terminated or cancelled without being exercised or settled in full, or are forfeited, or repurchased generally can be added back into the 2021 LTIP and become available for issuance, subject to several limitations. Upon the exercise of an SAR (or, after the effective date, exercise of an SAR granted under the 2014 LTIP), the gross number of shares for which the SAR is exercised shall be deemed issued and shall not again be available for issuance under the 2021 LTIP. Awards under the 2021 LTIP (or, after the effective date, awards under the 2014 LTIP) that are settled in cash (other than stock options or SARs) will not be considered issued shares under the 2021 LTIP and shall again be available for issuance under 2012 LTIP. If a participant exercises any award (including, after the effective date, any option or award under the 2014 LTIP) by tendering shares or by allowing the company to withhold shares, or if withholding tax liabilities are satisfied by the tendering or withholding of shares, then those tendered or withheld shares may be added back to the 2021 LTIP (other than in the case of shares tendered or withheld in connection with the exercise of stock options or SARs).

 

The Boardinformation included in this Proxy Statement and PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ending December 30, 2020, is updated by the following information regarding all existing equity compensation plans as of DirectorsMarch 8, 2021:

Number of shares that will be authorized for future grant after shareholder approval of the PG&E Corporation 2021 Long Term Incentive Plan44,000,000
Number of shares remaining available for future grant under the 2014 Plan(1)17,010,516
Number of shares relating to outstanding stock options at March 8,2021(2)2,261,636
Total number of shares outstanding at March 8, 2021, relating to full value awards (including30,172,973
phantom stock units, restricted stock units, and stock settled performance shares)(3)
Weighted average remaining term of outstanding options3.65
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options$40.07
Total shares of common stock outstanding (as of March 22, 2021)1,985,105,703

(1)The number of shares remaining available for future grant under the 2014 Plan reflects performance shares at maximum payout. Only the number of shares remaining available for future grant under the 2014 Plan as of the effective date will be transferred to the 2021 LTIP.
(2)No stock appreciation rights were outstanding as of March 8, 2021.
(3)Outstanding shares as of March 8, 2021, includes 20,625,688 performance shares counted at maximum payout. When counted at target, the number of performance shares outstanding is 8,620,903.

To the extent permitted by stock exchange regulations, awards granted or shares issued by PG&E Corporation in assumption of, or in substitution or exchange for, prior awards or obligations of any company acquired by or combined with PG&E Corporation or its subsidiaries shall not be added to or reduce the maximum limit on shares reserved under the 2021 LTIP. In the event that a company acquired by or combined with PG&E Corporation or any of its subsidiaries has shares available under a preexisting plan approved by shareholders that was not adopted in contemplation of the acquisition or combination, to the extent permitted by stock exchange regulations, the shares available for grant under that preexisting plan (as adjusted to reflect the acquisition or combination) may be used for awards under the 2021 LTIP, and shall not reduce or be added back to the shares authorized for grant under the 2021 LTIP. However, awards using such shares that are available under any such preexisting plan (1) shall not be made after the date awards or grants could have been made under the terms of the preexisting plan, absent the acquisition or combination, and (2) shall only be made to individuals who were not employees or directors of PG&E Corporation Recommendsor its subsidiaries prior to the acquisition or combination.

In general, equity-based awards provided under the 2021 LTIP will have a Vote AGAINST This Proposal.minimum vesting period of one year from the date of grant, with no vesting prior to the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to certain exceptions. The Committee may grant awards with shorter vesting periods that cover up to five percent (5%) of the total number of shares of authorized under the 2021 LTIP, and certain exceptions apply to awards granted to a non-employee director to reflect the need for reelection to the Boards. Further, the Committee may provide in an award agreement or following the time of grant that the vesting of an award shall accelerate in the event of the participant’s death, disability, retirement, or a termination of service other than for cause.

 

The Board believes shareholders should vote against this proposal for the following reasons:

PG&E Corporation’s current proxy access bylaw provisions strike an appropriate balance between the benefitsmaximum aggregate value of equity and risks of proxy access, and are consistent with current proxy access market standards. The proposal seeks the adoption of provisions that would unnecessarily disrupt that balance and are inconsistent with current market practice. Further, given the composition of PG&E Corporation’s shareholder base, the proposed changes would not significantly increase the ability for our shareholderscash-based awards granted to take advantage of proxy access, and therefore are unnecessary.

Our shareholders already have meaningful and appropriate proxy access rights. On February 17, 2016, the PG&E Corporation Board adopted proxy access bylaw provisions that permit shareholders owning 3 percent or more of the Corporation’s outstanding common stock for at least three years to nominate the greater of two directors or 20 percent of the Board, and to include these nominees in the Corporation’s proxy materials. The number of shareholders who may aggregate their shares to meet the ownership threshold is limited to 20. Nominations are subject to the eligibility, procedural, and disclosure requirements set forth in the Corporation’s bylaws.

Our proxy access bylaw provisions’ specific requirements reflect a broad range of perspectives, including (1) current practices among other large companies and (2) the views of PG&E Corporation’s largest investors. The Board considered and weighed these perspectives when developing the Corporation’s proxy access bylaw provisions, and believes that these provisions strike an appropriate and meaningful balance between enhancing shareholder rights and adequately protecting the best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders through reasonable procedures for conducting election contests.

PG&E Corporation is committed to strong corporate governance practices, including accountability to our shareholders. In addition to proxy access, shareholders have other ways to provide input. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines reflect the Board’s commitment to open communications with shareholders, and provide opportunities for direct communication and dialogue with the Board and management.

Removing the shareholder aggregation limit from the Corporation’s proxy access bylaw provisions would not significantly increase benefits to shareholders because the current 20-shareholder limit is not prohibitive, given the Corporation’s current shareholder base. As of January 2019, PG&E Corporation’s 30 largest institutional shareholders held approximately 62 percent of the Corporation’s outstanding common stock. As a practical matter, some of these shareholders could utilize proxy access individually, and a number of the others could easily form a group among themselves to submit a proxy access nomination. More importantly, any shareholder seeking to form a nominating group, regardless of the size of its holdings, could achieve the 3 percent minimum required ownership by combining with one or more of the 30 largest investors. Of course, nominating groups are not limited to these large institutional investors, and a shareholder seeking to nominate anon-employee director candidate may approach any other shareholders to meet the 3 percent ownership threshold.

Therefore, the 20-shareholder aggregation limit does not unduly restrict any shareholder from forming a group to submit a proxy access nomination, and provides ample opportunities for all holders of less than 3 percent of the Corporation’s common stock to combine with other shareholders to reach the 3 percent ownership threshold.

In addition, and as discussed elsewhere in this Joint Proxy Statement and public statements, the Board of PG&E Corporation began conducting a Board refreshment process in January 2019 in order to add fresh perspectives to the Board to help address the serious challenges the business faces now andduring any calendar year shall not exceed $750,000 (“Annual Limit”), except that, in the future. Throughout this process,case of a non-employee director of PG&E Corporation engaged in constructive dialogue with shareholders and other stakeholders on potential new director nominees and on the compositionwho is serving as Chairman of the Board as a whole.

For these reasons, the PG&E Corporation Board unanimously recommends a voteAGAINST this proposal.Annual Limit shall be

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement9790
 
Back to Contents

increased by 200 percent. The value of an equity-based award shall be based on the award’s grant date fair value as determined under applicable accounting standards.

The Committee monitors the PG&E Corporation burn rate to help ensure that share usage does not exceed competitive levels.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

The Committee may grant awards in the form of restricted stock, restricted stock units (RSUs), or both.

Restricted Stock. Restricted stock includes shares of PG&E Corporation common stock that may be subject to vesting, transfer, and other restrictions, or performance goals. Restricted stock may be issued under the 2021 LTIP with or without requiring cash consideration.

Unless otherwise provided in the LTIP and applicable award agreement, the holders of restricted stock awarded under the 2021 LTIP shall have the same voting, and other rights as PG&E Corporation’s other shareholders.

Restricted Stock Units. RSUs are a bookkeeping entry representing a right to receive a number of shares or payment equal to the value of a number of shares of PG&E Corporation common stock, as awarded under the 2021 LTIP. RSUs may be subject to vesting, performance, or other conditions as may be established by the Committee.

Each vested restricted stock unit may be settled in the form of one share of PG&E Corporation common stock, cash equal to the value of such shares, or a combination of both. The actual number of stock units eligible for settlement may be larger or smaller than the number included in the original award, based on predetermined performance factors. The distribution may occur or commence when all vesting conditions applicable to the RSUs have been satisfied, or it may be deferred to a later date, if permitted by the Committee or set forth in the applicable award agreement.

The holders of RSUs will have no voting rights unless and until the RSUs are settled in shares of PG&E Corporation common stock.

Termination of Employment or Other Relationship with PG&E Corporation. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee specified in the applicable restricted stock agreement or RSU agreement, upon a participant’s termination of employment or other relationship with PG&E Corporation, all unvested restricted stock and RSUs are forfeited.

Performance Awards

The Committee may grant performance awards in the form of performance shares or performance units. Specific terms of performance awards (including the number of shares or units awarded, dividend equivalents (if any), and the performance award formula, goal, and period) will be set by the Committee consistent with the 2021 LTIP.

Performance Goals. The final value of a performance will be based on the extent to which the established performance goals are achieved within the corresponding performance period. Performance goals are targets relating to one or more measures of business, or financial performance. Performance measures are calculated with respect to PG&E Corporation, its subsidiaries, divisions, and/or business units, or may be based on performance relative to performance of other companies or upon comparison of any of the indicators of performance relative to performance of other companies.

These measures may be based on one or more of the following: (1) sales revenue, (2) gross margin, (3) operating margin, (4) operating income, (5) pretax profit, (6) earnings before interest, taxes, and depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)/ adjusted EBITDA, (7) net income, (8) expenses, (9) the market price of the stock, (10) earnings per share, (11) return on shareholder equity or assets, (12) return on capital, (13) return on net assets, (14) economic profit or economic value added (EVA), (15) market share, (16) customer satisfaction, (17) safety, (18) total shareholder return, (19) earnings, (20) cash flow, (21) revenue, (22) profits before interest and taxes, (23) profit/loss, (24) profit margin, (25) working capital, (26) price/earnings ratio, (27) debt or debttoequity, (28) accounts receivable, (29) writeoffs, (30) cash, (31) assets, (32) liquidity, (33) core earnings, (34) operational reliability, (35) environmental performance, (36) funds from operations, (37) adjusted revenues, (38) free cash flow, or (39) operational performance. The Committee shall determine the extent to which applicable performance goals have been attained and, if applicable, the resulting final value of the award.

Performance Shares. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, the initial value of a performance share is the fair market value of one share of PG&E Corporation common stock on the grant date. The Committee will also specify the form of payment for the settlement of performance shares: cash, stock, or a combination of both.

Performance Units. Each performance unit will have an initial value determined by the Committee.

Voting Rights. The holders of performance share awards will have voting rights only as to those awards that settle in stock and only after the underlying shares have been issued by PG&E Corporation.

 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   91
Back to Contents

Termination of Employment or Other Relationship with PG&E Corporation. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee or set forth in the performance share or performance unit agreement, the 2021 LTIP describes how a participant’s termination of employment or other relationship with PG&E Corporation affects that individual’s performance shares or performance units.

Stock Options

The Committee may grant ISOs, NQSOs, and related tandem SARs.

Stock Options. Stock options allow the participant to buy a certain number of shares of PG&E Corporation common stock at an exercise price equal to at least the fair market value on the date the option is granted (subject to certain limitations set forth in the 2021 LTIP). The participant may exercise an option only during specified time periods. Specific terms of the option will be set by the Committee.

Payment for Shares Upon Exercise of Stock Options. At the time a stock option is exercised, shares of PG&E Corporation common stock may be purchased using the following, to the extent provided in the option agreement and permitted by law:

Cash or certain cash equivalents,
Shares of PG&E Corporation common stock owned by the participant, with a fair market value equal to or greater than the option exercise price,
A “cashless exercise” procedure (whereby a broker sells the shares or holds them as collateral for a margin loan, and delivers the net stock option sale or loan proceeds to the participant), subject to limitations set forth by the Committee and PG&E Corporation,
A “net exercise” procedure (whereby the participant receives the number of shares with a value equivalent to the net proceeds from the participant’s exercised options), or
Any combination of the foregoing or any other method of payment that the Committee may allow.

An award agreement may provide that a stock option may be considered exercised, to the extent then vested, if, on the last day of the term of an option, the fair market value of one share of PG&E Corporation common stock exceeds the option price per share, with payment made by withholding shares otherwise issuable in connection with the exercise of the stock option. If a stock option is automatically exercised in this manner, PG&E Corporation will give the participant the number of shares for which the stock option was deemed exercised, less the number of shares required to be withheld for the payment of the total purchase price and required withholding taxes. Any fractional share shall be settled in cash.

Term of Stock Options and Tandem SARs. The maximum term of stock options and any related tandem SARs is 10 years (subject to certain limited extensions if, on the last day of the term, exercise is prohibited by law). Stock options are subject to earlier termination, as described below.

Termination of Employment or Other Relationship with PG&E Corporation. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, each stock option agreement will describe how a participant’s termination of employment or other relationship with PG&E Corporation affects the exercise of that individual’s stock options.

Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs)

The Committee may grant awards in the form of freestanding or related tandem SARs. SARs are a bookkeeping entry representing, for each share of PG&E Corporation common stock subject to the SAR or related stock option, the right to receive payment in combination of shares and cash equal to the amount by which the fair market value (on the date of surrender) of the shares subject to the SAR or the related stock option exceeds the exercise price.

Exercisability and Term. Specific terms of an SAR award (including the number awarded, exercise price, the date when all or any part of the SAR can be exercised, and the term) will be set by the Committee. A tandem SAR is subject to the same terms and conditions as the related stock option. A tandem SAR can be exercised only if the related option is surrendered, subject to limitations established by the Committee. No SAR will be exercisable more than 10 years after the date it was granted (subject to certain limited extensions if, on the last day of the term, exercise is prohibited by law).

Exercise of SARs. Upon exercise of an SAR, the participant will receive shares, cash, or a combination of shares and cash, as determined by the Committee. The total amount of cash and/or the fair market value of PG&E Corporation common stock received upon exercise of an SAR will be equal to the amount by which the fair market value (on the date of surrender) of the shares subject to the SAR or related option exceeds the exercise price.

An award agreement may provide that if, on the date that an SAR expires, the exercise price of the SAR is less than the fair market value of the shares underlying the SAR, but any portion of the SAR has not been exercised, then the unexercised portion of the SAR, to the extent then vested, will automatically be deemed to be exercised as of that date.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   92
Back to Contents

Termination of Employment or Other Relationship with PG&E Corporation. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, each SAR agreement will describe how a participant’s termination of employment or other relationship with PG&E Corporation affects that individual’s SARs.

Automatic Awards for Non-Employee Directors

Under the 2021 LTIP, upon election to the Board at each year’s annual meeting of shareholders, each director of PG&E Corporation who is not an employee of PG&E Corporation or a subsidiary will automatically receive an annual incentive award. The annual award will be granted on the later of (1) the date on which the annual director election results are certified or (2) the date the 2021 LTIP becomes effective and grants can be made consistent with legal requirements. Such awards may be delayed until the first business day of the next open trading window period for the common stock of PG&E Corporation following certification of director election results.

Currently, non-employee directors are awarded annual RSUs with a grant date value of $140,000, with an additional $80,000 in value provided to the Chair of the PG&E Corporation Board. The maximum aggregate value of equity and cash-based awards granted to any non-employee director of PG&E Corporation during any calendar year shall not exceed $750,000, except that, in the case of a non-employee director who is serving as Chairman of the Board the annual limit shall be increased by 200 percent.

These RSUs generally vest after one year, at the earlier of the grant date anniversary or the end of the director’s elected term and may vest earlier upon the occurrence of certain events provided for in the 2021 LTIP. Directors may elect to defer receipt of such awards in accordance with the rules set forth in the 2021 LTIP.

Notwithstanding the above, the Board retains discretion to establish different terms and conditions pertaining to automatic non-employee director awards, or to amend the program, provided that the $750,000 limit described above may only be amended with shareholder approval.

Deferred Compensation Programs

The Committee may establish one or more deferred compensation programs under the 2021 LTIP to permit certain participants to irrevocably elect prior to a date specified by the Committee (i) to reduce cash compensation and to be automatically granted stock units subject to the terms of a deferred compensation award or (ii) to be automatically granted stock units subject to the terms of a deferred compensation award in lieu of cash or shares of PG&E Corporation common stock otherwise issuable to the participant upon the settlement of an award.

Specific terms of any stock units will be set by the Committee, consistent with terms of the 2021 LTIP.

Voting Rights. Participants will have no voting rights with respect to shares of PG&E Corporation common stock represented by stock units until the underlying shares are issued.

Settlement of Awards. A participant who elects to receive stock units must specify a settlement date for those units at the time of such election. Except as otherwise set forth in the award agreement, on the earlier of the settlement date or separation from service, the participant will receive a number of whole shares of PG&E Corporation common stock equal to the number of whole stock units subject to the deferred compensation awards. The participant will not be required to pay any additional amounts (other than applicable tax withholding) to acquire those shares. Any fractional stock units will be paid in cash.

Other Stock-Based Awards

The Committee also may grant other stockbased awards that are valued based on PG&E Corporation stock or dividends on that stock.

Dividend Equivalent Rights and Distributions

Dividends and dividend equivalents may be issued in connection with awards, the specific terms of which will be determined by the Committee, consistent with the terms of the 2021 LTIP. Dividend equivalents entitle the holder to be credited with an amount equal to all cash dividends paid on the shares underlying awards while the awards are outstanding. However, cash dividends, stock and any other property (other than cash) distributed as a dividend, a dividend equivalent or otherwise with respect to any award shall either not be payable or credited or be accumulated, subject, in either case, to restrictions and risk of forfeiture to the same extent as the underlying award with respect to which such cash, stock or other property has been distributed and paid after such restrictions and risk of forfeiture lapse in accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreement.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   93
Back to Contents

Adjustments

The number of shares subject to any award, and the award limits set forth in the 2021 LTIP, generally are subject to adjustment for certain events affecting the stock of PG&E Corporation (such as stock splits, stock dividends, or similar events) and the adjusted awards generally will continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions.

No Repricing or Buyouts

The 2021 LTIP does not allow outstanding stock options or SARs to be repriced or to be bought by PG&E Corporation for cash or otherwise, unless the shareholders approve the repricing or buyout. Subject to certain exceptions, shareholder approval generally would be required for any of the following: (a) the cancellation of outstanding stock options or SARs and the grant in substitution therefore of new stock options or SARs having a lower exercise price, another award, cash or a combination thereof (other than in connection with a change in control), (b) the amendment of outstanding stock options or SARs to reduce the exercise price thereof, (c) the purchase of outstanding unexercised stock options or SARs by PG&E Corporation whether by cash payment or otherwise if the exercise price of such Option or SAR is higher than the fair market value of an underlying shares of PG&E Corporation common stock as of the date of purchase, or (d) any other action with respect to a stock option or SAR that would be treated as a repricing under the rules and regulations of the principal U.S. national securities exchanges on which PG&E Corporation common stock is listed.

Other Terms of Awards

Transferability of Incentive Awards. Awards and shares of PG&E Corporation common stock that have not been issued or as to which any applicable restriction, performance or deferral period has not lapsed, may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. Such awards may be exercised during the life of the participant only by the participant or the participant’s guardian or legal representative. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may permit an award to be assigned or transferred to a family member or other permitted transferee to the extent covered under a Form S-8 Registration Statement under the Securities Act.

Deferral of Payments. The Committee may allow the deferral of any cash payments that may become due under the 2021 LTIP.

Effect of Change in Control. In the event of a change in control, the acquiror may elect to assume, continue, or substitute awards under the 2021 LTIP with awards based on stock of the acquiror. If the successor corporation does assume or continue any outstanding 2021 LTIP awards, they may be subject to accelerated vesting, exercisability, or lapse of restrictions, as the Committee or Board may determine, if the participant is terminated in connection with the change in control. In the event of a Change in Control in which Awards are not assumed or continued, a participant’s then-outstanding Awards that are not vested shall immediately vest, and all performance conditions associated with Performance Awards shall be deemed satisfied as if target performance was achieved, except as set forth in an applicable award agreement.

Tax-Related Issues

Tax Withholding. To the extent a participant incurs any tax liability in connection with the exercise, vesting, or receipt of an incentive award, the participant’s withholding obligation may be satisfied through payroll deductions or a direct cash payment to PG&E Corporation. In addition, the Committee may allow the participant to satisfy the withholding obligation by allowing PG&E Corporation to withhold a portion of the shares to be issued to the participant, up to the minimum statutory withholding rates.

Federal Income Tax Consequences. The following is a brief description of the federal income tax consequences under current tax laws of restricted stock, RSUs, performance awards, stock options, and tandem SARs granted under the 2021 LTIP. The summary expressly does not discuss the income tax laws of any state, municipality, or non-U.S. taxing jurisdiction, or the gift, estate, excise, or other tax laws other than federal income tax law. In addition, this summary does not discuss the rules applicable to deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Code.

Restricted Stock. Upon the grant of restricted stock subject to a vesting schedule, the participant will be deemed to receive taxable ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time they vest. Upon the sale or disposition of the shares, the participant will realize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the applicable vesting date and the sale or disposition price.

Section 83(b) of the Code permits a participant to elect, within 30 days after the grant of any shares of restricted stock subject to a vesting schedule, to be taxed at ordinary income rates on the fair market value of all the unvested shares received, based on the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. If the participant makes a Section 83(b) election, any later appreciation in the value of the shares will be taxable as capital gain instead of ordinary income when they are sold or transferred.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   94
Back to Contents

At the time the participant recognizes ordinary income with respect to a grant of restricted stock, PG&E Corporation will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the participant.

Restricted Stock Units. There will be no federal income tax consequences to either the participant or PG&E Corporation upon the grant of RSUs. Upon the payment of RSUs, the amount received will be taxable to the participant as ordinary income, and PG&E Corporation will be entitled to a corresponding federal income tax deduction.

Performance Awards. Performance awards are generally subject to federal income tax at the time they are settled. PG&E Corporation is generally entitled to a corresponding federal income tax deduction at that time.

Non-Qualified Stock Options. There will be no federal income tax consequences to either the participant or PG&E Corporation upon the grant of an NQSO. Upon the exercise of an NQSO, the participant generally will have taxable ordinary income equal to the difference between the current market value of the shares and the option exercise price, and PG&E Corporation will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction in that amount.

Incentive Stock Options. There will be no federal income tax consequences to either the participant or PG&E Corporation upon the grant or exercise of an ISO. However, unless the holding period requirements discussed below are violated, upon exercise of an ISO, a participant will be deemed to have a tax preference item (equal to the difference between the current market value of the shares on the date of exercise and the option exercise price) that may result in alternative minimum tax liability.

If a participant exercises an ISO and does not dispose of the shares within two years from the date of grant or within one year from the date the shares are transferred to the participant, any gain realized upon disposition will be taxable to the employee as a long-term capital gain, and PG&E Corporation will not be entitled to any deduction.

If a participant violates the holding period requirements, the participant will realize ordinary income in the year of disposition, and PG&E Corporation will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, in an amount equal to the excess of (1) the lesser of (a) the amount realized on the sale or exchange or (b) the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise, over (2) the option exercise price.

An ISO that is exercised more than three months after the participant terminates employment with PG&E Corporation generally will be treated as an NQSO for federal income tax purposes, unless the termination occurred due to death or disability.

Tandem Stock Appreciation Rights. There will be no federal income tax consequences to either the participant or PG&E Corporation upon the grant of a tandem SAR or during the period that the unexercised right remains outstanding. Upon the exercise of a tandem SAR, the amount received will be taxable to the participant as ordinary income, and PG&E Corporation will be entitled to a corresponding federal income tax deduction.

Deferred Compensation Awards. Deferred compensation awards are generally not subject to income tax until they are payable to the participant. However, deferred compensation awards are subject to employment tax at the time of vesting. PG&E Corporation is generally entitled to a corresponding federal income tax deduction at the time that the participant is subject to income tax.

Amendment and Termination of the 2021 LTIP

The PG&E Corporation Board of Directors or the Committee may at any time suspend, terminate, modify, or amend the 2014 LTIP in any respect, subject to shareholder approval as set forth in the 2021 LTIP or as required by applicable laws or regulations.

The Committee also may amend or modify the terms and conditions of any incentive award, or may cancel an award.

No suspension, termination, modification, or amendment of the 2021 LTIP, and no amendment, modification, or cancellation of any award, may adversely affect a participant’s rights under the 2021 LTIP or such award without the participant’s consent, unless necessary to comply with applicable law.

Funding

The costs of the 2021 LTIP will be borne by PG&E Corporation.

Benefits Under the 2021 LTIP

All awards to our executive officers, employees, or consultants are made at the companies’ discretion, and the benefits and amounts that will be received or allocated under the PG&E Corporation 2021 LTIP are not determinable at this time. If the PG&E Corporation 2021 LTIP had been in effect in 2020, then the following amounts would have been allocated to non-employee directors:

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   95
Back to Contents

Plan Benefits

Person or Group of PersonsNumber of
Units/Shares
All directors who are not executive officers as a group202,659 

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information(1)

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2020, concerning shares of PG&E Corporation common stock authorized for issuance under PG&E Corporation’s existing equity compensation plans.

  (a)  (b)  (c) 
Plan Category Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of Outstanding
Options, Warrants and
Rights
  Weighted Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected in
Column (a))
 
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders  20,902,525(2)  $40.07(3)   29,174,205(4) 
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders         
Total equity compensation plans  20,902,525(2)  $40.07(3)   29,174,205(4) 

(1)Subject to Compensation Committee certification
(2)Includes 160 phantom stock units, 904,067 restricted stock units and 17,724,603 performance shares. The weighted average exercise price reported in column (b) does not take these awards into account. For performance shares, amounts reflected in this table assume payout in shares at 200 percent of target or, for performance shares granted in 2018, reflects the estimated payout percentage of zero percent for performance shares using a total shareholder return metric, 200 percent for performance shares using a safety metric, and zero percent for performance shares using a financial metric. The actual number of shares issued can range from zero percent to 200 percent of target depending on achievement of performance objectives. For performance-based stock options, amounts reflected in this table reflect an actual payout of 102 percent. Restricted stock units and performance shares are generally settled in net shares. Upon vesting, shares with a value equal to required tax withholding will be withheld and, in lieu of issuing the shares, taxes will be paid on behalf of employees. Shares not issued due to share withholding or performance achievement below maximum will be available again for issuance.
(3)This is the weighted average exercise price for the 2,273,695 options outstanding as of December 31, 2020.
(4)Represents the total number of shares available for issuance under all PG&E Corporation equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2020. Stock-based awards granted under these plans include restricted stock units, performance shares, stock options, and phantom stock units. The 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan (2014 LTIP), which became effective on May 12, 2014, authorizes up to 17 million shares to be issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2014 LTIP. In addition, 5.5 million shares related to awards outstanding under the 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan at December 31, 2013, or awards granted under the 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan from January 1, 2014, through May 11, 2014, were cancelled, forfeited or expired and became available for issuance under the 2014 LTIP. A further 30 million shares were authorized for issuance under the 2014 LTIP on July 1, 2020, as part of PG&E Corporation’s Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.

The Board of Directors of PG&E Corporation Unanimously Recommends a Vote FOR this Proposal.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   96
Back to Contents

Share Ownership InformationOur Shareholders

 

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERSSHARE OWNERSHIP INFORMATION 

Principal Shareholders

 

The following table presents certain information regarding shareholders that PG&E Corporation and the Utility know are beneficial owners of more than 5 percent of any class of voting securities of the Corporation or the Utility as of April 24, 2019March 8, 2021 (except as noted below).

 

Class of StockName and Address of
Beneficial Owner
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
  Percent
of Class
 Name and Address of
Beneficial Owner
 Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
 Percent
of Class
Pacific Gas and Electric Company stock(1)PG&E Corporation(2)
77 Beale Street
P.O. Box 770000
San Francisco, CA 94177
264,374,809 96.24% PG&E Corporation(2)
77 Beale Street
P.O. Box 770000
San Francisco, CA 94177
 264,374,809 96.24%
PG&E Corporation common stock PG&E Fire Victim Trust(3)
Two Embarcadero Center,
Suite 1500
San Francisco CA, 94111
 477,743,590 24%
PG&E Corporation common stock FMR LLC
245 Summer Street,
Boston, MA 02210
 151,746,986(4) 7.6%
PG&E Corporation common stock The Vanguard Group Inc.
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
 134,894,201(5)6.8%
Pacific Gas and Electric Company first preferred stock

Stonehill Capital(3)
Management LLC, et al.

885 Third Avenue, 30th Fl

New York, NY, 10022

672,126(3)  6.5% Stonehill Capital
Management LLC, et al.
885 Third Avenue, 30th Fl
New York, NY, 10022
 998,472(6)9.7%
PG&E Corporation common stockThe Vanguard Group Inc.(4)
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
47,523,913(4)  9.2%

 

(1)The Utility’s common stock and preferred stock vote together as a single class. Each share is entitled to one vote.
(2)As of April 24,March 8, 2019, the Corporation held 100%100 percent of the issued and outstanding shares of Utility common stock, and no Utility preferred shares.
(3)In connection with the Plan of Reorganization, in July and August 2020, the Utility distributed 477,743,590 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock to the PG&E Fire Victim Trust (the “Trust”). As of March 31, 2021, The Trust has advised PG&E Corporation that it continued to hold beneficial ownership of 477,743,590 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock. In a Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on July 10, 2020 by the Trust and the honorable John K. Trotter (ret) as Trustee for the Trust, the Trust and Trustee disclosed that the Trustee may be deemed to have shared dispositive power or shared voting power over shares held by the Trust. Subject to limited exceptions, the Trust has entered into an agreement with PG&E Corporation pursuant to which all shares of PG&E Corporation common stock held by the Trust in excess of 9.9% of the outstanding shares of PG&E Corporation common stock are subject to “mirror voting”, whereby such shares of common stock must be voted in the same proportion as the votes of all other shareholders of PG&E Corporation on all matters except for those directly related to the natural environment or safety. See “Related Party Transactions” below for further information about certain agreements between PG&E Corporation, the Utility, and the Trust.
(4)The information relates to beneficial ownership as of January 28, 2019,December 31, 2020, as reported in aan amended Schedule 13G13G/A filed with SEC on February 8, 2021, by FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson (FMR LLC’s Director, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer). For these purposes, FMR LLC and Ms. Johnson report sole voting power with respect to 19,813,452 shares, and sole dispositive power with respect to 151,746,986 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock.
(5)The information relates to beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2021, as reported in an amended Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 7, 201910, 2021, by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”). For these purposes, Vanguard has shared voting power with respect to 2,035,490 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 131,856,001 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 3,038,200 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock.
(6)The information relates to beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2020, as reported in an amended Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 12, 2021 by Stonehill Capital Management LLC (“Stonehill”) and the following entities and individuals, all of whom share voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares: Stonehill Institutional Partners, L.P., John Motulsky.Motulsky, Christopher Wilson, Jonathan Sacks, Peter Sisitsky, Michael Thoyer, Michael Stern, and Samir Arora.
(4)The information relates to beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2018, as reported in an amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC Stonehill Institutional Partners, L.P. on February 11, 2019 by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”). For these purposes, Vanguardits own has sole voting power with respect to 695,977 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock, shared voting power with respect to 251,229 shares, soleand dispositive power with respect to 46,685,227 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 838,686546,223 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock held by Vanguard.Utility preferred shares (5.3 percent) only.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement9897
 
Back to Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENTSecurity Ownership of Management

 

The following table sets forth the number of shares of PG&E Corporation common stock beneficially owned (as defined in the rules of the SEC) as of April 15, 2019March 8, 2021, by the directors, the nominees for director, the NEOs, and all directors and executive officers of PG&E Corporation and the Utility as a group. As of April 15, 2019,March 8, 2021, no listed individual owned shares of any class of Utility securities. The table also sets forth common stock equivalents credited to the accounts of directors and executive officers under the Corporation’s deferred compensation and equity plans. Directors and Section 16 Officers of the Corporation and the Utility may not engage in any hedging or monetization transactions that limit or eliminate the officer’s ability to profit from an increase in the value of company stock, and generally are prohibited from pledging company stock as collateral for a loan.

 

NameBeneficial
Stock
Ownership(1)(2)
 Percent of
Class(3)
Common
Stock
Equivalents(4)
 Total 
Richard R. Barrera(5)0 *0 0 
Jeffrey L. Bleich(5)0 *0 0 
Nora Mead Brownell(5)0 *0 0 
Frederick W. Buckman(5)0 *0 0 
Cheryl F. Campbell(5)0 *0 0 
Fred J. Fowler(5)14,043 *0 14,043 
William D. Johnson(5)0 *0 0 
Michael J. Leffell(5)(8)80,360 *0 80,360 
Kenneth Liang(5)(10)12,000 *0 12,000 
Dominique Mielle(5)0 *0 0 
Meridee A. Moore(5)(9)140,000 *0 140,000 
Eric D. Mullins(5)2,099 *6,353 8,452 
Kristine M. Schmidt(5)0 *0 0 
Alejandro D. Wolff(5)0 *0 0 
Geisha J. Williams(6)(7)159,632 *4,282 163,914 
Jesus Soto Jr.(6)36,219 *0 36,219 
Steven E. Malnight(6)(7)23,367 *0 23,367 
Patrick M. Hogan(6)(7)26,247 *0 26,247 
Jason P. Wells(6)56,882 *0 56,882 
David S. Thomason(6)8,549 *0 8,549 
John R. Simon(6)56,674 *160 56,834 
Nickolas Stavropoulos(6)(7)68,229 *2,518 70,747 
All PG&E Corporation directors and executive officers as a group (24 persons)743,352 *13,313 756,665 
All Utility directors and executive officers as a group (28 persons)809,208 *13,313 822,521 
Name Beneficial
Stock
Ownership(1)(2)
 Percent of
Class(3)
 Common
Stock
Equivalents(4)
 Total
Rajat Bahri(5) 0 * 0 0
Cheryl F. Campbell(5) 15,504 * 0 15,504
Kerry Cooper(5) 0 * 0 0
Jessica Denecour(5) 0 * 0 0
Admiral Mark Ferguson III(5) 0 * 0 0
Robert Flexon(5) 0 * 0 0
W. Craig Fugate(5) 0 * 0 0
Arno Harris(5) 0 * 0 0
Michael Niggli(5)(11) 500 * 0 500
Patricia K. Poppe(5)(6) 609 * 0 609
Dean Seavers(5) 0 * 0 0
William L. Smith(5)(7) 186,231 * 0 186,231
Oluwadara Treseder(5) 0 * 0 0
Benjamin Wilson(5) 0 * 0 0
John M. Woolard(5) 11,628 * 0 11,628
Adam L. Wright(5)(8) 0 * 0 0
Michael A. Lewis(9) 4,209 * 9 4,209
Christopher A. Foster(9) 14,611 * 0 14,611
David S. Thomason(9) 15,306 * 0 15,306
John R. Simon(9) 104,747 * 160 104,907
James M. Welsch(9) 21,254 * 0 21,254
William D. Johnson(9)(10) 1,033,556 * 0 1,033,556  
Andrew M. Vesey(9)(10) 27,313 * 0 27,313
Jason P. Wells(9)(10) 39,859 * 0 39,859
Janet C. Loduca(9)(10) 18,901 * 0 18,901
All PG&E Corporation directors and executive officers as a group        
(18 persons) 1,457,668 * 160 1,457,828
All Utility directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons) 289,827 * 0 289,827

 

*Less than 1 percent
(1)This column includes any shares held in the name of the spouse, minor children, or other relatives sharing the home of the listed individuals and, in the case of current and former executive officers, includes shares of PG&E Corporation common stock held in the defined contribution retirement plan maintained by PG&E Corporation. Except as otherwise indicated below, theThe listed individuals have sole voting and investment power over the shares shown in this column. Voting power includes the power to direct the voting of the shares held, and investment power includes the power to direct the disposition of the shares held.
 This column also includes the following shares of PG&E Corporation common stock in which the listed individuals share voting and investment power: Ms. Williams 88,354 shares, Mr. Wells 38,32639,759 shares and Mr. Simon 38,404 shares, Mr. Stavropoulos 48,67955,106 shares, all PG&E Corporation directors and executive officers as a group 213,763 shares, and all Utility directors and executive officers as a group 213,76394,865 shares. No reported shares are pledged.
(2)This column includes the following shares of PG&E Corporation common stock that the individuals have the right to acquire within 60 days of April 15, 2019March 8, 2021, through the exercise of vested stock options or the settlement of vested phantom stock awards: Ms. Williams 52,134Mr. Lewis 2,696 shares, Mr. Soto 5,865 shares, Mr. Malnight 5,865 shares, Mr. Hogan 5,213 shares, Mr. Wells 16,292Foster 3,911 shares, Mr. Thomason 2,1186,354 shares, Mr. Simon 14,66343,989 shares, Mr. Stavropoulos 19,550Welsch 9,776 shares, Mr. Johnson 975,621 shares, Ms. Loduca 7,332 shares, all PG&E Corporation directors and executive officers as a group 136,0361,033,549 shares, and all Utility directors and executive officers as a group 151,35126,158 shares. These individuals have neither voting power nor investment power with respect to these shares unless and until they are purchased through the exercise of the options or, with respect to the phantom stock awards, settled in shares of PG&E Corporation common stock, under the terms of the 2006 LTIP and the 2014 LTIP.
(3)The percent of class calculation is based on the number of shares of PG&E Corporation common stock outstanding as of April 15, 2019,March 8, 2021, which was 529,210,278 shares outstanding.1,985,105,703.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement9998
 
Back to Contents
(4)This column reflects the number of stock units that were purchased by listed individuals through salary and other compensation deferrals or that were awarded under equity compensation plans. The value of each stock unit is equal to the value of a share of PG&E Corporation common stock and fluctuates daily based on the market price of PG&E Corporation common stock. The listed individuals who own these stock units share the same market risk as PG&E Corporation shareholders, although they do not have voting rights with respect to these stock units.
(5)Mr. Barrera, Mr. Bleich, Ms. Brownell, Mr. Buckman, Ms.Messrs. Bahri, Ferguson, Flexon, Fugate, Harris, Niggli, Seavers, Smith, Wilson and Woolard, and Mses. Campbell, Mr. Fowler, Mr. Leffell, Mr. Liang, Ms. Mielle, Ms. Moore, Mr. Mullins, Ms. SchmidtCooper, Denecour, Poppe, and Mr. WolffTreseder, are directors and director nominees of both PG&E Corporation and the Utility. Mr. JohnsonWright is a director and director nominee of the UtilityUtility.
(6)Ms. Poppe currently serves as CEO of PG&E Corporation, effective January 4, 2021.
(7)Mr. Smith was Interim CEO and a director nomineePresident of PG&E Corporation from June 30, 2020, through January 3, 2021. He is included in the Summary Compensation Table as an NEO of PG&E Corporation.
(6)(8)Mr. Wright currently serves as Executive Vice President, Operations and Chief Operations Officer of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, effective February 1, 2021.
(9)Messrs. Smith, Foster, Simon, Johnson, and Wells are included in the Summary Compensation Table as NEOs of PG&E Corporation. Messrs. Lewis and Vesey and Ms. Williams, Mr. Soto, Mr. Malnight, Mr. Wells, Mr. Simon, and Mr. StavropoulosLoduca are included in the Summary Compensation Table as NEOs of both PG&E Corporation and the Utility. Mr. HoganMessrs. Thomason and Mr. ThomasonWelsch are included in the Summary Compensation Table as NEOs of the Utility only.
(7)(10)Messrs. Johnson, Vesey, and Wells and Ms. Williams, Mr. Malnight, Mr. Hogan, and Mr. StavropoulosLoduca were NEOs during 20182020 but are no longer employed with PG&E Corporation or the Utility.
(8)(11)Mr. LeffellNiggli beneficially owns (i) 1,375500 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock directly in his name or in his self-directed individual retirement account, (ii) 73,880 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock through his interest in Portage Capital, LLC, a family investment partnership, (iii) 4,150 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock held by an entity owned by members of Mr. Leffell’s immediate family and (iv) 955 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock held in accounts owned by members of Mr. Leffell’s immediate family. Mr. Leffell has sole voting and investment power over all such shares.
(9)Ms. Moore beneficially owns 140,000 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock through her interest in Watershed Asset Management, LLC, an asset management firm. Ms. Moore has sole voting and investment power over all such shares.
(10)12,000 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock are held by the Liang Family Trust, for which Kenneth and Laura Liang are trustees. In his capacity as a trustee together with Laura Liang, Mr. Liang has sole voting and investment power over all such shares.account.

 

SECTIONSection 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEBeneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

In accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC regulations, PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s directors and certain officers, as well as persons who own greater than 10 percent of the Corporation’s or the Utility’s equity securities, must file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of such equity securities with the SEC and the principal national securities exchange on which those securities are registered, and must furnish the Corporation or the Utility with copies of all such reports that they file.

 

Based solely on review of copies of such reports received or written representations from certain reporting persons, PG&E Corporation and the Utility believe that during 2018,2020, all filing requirements applicable to their respective directors, officers, and 10 percent shareholders were satisfied. No information is reported for individuals during periods in which they were not directors, officers, or 10 percent shareholders of the applicable company.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement10099
 
Back to Contents

Related Party TransactionsRELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

Approval PoliciesPolicy

 

The Boards of PG&E Corporation and the Utility each adopted a written policy (the companies’ Related Party Transaction Policy (“Policy”)) which generally requires Audit Committee approval or ratification of transactions that would require disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Item 404(a)”), except that the Policy has a lower dollar threshold than Item 404(a).

 

Under the Policy, at the first meeting of each year, each company’s Audit Committee reviews, approves, and/or ratifies related party transactions (other than the types of transactions that are excluded from disclosure under Item 404(a), as described below) with values exceeding $10,000 in which either company participates and in which any “Related Party” has a material direct or indirect interest. For these purposes, “Related Party” generally includes (1) any director, nominee for director, or executive officer, (2) holders of greater than 5 percent of that company’s voting securities, and (3) those parties’ immediate family members.

 

After the annual review and approval of related party transactions, if either company wishes to enter into a new related party transaction, then that transaction must be either pre-approved or ratified by the applicable Audit Committee. If a transaction is not ratified in accordance with the Policy, management will make all reasonable efforts to cancel or annul that transaction.

 

Where it is not practical or desirable to wait until the next Audit Committee meeting to obtain approval or ratification, the Chair of the applicable Audit Committee may elect to approve a particular related party transaction. If the Chair of the applicable Audit Committee has an interest in the proposed related party transaction, then that transaction may be reviewed and approved by another independent and disinterested member of the applicable Audit Committee. In either case, the individual approving the transaction must report such approval to the full Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting.

 

When reviewing any related party transaction, the Audit Committees consider whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s-length dealings with an unrelated third party. The Policy also requires that each Audit Committee disclose to the respective Board any material related party transactions.

 

As provided in Item 404(a), the following types of transactions are excluded:

 

Transactions where the rates or charges are determined by competitive bids,
Transactions for the rendering of services as a common or contract carrier, or public utility, at rates or charges fixed in conformity with law or governmental authority,
Transactions for services as a bank depository of funds, transfer agent, registrar, trustee under a trust indenture, or similar services,
Benefits received on a pro rata basis by holders of PG&E Corporation or Utility securities,
Transactions where the individual’s interest arises solely (1) from such person’s position as a director of another corporation or organization whichthat is a party to the transaction, (2) from the direct or indirect ownership of such person and a specific group (consisting of directors, nominees for director, and executive officers of the corporation, or any member of their immediate families), in the aggregate, of less than a 10 percent equity interest in another person (other than a partnership) that is a party to the transaction, or (3) from both such position and ownership,
Transactions where the individual’s interest arises solely from the holding of an equity interest (including a limited partnership interest, but excluding a general partnership interest) or a creditor interest in another person that is party to the transaction with PG&E Corporation, the Utility, or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates, and the transaction is not material to such other person,
Transactions where the individual’s interest arises only from such person’s position as a limited partner in a partnership engaged in a transaction with PG&E Corporation or the Utility, in which the individual’s interest (when aggregated with any other Related Parties) is less than 10 percent and the individual does not serve as a general partner of, nor hold another position in, the partnership,
An employment relationship or transaction involving an executive officer of the respective company (and any related compensation resulting solely from that relationship or transaction), if the compensation is reported pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 402,

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement 101100
 
Back to Contents
An employment relationship or transaction involving an executive officer of the respective company (and any related compensation resulting solely from that relationship or transaction), if the compensation would have been reported pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 402 as compensation earned for services if that individual were an executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table, and such compensation had been approved or recommended to the Board by the PG&E Corporation Compensation Committee (and the executive officer is not an immediate family member of another Related Party), or
Compensation provided to a director, provided that such compensation is reported pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 407.

 

Since January 1, 2018,2020, all related party transactions have been approved or ratified by the applicable Audit Committee in accordance with this Policy.Policy, with the exception of certain agreements entered into with the PG&E Fire Victim Trust, and which were approved by the Bankruptcy Court and the full PG&E Corporation Board in connection with the Companies’ emergence from Chapter 11.

 

Related Person TransactionsRELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

 

Since January 1, 2018, one provider2020, an affiliate of asset managementFidelity Management and Research Company, LLC (Fidelity) has provided recordkeeper and trustee services in excess of $120,000 has beenfor benefit plans sponsored by PG&E Corporation. During 2020, Fidelity became beneficial owner of at least 5 percent of PG&E Corporation common stock: The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”). Vanguard (including its affiliates), provided asset management services to grantor trusts associated with certain of the companies’ non-qualified and deferred income benefit plans, and to The PG&E Corporation Foundation.stock. In exchange for these services, VanguardFidelity affiliates earned approximately $143,000$1,100,000 in fees during 2018.2020. The services were (1) approved by the PG&E Corporation Audit Committee, and (2) subject to terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s-length dealings with an unrelated third party. Such services were initiated prior to Fidelity becoming a five percent owner of PG&E Corporation common stock, and PG&E Corporation expects that VanguardFidelity affiliates will continue to provide similar services and products in the future, at similar levels, in the normal course of business operations.

 

Kathy Thomason is employed by the Utility as a Business FinanceStrategic Analyst, Expert,Principal, and she is the spouse of David S. Thomason, who is Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller of the Utility. Since January 1, 2018,2020, Ms. Thomason received compensation and related payments and benefits from the Utility with aan annual value of approximately $120,000.$170,000. Any payments to Ms. Thomason for services rendered during 20192021 are expected to be similar in nature and value to payments provided during 2018,2020, consistent with the Utility’s policies and practices that apply to employee compensation generally.

 

In connection with the Plan of Reorganization, in July and August 2020, the Utility distributed 477,743,590 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock to the Trust and entered into the following agreements with the Trust:

2019Assignment Agreement: On July 1, 2020, the Utility and the Trust entered into an assignment agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”). Pursuant to the Assignment Agreement, the Utility funded the Trust with aggregate consideration consisting of $6.75 billion in cash (including $1.35 billion on a deferred basis in accordance with the Tax Benefits Payment Agreement described below) and 476,995,175 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock (the “Initial Plan Shares”). On August 3, 2020, pursuant to an antidilution provision in the Assignment Agreement, the Utility distributed an additional 748,415 shares of PG&E Corporation common stock to the Trust (together with the Initial Plan Shares, the “Plan Shares”).
Registration Rights Agreement: In addition to various obligations relating to registration of PG&E Corporation, the common stock (summarized in PG&E Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2020), PG&E Corporation is required to pay the fees and expenses for one counsel for the Trust (subject to a cap of $100,000 for the initial registration and for each assisted underwritten offering) in connection with the initial registration and each assisted underwritten offering, but excluding any underwriting discounts or commissions or fees and expenses of the Trust.
Tax Benefits Payment Agreement: The Utility agreed to pay to the Trust in cash an aggregate amount of $1.35 billion, comprising (i) at least $650 million of tax benefits for fiscal year 2020 to be paid on or before January 15, 2021 (the “First Payment Date”), and (ii) of the remainder of the $1.35 billion of tax benefits for fiscal year 2021 to be paid on or before January 15, 2022.

As previously disclosed, in 2020, prior to the effective date of the Plan of Reorganization, PG&E Corporation entered into certain backstop commitment letters and related arrangements with Knighthead Capital Management LLC and Abrams Capital Management, LP, and the Utility entered into certain backstop commitment letters and related arrangements with Stonehill Capital Partners LLC. See “Note 2 – Bankruptcy Filing – Equity Financing - Equity Backstop Commitments and Forward Stock Purchase Agreements” to PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, included in PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s 10-K for a description of these arrangements.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement 102101
 
Back to Contents

 

Legal Proceedings

 

Wildfire-Related Derivative Litigation

 

Two purported derivative lawsuits alleging claims for breach of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment were filed in the San Francisco County Superior Court on November 16, 2017, and November 20, 2017, respectively, naming as defendants certain current and certain former members of the Board of Directors and certain current and former officers of PG&E Corporation and the Utility. PG&E Corporation and the Utility are named as nominal defendants. These lawsuits were consolidated by the court on February 14, 2018, and are denominated In Re California North Bay Fire Derivative Litigation (now re-captioned Trotter v. Williams et al.). On April 13, 2018, the plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint. After the parties reached an agreement regarding a stay of the derivative proceeding pending resolution of certain relatedthe tort actions described above and any regulatory proceeding relating to the 2017 Northern California wildfires, on April 24, 2018, the court entered a stipulation and order to stay. The stay iswas subject to certain conditions regarding the plaintiffs’ access to discovery in other actions. On January 28, 2019, the plaintiffs filed a request to lift the stay for the purposes of amending their complaint to add allegations regarding the 2018 Camp fire. Prior to resolution of the plaintiffs’ request to lift the stay, this matter was automatically stayed by PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, as discussed below. On November 12, 2020, the Trustee for the Fire Victim Trust filed a motion to intervene to substitute as the plaintiff in the matter, to which the parties later stipulated. On March 8, 2021, the court granted the parties’ stipulation to substitute the Trustee as the plaintiff. Separately, on February 24, 2021, the Trustee filed an amended complaint in one of the pending state court derivative actions—the Trotter v. Chew action discussed belowasserting two claims for breach of fiduciary duty against certain of PG&E’s directors and officers. Neither PG&E Corporation nor the Utility is a party to the action. A case management conference was held on March 18, 2021. A hearing on the defendants’ demurrer and a further case management conference is currently scheduled for July 15, 2021. Trial is currently set for June 27, 2022.

 

On August 3, 2018, a third purported derivative lawsuit, entitled Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System v. Chew, et al. (now captioned Trotter v. PG&E Corp., et al.), was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, naming as defendants certain current and former members of the Board of Directors and certain current and former officers of PG&E Corporation and the Utility. PG&E Corporation is named as a nominal defendant. The lawsuit alleges claims for breach of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment as well as a claim under Section 14(a) of the federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934 alleging that PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s 2017 proxy statement contained misrepresentations regarding the companies’ risk management and safety programs. On October 15, 2018, PG&E Corporation filed a motion to stay the litigation. Prior to the scheduled hearing on this motion, this matter was automatically stayed by PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s commencement of bankruptcy proceedings,the Chapter 11 Cases, as discussed below. On December 14, 2020, the court entered a stipulation and order to substitute the Trustee for the Fire Victim Trust as the plaintiff. On March 10, 2021, the court granted the parties’ stipulation to voluntarily dismiss the action without prejudice.

 

On October 23, 2018, a fourth purported derivative lawsuit, entitled City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System v. Chew, et al., was filed in San Francisco County Superior Court, alleging claims for breach of fiduciary duty, corporate waste and unjust enrichment. It namesnamed as defendants certain current and former members of the Board of Directors and certain current and former officers of PG&E Corporation, and namesnamed PG&E Corporation as a nominal defendant. PlaintiffThe plaintiff filed a request with the court seeking the voluntary dismissal of this matter without prejudice on January 18, 2019.

 

On November 21, 2018, a fifth purported derivative lawsuit, entitled Williams v. Earley, Jr., et al. (now captioned Trotter v. Earley, et al.), was filed in federal court in San Francisco, alleging claims identical to those alleged in the Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System v. Chew, et al.al. lawsuit listed above against certain current and former officers and directors, and naming PG&E Corporation and the Utility as nominal defendants. This lawsuit includes allegations related to the 2017 Northern California wildfires and the 2018 Camp fire. This action was stayed by stipulation of the parties and order of the court on December 21, 2018, subject to resolution of the pending securities class action. On January 7, 2021, the court entered a stipulation and order to substitute the Trustee for the Fire Victim Trust as the plaintiff. On March 3, 2021, the court granted the parties’ stipulation to voluntarily dismiss the action without prejudice.

 

On December 24, 2018, a sixth purported derivative lawsuit, entitled Bowlinger v. Chew, et al. (now captioned Trotter v. Chew, et al.), was filed in San Francisco Superior Court, alleging claims for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, corporate waste, and unjust enrichment in connection with the 2018 Camp fire against certain current and former officers and directors, and naming PG&E Corporation and the Utility as nominal defendants. On February 5, 2019, the plaintiff filed a response to the notice asserting that the automatic stay did not apply to his claims. PG&E Corporation

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   102
Back to Contents

and the Utility accordingly filed a Motion to Enforce the Automatic Stay with the Bankruptcy Court as to the Bowlinger action, which was granted. On November 5, 2020, the court entered a stipulation and order to substitute the Fire Victim Trust as the plaintiff. The court has scheduledTrustee for the Fire Victim Trust filed an amended complaint on February 24, 2021, asserting two claims for breach of fiduciary duty against certain of PG&E’s former directors and officers. Neither PG&E Corporation nor the Utility remains a party to the action. A case management conference was held on March 18, 2021. A hearing on the defendants’ demurrer and a further case management conference is currently scheduled for December 13, 2019.July 15, 2021. Trial is currently set for June 27, 2022.

 

On January 25, 2019, a seventh purported derivative lawsuit, entitled Hagberg v. Chew, et al., was filed in San Francisco Superior Court, alleging claims for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, corporate waste, and unjust enrichment in connection with the 2018 Camp fire against certain current and former officers and directors, and naming PG&E Corporation and the Utility as nominal defendants. A case management conference is currently set for July 7, 2021.

 

On January 28, 2019, an eighth purported derivative lawsuit, entitled Blackburn v. Meserve, et al. (now captioned Trotter v. Meserve, et al.), was filed in federal court alleging claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and waste of corporate assets in connection with the 2017 Northern California wildfires and the 2018 Camp fire against certain current and former officers and directors, and naming PG&E Corporation as a nominal defendant. On January 8, 2021, the court entered a stipulation and order to substitute the Fire Victim Trust as the plaintiff. On March 10, 2021, the court granted the parties’ stipulation to voluntarily dismiss the action without prejudice.

 

Due to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, PG&E Corporation and the Utility filed notices in each of these proceedings on February 1, 2019, reflecting that the proceedings arewere automatically stayed through the Effective Date pursuant to Sectionsection 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. On February 5, 2019,PG&E Corporation’s and the plaintiff in Bowlinger v. Chew, et al. filed a responseUtility’s rights with respect to the notice asserting that the automatic stay did not apply to his claims.derivative claims asserted against former officers and directors of PG&E Corporation and the Utility accordingly filedwere assigned to the Fire Victim Trust under the TCC RSA. The assignment became effective as of the Effective Date of the Plan.

The above purported derivative lawsuits were brought against the named defendants on behalf of PG&E Corporation and/or the Utility. As a Motionresult of the assignment of these claims to Enforce the Automatic Stay with the Bankruptcy Court asFire Victim Trust, any recovery based on these claims would be paid to theBowlinger action, which motion was granted. Fire Victim Trust. Any such recovery is limited to the extent of any director and officer insurance policy proceeds paid by any insurance carrier to reimburse PG&E Corporation and/or the Utility for amounts paid pursuant to their indemnification obligations in connection with such causes of action.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement 103
 
Back to Contents

Wildfire-Related Securities Class Action Litigation

User Guide

 

In June 2018, two purported securities class actions were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, naming PG&E Corporation and certain of its current and former officers as defendants, entitled David C. Weston v. PG&E Corporation, et al. and Jon Paul Moretti v. PG&E Corporation, et al., respectively. The complaints alleged material misrepresentations and omissions related to, among other things, vegetation management and transmission line safety in various PG&E Corporation public disclosures. The complaints asserted claims under Section 10(b) and Section 20(a) of the federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and sought unspecified monetary relief, interest, attorneys’ fees and other costs. Both complaints identified a proposed class period of April 29, 2015 to June 8, 2018. On September 10, 2018, the court consolidated both cases and the litigation is now denominated In Re PG&E Corporation Securities Litigation. The court also appointed the Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico as lead plaintiff. The plaintiff filed a consolidated amended complaint on November 9, 2018. After the plaintiff requested leave to amend their complaint to add allegations regarding the 2018 Camp fire, the plaintiff filed a second amended consolidated complaint on December 14, 2018.

Due to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, PG&E Corporation and the Utility filed a notice on February 1, 2019, reflecting that the proceedings are automatically stayed pursuant to Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. On February 15, 2019, PG&E Corporation and the Utility filed a complaint in Bankruptcy Court against the plaintiff seeking preliminary and permanent injunctive relief to extend the stay to the claims alleged against the individual officer defendants.

On February 22, 2019, a purported securities class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, entitled York County on behalf of the York County Retirement Fund, et al. v. Rambo, et al. (the “York County Action”) The complaint names as defendants certain current and former officers and directors, as well as the underwriters of four public offerings of notes from 2016 to 2018. Neither PG&E Corporation nor the Utility is named as a defendant. The complaint alleges material misrepresentations and omissions in connection with the note offerings related to, among other things, PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s vegetation management and wildfire safety measures. The complaint asserts claims under Section 11 and Section 15 of the federal Securities Act of 1933, and seeks unspecified monetary relief, attorneys’ fees and other costs, and injunctive relief.

On May 7, 2019, the District Court granted the parties’ stipulation to consolidate theYork County Action withIn re PG&E Corporation Securities Litigation. Pursuant to the terms of the stipulation, the parties agreed that the plaintiff may file a third amended consolidated complaint inIn re PG&E Corporation Securities Litigation by May 28, 2019 incorporating the allegations from theYork County Action. In a separate stipulation granted by the Bankruptcy Court on May 2, 2019, PG&E Corporation and the Utility’s pending complaint against the plaintiff was dismissed. This stipulation further provides that within 21 days of the plaintiff’s filing of the third amended consolidated complaint inIn re PG&E Corporation Securities Litigation, PG&E Corporation and the Utility may file a new complaint against the plaintiff in the Bankruptcy Court seeking preliminary and permanent injunctive relief to extend the stay to the claims alleged against the individual officer, director and underwriter defendants in the third amended consolidated complaint.

Bankruptcy Proceedings

Other than the executive officers of PG&E Corporation and the Utility with respect to the Chapter 11 Cases, none of the directors, executive officers, or persons nominated to become directors of PG&E Corporation or the Utility has been a general partner or executive officer of a debtor in, or personally the subject of, a bankruptcy or similar proceeding during the past ten years.DEFINED TERMS

 

“2006 LTIP” refers to the PG&E Corporation 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
“2014 LTIP” refers to the PG&E Corporation 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
2019 Form 10-K/A” refers to Amendment No. 1 to the PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
“2021 LTIP” refers to the PG&E Corporation 2021 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
“2020 Annual Report” refers to the PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company 2020 Joint Annual Report to Shareholders.
“2021 Annual Meetings” refers to the 2021 annual meetings of shareholders of PG&E Corporation and the Utility, which will be held concurrently on May 20, 2021.
“2021 Proxy Materials” refers to the Joint Notice, this Proxy Statement, the Proxy Card or Voting Instruction Card, and the 2020 Annual Report.
“401(k) Plan” refers to the PG&E Corporation Retirement Savings Plan or the PG&E Corporation Retirement Savings Plan for Union-Represented Employees.
“AB 1054” refers to California Assembly Bill 1054 relating to California utilities and wildfire protections
“AB 979” refers to Assembly Bill 979 that requires California-based publicly held corporations to diversify their boards of directors
“Bankruptcy Code” refers to the United States Bankruptcy Code.
“Bankruptcy Court” refers to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California.
“Board” refers to the Board of Directors of either PG&E Corporation or the Utility, as applicable.
“CD&A” refers to the section of the Proxy Statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
“CEO” refers to the position of Chief Executive Officer.
“Chapter 11” refers to chapter 11 of title 11 of the U.S. Code.
“Chapter 11 Cases” refers to voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11, which were filed by each of PG&E Corporation and the Utility on January 29, 2019, in the Bankruptcy Court.
“Corporation” refers to PG&E Corporation.
“Corporation Board” refers to the Board of Directors of PG&E Corporation.
“CPUC” refers to the California Public Utilities Commission.
“DEI” refers to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
“ESG” refers to Environmental, Social and Governance topics covered in this Proxy Statement.
“Federal Monitor” refers to the Utility’s monitor appointed by the federal court to oversee compliance with probation terms.
“Guidelines” refers to the Corporate Governance Guidelines adopted by the Boards of PG&E Corporation and the Utility.
“Independent Auditor” refers to the independent registered public accounting firm.
“Joint Notice” refers to the Joint Notice of Annual Meetings of Shareholders of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
“LTIP” refers to the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan and/or the 2021 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
“NEO” or “Named Executive Officer” refers to an officer who is listed in the Summary Compensation Table of this Proxy Statement.
“Notice of Internet Availability” refers to the “Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on May 20, 2021, and Notice of Annual Meetings of Shareholders” for PG&E Corporation or the Utility, as applicable, which was mailed to certain shareholders starting on or about April 8, 2021.
“NYSE” refers to the New York Stock Exchange.
“NYSE American” refers to the NYSE American stock exchange (formerly known as NYSE MKT, LLC and as the American Stock Exchange).
“PEO” refers to an officer or officers who serve as “principal executive officer” of PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company, as appropriate.
“PG&E” refers to both PG&E Corporation and its subsidiary, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, or the “Utility.”

2021 Joint Proxy Statement 104
 
Back to Contents
“POR OII” refers to the Plan of Reorganization Order Instituting Investigation proceeding initiated by the CPUC on September 26, 2019.
“Proxy” refers to your authorization for another person or persons to vote your shares at the 2021 Annual Meetings, in the manner indicated on the Proxy. Also may refer to the person or persons so authorized (also called proxy holders).
“Proxy Card” refers to your proxy card, on which you may indicate how you would like the named proxy holders to vote your shares at the 2021 Annual Meetings.
“Proxy Statement” refers to this 2021 Joint Proxy Statement for PG&E Corporation and the Utility.
“PSU” refers to a performance share unit (sometimes also called a performance share).
“Record Date” is March 22, 2021. This is the date set by the Boards to determine which shareholders may vote at and attend the 2021 Annual Meetings.
“RSU” refers to a restricted stock unit.
“SEC” refers to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
“Section 16 Officer” refers to any “officer” as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
“STIP” refers to the Short-Term Incentive Plan.
“TCC” refers to the Official Committee of Tort Claimants.
“TCC RSA” refers to Restructuring Support Agreement dated December 6, 2019, with TCC and attorneys and other advisors and agents for certain holders of Fire Victim Claims (as defined therein), as amended.
“TSR” refers to total shareholder return, measured by stock price appreciation and dividends paid, relative to companies in the Performance Comparator Group.
“Utility” refers to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation.
“Voting Instruction Card” refers to the form used by beneficial shareholders or participants in a 401(k) Plan to transmit instructions to the nominee or the plan trustee, respectively, on how to vote any shares for which that shareholder or plan participant has voting rights.

 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   105
 

Back to Contents

Website Availability of Governance DocumentsWEBSITE AVAILABILITY OF GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS

 

Current copies of the following corporate governance documents are available online through the Corporate Governance section of PG&E Corporation’s website (www.pgecorp.com/corp/about-us/corporate-governance.page) or the Company Information section of the Utility’s website (www.pge.com/en_US/about-pge/company-information/company-information.page), under the “Get more information about our corporate governance practices” link), as appropriate.

 

Corporate Governance Guidelines for PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (which include definitions of “independence” for directors) (under the “PG&E Corporation Policies and Bylaws” and “Pacific Gas and Electric Company Policies and Bylaws” links)
Charters for the standing committees of the PG&E Corporation and Utility Boards of Directors, including the following (under the “PG&E Corporation Board of Directors” and “Pacific Gas and Electric Company Board of Directors” links):

 Audit Committees of PG&E Corporation and the Utility
 Compensation Committee of PG&E Corporation
 Compliance and Public Policy Committee of PG&E Corporation
 Executive Committees of PG&E Corporation and the Utility
 Finance Committee of PG&E Corporation
 Nominating and Governance Committee of PG&E Corporation
 Safety and Nuclear Oversight Committees of PG&E Corporation and the Utility

 

Current copies of the following codes of conduct, applicable to both companies, are available online through the Compliance and Ethics section of PG&E Corporation’s website (www.pgecorp.com/corp/about-us/compliance-ethics/program.page)or the Company Information section of the Utility’s website (www.pge.com/en_US/about-pge/company-information/company-information.page),under the “Find out why we emphasize compliance and ethics” link), as appropriate.

 

Code of Conduct for Employees (including executive officers)
Code of Conduct for Directors

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement 105106
 
Back to Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETINGS AND VOTING

 

How can I participate in the 2021 Annual Meetings?

The 2021 Annual Meetings of Shareholders of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company will be held on May 20, 2021, at 10 a.m. Pacific time. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we will only host the 2021 Annual Meetings by live webcast to protect the health and safety of our shareholders, customers, and employees. There will not be a physical in-person meeting. Please be assured that you will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate in the virtual meeting as you would at an in-person meeting.

To participate in the 2021 Annual Meetings, follow the instructions on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice of Internet Availability”), Proxy Card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials), or Voting Instruction Card. With your 16-digit control number found in these materials, you can access the webcast at:

 

For holders of PG&E Corporation common shares, you can access the 2021 Annual Meetings at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PCG2021.
For holders of Utility preferred shares, you can access the 2021 Annual Meetings at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PCG-P2021.
If you hold both PG&E Corporation common shares and Utility preferred shares, you can view the webcast in one browser using either URL; however, in order to vote you are required to log into each company’s website separately, as discussed below in “How do I vote.”

 

2020We encourage you to access the 2021 Annual Meetings approximately 15 minutes prior to the start of the meetings to allow ample time to check in. If you encounter any difficulties during the check-in process or meetings, please call the technical support number posted on the 2021 Annual Meetings log-in page.

Who can participate in the 2021 Annual Meetings?

Only PG&E Corporation and Utility shareholders who held shares as of the Record Date (March 22, 2021), or their duly appointed legal proxies, may participate and vote in the 2021 Annual Meetings.

How do I vote?

We encourage you to vote by proxy over the Internet, telephone, or mail prior to the 2021 Annual Meetings even if you plan to participate. If your shares are registered to you directly, there are three ways to submit your Proxy:

Over the Internet. You may submit your Proxy and vote your shares over the Internet by going to www.proxyvote.com. Voting instructions are provided on either your Notice of Internet Access or, if you received your Proxy Materials by mail, or your Proxy Card.
By telephone. If you received your Proxy Materials by mail, you may submit your Proxy and vote your shares by calling the toll-free number on the Proxy Card.
By mail. If you received your proxy materials by mail, you may submit your Proxy and vote your shares by completing, signing, and dating the Proxy Card and mailing it in the postage-paid envelope provided.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   107
Back to Contents

You can also vote during the 2021 Annual Meetings with your 16-digit control number. For holders of PG&E Corporation shares, you can access the 2021 Annual Meetings and vote your shares at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PCG2021. For holders of Utility shares, you can access the 2021 Annual Meetings and vote your shares at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PCG-P2021.

If you hold shares of both PG&E Corporation and the Utility, we encourage you to vote prior to the 2021 Annual Meetings to ensure that you have time to participate in the meetings. To vote your Corporation and Utility shares at the 2021 Annual Meetings, you will be required to log in with your 16-digit control number to each company’s website, separately. You can still view the webcast in one browser.

If your shares are not registered to you directly but are held indirectly through a broker, bank, trustee, nominee, or other third party (“broker”), follow the instructions provided by your broker to vote your shares. If you do not submit voting instructions to your broker, the broker will not be permitted to vote your shares on any proposal, unless it constitutes a “routine” item and your broker is a member of the NYSE and permitted by NYSE rules to vote on “routine” items. The election of directors, the say-on-pay vote, and equity plan proposals, for example, are “non-routine” items.

If you are a 401(k) Plan participant, specific instructions for voting are noted on the Voting Instruction Card. 

What is the voting deadline?

If you hold your shares directly and submit your Proxy over the Internet or by telephone, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern time, on Wednesday, May 19, 2021. These Internet and telephone voting procedures comply with California law. If you submit your Proxy by mail, your vote must be received by 10:00 a.m., Pacific time, on Thursday, May 20, 2021. 

If you are a participant in a 401(k) Plan, your voting instructions must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern time, on Monday, May 17, 2021, for the 401(k) Plan trustee to vote your shares. 

If your shares otherwise are not registered to you directly but are registered in the name of your nominee (such as a broker, bank, trustee, or other third party), please consult information provided by the nominee.

If you participate in the 2021 Annual Meetings via webcast, you can vote your shares until the voting is closed. 

Can I change my vote?

If your shares are registered to you directly, you can change your vote or revoke your Proxy any time before it is exercised by doing one of the following before the applicable deadline: (1) returning a signed Proxy Card with a later date, (2) entering a new vote over the Internet or by telephone, (3) notifying the Corporate Secretary of PG&E Corporation or the Utility, as appropriate, in writing, at 77 Beale Street, P.O. Box 770000, San Francisco, California 94177, or (4) voting during the 2021 Annual Meetings until voting is closed. Your participation in the 2021 Annual Meetings will not automatically revoke your Proxy unless you vote again during the 2021 Annual Meetings.

If you are a participant in a 401(k) Plan, you may change your vote at any time prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern time, on Monday, May 17, 2021. The last vote that the 401(k) Plan trustee receives from you within this timeframe will be the vote that is counted. Participants in a 401(k) Plan are not eligible to vote during the 2021 Annual Meetings.

If your shares otherwise are not registered to you directly but are registered in the name of your nominee (such as a broker, bank, trustee, or other third party), follow the instructions provided by your nominee to change your vote or revoke your voting instructions. 

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   108
Back to Contents

What am I voting on, and what are each Board’s voting recommendations?

PG&E Corporation shareholders will be voting on the following items and the Board of the Corporation unanimously recommends that you vote as follows: 

Item No.DescriptionBoard’s Voting
Recommendation
1Election of 7 directors(1)FOR all nominees
2Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Auditor for 2021FOR this proposal
3Advisory vote to approve executive compensationFOR this proposal
4Management proposal to approve the PG&E Corporation 2021 Long-Term Incentive PlanFOR this proposal
(1)As of the date of this Proxy Statement, no other candidates have been nominated for election at the 2021 Annual Meetings in opposition to the Corporation Board nominees.

The Utility’s shareholders will be voting on the following items and the Board of the Utility unanimously recommends that you vote as follows:

Item No.(2)DescriptionBoard’s Voting
Recommendation
1Election of 8 directorsFOR all nominees
2Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Auditor for 2021FOR this proposal
3Advisory vote to approve executive compensationFOR this proposal
(2)There is no Item No. 4 proposal for the Utility.

What vote is required to approve each item?

A majority voting standard applies to the election of each director nominee and to the approval of Item Nos. 2, 3, and 4. Under a majority voting standard, approval occurs if the shares voted “for” a director nominee or other item exceed the number of shares voted “against” that nominee or item. In addition, the shares voting affirmatively must equal at least a majority of the quorum that is required to conduct business at each meeting. This means that the shares voting affirmatively must be greater than 25 percent of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.

When determining whether a majority of the votes cast have approved the PG&E Corporation 2021 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2021 LTIP”), an “abstention” will have the same effect as a vote against the 2021 LTIP. In determining whether a majority of the shares represented and voting have elected a director nominee or approved any other proposal, abstentions and any broker non-votes (see the definition below under “What is a broker non-vote?”) will not be considered.

For all matters subject to a majority voting standard (other than the 2021 LTIP proposal), abstentions and broker non-votes that occur with respect to the election of a director nominee or a proposal could prevent the election of a nominee or the approval of a proposal if the number of shares voting affirmatively does not constitute a majority of the required quorum.

Abstentions and broker non-votes will be treated as present for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present at each meeting.

Where shareholders are being asked for an advisory vote or for ratification (Item No. 2 and 3), any voting results with respect to these items will be non-binding on the affected company but will be considered by that company’s Board.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   109
Back to Contents

What is a broker non-vote?

If you hold your shares indirectly through your broker, then your broker is the registered holder of your shares and submits the Proxy to vote your shares. You are the beneficial owner of the shares, and typically you will be asked to provide your broker with instructions as to how you want your shares to be voted. Under the rules of the NYSE, if you fail to provide your broker with voting instructions, your broker can use its discretion to vote your shares on “routine” matters, like the ratification of the appointment of the Independent Auditor. However, your broker may not use its discretion to vote your shares on “non-routine” matters, like director elections, advisory votes on executive compensation, and equity-plan proposals. When a broker votes your shares on routine matters but is unable to vote your shares on other non-routine matters because you have failed to provide instructions on how to vote any non-routine matters, a “broker non-vote” occurs with respect to these other non-routine matters.

What shares am I entitled to vote?

If you are a PG&E Corporation registered shareholder, you are entitled to vote all the shares of PG&E Corporation common stock that you own (or for which you have been given the right to provide instructions as to how such shares should be voted) as of the close of business on March 22, 2021 (Record Date). If you are a Utility registered shareholder, you are entitled to vote all the shares of Utility preferred stock that you own (or for which you have been given the right to provide instructions as to how such shares should be voted) as of the Record Date.

If you are a registered holder of both PG&E Corporation common stock and Utility preferred stock, you are entitled to vote separately on each company’s proposals.

We encourage shareholders to submit proxies in advance of the 2021 Annual Meetings over the Internet, by telephone, or by mail. You can help ensure that your shares are voted at the 2021 Annual Meetings by following the instructions on the enclosed Proxy Card and submitting your votes over the Internet or by telephone, or by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed Proxy Card.

Is my vote confidential?

PG&E Corporation and the Utility each have adopted a confidential voting policy under which shareholder votes are revealed only to a non-employee proxy tabulator or an independent inspector of election, except (1) as necessary to meet legal requirements, (2) in a dispute regarding authenticity of proxies and ballots, (3) in the event of a proxy contest if the other party does not agree to comply with the confidential voting policy, and (4) where disclosure may be necessary for either company to assert or defend claims. The policy allows the companies to engage shareholders, and to directly or indirectly (1) accept voting information that is voluntarily provided by shareholders, or (2) request and obtain final shareholder voting information that is or will be publicly disclosed pursuant to law, regulation, or similar requirements.

Who will count the votes?

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will act as the proxy tabulators and the inspectors of election for the 2021 Annual Meetings. Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. is independent of PG&E Corporation and the Utility and their respective directors, officers, and employees. Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will also be the voting instruction tabulator for the 401(k) Plan.

How will the 2021 Annual Meetings be conducted?

The independent non-executive Chair of the Board of PG&E Corporation, or his designee, will preside over the 2021 Annual Meetings and will make any and all determinations regarding the conduct of the meetings.

All items of business described in this Proxy Statement will be deemed presented at the 2021 Annual Meetings.

There will be a general question and answer period. Questions and comments should pertain to corporate performance, items for consideration at the 2021 Annual Meetings, or other matters of interest to shareholders generally. The meetings are not a forum to present general economic, political, or other views that are not directly related to the business of the Corporation or the Utility.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   110
Back to Contents

Are the 2021 Proxy Materials for the 2021 Annual Meetings available online?

Yes. You can go online at investor.pgecorp.com/financials/annual-reports-and-proxy-statements to access the 2021 Proxy Materials.

How many copies of the 2021 Proxy Materials will I receive?

Registered Holders and 401(k) Plan Participants

You will receive one Notice of Internet Availability for each account, unless you have requested paper copies of the proxy materials, in which case you will receive one copy of the 2021 Proxy Materials for each account.

Beneficial Owners

If you receive your proxy materials through Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions (“Broadridge”), and there are multiple beneficial owners at the same address, you may receive fewer Notices of Internet Availability or fewer copies of the 2021 Proxy Materials than the number of beneficial owners at that address. SEC rules permit Broadridge to deliver only one Notice of Internet Availability or only one copy of the 2021 Proxy Materials to multiple beneficial owners sharing an address, unless the applicable company receives contrary instructions from any beneficial owner at that address.

If you receive your proxy materials through Broadridge and (1) you currently receive only one copy of the Notice of Internet Availability or only one copy of the 2021 Proxy Materials at a shared address but you wish to receive an additional copy of the Notice of Internet Availability or of the 2021 Proxy Materials or any future notices or proxy materials, or (2) you share an address with other beneficial owners who also receive their separate notices of Internet availability or proxy materials through Broadridge and you wish to request delivery of a single copy of any notice of Internet availability or of the proxy materials to the shared address in the future, please contact Broadridge by calling 1-866-540-7095 or mailing Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability or Proxy Card on or about the same time?

It means that your PG&E Corporation common shares or Utility preferred shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. In order to vote all of your shares, please sign and return each Proxy Card or, if you vote over the Internet, by telephone or during the 2021 Annual Meetings, vote once for each Notice of Internet Availability or Proxy Card you receive.

What if I submit my Proxy but I do not specify how I want my shares voted?

For PG&E Corporation’s registered shareholders, the Corporation’s proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with the Corporation Board’s recommendations, which are as follows: “For” each of the Corporation Board’s nominees for director and “For” Item Nos. 2, 3, and 4. For the Utility’s registered shareholders, the Utility’s proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with the Utility Board’s recommendations, which are as follows: “For” each of the nominees for director and “For” Item Nos. 2 and 3.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   111
Back to Contents

What if I do not submit my Proxy or Voting Instruction Card?

If you are a registered shareholder, your shares will not be voted if you do not submit your Proxy or vote during the virtual 2021 Annual Meetings. If you are a participant in a 401(k) Plan, your shares will not be voted if you do not submit your Voting Instruction Card. If you hold your shares through a broker (or other intermediary), your broker may vote your shares in the broker’s discretion on “routine” matters, as discussed above under “What is a broker non-vote?” Your vote is extremely important. Even if you plan to participate in the 2021 Annual Meetings, we request that you act promptly to vote your shares by completing, signing and dating the enclosed Proxy Card and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope, or by voting over the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions provided on the enclosed Notice of Internet Availability, Proxy Card or Voting Instruction Card.

How many shares are entitled to vote at the 2021 Annual Meetings?

As of the Record Date, there were 1,985,105,703 PG&E Corporation common shares, without par value, outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share is entitled to one vote.

As of the Record Date, there were 10,319,782 Utility first preferred shares, $25 par value, and 264,374,809 Utility common shares, $5 par value, outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share is entitled to one vote.

How much will this Proxy solicitation cost?

All costs of soliciting Proxies on behalf of PG&E Corporation and the Utility will be borne by PG&E Corporation and the Utility.

PG&E Corporation and the Utility hired Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. to assist in the proxy solicitation of votes for a fee of $17,000 plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, the Corporation and the Utility will reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to shareholders. The companies’ solicitation of Proxies also may be made in person, by telephone, or by electronic communications by the companies’ respective directors, officers, and employees, who will not receive additional compensation for those solicitation activities.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   112
Back to Contents

2022 ANNUAL MEETINGS 

 

What is the date of the 20202022 annual meetings?

 

PG&E Corporation and the Utility currently anticipate that the date of their 20202022 annual meetings will be roughly one year after the date of the 20192021 Annual Meetings. Exact dates will be communicated to shareholders in the proxy materials for that meeting.those meetings.

 

Can I submit nominees for inclusion in proxy materials for the 20202022 annual meetings?

 

PG&E Corporation’s bylaws include proxy access provisions. Under these provisions, shareholders of PG&E Corporation who meet the requirements set forth in the bylaws may submit director nominations for inclusion in the Corporation’s proxy materials. Proxy access nominations for the Corporation’s 20202022 annual meeting must be provided to the PG&E Corporation Corporate Secretary no earlier than December 26, 2019November 9, 2021, and no later than January 25, 2020December 9, 2021, and must meet all requirements set forth in the bylaws. However, if the Corporation’s 20202022 annual meeting is scheduled on a date that is more than 30 days before or after the anniversary date of the 20192021 Annual Meetings, a proxy access nomination for the 20202022 meeting generally will be timely if it is received no later than the close of the business on the date that is 180 days prior to the 20202022 annual meeting date or the 10thday after the date on which the date of the 20202022 annual meeting is disclosed, whichever is later. The Utility did not adopt proxy access bylaw provisions, given the fact that over 95 percent of the Utility’s common stock is held by PG&E Corporation; no Utility shareholders may submit director nominations via proxy access.

 

Can shareholders introduce proposals (other than proxy access proposals, but including director nominations) during the 20202022 annual meetings?

 

If you are a shareholder of PG&E Corporation or the Utility and would like to introduce a proposal or other business during that company’s 20202022 annual meeting, each company’s bylaws require that your proper advance written notice of the matter be received at the principal executive office of the applicable company no earlier than February 22, 2020January 20, 2022, and no later than 5:00 p.m., Pacific time, on March 23, 2020.February 19, 2022. However, if the 20202022 annual meeting of either company is scheduled on a date that differs by more than 30 days from the anniversary date of the 20192021 Annual Meetings, your notice will be timely if it is received no later than the 10thday after the date on which that company publicly discloses the date of its 20202022 annual meeting. You must also provide information regarding your proposal, and satisfy other requirements as set forth in the applicable company’s bylaws.

 

If your proposal involves nominating an individual for director during the annual meetings, certain additional information regarding the nominees and the nomination must be provided in your advance written notice regarding the nominee. For information onnominee, which must be submitted in accordance with procedures set forth in the director nomination process in general, see page 36.applicable company’s bylaws.

 

What is the submission deadline if I want my shareholder proposal to be included in the proxy statement for the 20202022 annual meetings?

 

If you would like to submit a proposal to be included in the proxy statement for PG&E Corporation’s or the Utility’s 20202022 annual meeting pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8, the applicable company’s Corporate Secretary must receive your proposal no later than January 25, 2020.December 9, 2021.

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement 106113
 
Back to Contents

How and where can I make a submission?

 

If you wish to submit advance notice of any business to be brought before the 20202022 annual meetings (including notice of any proxy access nominees), or a shareholder proposal for inclusion in the 20202022 joint proxy statement, you may submit such notice or proposal via e-mail, fax, or U.S. mail (all shown below). If you submit a notice or proposal via U.S. mail, we recommend that you use a delivery method that indicates when your submission was received at the principal executive office of the applicable company.

 

E-Mail:CorporateSecretary@pge.com

 

Fax:415-973-8719

 

U.S. Mail:

Office of the Corporate Secretary

PG&E Corporation/Pacific Gas and Electric Company
P.O. Box 770000
San Francisco, California 94177

 

20192021 Joint Proxy Statement 107114
 
Back to Contents

Appendix A: PG&E Corporation 2021 Long-Term Incentive Plan

 

(As adopted effective [   ], 2021)

 

1.Establishment, Purpose and Term of Plan.
1.1Establishment. The PG&E Corporation 2021 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), is hereby established effective as of the later of the date approved by the shareholders of the Company or June 1, 2021 (the “Effective Date”). This Plan replaces the PG&E Corporation 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
1.2Purpose. The purpose of the Plan is to advance the interests of the Participating Company Group and its shareholders by providing an incentive to attract and retain the best qualified personnel to perform services for the Participating Company Group, by motivating such persons to contribute to the growth and profitability of the Participating Company Group, by aligning their interests with interests of the Company’s shareholders, and by rewarding such persons for their services by tying a significant portion of their total compensation package to the success of the Company. The Plan seeks to achieve this purpose by providing for Awards in the form of Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock Awards, Performance Shares, Performance Units, Restricted Stock Units, Deferred Compensation Awards and other Stock-Based Awards as described below.
1.3Term of Plan. The Plan shall continue in effect until the earlier of its termination by the Board or the date on which no Awards remain outstanding under the Plan. However, the term during which all Awards shall be granted, if at all, shall be within ten (10) years from the Effective Date. Moreover, Incentive Stock Options shall not be granted later than March 3, 2031 (ten (10) years from the date on which the Plan was adopted by the Board).
2.Definitions and Construction.
2.1Definitions. Whenever used herein, the following terms shall have their respective meanings set forth below:
(a)Affiliate” means (i) an entity that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediary entities, controls the Company or (ii) an entity that is controlled by the Company directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediary entities. For this purpose, the term “control” (including the term “controlled by”) means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of the relevant entity, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise; provided that “affiliate” also shall have such other meaning assigned such term for the purposes of registration on Form S-8 under the Securities Act.
(b)Award” means any Option, SAR, Restricted Stock Award, Performance Share, Performance Unit, Restricted Stock Unit or Deferred Compensation Award or other Stock-Based Award granted under the Plan.
(c)Award Agreement” means a written agreement between the Company and a Participant setting forth the terms, conditions and restrictions of the Award granted to the Participant (which may also be in electronic form).
(d)Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
(e)Change in Control” means, unless otherwise defined by the Participant’s Award Agreement or contract of employment or service, the occurrence of any of the following:
(i)any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act, but excluding any benefit plan for Employees or any trustee, agent or other fiduciary for any such plan acting in such person’s capacity as such fiduciary), directly or indirectly, becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act), of stock of the Company representing thirty percent (30%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding voting stock; or

 

Location of the 2019 Annual Meetings

The 2019 Annual Meetings of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (together, “PG&E”) will be held concurrently on Friday, June 21, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time at the PG&E headquarters, located at 77 Beale Street in downtown San Francisco, California. Entry to the meetings will be through the atrium on Beale Street, between Market Street and Mission Street.

The meetings are easily accessible using public transportation. If you are traveling by MUNI or BART, exit at the Embarcadero station.

There is no parking available at the PG&E headquarters. Parking is available at public garages in the area.

Please note that the following items will not be allowed in the meetings: cameras, video or tape recorders, and other electronic recording devices, or any other items that might be disruptive or pose a safety or security risk. For your protection, all purses, briefcases, backpacks, and packages will be subject to inspection. Photography and video/audio recording are not permitted at the meetings.

Assistive listening devices will be available at the meetings.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-1
 
Back to Contents
(ii)during any two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board, unless the election, or the nomination for election by the shareholders of the Company, of each new Director was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the Directors then still in office (1) who were Directors at the beginning of the period or (2) whose election or nomination was previously so approved; or
(iii)the consummation of any consolidation or merger of the Company other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the holders of the voting stock of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to directly or indirectly hold at least seventy percent (70%) of the Combined Voting Power of the Company, the surviving entity in the merger or consolidation or the parent of such surviving entity outstanding immediately after the merger or consolidation; or
(iv)(1) the consummation of any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one or a series of related transactions) of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, or (2) the approval of the Shareholders of the Company of a plan of liquidation or dissolution of the Company.
For purposes of paragraph (iii), the term “Combined Voting Power” shall mean the combined voting power of the Company’s or other relevant entity’s then outstanding voting stock.
(f)Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any applicable regulations promulgated thereunder.
(g)Committee” means the Compensation Committee or other committee of the Board duly appointed to administer the Plan and having such powers as shall be specified by the Board. If no committee of the Board has been appointed to administer the Plan, the Board shall exercise all of the powers of the Committee granted herein, and, in any event, the Board may in its discretion exercise any or all of such powers.
(h)Company” means PG&E Corporation, a California corporation, or any successor corporation thereto.
(i)Consultant” means a person engaged to provide consulting or advisory services (other than as an Employee or a member of the Board) to a Participating Company, provided that the identity of such person, the nature of such services, or the entity to which such services are provided would not preclude the Company from offering or selling securities to such person pursuant to the Plan in reliance on registration on a Form S-8 Registration Statement under the Securities Act.
(j)Deferred Compensation Award” means an award of Stock Units granted to a Participant pursuant to Section 12 of the Plan.
(k)Director” means a member of the Board.
(l)Disability” means the permanent and total disability of the Participant, within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code, except as otherwise set forth in the Plan or an Award Agreement.
(m)Dividend Equivalent” means a credit, made at the discretion of the Committee or as otherwise provided by the Plan, to the account of a Participant in an amount equal to the cash dividends paid on one share of Stock for each share of Stock represented by an Award held by such Participant.
(n)Employee” means any person treated as an employee (including an Officer or a member of the Board who is also treated as an employee) in the records of a Participating Company and, with respect to any Incentive Stock Option granted to such person, who is an employee for purposes of Section 422 of the Code; provided, however, that neither service as a member of the Board nor payment of a director’s fee shall be sufficient to constitute employment for purposes of the Plan. The Company shall determine in good faith and in the exercise of its discretion whether an individual has become or has ceased to be an Employee and the effective date of such individual’s employment or termination of employment, as the case may be. For purposes of an individual’s rights, if any, under the Plan as of the time of the Company’s determination, all such determinations by the Company shall be final, binding and conclusive, notwithstanding that the Company or any court of law or governmental agency subsequently makes a contrary determination.
(o)Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-2
Back to Contents
(p)Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of a share of Stock or other property as determined by the Committee, in its discretion, or by the Company, in its discretion, if such determination is expressly allocated to the Company herein, subject to the following:
(i)Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, if, on such date, the Stock is listed on a national or regional securities exchange or market system, the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock shall be the closing price of a share of Stock as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange or such other national or regional securities exchange or market system constituting the primary market for the Stock, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Company deems reliable. If the relevant date does not fall on a day on which the Stock has traded on such securities exchange or market system, the date on which the Fair Market Value shall be established shall be the last day on which the Stock was so traded prior to the relevant date, or such other appropriate day as shall be determined by the Committee, in its discretion.
(ii)Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its discretion, determine the Fair Market Value on the basis of the opening, closing, high, low or average sale price of a share of Stock or the actual sale price of a share of Stock received by a Participant on such date, the preceding trading day, the next succeeding trading day, or an average determined over a period of trading days. The Committee may vary its method of determination of the Fair Market Value as provided in this Section for different purposes under the Plan.
(iii)If, on such date, the Stock is not listed on a national or regional securities exchange or market system, the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock shall be as determined by the Committee in good faith without regard to any restriction other than a restriction that, by its terms, will never lapse.
(q)Incentive Stock Option” means an Option intended to be (as set forth in the Award Agreement) and which qualifies as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422(b) of the Code.
(r)Insider” means an Officer, a Director or any other person whose transactions in Stock are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
(s)Net-Exercisemeans a procedure by which the Participant will be issued a number of shares of Stock determined in accordance with the following formula:
X = Y(A-B)/A, where
X = the number of shares of Stock to be issued to the Participant upon exercise of the Option;
Y = the total number of shares with respect to which the Participant has elected to exercise the Option;
A = the Fair Market Value of one (1) share of Stock;
B = the exercise price per share (as defined in the Participant’s Award Agreement).
(t)Non-employee Director” means a Director who is not an Employee.
(u)Non-employee Director Award” means an Award granted to a Non-employee Director pursuant to Section 7 of the Plan.
(v)Nonstatutory Stock Option” means an Option not intended to be (as set forth in the Award Agreement) an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422(b) of the Code.
(w)Officer” means any person designated by the Board as an officer of the Company.
(x)Option” means the right to purchase Stock at a stated price for a specified period of time granted to a Participant pursuant to Section 6 or Section 7 of the Plan. An Option may be either an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonstatutory Stock Option.
(y)Option Expiration Datemeans the date of expiration of the Option’s term as set forth in the Award Agreement.
(z)Parent Corporation” means any present or future “parent corporation” of the Company in an unbroken chain of corporations ending with the Company in which each of the corporations other than the Company owns stock possessing 50% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain.
(aa)Participant” means any eligible person who has been granted one or more Awards.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-3
Back to Contents
(bb)Participating Company” means the Company or any Affiliate.
(cc)Participating Company Group” means, at any point in time, all entities collectively that are then Participating Companies.
(dd)Performance Award” means an Award of Performance Shares or Performance Units.
(ee)Performance Award Formula” means, for any Performance Award, a formula or table established by the Committee pursuant to Section 10.3 of the Plan that provides the basis for computing the value of a Performance Award at one or more levels of attainment of the applicable Performance Goal(s) measured as of the end of the applicable Performance Period.
(ff)Performance Goal” means a performance goal established by the Committee pursuant to Section 10.3 of the Plan.
(gg)Performance Period” means a period established by the Committee pursuant to Section 10.3 of the Plan at the end of which one or more Performance Goals are to be measured.
(hh)Performance Share” means a bookkeeping entry representing a right granted to a Participant pursuant to Section 10 of the Plan to receive a payment equal to the value of a share of Stock, based upon performance.
(ii)Performance Unit” means a bookkeeping entry representing a right granted to a Participant pursuant to Section 10 of the Plan to receive a payment equal to a cash value as determined by the Committee, based upon performance.
(jj)Prior Plan” means the PG&E Corporation 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(kk)Restricted Stock Award” means an Award of Restricted Stock.
(ll)Restricted Stock Unitor “Stock Unit” means a bookkeeping entry representing a right granted to a Participant pursuant to Section 11 or Section 12 of the Plan, respectively, to receive a share of Stock or payment equal to the value of a share of Stock on a date determined in accordance with the provisions of Section 11 or Section 12, as applicable, and the Participant’s Award Agreement.
(mm)Restriction Period” means the period established in accordance with Section 9.4 of the Plan during which shares subject to a Restricted Stock Award are subject to Vesting Conditions.
(nn)Retirementmeans termination as an Employee with the Participating Company Group at age 55 or older, provided that the Participant was an Employee for at least five consecutive years prior to the date of such termination.
(oo)Rule 16b-3” means Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, as amended from time to time, or any successor rule or regulation.
(pp)SAR” or “Stock Appreciation Right” means a bookkeeping entry representing, for each share of Stock subject to such SAR, a right granted to a Participant pursuant to Section 8 of the Plan to receive payment in any combination of shares of Stock or cash of an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of exercise of the SAR over the exercise price.
(qq)Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
(rr)Separation from Service” means a Participant’s “separation from service,” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
(ss)Service” means a Participant’s employment or service with the Participating Company Group, whether in the capacity of an Employee, a Director or a Consultant. A Participant’s Service shall not be deemed to have terminated merely because of a change in the capacity in which the Participant renders such Service or a change in the Participating Company for which the Participant renders such Service, provided that there is no interruption or termination of the Participant’s Service. Furthermore, a Participant’s Service shall not be deemed to have terminated if the Participant takes any military leave, sick leave, or other bona fide leave of absence approved by the Company. However, if any such leave taken by a Participant exceeds ninety (90) days, then on the ninety-first (91st) day following the commencement of such leave, the Participant’s Service shall be deemed terminated, and any Incentive Stock Option held by the Participant shall cease to be treated as an Incentive Stock Option and instead shall be treated thereafter as a Nonstatutory Stock Option commencing on the third (3rd) month from such deemed termination, unless the Participant’s right to return to Service with the Participating Company Group is guaranteed by statute or contract. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless otherwise designated by the Company or required by law, a leave of absence shall not be treated as Service for purposes of determining vesting under the Participant’s Award Agreement. A

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-4
Back to Contents
Participant’s Service shall be deemed to have terminated either upon an actual termination of Service or upon the entity for which the Participant performs Service ceasing to be a Participating Company. Subject to the foregoing, the Company, in its discretion, shall determine whether the Participant’s Service has terminated and the effective date of such termination.
(tt)Stock” means the common stock of the Company, as adjusted from time to time in accordance with Section 4.2 of the Plan.
(uu)Stock-Based Awards” means any award that is valued in whole or in part by reference to, or is otherwise based on, the Stock, including dividends on the Stock, but not limited to those Awards described in Sections 6 through 12 of the Plan.
(vv)Subsidiary Corporation” means any present or future “subsidiary corporation” of the Company in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company in which each of the corporations other than the last corporation owns stock possessing 50% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain.
(ww)Substitute Awardsmeans Awards granted or Shares issued by the Company in assumption of, or in substitution or exchange for, awards previously granted, or the right or obligation to make future awards, in each case by a company acquired by the Company or any Subsidiary Corporation or with which the Company or any Subsidiary Corporation combines.
(xx)Ten Percent Owner” means a Participant who, at the time an Option is granted to the Participant, owns stock possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of a Parent Corporation or Subsidiary Corporation that is a Participating Company within the meaning of Section 422(b)(6) of the Code.
(yy)Vesting Conditions” mean those conditions established in accordance with Section 9.4 or Section 11.2 of the Plan prior to the satisfaction of which shares subject to a Restricted Stock Award or Restricted Stock Unit Award, respectively, remain subject to forfeiture or a repurchase option in favor of the Company upon the Participant’s termination of Service, or other deadline for satisfying such conditions, as applicable.
2.2Construction. Captions and titles contained herein are for convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of any provision of the Plan. Except when otherwise indicated by the context, the singular shall include the plural and the plural shall include the singular. Use of the term “or” is not intended to be exclusive, unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
3.Administration.
3.1Administration by the Committee. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. All questions of interpretation of the Plan or of any Award shall be determined by the Committee, and such determinations shall be final and binding upon all persons having an interest in the Plan or such Award.
3.2Authority of Officers. Any Officer shall have the authority to act on behalf of the Company with respect to any matter, right, obligation, determination or election that is the responsibility of or which is allocated to the Company herein, provided the Officer has apparent authority with respect to such matter, right, obligation, determination or election. In addition, to the extent specified in a resolution adopted by the Board, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company shall have the authority to grant Awards to an Employee who is not an Insider and who is receiving a salary below the level that requires approval by the Committee provided that the terms of such Awards conform to guidelines established by the Committee.
3.3Administration with Respect to Insiders. With respect to participation by Insiders in the Plan, at any time that any class of equity security of the Company is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, the Plan shall be administered in compliance with the requirements, if any, of Rule 16b-3.
3.4Powers of the Committee. In addition to any other powers set forth in the Plan and subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have the full and final power and authority, in its discretion:
(a)to determine the persons to whom, and the time or times at which, Awards shall be granted and the number of shares of Stock or units to be subject to each Award based on the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, except that (i) Awards to the Chief Executive Officer shall be based on the recommendation of the independent members of the Board in compliance with applicable stock exchange rules, (ii) Non-employee Director Awards shall be granted automatically pursuant to Section 7 of the Plan, and (iii) other Awards to Non-employee Directors shall be approved by the Board;

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-5
Back to Contents
(b)to determine the type of Award granted and to designate Options as Incentive Stock Options or Nonstatutory Stock Options;
(c)to determine the Fair Market Value of shares of Stock or other property;
(d)to determine the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to each Award (which need not be identical) and any shares acquired pursuant thereto, including, without limitation, (i) the exercise or purchase price of shares purchased pursuant to any Award, (ii) the method of payment for shares purchased pursuant to any Award, (iii) the method for satisfaction of any tax withholding obligation arising in connection with any Award, including by the withholding or delivery of shares of Stock, (iv) the timing, terms and conditions of the exercisability or vesting of any Award or any shares acquired pursuant thereto, (v) the Performance Award Formula and Performance Goals applicable to any Award and the extent to which such Performance Goals have been attained, (vi) the time of the expiration of any Award, (vii) the effect of the Participant’s termination of Service on any of the foregoing, and (viii) all other terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to any Award or shares acquired pursuant thereto not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan;
(e)to determine whether an Award will be settled in shares of Stock, cash, or in any combination thereof;
(f)to approve one or more forms of Award Agreement;
(g)to amend, modify, extend, cancel or renew any Award or to waive any restrictions or conditions applicable to any Award or any shares acquired pursuant thereto;
(h)to accelerate, continue, extend or defer the exercisability or vesting of any Award or any shares acquired pursuant thereto, including with respect to the period following a Participant’s termination of Service;
(i)without the consent of the affected Participant and notwithstanding the provisions of any Award Agreement to the contrary, to unilaterally substitute at any time a Stock Appreciation Right providing for settlement solely in shares of Stock in place of any outstanding Option, provided that such Stock Appreciation Right covers the same number of shares of Stock and provides for the same exercise price (subject in each case to adjustment in accordance with Section 4.2) as the replaced Option and otherwise provides substantially equivalent terms and conditions as the replaced Option, as determined by the Committee, and subject to limitations set forth in Section 3.5;
(j)to prescribe, amend or rescind rules, guidelines and policies relating to the Plan, or to adopt sub-plans or supplements to, or alternative versions of, the Plan, including, without limitation, as the Committee deems necessary or desirable to comply with the laws or regulations of or to accommodate the tax policy, accounting principles or custom of, foreign jurisdictions whose citizens may be granted Awards;
(k)to correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or any Award Agreement and to make all other determinations and take such other actions with respect to the Plan or any Award as the Committee may deem advisable, to the extent not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan or applicable law; and
(l)to delegate to the Chief Executive Officer or the senior officer responsible for human resources the authority with respect to ministerial matters regarding the Plan and Awards made under the Plan.
3.5Option or SAR Repricing/Buyout. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Plan, without the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Stock cast in person or by proxy at a meeting of the shareholders of the Company at which a quorum representing a majority of all outstanding shares of Stock is present or represented by proxy, the Company shall not approve a program providing for any of the following: (a) the cancellation of outstanding Options or SARs and the grant in substitution therefore of new Options or SARs having a lower exercise price, another Award, cash or a combination thereof (other than in connection with a Change in Control), (b) the amendment of outstanding Options or SARs to reduce the exercise price thereof, (c) the purchase of outstanding unexercised Options or SARs by the Company, whether by cash payment or otherwise, if the exercise price of such Option or SAR is higher than the fair market value of an underlying share of Stock as of the date of purchase, or (d) any other action with respect to an Option or SAR that would be treated as a repricing under the rules and regulations of the principal U.S. national securities exchanges on which the Stock is listed. This paragraph shall not be construed to apply to “issuing or assuming a stock option in a transaction to which section 424(a) applies,” within the meaning of Section 424 of the Code. For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 3.5 shall not preclude any action taken without shareholder approval that is described in Section 4.2.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-6
Back to Contents
3.6Indemnification. In addition to such other rights of indemnification as they may have as members of the Board or the Committee or as officers or employees of the Participating Company Group, members of the Board or the Committee and any officers or employees of the Participating Company Group to whom authority to act for the Board, the Committee or the Company is delegated shall be indemnified by the Company against all reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, actually and necessarily incurred in connection with the defense of any action, suit or proceeding, or in connection with any appeal therein, to which they or any of them may be a party by reason of any action taken or failure to act under or in connection with the Plan, or any right granted hereunder, and against all amounts paid by them in settlement thereof (provided such settlement is approved by independent legal counsel selected by the Company) or paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding, except in relation to matters as to which it shall be adjudged in such action, suit or proceeding that such person is liable for gross negligence, bad faith or intentional misconduct in duties; provided, however, that within sixty (60) days after the institution of such action, suit or proceeding, such person shall offer to the Company, in writing, the opportunity at its own expense to handle and defend the same.
4.Shares Subject to Plan.
4.1Maximum Number of Shares Issuable. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan shall be 44 million (44,000,000), plus any shares authorized but not covered by an award under the Prior Plan as of the Effective Date. After the Effective Date, no Awards may be granted under the Prior Plan. Shares of Stock issued hereunder shall consist of authorized but unissued or reacquired shares of Stock or any combination thereof. If (i) an outstanding Award for any reason expires or is forfeited, terminated or canceled without having been exercised or settled in full, or if shares of Stock acquired pursuant to an Award subject to forfeiture or repurchase are forfeited or repurchased by the Company, the shares of Stock allocable to the terminated portion of such Award or such forfeited or repurchased shares of Stock shall again be available for issuance under the Plan; or (ii) after the Effective Date, an outstanding Award under the Prior Plan (whenever granted) for any reason expires or is forfeited, terminated or canceled without having been exercised or settled in full, or if shares of Stock acquired pursuant to an Award under the Prior Plan subject to forfeiture or repurchase are forfeited or repurchased by the Company, the shares of Stock allocable to the terminated portion of such Award or such forfeited or repurchased shares of Stock shall again be available for issuance under the Plan. Shares of Stock shall not be deemed to have been issued pursuant to the Plan (and shall again be available for issuance under the Plan) with respect to any portion of an Award (or, after the Effective Date, an award under the Prior Plan) that is settled in cash (other than in the case of Options or SARs, in which case shares of Stock having a Fair Market Value equal to the cash delivered shall be deemed issued pursuant to the Plan). Upon the exercise of an SAR (or, after the Effective Date, exercise of an SAR that was granted under the Prior Plan), the gross number of shares for which the SAR is exercised shall be deemed issued and shall not again be available for issuance under the Plan. Any Shares that are withheld by the Company or tendered by a Participant (by either actual delivery or attestation) on or after the Effective Date (i) to pay the Exercise Price of an Option granted under the Plan or the Prior Plan or (ii) to satisfy tax withholding obligations associated with an Option or SAR granted under the Plan or the Prior Plan, shall not become available again for grant under the Plan. Any Shares that were purchased by the Company on the open market on or after the Effective Date with the proceeds from the exercise of an Option granted under the Plan or the Prior Plan shall not become available for grant under the Plan. In the event that after the Effective Date, withholding tax liabilities arising in connection with an Award (other than an Option or SAR) under this Plan or the Prior Plan are satisfied by the tendering of shares of Stock (either actually or by attestation) or by the withholding of shares by the Company, then in each such case (other than in the case of such shares tendered or withheld in connection with the exercise of Options or SARs) the shares of Stock so tendered or withheld shall be added to the shares available for grant under the Plan on a one-for-one basis.
4.2Adjustments for Changes in Capital Structure. Subject to any required action by the shareholders of the Company or Section 409A of the Code, in the event of any change in the Stock effected without receipt of consideration by the Company, whether through merger, consolidation, reorganization, reincorporation, recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, split-up, split-off, spin-off, combination of shares, exchange of shares, or similar change in the capital structure of the Company, or in the event of payment of a dividend or distribution to the shareholders of the Company in a form other than Stock (excepting normal cash dividends) that has a material effect on the Fair Market Value of shares of Stock, appropriate adjustments shall be made in the number and kind of shares subject to the Plan and to

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-7
Back to Contents
any outstanding Awards, in the Award limits set forth in Section 5.4, and in the exercise or purchase price per share under any outstanding Award, in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of Participants’ rights under the Plan. For purposes of the foregoing, conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be treated as “effected without receipt of consideration by the Company.” Any fractional share resulting from an adjustment pursuant to this Section 4.2 shall be rounded down to the nearest whole number. The Committee in its sole discretion, may also make such adjustments in the terms of any Award to reflect, or related to, such changes in the capital structure of the Company or distributions as it deems appropriate, including modification of Performance Goals, Performance Award Formulas and Performance Periods. The adjustments determined by the Committee pursuant to this Section 4.2 shall be final, binding and conclusive.
4.3Substitute Awards. To the extent permitted under the rules of the applicable stock exchange on which the Stock is listed, Substitute Awards shall not reduce the shares of Stock authorized for grant under the Plan, nor shall Shares subject to a Substitute Award be added to the shares of Stock available for Awards under the Plan as provided above. Additionally, subject to the rules of the applicable stock exchange on which the Stock is listed, in the event that a company acquired by the Company or any Subsidiary Corporation or with which the Company or any Subsidiary Corporation combines has shares available under a pre-existing plan approved by shareholders and not adopted in contemplation of such acquisition or combination, the shares available for grant pursuant to the terms of such pre-existing plan (as adjusted, to the extent appropriate, using the exchange ratio or other adjustment or valuation ratio or formula used in such acquisition or combination to determine the consideration payable to the holders of common stock of the entities party to such acquisition or combination) may be used for Awards under the Plan and shall not reduce the shares authorized for grant under the Plan (and shares subject to such Awards shall not be added to the shares available for Awards under the Plan as provided in the paragraphs above); provided that Awards using such available shares shall not be made after the date awards or grants could have been made under the terms of the pre-existing plan, absent the acquisition or combination, and shall only be made to individuals who were not Employees or Directors prior to such acquisition or combination.
5.Eligibility and Award Limitations.
5.1Persons Eligible for Awards. Awards may be granted only to Employees, Consultants and Directors (including Non-employee Directors). For purposes of the foregoing sentence, “Employees,” “Consultants” and “Directors” shall include prospective Employees, prospective Consultants and prospective Directors to whom Awards are granted in connection with written offers of an employment or other service relationship with the Participating Company Group; provided, however, that no Stock subject to any such Award shall vest, become exercisable or be issued prior to the date on which such person commences Service. A Non-employee Director Award may be granted only to a person who, at the time of grant, is a Non-employee Director.
5.2Participation. Awards other than Non-employee Director Awards are granted solely at the discretion of the Committee. Eligible persons may be granted more than one Award. However, eligibility in accordance with this Section shall not entitle any person to be granted an Award, or, having been granted an Award, to be granted an additional Award.
5.3Incentive Stock Option Limitations.
(a)Persons Eligible.An Incentive Stock Option (“ISO”) may be granted only to a person who, on the effective date of grant, is an Employee of the Company, a Parent Corporation or a Subsidiary Corporation (each being an ISO-Qualifying Corporation). Any person who is not an Employee of an ISO-Qualifying Corporation on the effective date of the grant of an Option to such person may be granted only a Nonstatutory Stock Option. An Incentive Stock Option granted to a prospective Employee on the condition that such person become an Employee of an ISO-Qualifying Corporation shall be deemed granted effective on the date such person commences Service with an ISO-Qualifying Corporation, with an exercise price determined as of such date in accordance with Section 6.1.
(b)Fair Market Value Limitation.To the extent that options designated as Incentive Stock Options (granted under all stock option plans of the Participating Company Group, including the Plan) become exercisable by a Participant for the first time during any calendar year for stock having a Fair Market Value greater than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000), the portion of such options that exceeds such amount shall be treated as Nonstatutory Stock Options. For purposes of this Section, options designated as Incentive Stock Options shall be taken into account in the order in which they were granted, and the Fair Market Value of stock shall be determined as of the time the option with

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-8
Back to Contents
respect to such stock is granted. If the Code is amended to provide for a limitation different from that set forth in this Section, such different limitation shall be deemed incorporated herein effective as of the date and with respect to such Options as required or permitted by such amendment to the Code. If an Option is treated as an Incentive Stock Option in part and as a Nonstatutory Stock Option in part by reason of the limitation set forth in this Section, the Participant may designate which portion of such Option the Participant is exercising. In the absence of such designation, the Participant shall be deemed to have exercised the Incentive Stock Option portion of the Option first. Upon exercise, shares issued pursuant to each such portion shall be separately identified.
5.4Award Limits.
(a)Maximum Number of Shares Issuable Pursuant to Incentive Stock Options.Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan pursuant to the exercise of Incentive Stock Options shall not exceed the number of shares set forth in the first sentence of Section 4.1 plus, to the extent allowable under Section 422 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder, any shares of Stock that again become available for issuance pursuant to the remaining provisions of Section 4.1.
(b)Non-employee Director Award Limits.The maximum aggregate value of equity- and cash-based Awards granted to any Non-employee Director for service in such capacity during any calendar year shall not exceed $750,000 (“Annual Limit”), except that, in the case of a Non-employee Director who is serving as Chairman of the Board, the Annual Limit shall be increased by 200%. The value of an equity-based Award shall be based on the Award’s grant date fair value as determined under applicable accounting standards.
5.5Dividends and Dividend Equivalents. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, cash dividends, stock and any other property (other than cash) distributed as a dividend, a Dividend Equivalent or otherwise with respect to any Award (a) shall either (i) not be paid or credited or (ii) be accumulated, (b) shall be subject to restrictions and risk of forfeiture to the same extent as the underlying Award with respect to which such cash, stock or other property has been distributed, and (c) shall be paid after such restrictions and risk of forfeiture lapse in accordance with the terms of the applicable Award Agreement.
5.6Minimum Vesting Period. Except in the case of Substitute Awards granted pursuant to Sections 4.3, any equity-based Award (including any portion thereof) shall have a minimum vesting period of one year from the date of its grant with no vesting prior to the first anniversary of the grant date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the Committee may provide in an Award Agreement or following the time of grant that the vesting of an Award shall accelerate in the event of the Participant’s death, Disability, Retirement, or a termination of Service other than for cause, and (ii) the Committee may grant Awards covering up to five percent (5%) of the total number of shares of Stock authorized under Section 4.1 of the Plan (subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Plan) without respect to the minimum vesting requirements set forth in this Section 5.6. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with regard to Awards granted to a Non-employee Director, the vesting of such Awards will be deemed to satisfy the one (1) year minimum vesting requirement to the extent that the Awards vest on the earlier of the one (1) year anniversary of the date of grant and the next annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders that is at least fifty (50) weeks after the immediately preceding year’s annual meeting.
6.Terms and Conditions of Options.
Options shall be evidenced by Award Agreements specifying the number of shares of Stock covered thereby, in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. No Option or purported Option shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing Options may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions.
6.1Exercise Price. The exercise price for each Option shall be established in the discretion of the Committee; provided, however, that (a) the exercise price per share shall be not less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the effective date of grant of the Option and (b) no Incentive Stock Option granted to a Ten Percent Owner shall have an exercise price per share less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the effective date of grant of the Option. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Option (whether an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonstatutory Stock Option) may be granted with an exercise price lower than the minimum exercise price set forth above if such Option is granted as a Substitute Award, except as would result in taxation under Section 409A or loss of ISO status.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-9
Back to Contents
6.2Exercisability and Term of Options. Options shall be exercisable at such time or times, or upon such event or events, and subject to such terms, conditions, performance criteria and restrictions as shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such Option; provided, however, that (a) no Option shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years after the effective date of grant of such Option, (b) no Incentive Stock Option granted to a Ten Percent Owner shall be exercisable after the expiration of five (5) years after the effective date of grant of such Option, and (c) no Option granted to a prospective Employee, prospective Consultant or prospective Director may become exercisable prior to the date on which such person commences Service. Subject to the foregoing, unless otherwise specified by the Committee in the grant of an Option, any Option granted hereunder shall terminate ten (10) years after the effective date of grant of the Option, unless earlier terminated in accordance with its provisions.
6.3Payment of Exercise Price.
(a)Forms of Consideration Authorized. Except as otherwise provided below, payment of the exercise price for the number of shares of Stock being purchased pursuant to any Option shall be made (i) in cash, by check or in cash equivalent, (ii) by tender to the Company, or attestation to the ownership, of shares of Stock owned by the Participant having a Fair Market Value not less than the exercise price, (iii) by delivery of a properly executed notice of exercise together with irrevocable instructions to a broker providing for the assignment to the Company of the proceeds of a sale or loan with respect to some or all of the shares being acquired upon the exercise of the Option (including, without limitation, through an exercise complying with the provisions of Regulation T as promulgated from time to time by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System) (a Cashless Exercise), (iv) by delivery of a properly executed notice of exercise electing a Net-Exercise, (v) by such other consideration as may be approved by the Committee from time to time to the extent permitted by applicable law, or (vi) by any combination thereof. The Committee may at any time or from time to time grant Options that do not permit all of the foregoing forms of consideration to be used in payment of the exercise price or that otherwise restrict one or more forms of consideration. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Award Agreement may provide that, if on the last day of the term of an Option the Fair Market Value of one share exceeds the option price per share, and the Participant has not exercised the Option (or a tandem Stock Appreciation Right, if applicable) and the Option has not expired, the Option, to the extent vested, shall be deemed to have been exercised by the Participant on such day with payment made by withholding shares otherwise issuable in connection with the exercise of the Option. In such event, the Company shall deliver to the Participant the number of shares for which the Option was deemed exercised, less the number of shares required to be withheld for the payment of the total purchase price and required withholding taxes; provided, however, any fractional share shall be settled in cash.
(b)Limitations on Forms of Consideration.
(i)Tender of Stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Option may not be exercised by tender to the Company, or attestation to the ownership, of shares of Stock to the extent such tender or attestation would constitute a violation of the provisions of any law, regulation or agreement restricting the redemption of the Company’s stock.
(ii)Cashless Exercise. The Company reserves, at any and all times, the right, in the Company’s sole and absolute discretion, to establish, decline to approve, or terminate any program or procedures for the exercise of Options by means of a Cashless Exercise, including with respect to one or more Participants specified by the Company, notwithstanding that such program or procedures may be available to other Participants.
6.4Effect of Termination of Service.
(a)Option Exercisability. Subject to earlier termination of the Option as otherwise provided herein and unless otherwise provided by the Committee, an Option shall be exercisable after a Participant’s termination of Service only during the applicable time periods provided in the Award Agreement.
(b)Extension if Exercise Prevented by Law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless the Committee provides otherwise in the Award Agreement, if the exercise of an Option within the applicable time periods is prevented by the provisions of Section 15 below, the Option shall remain exercisable until three (3) months (or such longer period of time as determined by the Committee, in its discretion) after the date the Participant is notified by the Company that the Option is exercisable, but in any event no later than the earlier of the Option Expiration Date and the tenth anniversary of the date of grant of the Option.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-10
Back to Contents
(c)Extension if Exercise Prohibited by Law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that on the last business day of the term of an Option (other than an Incentive Stock Option) the exercise of the Option is prohibited by applicable law, the term of the Option shall be extended for a period of thirty (30) days following the end of the legal prohibition.
7.Terms and Conditions of Non-employee Director Awards.

Non-employee Director Awards granted under this Plan shall be automatic and non-discretionary and shall comply with and be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Section 7.

The grant date for all Non-employee Director awards to be made under this Section 7 shall be the later of (1) the date on which the independent inspector of election certifies the results of the annual election of directors by shareholders of PG&E Corporation, or (2) the date that this Plan becomes effective and grants can be made consistent with legal requirements; provided, however, that in extraordinary circumstances, the grant shall be delayed until the first business day of the next open trading window period following certification of the director election results, as determined by the General Counsel of PG&E Corporation (the “Grant Date”).

7.1Grant of Restricted Stock Unit.
(a)Timing and Amount of Grant. Each person who is a Non-employee Director on the Grant Date (other than a Non-employee Director who is serving as the Company’s non-executive chair of the Board) shall receive a grant of Restricted Stock Units with the number of Restricted Stock Units determined by dividing $140,000 by the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the Grant Date (rounded down to the nearest whole Restricted Stock Unit). A Non-employee Director who also serves as the Company’s non-executive chair of the Board on the Grant Date shall receive a grant of Restricted Stock Units with the number of Restricted Stock Units determined by dividing $220,000 by the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the Grant Date (rounded down to the nearest whole Restricted Stock Unit). The Restricted Stock Units awarded to a Non-employee Director shall be credited to the director’s Restricted Stock Unit account. Each Restricted Stock Unit awarded to a Non-employee Director in accordance with this Section 7.1(a) shall be deemed to be equal to one (1) (or fraction thereof) share of Stock on the Grant Date, and the value of the Restricted Stock Unit shall thereafter fluctuate in value in accordance with the Fair Market Value of the Stock. No person shall receive more than one grant of Restricted Stock Units pursuant to this Section 7.1(a) during any calendar year.
(b)Dividend Rights. Each Non-employee Director’s Restricted Stock Unit account shall be credited quarterly on each dividend payment date with additional Restricted Stock Units (including fractions computed to three decimal places) determined by dividing (1) the amount of cash dividends paid on such date with respect to the number of shares of Stock represented by the Restricted Stock Units previously credited to the account by (2) the Fair Market Value per share of Stock on such date. Such additional Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to the same terms and conditions and shall be settled in the same manner and at the same time as the Restricted Stock Units originally subject to the Restricted Stock Unit Award.
(c)Vesting and Settlement of Restricted Stock Units. Restricted Stock Units shall vest on the earlier of (i) the first anniversary of the Grant Date or (ii) the last day of the director’s elected term (the normal vesting date). Restricted Stock Units credited to a Non-employee Director’s Restricted Stock Unit account shall, to the extent vested, be settled in a lump sum by the issuance of an equal number of shares of Stock, rounded down to the nearest whole share, upon the earliest of (i) the first anniversary of the Grant Date (the normal settlement date), (ii) the Non-employee Director’s death, (iii) the Non-employee Director’s Disability (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code), or (iv) the Non-employee Director’s Separation from Service following a Change in Control. However, a Non-employee Director may irrevocably elect, no later than December 31 of the calendar year prior to the Grant Date of the Restricted Stock Units (or such later time permitted by Section 409A) to have the Non-employee Director’s Restricted Stock Unit account settled in (1) a series of 10 approximately equal annual installments (which shall be separate payments for purposes of Section 409A) commencing in January of any year following the normal settlement date, or (2) a lump sum in January of any future year following the normal settlement date. In the event that the Non-employee Director elects settlement of the Restricted Stock Units in accordance with the immediately preceding sentence, the Restricted Stock Units shall be earlier settled in a lump sum, to the extent vested, upon the occurrence of any of the events set forth in Section 7.1(c)(ii) through 7.1(c)(iv) prior to the elected settlement date (or commencement thereof in the case of settlement in 10 equal annual installments). In the event that a Non-employee Director elects to have the Non-employee Director’s Restricted Stock

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-11
Back to Contents

Unit account settled in a series of 10 approximately equal annual installments commencing in January of any year following the normal settlement date and one of the events set forth in Section 7.1(c) (ii) through 7.1(c)(iv) occurs after commencement of such installments but prior to full settlement of the Non-employee Director’s Restricted Stock Units, then any remaining unsettled Restricted Stock Units will be settled in a lump sum upon the occurrence of the applicable event but only to the extent that such acceleration would not result in the imposition of taxation under Section 409A. The Board may authorize other deferral alternatives with respect to Restricted Stock Units granted to Non-employee Directors, provided that such deferral alternatives comply with the deferral timing and other requirements of Section 409A. Such deferral alternatives may include, without limitation, deferral until the Non-employee Director’s separation from service or until the January following such separation.

7.2Effect of Termination of Service as a Non-employee Director.
(a)Forfeiture of Award. If the Non-employee Director has a Separation from Service prior to the normal vesting date, all Restricted Stock Units credited to the Participant’s account that have not vested in accordance with Section 7.2(b) or 7.3 shall be forfeited to the Company from and after the date of such Separation from Service, and the Participant shall cease to have any rights with respect thereto; provided, however, that if the Non-employee Director Separates from Service due to a pending Disability determination, such forfeiture shall not occur until a finding that such Disability has not occurred.
(b)Death or Disability. If the Non-employee Director becomes “disabled,” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code or in the event of the Non-employee Director’s death, all Restricted Stock Units credited to the Non-employee Director’s account shall immediately vest and become payable, in accordance with Section 7.1(c), to the Participant (or the Participant’s legal representative or other person who acquired the rights to the Restricted Stock Units by reason of the Participant’s death) in the form of a number of shares of Stock equal to the number of Restricted Stock Units credited to the Restricted Stock Unit account, rounded down to the nearest whole share.
(c)Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7.1(c) above, the Board, in its sole discretion, may amend this Section 7 or establish different terms and conditions pertaining to Non-employee Director Awards, in compliance with Section 409A of the Code.
7.3Other Awards to Non-employee Directors. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Plan, subject to Section 5.4(b) of the Plan, Non-employee Directors shall be eligible to receive all types of Awards under the Plan in addition to or instead of Non-employee Director Awards, as may be determined by the Board.
8.Terms and Conditions of Stock Appreciation Rights.

Stock Appreciation Rights shall be evidenced by Award Agreements specifying the number of shares of Stock subject to the Award, in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. No SAR or purported SAR shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing SARs may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions.

8.1Types of SARs Authorized. SARs may be granted in tandem with all or any portion of a related Option (a “Tandem SAR”) or may be granted independently of any Option (a Freestanding SAR). A Tandem SAR may be granted either concurrently with the grant of the related Option or at any time thereafter prior to the complete exercise, termination, expiration or cancellation of such related Option.
8.2Exercise Price. The exercise price for each SAR shall be established in the discretion of the Committee; provided, however, that (other than in connection with Substitute Awards granted in accordance with Code Section 424(a)): (a) the exercise price per share subject to a Tandem SAR shall be the exercise price per share under the related Option and (b) the exercise price per share subject to a Freestanding SAR shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the effective date of grant of the SAR.
8.3Exercisability and Term of SARs.
(a)Tandem SARs.Tandem SARs shall be exercisable only at the time and only to the extent that the related Option is exercisable, subject to such provisions as the Committee may specify where the Tandem SAR is granted with respect to less than the full number of shares of Stock subject to the related Option.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-12
Back to Contents
(b)Freestanding SARs.Freestanding SARs shall be exercisable at such time or times, or upon such event or events, and subject to such terms, conditions, performance criteria and restrictions as shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such SAR; provided, however, that no Freestanding SAR shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years after the effective date of grant of such SAR.
(c)Extension if Exercise Prevented by Law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless the Committee provides otherwise in the Award Agreement, if the exercise of an SAR within the applicable time periods is prevented by the provisions of Section 15 below, the SAR shall remain exercisable until three (3) months (or such longer period of time as determined by the Committee, in its discretion) after the date the Participant is notified by the Company that the SAR is exercisable, but in any event no later than the earlier of the date of expiration of the SAR’s term (as set forth in the applicable Award Agreement) and the tenth anniversary of the date of grant of the SAR.
(d)Extension if Exercise Prohibited by Law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that on the last business day of the term of an SAR the exercise of the SAR is prohibited by applicable law, the term shall be extended for a period of thirty (30) days following the end of the legal prohibition.
8.4Deemed Exercise of SARs. An Award Agreement may provide that if on the last day of the term of an SAR, the Fair Market Value of one share exceeds the grant price per share of the Stock Appreciation Right, and the Participant has not exercised the SAR or the tandem Option (if applicable), and the SAR has not otherwise expired, the SAR, to the extent then vested, shall be deemed to have been exercised by the Participant on such day. In such event, the Company shall make payment to the Participant in accordance with this Section, reduced by the number of shares (or cash) required for withholding taxes; provided, however, any fractional share shall be settled in cash.
8.5Effect of Termination of Service. Subject to earlier termination of the SAR as otherwise provided herein and unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the grant of an SAR and set forth in the Award Agreement, an SAR shall be exercisable after a Participant’s termination of Service only as provided in the Award Agreement.
9.Terms and Conditions of Restricted Stock Awards.

Restricted Stock Awards shall be evidenced by Award Agreements specifying the number of shares of Stock subject to the Award, in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. No Restricted Stock Award or purported Restricted Stock Award shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing Restricted Stock Awards may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions.

9.1Types of Restricted Stock Awards Authorized. Restricted Stock Awards may or may not require the payment of cash compensation for the stock. Restricted Stock Awards may be granted upon such conditions as the Committee shall determine, including, without limitation, upon the attainment of one or more Performance Goals described in Section 10.4 or other performance conditions established by the Committee.
9.2Purchase Price. The purchase price, if any, for shares of Stock issuable under each Restricted Stock Award and the means of payment shall be established by the Committee in its discretion.
9.3Purchase Period. A Restricted Stock Award requiring the payment of cash consideration shall be exercisable within a period established by the Committee; provided, however, that no Restricted Stock Award granted to a prospective Employee, prospective Consultant or prospective Director may become exercisable prior to the date on which such person commences Service.
9.4Vesting and Restrictions on Transfer. Shares issued pursuant to any Restricted Stock Award may or may not be made subject to Vesting Conditions based upon the satisfaction of such Service requirements, conditions, restrictions or performance criteria, including, without limitation, Performance Goals as described in Section 10.4, as shall be established by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such Award. During any Restriction Period in which shares acquired pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award remain subject to Vesting Conditions, such shares may not be sold, exchanged, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise disposed of other than as provided in the Award Agreement or as provided in Section 18. Upon request by the Company, each Participant shall execute any agreement evidencing such transfer restrictions prior to the receipt of shares of Stock hereunder and shall promptly present to the Company any and all certificates representing shares of Stock acquired hereunder for the placement on such certificates of appropriate legends evidencing any such transfer restrictions.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-13
Back to Contents
9.5Voting Rights, Dividends and Distributions. Except as provided in Section 5.5, Section 9.4, this Section, and any Award Agreement, during the Restriction Period applicable to shares subject to a Restricted Stock Award, the Participant shall have all of the rights of a shareholder of the Company holding shares of Stock, including the right to vote such shares and to receive all dividends and other distributions paid with respect to such shares. However, in the event of a dividend or distribution paid in shares of Stock or any other adjustment made upon a change in the capital structure of the Company as described in Section 4.2, any and all new, substituted or additional securities or other property (other than normal cash dividends) to which the Participant is entitled by reason of the Participant’s Restricted Stock Award shall be immediately subject to the same Vesting Conditions as the shares subject to the Restricted Stock Award with respect to which such dividends or distributions were paid or adjustments were made.
9.6Effect of Termination of Service. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the grant of a Restricted Stock Award and set forth in the Award Agreement, if a Participant’s Service terminates for any reason, whether voluntary or involuntary (including the Participant’s death or Disability), then the Participant shall forfeit to the Company any shares acquired by the Participant pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award that remain subject to Vesting Conditions as of the date of the Participant’s termination of Service in exchange for the payment of the purchase price, if any, paid by the Participant. The Company shall have the right to assign at any time any repurchase right it may have, whether or not such right is then exercisable, to one or more persons as may be selected by the Company.
10.Terms and Conditions of Performance Awards.

Performance Awards shall be evidenced by Award Agreements in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. No Performance Award or purported Performance Award shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing Performance Awards may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference.

10.1Types of Performance Awards Authorized. Performance Awards may be in the form of either Performance Shares or Performance Units. Each Award Agreement evidencing a Performance Award shall specify the number of Performance Shares or Performance Units subject thereto, the Performance Award Formula, the Performance Goal(s) and Performance Period applicable to the Award, and the other terms, conditions and restrictions of the Award.
10.2Initial Value of Performance Shares and Performance Units. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in granting a Performance Award, each Performance Share shall have an initial value equal to the Fair Market Value of one (1) share of Stock, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2, on the effective date of grant of the Performance Share. Each Performance Unit shall have an initial value determined by the Committee. The final value payable to the Participant in settlement of a Performance Award determined on the basis of the applicable Performance Award Formula will depend on the extent to which Performance Goals established by the Committee are attained within the applicable Performance Period established by the Committee.
10.3Establishment of Performance Period, Performance Goals and Performance Award Formula. In granting each Performance Award, the Committee shall establish in writing the applicable Performance Period, Performance Award Formula and one or more Performance Goals that, when measured at the end of the Performance Period, shall determine on the basis of the Performance Award Formula the final value of the Performance Award to be paid to the Participant. The Company shall notify each Participant granted a Performance Award of the terms of such Award, including the Performance Period, Performance Goal(s) and Performance Award Formula.
10.4Measurement of Performance Goals. Performance Goals shall be established by the Committee on the basis of targets to be attained (Performance Targets) with respect to one or more measures of business or financial performance (each, a Performance Measure), subject to the following.
(a)Performance Measures.Performance Measures shall be calculated with respect to the Company and/ or each Subsidiary Corporation and/or such division or other business unit as may be selected by the Committee, or may be based upon performance relative to performance of other companies or upon comparisons of any of the indicators of performance relative to performance of other companies. Performance Measures may be based upon one or more of the following business criteria, as determined by the Committee: (i) sales revenue; (ii) gross margin; (iii) operating margin; (iv) operating income; (v) pre-tax profit; (vi) earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)/ adjusted EBITDA; (vii) net income; (viii) expenses; (ix) the market price of the Stock; (x) earnings per

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-14
Back to Contents
share; (xi) return on shareholder equity or assets; (xii) return on capital; (xiii) return on net assets; (xiv) economic profit or economic value added (EVA); (xv) market share; (xvi) customer satisfaction; (xvii) safety; (xviii) total shareholder return; (xix) earnings; (xx) cash flow; (xxi) revenue; (xxii) profits before interest and taxes; (xxiii) profit/loss; (xxiv) profit margin; (xxv) working capital; (xxvi) price/ earnings ratio; (xxvii) debt or debt-to-equity; (xxviii) accounts receivable; (xxix) write-offs; (xxx) cash; (xxxi) assets; (xxxii) liquidity; (xxxiii) core earnings (xxxiv) operational reliability; (xxxv) environmental performance; (xxxvi) funds from operations; (xxxvii) adjusted revenues; (xxxviii) free cash flow; or (xxxix) operational performance.
(b)Performance Targets.Performance Targets may include a minimum, maximum, target level and intermediate levels of performance, with the final value of a Performance Award determined under the applicable Performance Award Formula by the level attained during the applicable Performance Period. A Performance Target may be stated as an absolute value or as a value determined relative to a standard selected by the Committee.
10.5Settlement of Performance Awards.
(a)Determination of Final Value.As soon as practicable, but no later than the 15th day of the third month following the completion of the Performance Period applicable to a Performance Award (or such shorter period set forth in an Award Agreement), the Committee shall certify the extent to which the applicable Performance Goals have been attained and the resulting final value of the Award earned by the Participant and to be paid upon its settlement in accordance with the applicable Performance Award Formula no later than the 15th day of the third month following the completion of such Performance Period (or such shorter period set forth in an Award Agreement).
(b)Discretionary Adjustment of Award Formula.In its discretion, the Committee may, either at the time it grants a Performance Award or at any time thereafter, provide for the positive or negative adjustment of the Performance Award Formula applicable to a Performance Award to reflect such Participant’s individual performance in his or her position with the Company or such other factors as the Committee may determine.
(c)Payment in Settlement of Performance Awards. As soon as practicable following the Committee’s determination and certification in accordance with Sections 10.5(a) and (b) but, in any case, no later than the 15th day of the third month following completion of the Performance Period applicable to a Performance Award (or such shorter period set forth in an Award Agreement), payment shall be made to each eligible Participant (or such Participant’s legal representative or other person who acquired the right to receive such payment by reason of the Participant’s death) of the final value of the Participant’s Performance Award. Payment of such amount shall be made in cash, shares of Stock, or a combination thereof as determined by the Committee.
10.6Voting Rights, Dividend Equivalent Rights and Distributions. Participants shall have no voting rights with respect to shares of Stock represented by Performance Share Awards until the date of the issuance of such shares, if any (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company). However, the Committee, in its discretion, may provide in the Award Agreement evidencing any Performance Share Award that the Participant shall be entitled to receive Dividend Equivalents with respect to the payment of cash dividends on Stock having a record date prior to the date on which the Performance Shares are settled or forfeited. Such Dividend Equivalents, if any, shall be credited to the Participant in the form of additional whole Performance Shares as of the date of payment of such cash dividends on Stock. The number of additional Performance Shares (rounded to the nearest whole number) to be so credited shall be determined by dividing (a) the amount of cash dividends paid on such date with respect to the number of shares of Stock represented by the Performance Shares previously credited to the Participant by (b) the Fair Market Value per share of Stock on such date. Dividend Equivalents credited in connection with Performance Shares shall be subject to Section 5.5 of the Plan. Settlement of Dividend Equivalents may be made in cash, shares of Stock, or a combination thereof as determined by the Committee, and may be paid on the same basis as settlement of the related Performance Shares as provided in Section 10.5. Dividend Equivalents shall not be paid with respect to Performance Units. In the event of an adjustment described in Section 4.2, the adjusted Performance Share Award shall be immediately subject to the same Performance Goals as are applicable to the Award.
10.7Effect of Termination of Service. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the grant of a Performance Award and set forth in the Award Agreement, the effect of a Participant’s termination of Service on the Performance Award shall be as follows.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-15
Back to Contents
(a)Death or Disability.If the Participant’s Service terminates because of the death or Disability of the Participant before the completion of the Performance Period applicable to the Performance Award, the final value of the Participant’s Performance Award shall be determined by the extent to which the applicable Performance Goals have been attained with respect to the entire Performance Period and shall be prorated based on the number of months of the Participant’s Service during the Performance Period. Payment shall be made following the end of the Performance Period in any manner permitted by Section 10.5.
(b)Other Termination of Service. If the Participant’s Service terminates for any reason except death or Disability before the completion of the Performance Period applicable to the Performance Award, such Award shall be forfeited in its entirety; provided, however, that in the event of termination of the Participant’s Service for other reasons, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may waive the automatic forfeiture of all or any portion of any such Award.
11.Terms and Conditions of Restricted Stock Unit Awards.

Restricted Stock Unit Awards shall be evidenced by Award Agreements specifying the number of Restricted Stock Units subject to the Award, in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. No Restricted Stock Unit Award or purported Restricted Stock Unit Award shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing Restricted Stock Units may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions.

11.1Grant of Restricted Stock Unit Awards. Restricted Stock Unit Awards may be granted upon such conditions as the Committee shall determine, including, without limitation, upon the attainment of one or more Performance Goals described in Section 10.4.
11.2Vesting. Restricted Stock Units may or may not be made subject to Vesting Conditions based upon the satisfaction of such Service requirements, conditions, restrictions or performance criteria, including, without limitation, Performance Goals as described in Section 10.4, as shall be established by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such Award.
11.3Voting Rights, Dividend Equivalent Rights and Distributions. Participants shall have no voting rights with respect to shares of Stock represented by Restricted Stock Units until the date of the issuance of such shares (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company). However, the Committee, in its discretion, may provide in the Award Agreement evidencing any Restricted Stock Unit Award that the Participant shall be entitled to receive Dividend Equivalents with respect to the payment of cash dividends on Stock having a record date prior to the date on which Restricted Stock Units held by such Participant are settled. Such Dividend Equivalents, if any, shall be paid by crediting the Participant with additional whole Restricted Stock Units as of the date of payment of such cash dividends on Stock. The number of additional Restricted Stock Units (rounded to the nearest whole number) to be so credited shall be determined by dividing (a) the amount of cash dividends paid on such date with respect to the number of shares of Stock represented by the Restricted Stock Units previously credited to the Participant by (b) the Fair Market Value per share of Stock on such date. Such additional Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to the same terms and conditions and shall be settled in the same manner and at the same time as the Restricted Stock Units originally subject to the Restricted Stock Unit Award, provided that Dividend Equivalents may be settled in cash, shares of Stock, or a combination thereof as determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement. In the event of an adjustment as described in Section 4.2, the Participant’s adjusted Restricted Stock Unit Award shall be immediately subject to the same Vesting Conditions as are applicable to the Award.
11.4Effect of Termination of Service. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the grant of a Restricted Stock Unit Award and set forth in the Award Agreement, if a Participant’s Service terminates for any reason, whether voluntary or involuntary (including the Participant’s death or Disability), then the Participant shall forfeit to the Company any Restricted Stock Units pursuant to the Award that remain subject to Vesting Conditions as of the date of the Participant’s termination of Service.
11.5Settlement of Restricted Stock Unit Awards. The Company shall issue to a Participant on the date on which Restricted Stock Units subject to the Participant’s Restricted Stock Unit Award vest or on such other date determined by the Committee, in its discretion, and set forth in the Award Agreement one (1) share of Stock (and/or any other new, substituted or additional securities or other property pursuant to an adjustment described in Section 11.3) for each Restricted Stock Unit then becoming vested or otherwise to be settled

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-16
Back to Contents

on such date, subject to the withholding of applicable taxes, provided that Restricted Stock Units may be settled in cash, shares of Stock, or a combination thereof as determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if permitted by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement, and subject to the restrictions of Section 409A of the Code, the Participant may elect in accordance with terms specified in the Award Agreement to defer receipt of all or any portion of the shares of Stock or other property otherwise issuable to the Participant pursuant to this Section.

12.Deferred Compensation Awards.
12.1Establishment of Deferred Compensation Award Programs. This Section 12 shall not be effective unless and until the Committee determines to establish a program pursuant to this Section. The Committee, in its discretion and upon such terms and conditions as it may determine, may establish one or more programs pursuant to the Plan under which:
(a)Subject to the restrictions of Section 409A of the Code, Participants designated by the Committee who are Insiders or otherwise among a select group of management or highly compensated Employees may irrevocably elect, prior to a date specified by the Committee, to reduce such Participant’s compensation otherwise payable in cash (subject to any minimum or maximum reductions imposed by the Committee) and to be granted automatically at such time or times as specified by the Committee one or more Awards of Stock Units with respect to such numbers of shares of Stock as determined in accordance with the rules of the program established by the Committee and having such other terms and conditions as established by the Committee; and
(b)Subject to the restrictions of Section 409A of the Code, Participants designated by the Committee who are Insiders or otherwise among a select group of management or highly compensated Employees may irrevocably elect, prior to a date specified by the Committee, to be granted automatically an Award of Stock Units with respect to such number of shares of Stock and upon such other terms and conditions as established by the Committee in lieu of cash or shares of Stock otherwise issuable to such Participant upon the settlement of a Performance Award or Performance Unit.
12.2Terms and Conditions of Deferred Compensation Awards. Deferred Compensation Awards granted pursuant to this Section 12 shall be evidenced by Award Agreements in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. No such Deferred Compensation Award or purported Deferred Compensation Award shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing Deferred Compensation Awards may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions.
(a)Vesting Conditions. Deferred Compensation Awards shall or shall not be subject to vesting conditions, as determined by the Committee.
(b)Terms and Conditions of Stock Units.
(i)Voting Rights, Dividend Equivalent Rights and Distributions. Participants shall have no voting rights with respect to shares of Stock represented by Stock Units until the date of the issuance of such shares (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company). However, the Committee, in its discretion, may provide in the applicable Award Agreement that the Participant shall be entitled to receive Dividend Equivalents with respect to the payment of cash dividends on Stock having a record date prior to the date on which Stock Units held by such Participant are settled. Such Dividend Equivalents shall be paid by crediting the Participant with additional whole and/or fractional Stock Units as of the date of payment of such cash dividends on Stock. The method of determining the number of additional Stock Units to be so credited shall be specified by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement. Such additional Stock Units shall be subject to the same terms and conditions and shall be settled in the same manner and at the same time as the Stock Units originally subject to the Stock Unit Award. In the event of a dividend or distribution paid in shares of Stock or any other adjustment made upon a change in the capital structure of the Company as described in Section 4.2, appropriate adjustments shall be made in the Participant’s Stock Unit Award so that it represents the right to receive upon settlement any and all new, substituted or additional securities or other property (other than normal cash dividends) to which the Participant would be entitled by reason of the shares of Stock issuable upon settlement of the Award.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-17
Back to Contents
(ii)Settlement of Stock Unit Awards. A Participant electing to receive an Award of Stock Units pursuant to this Section 12 shall specify at the time of such election a settlement date with respect to such Award in accordance with rules established by the Committee. Except as otherwise set forth in the applicable Award Agreement, the Company shall issue to the Participant, upon the earlier of the settlement date elected by the Participant or the date of the Participant’s Separation from Service, a number of whole shares of Stock equal to the number of whole Stock Units subject to the Stock Unit Award. The Participant shall not be required to pay any additional consideration (other than applicable tax withholding) to acquire such shares. Any fractional Stock Unit subject to the Stock Unit Award shall be settled by the Company by payment in cash of an amount equal to the Fair Market Value as of the payment date of such fractional share.
13.Other Stock-Based Awards.

In addition to the Awards set forth in Sections 6 through 12 above, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may carry out the purpose of this Plan by awarding Stock-Based Awards as it determines to be in the best interests of the Company and subject to such other terms and conditions as it deems necessary and appropriate. Such awards may be evidenced by Award Agreements in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish.

14.Change in Control.
14.1Effect of Change in Control. Except as set forth in an applicable Award Agreement, in the event of a Change in Control, the surviving, continuing, successor, or purchasing corporation or other business entity or parent thereof, as the case may be (the “Acquiror”), may, without the consent of any Participant, either assume or continue the Company’s rights and obligations under outstanding Awards or substitute for such Awards substantially equivalent Awards covering the Acquiror’s stock. Except as set forth in an applicable Award Agreement, Awards that are assumed or continued in connection with a Change in Control shall be subject to such additional accelerated vesting and/or exercisability, or lapse of restrictions in connection with the Participant’s termination of Service in connection with the Change in Control as the Committee or Board may determine, if any. Except as set forth in an applicable Award Agreement, in the event of a Change in Control in which Awards are not assumed or continued, a Participant’s then-outstanding Awards that are not vested shall immediately vest, and all performance conditions associated with Performance Awards shall be deemed satisfied as if target performance was achieved, and shall be settled in cash, shares or a combination thereof, as determined by the Committee, within thirty (30) days following such Change in Control (except to the extent that settlement of the Award must be made pursuant to its original schedule in order to comply with Code Section 409A), notwithstanding that the applicable performance period, retention period or other restrictions and conditions have not been completed or satisfied.
15.Compliance with Securities Law.

The grant of Awards and the issuance of shares of Stock pursuant to any Award shall be subject to compliance with all applicable requirements of federal, state and foreign law with respect to such securities and the requirements of any stock exchange or market system upon which the Stock may then be listed. In addition, no Award may be exercised or shares issued pursuant to an Award unless (a) a registration statement under the Securities Act shall at the time of such exercise or issuance be in effect with respect to the shares issuable pursuant to the Award or (b) in the opinion of legal counsel to the Company, the shares issuable pursuant to the Award may be issued in accordance with the terms of an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. The inability of the Company to obtain from any regulatory body having jurisdiction the authority, if any, deemed by the Company’s legal counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any shares hereunder shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained. As a condition to issuance of any Stock, the Company may require the Participant to satisfy any qualifications that may be necessary or appropriate, to evidence compliance with any applicable law or regulation, and to make any representation or warranty with respect thereto as may be requested by the Company.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-18
Back to Contents
16.Tax Withholding.
16.1Tax Withholding in General. The Company shall have the right to deduct from any and all payments made under the Plan, or to require the Participant, through payroll withholding, cash payment or otherwise, including by means of a Cashless Exercise or Net Exercise of an Option, to make adequate provision for the federal, state, local and foreign taxes, if any, required by law to be withheld by the Participating Company Group with respect to an Award or the shares acquired pursuant thereto. The Company shall have no obligation to deliver shares of Stock, to release shares of Stock from an escrow established pursuant to an Award Agreement, or to make any payment in cash under the Plan unless the Participating Company Group’s tax withholding obligations have been satisfied by the Participant.
16.2Withholding in Shares. The Company shall have the right, but not the obligation, to deduct from the shares of Stock issuable to a Participant upon the exercise or settlement of an Award, or to accept from the Participant the tender of, a number of whole shares of Stock having a Fair Market Value, as determined by the Company, equal to all or any part of the tax withholding obligations of the Participating Company Group. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Fair Market Value of any shares of Stock withheld or tendered to satisfy any such tax withholding obligations shall not exceed the amount determined by the applicable minimum statutory withholding rates to the extent required to avoid adverse accounting or other consequences to the Company or the Participant.
17.Amendment or Termination of Plan.

The Board or the Committee may amend, suspend or terminate the Plan at any time. However, without the approval of the Company’s shareholders, there shall be (a) no increase in the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan (except by operation of the provisions of Section 4.2), (b) no change in the class of persons eligible to receive Incentive Stock Options, (c) no amendment to Section 5.4(b), and (d) no other amendment of the Plan that would require approval of the Company’s shareholders under any applicable law, regulation or rule. Notwithstanding the foregoing, only the Board may amend Section 7 and may do so without the approval of the Company’s shareholders. No amendment, suspension or termination of the Plan shall affect any then outstanding Award unless expressly provided by the Board or the Committee. In any event, no amendment, suspension or termination of the Plan may adversely affect any then outstanding Award without the consent of the Participant unless necessary to comply with any applicable law, regulation or rule.

18.Miscellaneous Provisions.
18.1Repurchase Rights. Shares issued under the Plan may be subject to one or more repurchase options, or other conditions and restrictions as determined by the Committee in its discretion at the time the Award is granted. The Company shall have the right to assign at any time any repurchase right it may have, whether or not such right is then exercisable, to one or more persons as may be selected by the Company. Upon request by the Company, each Participant shall execute any agreement evidencing such transfer restrictions prior to the receipt of shares of Stock hereunder, and shall promptly present to the Company any and all certificates representing shares of Stock acquired hereunder for the placement on such certificates of appropriate legends evidencing any such transfer restrictions.
18.2Provision of Information. Each Participant shall be given access to information concerning the Company equivalent to that information generally made available to the Company’s common shareholders.
18.3Rights as Employee, Consultant or Director. No person, even though eligible pursuant to Section 5, shall have a right to be selected as a Participant, or, having been so selected, to be selected again as a Participant. Nothing in the Plan or any Award granted under the Plan shall confer on any Participant a right to remain an Employee, Consultant or Director or interfere with or limit in any way any right of a Participating Company to terminate the Participant’s Service at any time. To the extent that an Employee of a Participating Company other than the Company receives an Award under the Plan, that Award shall in no event be understood or interpreted to mean that the Company is the Employee’s employer or that the Employee has an employment relationship with the Company. A Participant’s rights, if any, in respect of or in connection with any Award are derived solely from the discretionary decision of the Company to permit the individual to participate in the Plan and to benefit from a discretionary Award. By accepting an Award under the Plan, a Participant expressly acknowledges that there is no obligation on the part of the Company to continue the Plan and/or grant any additional Awards. Any Award granted hereunder is not intended to be compensation of a continuing or recurring nature, or part of a Participant’s normal

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-19
Back to Contents
or expected compensation, and in no way represents any portion of a Participant’s salary, compensation, or other remuneration for purposes of pension benefits, severance, redundancy, resignation or any other purpose. The Company and its Parent Corporations and Subsidiary Corporations and Affiliates reserve the right to terminate the Service of any person at any time, and for any reason, subject to applicable laws and such person’s written employee agreement (if any), and such terminated person shall be deemed irrevocably to have waived any claim to damages or specific performance for breach of contract or dismissal, compensation for loss of office, tort or otherwise with respect to the Plan or any outstanding Award that is forfeited and/or is terminated by its terms or to any future Award.
18.4Rights as a Shareholder. A Participant shall have no rights as a shareholder with respect to any shares covered by an Award until the date of the issuance of such shares (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company). No adjustment shall be made for dividends, distributions or other rights for which the record date is prior to the date such shares are issued, except as provided in another provision of the Plan.
18.5Fractional Shares. The Company shall not be required to issue fractional shares upon the exercise or settlement of any Award.
18.6Severability. If any one or more of the provisions (or any part thereof) of this Plan shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such provision shall be modified so as to make it valid, legal and enforceable, and the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions (or any part thereof) of the Plan shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.
18.7Unfunded Obligation. Participants shall have the status of general unsecured creditors of the Company. Any amounts payable to Participants pursuant to the Plan shall be unfunded and unsecured obligations for all purposes, including, without limitation, Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. No Participating Company shall be required to segregate any monies from its general funds, or to create any trusts, or establish any special accounts with respect to such obligations. The Company shall retain at all times beneficial ownership of any investments, including trust investments, that the Company may make to fulfill its payment obligations hereunder. Any investments or the creation or maintenance of any trust or any Participant account shall not create or constitute a trust or fiduciary relationship between the Committee or any Participating Company and a Participant, or otherwise create any vested or beneficial interest in any Participant or the Participant’s creditors in any assets of any Participating Company. The Participants shall have no claim against any Participating Company for any changes in the value of any assets that may be invested or reinvested by the Company with respect to the Plan. Each Participating Company shall be responsible for making benefit payments pursuant to the Plan on behalf of its Participants or for reimbursing the Company for the cost of such payments, as determined by the Company in its sole discretion. In the event the respective Participating Company fails to make such payment or reimbursement, a Participant’s (or other individual’s) sole recourse shall be against the respective Participating Company, and not against the Company. A Participant’s acceptance of an Award pursuant to the Plan shall constitute agreement with this provision.
18.8Choice of Law. Except to the extent governed by applicable federal law, the validity, interpretation, construction and performance of the Plan and each Award Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, without regard to its conflict of law rules.
18.9Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan, to the extent (i) any Award payable in connection with a Participant’s Separation from Service constitutes deferred compensation subject to (and not exempt from) Section 409A of the Code and (ii) the Participant is deemed at the time of such separation to be a “specified employee” under Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury regulations thereunder, then payment shall not be made or commence until the earlier of (i) six (6) months after such Separation from Service or (ii) the date of the Participant’s death following such Separation from Service; provided, however, that such delay shall only be effected to the extent required to avoid adverse tax treatment to the Participant, including (without limitation) the additional twenty percent (20%) tax for which the Participant would otherwise be liable under Section 409A(a)(1)(B) of the Code in the absence of such delay.  Upon the expiration of the applicable delay period, any payment that would have otherwise been paid during that period (whether in a single sum or in installments) in the absence of this paragraph shall be paid to the Participant or the Participant’s beneficiary in one lump sum on the first business day immediately following such delay and any undelayed payments will be paid in accordance with their normal terms. Each Award is intended to comply with or be exempt from the provisions of Section 409A of the Code and shall be interpreted in a manner consistent therewith. The Committee may in its sole discretion (but without any obligation to do so) amend the terms of any Award to the extent it

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-20
Back to Contents
determines necessary to comply with Section 409A of the Code. Each payment under this Plan is intended to constitute a separate payment for purposes of Section 1.409A-2(b)(2) of the Treasury regulations. In no event will a Participating Company have any obligation or liability under the terms of this Plan to reimburse, indemnify, or hold harmless any Participant or any other person in respect of Awards, for any taxes, interest or penalties imposed, or other costs incurred, as a result of Section 409A of the Code.
18.10Restrictions on Transfer. No Award and no shares of Stock that have not been issued or as to which any applicable restriction, performance or deferral period has not lapsed, may be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered, other than by will or the laws of decent and distribution, and such Awards may be exercised during the life of the Participant only by the Participant or the Participant’s guardian or legal representative. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent permitted by the Committee, in its discretion, and set forth in the applicable Award Agreement, an Award shall be assignable or transferrable to a “family member” or other permitted transferee to the extent covered under a Form S-8 Registration Statement under the Securities Act.

2021 Joint Proxy Statement   A-21
Back to Contents

 
Back to Contents